Mwali: Mmiliki wa DOWANS ni huyu!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wakati tunasubiri, hebu tujikumbushe kidogo kwa kuanza na kitafunio.

Tanzania : Richmond - briefcase firm that won lucrative tender

Until June 2006, Richmond Development Company (RDC) was barely known to the Tanzanian public; but since then, it has quickly assumed notoriety for being arguably the most talked about firm in the country. The firm previously linked to an almost forgotten attempt to implement the suspended construction of the Dar es Salaam-Mwanza oil pipeline, has generated a lot of heat, this time around over a lucrative tender to generate emergency power.

An apparent or suspect delay in generating even the first 20MW of the total 100MW supply contract, and with company officials sending mixed signals, Richmond had so far proved an enigma in President Jakaya Kikwete's administration. Events that led to the re-emergence of Richmond began early in 2006, when the country's hydropower generation deteriorated owing to persistent drought. Faced with a major electricity supply crisis then, Tanesco advertised a tender for emergency power supply and opened the way for what is now the Richmond story. Following the genesis of some of the major highlights around the matter:

Sometimes in February 2006, TANESCO rejects applications from a host of companies, Richmond included, for supply of 100MW of emergency power. The reasons given were that the applicants were incompetent and did not meet specified requirements, including showing financial capabilities and providing sureties.

A few days later, TANESCO floats suggestions that SONGAS be single-sourced to supply the power due to its experience. But in an interesting twist, SONGAS, which had been given the go-ahead to present a programme, was stopped by the then Minister for Energy, Dr Ibrahim Msabaha, who then moves the tendering process to the ministry headquarters.

On June 23 2006, Richmond reportedly defeats other firms to sign a $172.5million contract to generate 100MW for two years with a possibility of renewal for up to five years. The Government, through Dr Msabaha, announces that initial generation for 20MW by the firm would be available in October 2006 while the balance would be in place by December 2006. Soon afterwards in early September 2006, Richmond’s troubles began when the company failed to secure a guarantor to obtain a letter of credit from a commercial bank to implement the project.

It is reported that foreign banks in the US, the apparent home base of Richmond, refused to offer support after it reportedly failed a due diligence exercise. On September 12, Dr Msabaha announces at a press conference that CRBB Bank had offered the missing letter of credit to bail out Richmond. On September 27, William Pate, an official in the Texas Secretary of State’s office (the department that registers private corporations in Texas), tells The Citizen that his office has no record on Richmond Development Company.

The US Business Directory puts Richmond’s local sales in the United States in the range of $1,000 to $499,000 per year and also listed the number of the company’s employees at between 1 and 4. On October 8, Richmond fails to beat the dateline for availing the first 20MW turbine as had been promised. The date was quoted when President Jakaya Kikwete inspected various power projects a week earlier and also when Prime Minister Edward Lowassa visited SONGAS. Earlier, a State-owned newspaper blamed the failure on refusal by Treasury to release $10m (Sh12.5b at the time) as down payment to enable the firm lease and airlift the turbine from US.

On October 20, Richmond issues a press statement stating that the company was finally airlifting gas turbines to Dar es Salaam from US. On the same date, The TIC Executive Director, Emmanuel ole Naiko confirmed to The Citizen that the company had a week earlier filed for registration and investment incentives. Records held by Brela show that Richmond Development Company was officially registered on July 13 2006 and received a certificate of incorporation number 57014, exactly 20 days after it had signed the power contract. The company’s authorized share capital was given as Sh1.26bn.

Mr Mohammed Gire, (750,000 shares), a Tanzanian born businessman currently living in the US, is the majority share holder while Mr Naeem Gire, who is believed to be his blood relative, holds the rest of 250,000 shares to make a total of a million shares. After flying in the generators, the firm’s financial director, Mr Zahoor Gire, announces that generation was expected to commence in December 2006, at the latest.

On November 24, 2006, Mr Nazir Karamagi replaces Dr Msabaha, removed in circumstances believed to be related to impatience with Richmond, defends its hiring saying it offered a cheaper price and showed the potential to act fast.

He also revealed that the remainder of generators would now be shipped from South Africa and not US as said before by officials. Mr Karamagi’s move followed concerns by Tanzania’s major donors, the business community and professionals who expressed displeasure on the manner in which the government handled the energy crisis and the emergency projects.

After missing the December dateline to generate the 20MW, on December 11, 2006, Richmond turns the heat on the Tanesco, whom it accuses of supplying sand-filled labeled natural gas, allegedly hindering its envisaged generation of power.

On December 12, 2006, the Minister for Planning, Economy and Empowerment, Dr Juma Ngasongwa, comes to Richmond’s defence claiming it had been denied the use of the Songo Songo gas by SONGAS. December 13, 2006: Mr Karamagi witnesses the fitting of gas filters by Richmond following a row over dirty gas with TANESCO.

December 17, 2006: Richmond Development Company approaches South African based company, Dowans Holdings, to cut a deal in a desperate effort by Richmond to hang on to the lucrative $172.5million emergency power supply contract.

March 29, 2007: Dowans, the company that bought off Richmond Development Company, is slapped with a $10,000 per day penalty notice for failing to beat the deadline.

At the same time it emerged that Dowans was raising concern about incurring extra expenses to the tune of $500, 000 in unexpected costs to get the contract going.

Around May 2007, the State-run anti-corruption watchdog announces that investigation had found no irregularities in the Richmond power supply deal.

Mid-November 2007: The speaker of the National Assembly, Mr Samuel Sitta, forms a parliamentary committee to investigate the evaluation and the entire tendering process leading up to the controversial decision to award the contract to Richmond.

December 10, 2007: A team of five of the parliamentary committee team left for Washington DC, USA seeking to establish Richmond’s existence and competence to run a multibillion-shilling project. December 24, 2007: It emerged that the government is to pay Sh100 billion in energy charges alone to Dowans, the company that inherited the 100-megawatts power generation contract from Richmond.

February 4, 2008: The national assembly speaker, Mr Sitta, postpones a trip to the US to preside over the presentation of the Richmond report in Parliament by the probe team. February 6, 2008: The report is presented in Parliament where a number of top ranking government officials including the Prime Minister’s Office are implicated.

Dr. Msabaha alilalama kuwa amefanywa Bangusilo - wa nani ? Tuwe macho safari hii tusije tukauziwa hii mitambo chakavu kupitia shemejiye mwingine wa Dowans !!
 
Nijuavyo mimi DOWANS niya jamaa mmoja best ya Rostam aitwaye HABIB. Huu ndo ufupi kwa sasa
 
Ahhahahaaaaa,hata hiyo mihuri wana jamii forum ,unaweza kushangaa kampuni ilishakufa baada ya watu kuwin tenda,inawezekana nayo ilikuwa kampuni hewa,ilimradi walipata chao,basi wakaamua kusambaratika.
 
Dowans ni ya Rostam Abdulrasul Aziz

Hata hizo documents zikisema vingine, mimi "nimeshajiaminisha" hivyo...!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Tanzania ni nchi ya ajabu kweli kweli, hawa watu bado ni wabunge pamoja na madudu yao yote haya!

Rostam alianza kutuibia siku nyingi sana, hizi pesa zote tunazozisema sasa huenda ni kiasi kidogo tu ya mabilioni aliyochota kwenye fuko la umma.

Mambo mengine ni umafia hasa.
 
Maana huu huwezi kuuita wizi...mwizi anaiba kwa kujificha, akishtukiwa huwa anaingia mitini...sasa huu hata sijui tuuiteje, maana tumeshapiga kelele ya mwizi lakini mwizi ndo bado hata hashtuki.....Dah nchi imefika pabaya....Mwalimu Kambarage, rudi tunakumisi hiihiihii!!
 
Ningekuwa mimi Rostam... ningetangaza kujiuzulu Ubunge na kuamia Dubai ndani ya siku saba maana... wiki ijayo inshallah... mwali atatolewa ndani!!


Bora mwali atoke....nakumbuka mahojiano yako na Waziri Ngeleja. Ulipomuuliza Dowans inamilikiwa na nani, alivyojiuma uma mpaka alitia aibu.!!
 
Hivi katika watu 40million hajazaliwa tu hata Guerilla mmoja tumalize kazi???...Ngonjera za tuliowaamini zimeshachosha sasa. Lisanuke tu halafu tuanze upya kugawana mbao.
 
Tanzania ni nchi ya ajabu kweli kweli, hawa watu bado ni wabunge pamoja na madudu yao yote haya!

Rostam alianza kutuibia siku nyingi sana, hizi pesa zote tunazozisema sasa huenda ni kiasi kidogo tu ya mabilioni aliyochota kwenye fuko la umma.
********************

MTANZANIA: Ni wabunge, na wataendelea kuwa wabunge wakitaka, milele na milele, kwani kwa ufukara wao Watanzania watawapa tu kura. Mwashangaa ubunge kununuliwa? Si urais ulinunuliwa pia? -- kwani yote haya tunayoyazungumzia humu JF si yanatokana kununuliwa urais?

Angeingia Rais kwa njia ya haki, bila kwanza kufanyika wizi kutoka benki yetu (BoT) hata JF ingekosa wachangiaji. At least wasingekuwa wengi kiasi hiki.
 
Kumbukeni ni wanasheria gani waliotia sahihi kampuni ya Kagoda?

Richmond/Dowans na Kagoda Baba mmoja mama mmoja, lakini serikali inajitahidi kadri ya uwezo wake kuficha wamiliki wa Kagoda na Richmond/Dowans ni akina nani.
 
U.S. company denies wrongdoing in Tanzania corruption scandal
The Associated PressPublished: February 10, 2008

NAIROBI, Kenya

A U.S. company said it had never received "a single penny" from the Tanzanian government, despite being named as a recipient of millions of dollars in a scandal that has brought down the country's Cabinet the week before U.S. President George W. Bush is due to visit.

In a fax to The Associated Press, Houston-based Richmond Development Company said officials had not seen the parliamentary committee report that blamed the prime minister and two other ministers for continuing to make payments to the company after it had failed to provide emergency power.

But, it said, neither it "nor any of its employees have received a single penny from, or paid a penny to, the government of Tanzania or any of its officials."

The company did confirm it had negotiated a contract worth US$83 million (€57.2 million) with the government, but did not specify whether it had supplied any services under the contract. It said it had been "plagued by false and misleading claims" since it won the contract in 2006.

On Thursday, President Jakaya Kikwete dissolved his entire cabinet over the scandal, having already received the resignation of the prime minister and two other ministers named in the report. On Friday veteran civil servant and freshman legislator Mizengo Peter Pinda was elected as the new prime minister. The rest of the Cabinet has yet to be named.

On dark Saudi streets, boredom leads to speed
The upset comes a week before a visit by Bush, which has been considered a sign of approval for the government. More than half of Tanzania's budget comes from foreign aid and the impoverished East African country is struggling to improve services and attract foreign investment.

The resignations followed Wednesday's highly critical report by a parliamentary committee on a contract awarded to Richmond to supply emergency power about two years ago.

The report said a contract of US$172.5 million was signed to supply the government with 100 megawatts of emergency power when drought hit Tanzania's hydroelectric dams. But generators arrived faulty and late, or not at all.

There was no immediate explanation of the discrepancy between the worth of the contract given by the report and that given by Richmond.

The report said the company with which the contract had been signed did not exist in the United States. It said the government was paying the company US$140,000 a day, and asked who was collecting that money.

The fax from Richmond did not say why the contract had not been canceled if the company had not received payment, nor who else might have received it. But it emphasized the company — which says it has projects on four continents — "has no prior record of wrongdoing" and was not implicated in investigations by the U.S. Department of Commerce or previous committees in Tanzania investigating the project.

Kikwete took office in 2006 promising to fight graft in Tanzania, one of southern Africa's poorest countries. Last month, he fired the head of the central bank after international auditors discovered more than US$120 million was missing.

Bush praised Kikwete's "leadership and vision" in a statement announcing a trip to Africa that was to include three days in Tanzania.
 
Nimesubiri kuona mtu anaweza kunotice kitu kimoja:

a. NI kampuni gani iliyonunua mkataba wa Richmond? Dowans Holdings or Dowans Tanzania Limited?
 
Nimesubiri kuona mtu anaweza kunotice kitu kimoja:

a. NI kampuni gani iliyonunua mkataba wa Richmond? Dowans Holdings or Dowans Tanzania Limited?

Haya tuambie, wengine macho zetu zinauma hata kusoma maovu ya hawa watu. Why is this important?
Pia nimenotice hii kampuni iko Peugeot house - si kwa Mkono huko? Isije ikawa ni advocate hewa! Kwikwiiii
 
Nyani, utamu wa pilau unaanza kwa harufu!!

from The Citizen Feb 8, 2008 "December 17, 2006: Richmond Development Company approaches South African based company, Dowans Holdings, to cut a deal in a desperate effort by Richmond to hang on to the lucrative $172.5million emergency power supply contract."

Pay attention to the dates...

Nimesubiri kuona mtu anaweza kunotice kitu kimoja:

a. NI kampuni gani iliyonunua mkataba wa Richmond? Dowans Holdings or Dowans Tanzania Limited?

Richmonduli, I think.....
 
Pamoja na maumivu ya kuibiwa na hasira kwa mafisadi lakini sio siri kwa kukosa kuuza hii mitambo hapa mtu kapatikana. Nadhani faida yote ya Richmond na Downs imekwenda na maji. Nasema hivyo kwa sababu cost imekuwa kubwa kuliko benefit. Wameupoteza uwaziri mkuu, wameshindwa kuuza mitambo na kupoteza 60b, mkataba ulivunjwa sijui walipoteza ngapi, pressure ya rostam na lowassa juu, halafu milango ya keko iko wazi ..... hasara juu ya hasara!
 


The company did confirm it had negotiated a contract worth US$83 million (€57.2 million) with the government, but did not specify whether it had supplied any services under the contract. It said it had been "plagued by false and misleading claims" since it won the contract in 2006.

The report said a contract of US$172.5 million was signed to supply the government with 100 megawatts of emergency power when drought hit Tanzania's hydroelectric dams. But generators arrived faulty and late, or not at all.

There was no immediate explanation of the discrepancy between the worth of the contract given by the report and that given by Richmond.
The report said the company with which the contract had been signed did not exist in the United States. It said the government was paying the company US$140,000 a day, and asked who was collecting that money.

Ipi ni kweli katika huu mkataba $83 million au $173million?

Richmond USA wao wanasema walisaini mkataba wa $83 milion, lakini huku bongo serikalini ina mkataba wa $173 million, Hii tofauti ya milioni $90 imeenda wapi hata kama deal ni feki?

Kwa nini serikali imelikalia kimya bila kupeleleza hii deal licha ya makosa ya wazi kuanzia bei mpaka kampuni yenyewe kuwa nje-nje?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom