Chelsea FC (The Blues) | Special Thread

Chelsea FC (The Blues) | Special Thread

everlenk said:
Marahaba..... Duh! Wewe hata siyo rafik wa kweli Ntuzu peke yake ndo rafiki wa kweli kaninulia Pepsi ya baridiiiii nikasahau uchungu nilionao........ Halafu uache kusumbua watu hapo mtaani kwako eti umeshinda......lol
Click to expand...

Hahahah.... vipi unatumia capt.morgan!??
Yani toka jana nakutafta... mtandao unasumbuaaa... nithameeewe😉
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Leaving the ground following the
Chelsea victory over United it was
hard not to feel anything but delight.
This was a methodical performance,
the team completely negated one of
the league's in form sides, who a
week ago put four past Manchester
City. On this occasion, United looked
lost on the ball, Kurt Zouma marked
Marouane Fellaini out of the game
from the first minute and despite
having 70 percent of possession
throughout the match, the team in
red looked bereft of ideas.
The majority of their possession was
at the feet of a defensive trio in
Paddy McNair, Chris Smalling and
Antonio Valencia at the half way line.
There was not a single clue between
them as to how they could
breakdown Chelsea, now that lobbing
the ball up to Fellaini was no longer
an option. In the end the two centre
backs decided pot shots from thirty
yards out would be the best solution.
It really wasn't.
With that in mind, it came as
somewhat of a shock to read on my
timeline that Chelsea fans should feel
embarrassed by the performance or
that for some reason we should not
be proud of that win. It wasn't the
performance of champions . These
are the rambling of football's alleged
purists, rooting out the evil, enemy of
the game that is Jose Mourinho. In
reality, the problem isn't Mourinho, it
is the self-righteous, naive mind that
thinks a pragmatic performance is
anything but the right way to play
football.
Football is, after all, the only sport
that so thoroughly chastises those
who excel at defending. For those
who need reminding, defending is
half the game. Imagine a boxer being
criticised for not allowing his
opponent to hit him. Floyd
Mayweather, boxing's most
technically proficient fighter, will
hereby be known as "The Anti Boxer".
Imagine thinking the Seattle
Seahawks are an enemy of the NFL
as opposed to the embodiment of it.
Or that San Antonio's empire in the
Tim Duncan era should be forgotten
because they can defend their own
half of the court.
It is strange that those who
champion the right way of playing
football fail to understand the
importance of strategy. It is absurd
to think that there can be no
satisfaction in grinding out victories.
Tell that to the 40,000 inside
Stamford Bridge and every single one
of them would laugh: that
performance was nothing short of
incredible. The scoreline was the
perfect reflection of how the game
panned out -- only one team ever
looked like they'd find a way though.
It is no surprise that even with only
30 percent possession the next best
chance in the game aside from the
goal fell to Chelsea and Eden Hazard
when his acrobatic effort struck the
post from a tight angle.
As a winner, Mourinho's methods are
second to none. The idea that his
approach to big games is that of a
small club mentality is so
unbelievably narrow minded, that it
pains me to see people failing to
understand the beauty of it. This is
not the same style of play as an
underdog, praying that through sheer
force of will and desperate defending,
they can keep the onslaught at bay
for ninety minutes. Sure, there are
the odd occasion when this will work
out in their favour, when Mourinho
classed West Ham's football as 19th
Century, it felt like a compliment
more than an insult. Yet, at the end
of the day that result was as much
down to good fortune and a heroic
effort in goal by Adrian than anything
else. West Ham's subsequent efforts
at stifling the Chelsea attack with
mere numbers has failed. It is why
Brendan Rodgers' comment that
"Defending is easy" was so way off
the mark (much like the rest of the
league's challenge for the title).
I for one think it is sad to see so
many disregard half of the game in
the way they do towards defending.
Sure, free flowing, attacking football
is perhaps at its best in this
generation. However, a failure to
admire those who stand against the
tide, beating away everything thrown
at them is not a sign of championing
the beautiful game, it is blind
ignorance.
Soaking up pressure for ninety
minutes in the way that Mourinho's
sides do, is not easy. It takes an
unbelievable amount of discipling
and skill to perform. Mourinho's so
called negative tactics have yielded
unparalleled positive results.
Ultimately it boils down to efficiency.
Mourinho believes that his side can
do more with 30 percent of the ball
than the opposition can do with 70%.
Most of the time, he's right. Most of
the time, he wins. This isn't David
vs. Goliath, this is the Ali "Rope-a-
Dope" played out to perfection. This
is a masterclass in counter punching.
It is rather comical that Mourinho is
portrayed as a pantomime villain, the
Dementor of football, sucking the life
force out of the game. While, his
approach may not be easy on the
eye for a neutral, it is not Mourinho's
fault that the purist brigade are out
with their pitchforks and torches after
every victory he oversees, failing to
appreciate the complexity of the
game. Mourinho positions his players
as if they were pieces on a
chessboard. You have to react to the
opposition, life is a series of checks
and balances. In football no one
understand this better than The
Special One.
 
everlenk said:
Hahahaha!!!! Usiniache hoi ila huku ni balaa bahat nzuri mimi mwenyewe Iron Lady navumilia ww huoni navyozodolewa humu......
Click to expand...

Hakuzodoi mtu.. kuwa huru tu, ndo maana hata hatuweki picha za shetani mwenye jambia aliyekutana na pasi ya kisigino ya Oscar na tobo la Hazard... au tuwekeee!??
 
Safety last said:
Leaving the ground following the
Chelsea victory over United it was
hard not to feel anything but delight.
This was a methodical performance,
the team completely negated one of
the league's in form sides, who a
week ago put four past Manchester
City. On this occasion, United looked
lost on the ball, Kurt Zouma marked
Marouane Fellaini out of the game
from the first minute and despite
having 70 percent of possession
throughout the match, the team in
red looked bereft of ideas.
The majority of their possession was
at the feet of a defensive trio in
Paddy McNair, Chris Smalling and
Antonio Valencia at the half way line.
There was not a single clue between
them as to how they could
breakdown Chelsea, now that lobbing
the ball up to Fellaini was no longer
an option. In the end the two centre
backs decided pot shots from thirty
yards out would be the best solution.
It really wasn't.
With that in mind, it came as
somewhat of a shock to read on my
timeline that Chelsea fans should feel
embarrassed by the performance or
that for some reason we should not
be proud of that win. It wasn't the
performance of champions . These
are the rambling of football's alleged
purists, rooting out the evil, enemy of
the game that is Jose Mourinho. In
reality, the problem isn't Mourinho, it
is the self-righteous, naive mind that
thinks a pragmatic performance is
anything but the right way to play
football.
Football is, after all, the only sport
that so thoroughly chastises those
who excel at defending. For those
who need reminding, defending is
half the game. Imagine a boxer being
criticised for not allowing his
opponent to hit him. Floyd
Mayweather, boxing's most
technically proficient fighter, will
hereby be known as "The Anti Boxer".
Imagine thinking the Seattle
Seahawks are an enemy of the NFL
as opposed to the embodiment of it.
Or that San Antonio's empire in the
Tim Duncan era should be forgotten
because they can defend their own
half of the court.
It is strange that those who
champion the right way of playing
football fail to understand the
importance of strategy. It is absurd
to think that there can be no
satisfaction in grinding out victories.
Tell that to the 40,000 inside
Stamford Bridge and every single one
of them would laugh: that
performance was nothing short of
incredible. The scoreline was the
perfect reflection of how the game
panned out -- only one team ever
looked like they'd find a way though.
It is no surprise that even with only
30 percent possession the next best
chance in the game aside from the
goal fell to Chelsea and Eden Hazard
when his acrobatic effort struck the
post from a tight angle.
As a winner, Mourinho's methods are
second to none. The idea that his
approach to big games is that of a
small club mentality is so
unbelievably narrow minded, that it
pains me to see people failing to
understand the beauty of it. This is
not the same style of play as an
underdog, praying that through sheer
force of will and desperate defending,
they can keep the onslaught at bay
for ninety minutes. Sure, there are
the odd occasion when this will work
out in their favour, when Mourinho
classed West Ham's football as 19th
Century, it felt like a compliment
more than an insult. Yet, at the end
of the day that result was as much
down to good fortune and a heroic
effort in goal by Adrian than anything
else. West Ham's subsequent efforts
at stifling the Chelsea attack with
mere numbers has failed. It is why
Brendan Rodgers' comment that
"Defending is easy" was so way off
the mark (much like the rest of the
league's challenge for the title).
I for one think it is sad to see so
many disregard half of the game in
the way they do towards defending.
Sure, free flowing, attacking football
is perhaps at its best in this
generation. However, a failure to
admire those who stand against the
tide, beating away everything thrown
at them is not a sign of championing
the beautiful game, it is blind
ignorance.
Soaking up pressure for ninety
minutes in the way that Mourinho's
sides do, is not easy. It takes an
unbelievable amount of discipling
and skill to perform. Mourinho's so
called negative tactics have yielded
unparalleled positive results.
Ultimately it boils down to efficiency.
Mourinho believes that his side can
do more with 30 percent of the ball
than the opposition can do with 70%.
Most of the time, he's right. Most of
the time, he wins. This isn't David
vs. Goliath, this is the Ali "Rope-a-
Dope" played out to perfection. This
is a masterclass in counter punching.
It is rather comical that Mourinho is
portrayed as a pantomime villain, the
Dementor of football, sucking the life
force out of the game. While, his
approach may not be easy on the
eye for a neutral, it is not Mourinho's
fault that the purist brigade are out
with their pitchforks and torches after
every victory he oversees, failing to
appreciate the complexity of the
game. Mourinho positions his players
as if they were pieces on a
chessboard. You have to react to the
opposition, life is a series of checks
and balances. In football no one
understand this better than The
Special One.
Click to expand...

U make me feel good. Take big like.
 
Mchezaji wa Chelsea Patrick Bamford anayecheza kwa mkopo Middlesbrough ameshinda tuzo ya Championship player of the year.
 

Attachments

  • 1429507438051.jpg
    1429507438051.jpg
    51 KB · Views: 76
Safety last said:
Leaving the ground following the
Chelsea victory over United it was
hard not to feel anything but delight.
This was a methodical performance,
the team completely negated one of
the league's in form sides, who a
week ago put four past Manchester
City. On this occasion, United looked
lost on the ball, Kurt Zouma marked
Marouane Fellaini out of the game
from the first minute and despite
having 70 percent of possession
throughout the match, the team in
red looked bereft of ideas.
The majority of their possession was
at the feet of a defensive trio in
Paddy McNair, Chris Smalling and
Antonio Valencia at the half way line.
There was not a single clue between
them as to how they could
breakdown Chelsea, now that lobbing
the ball up to Fellaini was no longer
an option. In the end the two centre
backs decided pot shots from thirty
yards out would be the best solution.
It really wasn't.
With that in mind, it came as
somewhat of a shock to read on my
timeline that Chelsea fans should feel
embarrassed by the performance or
that for some reason we should not
be proud of that win. It wasn't the
performance of champions . These
are the rambling of football's alleged
purists, rooting out the evil, enemy of
the game that is Jose Mourinho. In
reality, the problem isn't Mourinho, it
is the self-righteous, naive mind that
thinks a pragmatic performance is
anything but the right way to play
football.
Football is, after all, the only sport
that so thoroughly chastises those
who excel at defending. For those
who need reminding, defending is
half the game. Imagine a boxer being
criticised for not allowing his
opponent to hit him. Floyd
Mayweather, boxing's most
technically proficient fighter, will
hereby be known as "The Anti Boxer".
Imagine thinking the Seattle
Seahawks are an enemy of the NFL
as opposed to the embodiment of it.
Or that San Antonio's empire in the
Tim Duncan era should be forgotten
because they can defend their own
half of the court.
It is strange that those who
champion the right way of playing
football fail to understand the
importance of strategy. It is absurd
to think that there can be no
satisfaction in grinding out victories.
Tell that to the 40,000 inside
Stamford Bridge and every single one
of them would laugh: that
performance was nothing short of
incredible. The scoreline was the
perfect reflection of how the game
panned out -- only one team ever
looked like they'd find a way though.
It is no surprise that even with only
30 percent possession the next best
chance in the game aside from the
goal fell to Chelsea and Eden Hazard
when his acrobatic effort struck the
post from a tight angle.
As a winner, Mourinho's methods are
second to none. The idea that his
approach to big games is that of a
small club mentality is so
unbelievably narrow minded, that it
pains me to see people failing to
understand the beauty of it. This is
not the same style of play as an
underdog, praying that through sheer
force of will and desperate defending,
they can keep the onslaught at bay
for ninety minutes. Sure, there are
the odd occasion when this will work
out in their favour, when Mourinho
classed West Ham's football as 19th
Century, it felt like a compliment
more than an insult. Yet, at the end
of the day that result was as much
down to good fortune and a heroic
effort in goal by Adrian than anything
else. West Ham's subsequent efforts
at stifling the Chelsea attack with
mere numbers has failed. It is why
Brendan Rodgers' comment that
"Defending is easy" was so way off
the mark (much like the rest of the
league's challenge for the title).
I for one think it is sad to see so
many disregard half of the game in
the way they do towards defending.
Sure, free flowing, attacking football
is perhaps at its best in this
generation. However, a failure to
admire those who stand against the
tide, beating away everything thrown
at them is not a sign of championing
the beautiful game, it is blind
ignorance.
Soaking up pressure for ninety
minutes in the way that Mourinho's
sides do, is not easy. It takes an
unbelievable amount of discipling
and skill to perform. Mourinho's so
called negative tactics have yielded
unparalleled positive results.
Ultimately it boils down to efficiency.
Mourinho believes that his side can
do more with 30 percent of the ball
than the opposition can do with 70%.
Most of the time, he's right. Most of
the time, he wins. This isn't David
vs. Goliath, this is the Ali "Rope-a-
Dope" played out to perfection. This
is a masterclass in counter punching.
It is rather comical that Mourinho is
portrayed as a pantomime villain, the
Dementor of football, sucking the life
force out of the game. While, his
approach may not be easy on the
eye for a neutral, it is not Mourinho's
fault that the purist brigade are out
with their pitchforks and torches after
every victory he oversees, failing to
appreciate the complexity of the
game. Mourinho positions his players
as if they were pieces on a
chessboard. You have to react to the
opposition, life is a series of checks
and balances. In football no one
understand this better than The
Special One.
Click to expand...
Nzi njoo usome hii article huku....usipoisoma ntaileta kwenu kule mwenyewe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kunguru mjanja said:
Mchezaji wa Chelsea Patrick Bamford anayecheza kwa mkopo Middlesbrough ameshinda tuzo ya Championship player of the year.
Click to expand...


Wakuu tufanye tathmini kwa haraka haraka juu ya mchezo wetu na ManU Wa juzi huku tukiangalia tufanye nini ktk game ijayo......

Kwa kuanza mi nasema hivi mchezo wetu na ManU ulikua mgumu sn hasa kutokana na hawa makocha kuwahi kufanya kz pamoja....hii ilikua ni sababu moja kubwa kwa ule mchezo kua mgumu... LvG alikuja darajani akiwa anamfahamu vzr José.. Na José aliweza kumsoma LvG namna atakavokuja na mbinu zake zote na ile hali ya kupambana.....

Kuna sababu nyingine nyingi zilifanya ule mchezo uwe mgumu na ndio maana José alikua na ile approach na kupeleka ManU kuchemsha.

Kwangu Mimi mchezo wetu na Arsenal utakua ni mgumu na mwepesi sio km huu Wa ManU ulikua mgumu sn....ila ninaona kuna uwezekano mkubwa Mou kufanya mabadiliko kidogo hasa kwa Zouma hatoweza kupangwa sambamba na Matic ila naona Obi anaweza kuanza na Willian na Hazard kua wings....
Nisiseme yote niwakaribishe wadau wote Wa the blues ktk kuchambua.

Nacho sisitiza ni kwamba Emirates tunakwenda kuifunga Arsenal... Mou anakuja kivingine...

Karibuni.

Cc kunguru mjanja b5-click the say Mentor Manumbu ligera Root kalou Viol Kituko na wengine wooooote ambao sijawataja....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Our Community

Coming Soon

Regional Communities

Coming Soon
Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register