Mjue Issa Michuzi

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have to side with GT on this.

Michuzi disgraced himself by posing with that dildo. I am amazed at his stupidity and lack of judgement to the extent of entertaining the idea that the picture is photoshoped.

How does anyone with clear thinking sink this low beats me.This person is unfit to hold any public capacity, let alone anything associated with Ikulu.

It is one thing to have a private fascination with dildos, quite another to display that shyt to the world, including kids out there. I am still shocked and hoping this was manufactured.

What's next, a picture of him in a threesome?
 
I have to side with GT on this.

Michuzi disgraced himself by posing with that dildo. I am amazed at his stupidity and lack of judgement to the extent of entertaining the idea that the picture is photoshoped.

How does anyone with clear thinking sink this low beats me.This person is unfit to hold any public capacity, let alone anything associated with Ikulu.

It is one thing to have a private fascination with dildos, quite another to display that shyt to the world, including kids out there. I am still shocked and hoping this was manufactured.

What's next, a picture of him in a threesome?

GT ana rekodi mbaya kwa personal attacks zake kwa watu lakini ni kweli Pundit kwa picha hii kuiweka in a public eyes ni shamefull na Michuzi hakustahili kufanya kitu hiki, na hata hiyo proffession yake anaidhalilisha.
Hastahili kuwa mpiga picha wa rais bali anatakiwa kuwa ponographer! Very cheap man.
 
Hivi Michuzi alisema anataka kuwa mpiga picha wa raisi?


Nyani, apart from the reports that he speculated openly so, the pose is ill advised for any self respecting person, regardless of position or ambition. The mere posting of that picture on a public domain website reveals much about the thought process of the person in question.
 
Hivi Michuzi alisema anataka kuwa mpiga picha wa raisi?

Binafsi nimeipenda hii "hit job" ya GT.....Kudos kaka'ke!!:D

Masuala ya alitaka/hakutaka si hatutaki kujua, wasiwasi wangu huyu bwana anaweza kuwa si ridhiki! Hivi ni wanaume wangapi wa kibongo ambao ni straight wanaenda kununua mi-dildo hata kama ni kwa ajili ya wenzi wao? au jamaa ndio alikuwa anatoka kwenye closet kiaina?

Michuzi hajatulia...:(
 
Nyani, apart from the reports that he speculated openly so, the pose is ill advised for any self respecting person, regardless of position or ambition. The mere posting of that picture on a public domain website reveals much about the thought process of the person in question.

Why is it ill advised? What is so bad about it? Would it have been ill advised if he'd have posed with a different bodypart?
 
Why is it ill advised? What is so bad about it? Would it have been ill advised if he'd have posed with a different bodypart?

Because he is depicting private parts in a public domain in an unbecoming fashion.
 
I am with Nyani on this one.

Michuzi is over 18 na anakila haki ya kufanya chochote ilimradi havunji sheria. Hii picha imepigwa NDANI ya sex shop akiwa ameshika ambacho ni caricature ya maumbile ya binadamu. Hakuna mahali panapoonyesha kuwa alikinunua au alikiingiza Tanzania (ambako nadhani ingekuwa ni kosa la jinai). Hatujui alikusudia nini na hii picha. Pengine alitaka kwenda kuwaonyesha wenzake aliowaacha nyumbani kuwa haya mambo kweli yapo. Or he was just having fun. As far as I know, hajawahi kugombea public office. Akifanya hivyo, hao atakaowaomba nafasi watakuwa na haki ya kupima uzito alichofanya na anavyohitajika katika nafasi hiyo. Kwangu mimi, kuna maovu kibao zaidi ya hiki alichokifanya Muhidin.

Give the guy a break. At least this shows that he has a sense of humour.
 
I am with Nyani on this one.

Michuzi is over 18 na anakila haki ya kufanya chochote ilimradi havunji sheria. Hii picha imepigwa NDANI ya sex shop akiwa ameshika ambacho ni caricature ya maumbile ya binadamu. Hakuna mahali panapoonyesha kuwa alikinunua au alikiingiza Tanzania (ambako nadhani ingekuwa ni kosa la jinai). Hatujui alikusudia nini na hii picha. Pengine alitaka kwenda kuwaonyesha wenzake aliowaacha nyumbani kuwa haya mambo kweli yapo. Or he was just having fun. As far as I know, hajawahi kugombea public office. Akifanya hivyo, hao atakaowaomba nafasi watakuwa na haki ya kupima uzito alichofanya na anavyohitajika katika nafasi hiyo. Kwangu mimi, kuna maovu kibao zaidi ya hiki alichokifanya Muhidin.

Give the guy a break. At least this shows that he has a sense of humour.

Bwana Fundi, kwa nini unadhani lingekuwa kosa la jinai? Mimi nimeshawai kuona vyinyago vya mpingo vilivyochongwa mithili ya maumbile ya sehemu za siri za kiume. Ina maana wale Wamakonde wachonga vinyago walivunja sheria?
 
I am with Nyani on this one.

Michuzi is over 18 na anakila haki ya kufanya chochote ilimradi havunji sheria. Hii picha imepigwa NDANI ya sex shop akiwa ameshika ambacho ni caricature ya maumbile ya binadamu. Hakuna mahali panapoonyesha kuwa alikinunua au alikiingiza Tanzania (ambako nadhani ingekuwa ni kosa la jinai). Hatujui alikusudia nini na hii picha. Pengine alitaka kwenda kuwaonyesha wenzake aliowaacha nyumbani kuwa haya mambo kweli yapo. Or he was just having fun. As far as I know, hajawahi kugombea public office. Akifanya hivyo, hao atakaowaomba nafasi watakuwa na haki ya kupima uzito alichofanya na anavyohitajika katika nafasi hiyo. Kwangu mimi, kuna maovu kibao zaidi ya hiki alichokifanya Muhidin.

Give the guy a break. At least this shows that he has a sense of humour.

Fundi,

What about posting this on his Tanzanian photojournalism public domain website? No problema?

Remember he is a photojournalist and works for the governments paper, what message is he sending? And what humor is in ponography?

To me he looks like he does not have a clue of the seriousness of the pose, especially posted in a public domain website.
 
Bwana Fundi, kwa nini unadhani lingekuwa kosa la jinai? Mimi nimeshawai kuona vyinyago vya mpingo vilivyochongwa mithili ya maumbile ya sehemu za siri za kiume. Ina maana wale Wamakonde wachonga vinyago walivunja sheria?

Nyani Ngabu, we are a society of hypocrites. Ukibeba hicho kinyago cha plastiki utarukiwa kama mpira wa kona na watu wa kazitamu n.k. Lakini hao wamakonde ni ushahidi kuwa hata sisi katika baadhi ya makabila yetu tulikuwa na vitu kama hivi kwa sababu tofauti ( elimu, msaada pengine kwa wale ambao wanamatatizo katika anga hizo n.k.).

Angalia tunavyodai kuwa sinema za kigeni zinaharibu maadili ya watoto wetu. Halafu nenda kaangalie na kusikiliza mdundiko au ngoma nyingine za kitamaduni ambapo wasanii wanaigiza matendo ya ngono hadharani huku tukiwashangilia!

Nimesema nadhani kwa sababu sina uhakika! Hata hivyo nitashangaa sana kama sheria zetu zinaruhusu mtu kuwa na nyenzo kama hizi!
 
Fundi,

What about posting this on his Tanzanian photojournalism public domain website? No problema?

Remember he is a photojournalist and works for the governments paper, what message is he sending? And what humor is in ponography?

To me he looks like he does not have a clue of the seriousness of the pose, especially posted in a public domain website.

I don't see any problem with him posting it on his website. He was just practising his freedom of expression. If his website was somehow connected to the government's paper's website, then there would have been a problem of some sorts.

You may not find any humor in it but others may, even more, they may find it to be valuable information. So don't impose what you deem to be right or wrong, moral or immoral on others granted no one is being harmed by the image(s) or the pose.

I think he was having fun and you can't choose what is and what isn't fun for him.
 
Fundi,

What about posting this on his Tanzanian photojournalism public domain website? No problema?

Remember he is a photojournalist and works for the governments paper, what message is he sending? And what humor is in ponography?

To me he looks like he does not have a clue of the seriousness of the pose, especially posted in a public domain website.

But did he really post it on his website? Even then, it is his website, isn't it?

I disagree with you that what he did qualifies as pornography. If all exposure of genitalia would be pornography than the old masters would really have a lot to answer for. You would have a hard time covering all the genitalia in public display in Rome for example! Tasteless, maybe. Pornography,no!

Contrary to what seems to be the general belief, bad taste is acceptable in the public domain!
 
But did he really post it on his website? Even then, it is his website, isn't it?

I disagree with you that what he did qualifies as pornography. If all exposure of genitalia would be pornography than the old masters would really have a lot to answer for. You would have a hard time covering all the genitalia in public display in Rome for example! Tasteless, maybe. Pornography,no!

Contrary to what seems to be the general belief, bad taste is acceptable in the public domain!

Fundi, all the old masters were philanderers :) or quirky at least, in fact the classic world barely attempted a disguise with the current political correctness.

Speaking of political correctness, which you seem to accuse us of displaying in the form of being hypocrites, I do believe wrong is wrong and two wrongs do not make a right.

The folly of his defence lies in the fact that, quite apart from his likes and dislikes, what he finds humorous and he does not, the fact that he is exposing minors with no prior warning is disturbing.

Hebu fikiria umembeba five year old wako unafungua michuzi blog unakutana na jibaba limebeba m dildo huo.

Pray the kid does not know enough to understand that the displayed is genitalia, otherwise unaweza kusababisha traumatic experience bure, to say nothing of fuelling underage exploration.
 
Fundi, all the old masters were philanderers :) or quirky at least, in fact the classic world barely attempted a disguise with the current political correctness.

Speaking of political correctness, which you seem to accuse us of displaying in the form of being hypocrites, I do believe wrong is wrong and two wrongs do not make a right.

The folly of his defence lies in the fact that, quite apart from his likes and dislikes, what he finds humorous and he does not, the fact that he is exposing minors with no prior warning is disturbing.

Hebu fikiria umembeba five year old wako unafungua michuzi blog unakutana na jibaba limebeba m dildo huo.

Pray the kid does not know enough to understand that the displayed is genitalia, otherwise unaweza kusababisha traumatic experience bure, to say nothing of fuelling underage exploration.

It's the parent's responsibility to ensure their children aren't exposed to adult content on the web. As a responsible parent you should know that "his" website sometimes does contain some adult content. So before opening it, you should make sure your five year old is not anywhere near you where he/she can see what you are about to look at.
 
It's the parent's responsibility to ensure their children aren't exposed to adult content on the web. As a responsible parent you should know that "his" website sometimes does contain some adult content. So before opening it, you should make sure your five year old is not anywhere near you where he/she can see what you are about to look at.

You could get sued for an attitude like that.
 
Pundit.

I don't think that there is anything wrong in having images of genitalia on public display (did I really say this?). Okay, not all genitalia are deserving of such a honour. That is why I don't think a five-year old child will be traumatised if he/she comes across such an image, which is so obviously fake. As a parent, it should be quite easy to explain. Don't you think that by then he/she already has a good idea of the various parts of the human body? This is just a model of something that is common to that specie known as man, isn't it? On the other hand, had the picture been of the esteemed Photographer putting the said item to its intended use, then I would have understood your sense of outrage! What saddens me is that there are probably some fools out there who, based on such images, will have great expectations from black men only to probably be disappointed! Such images feed into myths about black men that we would have a hard time to live up to! Now that, would be traumatic!
 
Hiyo picha is not a big deal kwenye zama hizi za ukimwi na utandawazi. Watoto wetu wanaona kila kitu. Tena ni bora sisi wazazi tuzungumze nao kabla ya kusikia kwa watu baki. Hiyo dildo waliojua ni dildo ndio pekee waliofahamu na wasio ijua it was just a picture.

Ni kama matangazo ya pedi kwenye TV wanaojua ndio wanaona noma na wasio jua its just a picture. Funny enough kabinti kangu 5 years by then kalikuwa kanaimba ule wimbo wa 'Wakati wote popote na Jesy' akaongeza msisitizo na sauti kubwa huku akirap'jazi pedi mpya.... Mara mama yake akamuita kwa sauti kali Wee mtoto! wimbo gani huo unaimba? mtoto akakatisha na kabla mama hajamalizia nikaingilia kati kuomba tumruhusu mtoto amalizie kawimbo kake hata hivyo hakumalizia kwa kuogopa ile sauti kali ya mama. Baadae nilimuelimisha mama kwa mtoto ni wimbo tuu wa pedi maana hajui chochotr zaidi, the point is kwa wasio jua it was just a picture.

Lazima tukubali watu tuna diifrent reactions on what is funny. Kwa mwingine its ofending na mwingine ni provocative the same as porn photos/movies kwa wengine its interesting na wengine zinatia kinyaa.

Mwacheni Michu aendeleze libeneke.
 
Fundi,

What about posting this on his Tanzanian photojournalism public domain website? No problema?

Remember he is a photojournalist and works for the governments paper, what message is he sending? And what humor is in ponography?

To me he looks like he does not have a clue of the seriousness of the pose, especially posted in a public domain website.

There is a difference between obscenity and pornography. Is the image (Michuzi's) obscene? You betcha! Is it pornographic? Nope...
 
There is a difference between obscenity and pornography. Is the image (Michuzi's) obscene? You betcha! Is it pornographic? Nope...

Dictionary.com

por⋅nog⋅ra⋅phy   /pɔrˈnɒgrəfi/
–noun obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, esp. those having little or no artistic merit.

Origin:
1840–50; < Gk pornográph(os) writing about harlots (porno-, comb. form of pórn&#275; harlot + -graphos -graph ) + -y 3

Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
The presentation or production of this material.
Lurid or sensational material: "Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the ... pornography of the era" (Morris Dickstein).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
0 Reactions
Reply
Back
Top Bottom