Universe ni Ndogo: No light years between Planets or Galaxies

Universe ni Ndogo: No light years between Planets or Galaxies

Hapa sijakuelewa kidogo, embu weka mifano na mwelezo ya ziada.
muda niliokusudia ni haya mambo ya sekunde ,dakika na saa.haya ni mambo ya kubuni tu hayana athari yeyote.ni system imewekwa tu.

Ndio maana utakuta saa inasema uongo kwa sababu ni system tu inaenda yenyewe.

Hakuna mahusiano kati ya jua kuzama na kuchomoza na sekunde na dakika.

Mdio maana leo tunaambiwa saa saba mchana ni 13 na wala hakuna mahusiano .

Lakini nyakati za kuamka tunajua kuwa jua haliwi kali kama nyakati za jua la utosi ambalo tunasema ni mchana.

Tokea dunia kuumbwa nyakati zipo ila muda wa sekunde na dakika vimekuja baadae.

Sijui umenipata kidogo?
 
muda niliokusudia ni haya mambo ya sekunde ,dakika na saa.haya ni mambo ya kubuni tu hayana athari yeyote.ni system imewekwa tu.

Ndio maana utakuta saa inasema uongo kwa sababu ni system tu inaenda yenyewe.

Hakuna mahusiano kati ya jua kuzama na kuchomoza na sekunde na dakika.

Mdio maana leo tunaambiwa saa saba mchana ni 13 na wala hakuna mahusiano .

Lakini nyakati za kuamka tunajua kuwa jua haliwi kali kama nyakati za jua la utosi ambalo tunasema ni mchana.

Tokea dunia kuumbwa nyakati zipo ila muda wa sekunde na dakika vimekuja baadae.

Sijui umenipata kidogo?
Hapo nimekupata uzuri.
 
Wanasema huko nje kuna Multverse yaani universe zipo nyingi halafu zimejipanga parallel. Albert Einstein aliwahi kuja na Theory moja inadai kwamba kuna Features tunaweza kuziona huku duniani lakini source yake sio huku duniani au kwenye universe yetu. Nitatoa mifano miwili.

1. Satellite za NASA zilipopita juu ya bara la Antactica ziliface high electrons zinazotokea duniani eneo lile. Lakini walipochunguza wakaona hakuna source ya electrons pale. Wakahisi huenda electrons zile zinatokea kwenye universe nyingine ambayo iko parallel na yetu.

2. Ukienda sehemu ambayo hujawahi kwenda kabisa. Lakini nafsi inakuambia kabisa hapo uliwahi kufika na unapafahamu. Theory hiyo inadai huenda wewe huyo huyo unaishi universe nyingine na umefika hilo eneo. Pia Theory inadai mtu mmoja unaweza kuishi kwenye parallel universe huku ukawa Polisi. Kule kwenye universe nyingine wewe ni Daktari, kwenye nyingine tena wewe ni Raisi wa nchi. Ila katika different parallel universes.
Hahahaha.
 
mimi sijauliza kuhusu hayo na wala sijauliza nini kilikuwepo kabla ya kitu hiko.

Nilichouliza mimi ni kuwa wakati ulimwengu unatanuka manake pia kupo kunakotanukiwa na ulimwengu ndio maana ulimwengu unapata nafasi ya kutanuka.

Sasa huko ambako kunatanukiwa na ulimwengu kunaitwaje ?

Na wala sikuuliza kwamba "kabla ya huko kunakotanukiwa na ulimwengu kulikuwa na nini".
Ningeuliza hivyo ndo ungenipa mifano hiyo.

Swali langu mimi ni kuwa kama unakubali ulimwengu unatanuka manake ni kuwa hapo unakubali kuwa kuna vitu viwili.

1.ulimwengu
2.sehemu ambayo ulimwengu hunatukia.

Sasa huko ambako ulimwengu hutanukia sio ulimwengu ?

Au unakataa kuwa hiyo sehemu haipo ?
Unaposema "ipo" umeshahusisha muda hali ya kuwa muda bado haujafika katika sehemu hiyo inayotanukiwa (kwa mujibu wa maelezo yako).Infact kujibu swali lako ni hivi :
Uumbaji bado unaendelea na mambo yote yanayoonekana na yanayojulikana na yaliyogundulika katika ulimwengu ikiwemo galaxy zote,space,nebula,clouds na takataka zote yanajaza 5% tu ya ulimwengu mzima.zaidi ya 95% ni dark energy na dark matter ambayo bado hazijajulikana.Turudi kwenye swali lako ukiamini kuwa kila kinachotanuka kinakuwa na kinachotanukiwa: what if there is another dimension? Akili yako inatambua kuwa katika normal dimension penye juu,lazima pana chini,penye kushoto lazima pawe na kulia (in human dimensions) ila kuna dimensions ambazo ni non observable.kabla ya muda there was nothing na muda unapofika ndipo panapokuwa "something" na space-time dimension "continuum" inazidi kukuwa na kutanuka kuelekea "nothingness"

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Kama hapakuwa na kabla ya big bang vipi kuhusu hivyo vilivyo ripuka.

Je vilikuwepo kabla ya big bang au ilitokea big bang kwanza kisha vilivyoripuka vikatokea baadae ?
Vilifuata baada ya big bang.Kwa kifupi ulimwengu ulikuwa mdogo sana zaidi ya chembe ya atom na kuanzia hapo na kutokana na visababishi ambavyo ni "laws of physics" ndipo ulimwengu ulipoanza kutanuka kwa spidi ya mwanga

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
ulimwengu ulikuwa mdogo sana zaidi ya chembe ya atom na kuanzia hapo na kutokana na visababishi ambavyo ni "laws of physics" ndipo ulimwengu ulipoanza kutanuka kwa spidi ya mwanga
sawa ulikuwa mdogo ulimwengu kama chembe ya atom au zaidi.

Lakini jee ulikuwepo huo ulimwengu kabla ya big bang ama haukuwepo huo ulimwengu mithili ya chembe ya atom ?
 
Vilifuata baada ya big bang
Kwa hiyo bing bang ni mripuko uliotokea bila kitu chochote kile kama ukisema hivyo vitu vilifuata baada ya big bang ?

Hapo hapo unasema ulimwengu ulikuwa kama chembr ya atom.hii bila shaka unakusudia kabla ya big bang ulimwengu ulikuwa zaidi ya chembe ya atom.

Sasa kwa maelezo haya manake tunakubaliana kuwa ulimwengu kabla ya big bang ulikuepo ila ulikuwa mdogo zaidi ya atom,ama sivyo ?
 
sawa ulikuwa mdogo ulimwengu kama chembe ya atom au zaidi.

Lakini jee ulikuwepo huo ulimwengu kabla ya big bang ama haukuwepo huo ulimwengu mithili ya chembe ya atom ?
Ulimwengu haukuwepo na ulimwengu umeanza baada ya bing bang.na kiuhalisia hakuna kinachofahamika zaidi ya laws of physics kama visababishi na nyuma ya 10exp-32 sec haijulikani nini kilikuwepo ila baada ya muda huo ulimwengu ulitanuka kwa factor ya at least 1078 katika 3 dimension. Yaani ni sawa na kutanua kitu cha 10−9 m,sawa na nusu ya molecule ya dna mpaka kufikia 10.6 light years (au 1017 au 62 trillion miles) .

Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
The expansion of the universe is the increase in distance between any two given gravitationally unbound parts of the observable universe with time.[1] It is an intrinsic expansion whereby the scale of space itself changes. The universe does not expand "into" anything and does not require space to exist "outside" it. Technically, neither space nor objects in space move. Instead it is the metric governing the size and geometry of spacetime itself that changes in scale. Although light and objects within spacetime cannot travel faster than the speed of light, this limitation does not restrict the metric itself. To an observer it appears that space is expanding and all but the nearest galaxies are receding into the distance.
During the inflationary epoch about 10−32 of a second after the Big Bang, the universe suddenly expanded, and its volume increased by a factor of at least 1078 (an expansion of distance by a factor of at least 1026 in each of the three dimensions), equivalent to expanding an object 1 nanometer (10−9 m, about half the width of a molecule of DNA) in length to one approximately 10.6 light years (about 1017 m or 62 trillion miles) long. A much slower and gradual expansion of space continued after this, until at around 9.8 billion years after the Big Bang (4 billion years ago) it began to gradually expand more quickly, and is still doing so.
The metric expansion of space is of a kind completely different from the expansions and explosions seen in daily life. It also seems to be a property of the universe as a whole rather than a phenomenon that applies just to one part of the universe or can be observed from "outside" of it.
Metric expansion is a key feature of Big Bang cosmology, is modeled mathematically with the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric and is a generic property of the universe we inhabit. However, the model is valid only on large scales (roughly the scale of galaxy clusters and above), because gravitational attraction binds matter together strongly enough that metric expansion cannot be observed at this time, on a smaller scale. As such, the only galaxies receding from one another as a result of metric expansion are those separated by cosmologically relevant scales larger than the length scales associated with the gravitational collapse that are possible in the age of the universe given the matter density and average expansion rate.
Physicists have postulated the existence of dark energy, appearing as a cosmological constant in the simplest gravitational models, as a way to explain the acceleration. According to the simplest extrapolation of the currently-favored cosmological model, the Lambda-CDM model, this acceleration becomes more dominant into the future. In June 2016, NASA and ESA scientists reported that the universe was found to be expanding 5% to 9% faster than thought earlier, based on studies using the Hubble Space Telescope.[2]
While special relativity prohibits objects from moving faster than light with respect to a local reference frame where spacetime can be treated as flat and unchanging, it does not apply to situations where spacetime curvature or evolution in time become important. These situations are described by general relativity, which allows the separation between two distant objects to increase faster than the speed of light, although the definition of "separation" is different from that used in an inertial frame. This can be seen when observing distant galaxies more than the Hubble radius away from us (approximately 4.5 gigaparsecs or 14.7 billion light-years); these galaxies have a recession speed that is faster than the speed of light. Light that is emitted today from galaxies beyond the cosmological event horizon, about 5 gigaparsecs or 16 billion light-years, will never reach us, although we can still see the light that these galaxies emitted in the past. Because of the high rate of expansion, it is also possible for a distance between two objects to be greater than the value calculated by multiplying the speed of light by the age of the universe. These details are a frequent source of confusion among amateurs and even professional physicists.[3] Due to the non-intuitive nature of the subject and what has been described by some as "careless" choices of wording, certain descriptions of the metric expansion of space and the misconceptions to which such descriptions can lead are an ongoing subject of discussion within education and communication of scientific concepts.[4][5][6][7]


Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Back
Top Bottom