Chelsea FC (The Blues) | Special Thread

[HIMARS]

Ntuzu herrera
Pangeni sikuz mimi nitatokeza ila iwe Jumapili maana Jumamosi nakuwa kanisani.
Siku zingine kazini

 

[Ntuzu]

mkuu Manumbu heshima kwako kwa kuja na hii idea binafsi nimeielewa sana, ningependa sana tena sana nishiriki kwenye hii mambo coz futball is part of my life, but bahati mbaya sipo dar mkuu nipo dom and i will be here for almost 3 weeks then nageuka mbeya (home) kuna mambo naifanya ambayo kidogo ina ni keep busy, but kwa lolote mtakalolifanya guyz plz contact me nipo tayari kuchangia mawazo na hata kutoa chochote pale kitakapo hitajika.
Ntuzu, Manumbu Mentor Wacha1 everlenk Bulldog cute b RRONDO Nzi Root b5-click na wengneo wadau wa epl toeni ushirikiano kwa hili, CEO Ntuzu big up sana

Ntuzu herrera
Pangeni sikuz mimi nitatokeza ila iwe Jumapili maana Jumamosi nakuwa kanisani.
Siku zingine kazini

Asanteni sn wadau kwa ushirikiano wenu asanteni pia kwa kuwasiliana kwa pm! Nafikiria kuweka no zangu hapa wazi ktk huu Uzi na threads zote km ya Arsenal, ManU LFC na city ili iwe rahisi kunipata moja kwa moja na pia ntacreate group ya wasapp ili wadau woooote niwaunge huko na iwe rahisi kupeana habari.

 

[Ntuzu]

Wakuu naombeni maoni yenu juu ya jina la group la wasapp.

Cc: kalou Viol everlenk cute b herrera Root Manumbu na wadau woooote. Mnapendekeza jina gani wadau?

 

[the say]

Mkuu ntakucheki pm nikupe no zangu.
Viol Mentor Kituko hawa wadau ntawapata kirahisi Manumbu nahitaji no yako ya sim haraka
kunguru mjanja Grand PA Root [MENTION=na wadau wengine mnicheki pm[/QUOTE]

Very good

 

[Viol]

Wakuu naombeni maoni yenu juu ya jina la group la wasapp.

Cc: kalou Viol everlenk cute b herrera Root Manumbu na wadau woooote. Mnapendekeza jina gani wadau?

Ntuzu naona iitwe "Chelsea JF"

 

[Ntuzu]

Ntuzu naona iitwe "Chelsea JF"

Asante Mkuu lkn kuna wadau wengine sio Wa Chelsea wanapenda kujumuika nasi unaonaje hilo Mkuu?

 

[Viol]

Asante Mkuu lkn kuna wadau wengine sio Wa Chelsea wanapenda kujumuika nasi unaonaje hilo Mkuu?

Basi inaweza kuitwa "JF SOCCER"

 

[kalou]

Asante Mkuu lkn kuna wadau wengine sio Wa Chelsea wanapenda kujumuika nasi unaonaje hilo Mkuu?

Jf soccer it is

 

[Ntuzu]

Basi inaweza kuitwa "JF SOCCER"

Pouwa Mkuu tengeneza hilo group fasta Mkuu no zangu unazo au ntakucheki kwa wasapp tuanze kz Mara moja

 

[Ntuzu]

Jf soccer it is

Asante sn kalou Viol nkuwi kwa ushirikiano wenu

 

[ligera]

wakuu nasikia eti falcao katua cheksea ni kweli ??

 

[FUSO]

[h=1]Colombian striker Radamel Falcao transfer saga finished,Chelsea FC will transfer him January 1st. Falcao accept £200,000-a-week deal.[/h] Reports last month suggested Chelsea are ready to meet Falcao's €60million buy-out clause during the winter transfer window, and last week it was reported that Blues owner Roman Abramovich is ready to break the bank by offering the Colombia international a whopping £200,000-a-week deal in a bid to lure him to west London next month.

 

[Mangungo II]

HABARI zenu wana Chelsea long time sijatia timu humu

But tupo pamoja tunangoja next season tukinukishe kama kawa

Viva Chelsea
#@ktbffh

 

[ENZO]

Premier League champions Chelsea will
start the defence of their title with a
home game against Swansea.

Jose Mourinho's men finished eight points
ahead of the rest in 2014/15 and will begin a
bid for a repeat showing against Garry Monk's
side when everything gets under way on
August 8.
Manchester United 's home game with
Tottenham is the stand-out clash of the
opening weekend, though, with Louis van
Gaal's men expected to be stronger in his
second season in charge.
Liverpool will have an immediate chance to
banish memories of their 6-1 drubbing at
Stoke on the final day of last season, after
being selected to go back to the Britannia on
day one of the new campaign.
Manchester City start out on the road at West
Brom, while Arsenal kick-off against new West
Ham boss Slaven Bilic at the Emirates.
Promoted Bournemouth begin life in the top
flight at home to Aston Villa , with fellow
newcomers Watford and new manager Quique
Sanchez Flores at Everton. Play-off winners
Norwich host Crystal Palace .
Elsewhere on day one, Steve McClaren - one of
three new bosses - starts out as Newcastle
manager against Southampton at St James'
Park and Leicester are at home to Sunderland.
Once the opening weekend is out of the way
Chelsea head to Manchester City for an early-
season blockbuster, followed by clashes at
West Brom and at home to Crystal Palace.
Manchester United are at Aston Villa on week
two, followed by a home game with Newcastle
and a trip to Swansea .
For City, Chelsea are followed by Everton
(away) and Watford (home), with Arsenal
taking in Crystal Palace (away), Liverpool
(home) and Newcastle (away) after their
opener.
The first Manchester derby of the season
comes at Old Trafford on October 24, with
the Etihad clash penned in for March 19.
United face Chelsea in a tasty-looking festive
clash on December 28 and meet them at
Stamford Bridge on February 6.
McClaren's first taste of the north-east rivalry
with Sunderland will come at home on
October 24, the first Merseyside derby is set
for October 3 at Anfield, with November 7
the date for the first meeting between Arsenal
and Tottenham.
Chelsea face Arsenal first on September 19,
playing the reverse fixture at the Emirates on
January 23.
Bournemouth and their 11,700-capacity
stadium can look forward to plenty, but will
surely have December 12 (Manchester
United), February 6 (Arsenal), April 2
(Manchester City), April 16 (Liverpool) and
April 23 (Chelsea) ringed on the calendar.
The season runs to May 15, with Chelsea
closing at home to Leicester and will be
hoping to have another comfortable title in
the bag by then.
Manchester United close at home to
Bournemouth - a fixture which could have
implications at both ends - with Arsenal at
home to Villa and Manchester City at Swansea.
Liverpool go to West Brom and Everton host
Norwich.
Elsewhere on the final day it will be Newcastle
v Tottenham, Southampton v Crystal Palace,
Stoke v West Ham and Watford v Sunderland.

 

[Manumbu]

Does Falcao's move to Chelsea make sense for anybody involved?

hether it's in the coming hours, the coming days, or even the coming weeks, Falcao appears to be coming to Stamford Bridge. On loan, most likely, with at least one prospect going the other way, also on loan. There's no stopping this train, so we better hop on and hang on because it's going straight to Titletown. Maybe. I think. I hope. I once ended up in Zurich instead of Venice, but hey, we all make mistakes sometimes.

And I could very well be wrong about Falcao. Perhaps he's more Crespo than Shevchenko, more Eto'o than Torres. Not that we should be looking at repeating the mistakes made with any of those four, but perhaps we'll come out on the "less tragic" end of the scale. Perhaps Falcao truly just needs a supportive environment and some Mourinho magic to find what seems to have disappeared over the past two years of physical and mental injuries. Perhaps there's real hope left in there. Perhaps he makes up for the embarrassment he caused us in the 2012 Super Cup, instead of adding to it. Perhaps perhaps perhaps.

But what I think is troubling me the most is that I cannot figure out how any of this makes good sense for any of the principal parties involved. It does makes complete sense for one person and one person alone: Falcao's agent, Jorge Mendes. If Falcao moves, he gets paid. If Falcao stays put, he doesn't get paid. He gets further exposure either way, but collecting yet another round of agent fees and various percentages of various signing fees and bonuses only happens if Falcao is on the move and is on the move to a lucrative destination like Chelsea. We pay better than 99% of teams out there. Agents love us. Mendes loves us, and Mendes loves Mourinho, too. Mendes will get paid handsomely, even if Falcao turns out to be a flop (again).

But surely, this is not the ideal move for either the player or his parent club. And we're talking a one-year loan to the exact same league where he flopped so spectacularly last season as the move that's likely to happen. This is the riskiest option for both Falcao and Monaco. The prospect of yet another high profile failure is all too real, even if we assume slightly improved performances. His value drops even further. He literally becomes the next Torres, his parent club saddled with a huge contract, his confidence shattered, his prospects just about reduced to zero.

The ridiculous amounts of moneys that Monaco have promised to Atlético Madrid, Falcao, and Falcao's ex-third party owners are going to have to be paid one way or another. As of right now, Monaco do not appear to be able to do so, but contracts (and transfer fees) are guaranteed in professional football, and surely, even if Falcao has the most professional pride in the world, he wouldn't just leave guaranteed millions on the table by agreeing to a mutual termination. The club's creditors won't either. So as far as Monaco are concerned, they need to find the option that puts them under the least amount of financial burden. But not just for right now, for the future as well. They need to put Falcao in the shop window; they need to send him to an easier league than the Premier League. They might have to eat a higher percentage of his contract right now, but if the striker finds success in, say, Italy, his value next summer would be markedly higher than after yet another terrible year in England. They might even be able to sell him and get out from underneath the dark cloud of financial obligations.

Sure, Monaco might have drank the Mourinho Kool-Aid, and gotten sold on the idea of new-Falcao becoming old-Falcao once again in London. It's going to be tremendously hard for Monaco to rid themselves of the striker regardless, so maybe they're hoping this moonshot hits before they have to sell the house, the kids, and the dog, and go live in a trailer down by the river with a broken player and a terrible team once again back in the French second division.

And perhaps Falcao's hoping for the same. He probably is hoping for the same. Pride is usually the last thing to go, and José's Kool-Aid can be ridiculously potent. Falcao could very well even be looking forward to the challenge of competing against the likes of Diego Costa and Loïc Rémy. He may not fully realize just how much better those two guys are. Falcao would be a distant third-choice at the moment and that's hardly a conducive environment towards rediscovering one's self-worth, confidence, and goalscoring ability.

Which then leads us to the question of just why Chelsea would entertain this nonsense in the first place. The time to buy and spend lavishly on Falcao was at least two years ago, if not earlier. Certainly before the ACL injury. Guys, guys, we finally got him! Or is Mourinho petty enough to be personally motivated to succeed where Van Gaal has failed? Is this like bizarro-Shevchenko then? Instead of the owner saddling him with a washed-up striker, he's saddling himself with a washed-up striker? Is Mourinho drinking his own Kool-Aid then, too? At least one thing in this story gets to be potent.

Mourinho does have a bizarre obsession with bringing in veteran strikers of questionable quality. In effect, he chose Eto'o over Lukaku, Drogba over Bamford the last two summers. Lukaku has gone away in the meantime, and now Bamford's constantly being linked with a move away as well. Falcao would certainly fit this pattern, for better or worse, and a strike force of Costa, Rémy, Falcao looks pretty great on paper. With a one-year deal - even if it's not a loan - we have little to lose in terms of finances or FFP. That's not a concern. The concern is the future of Rémy, the future of Bamford, the future of other young players like, say, Bertrand Traoré. Is one year of Falcao adding enough winning value to justify the negatives for other players already in the squad or in the system and ready to contribute? I highly doubt it.

In lieu of a proper conclusion, here's a warning. Off the top of my head, I can remember going on similar rants just twice in recent times, once about keeping Roberto Di Matteo and once about not selling David Luiz. In both cases, the opposite happened within roughly 24 hours. So get those welcome banners ready.

Does Falcao's move to Chelsea make sense for anybody involved? - We Ain't Got No History

 

[definition]

Does Falcao's move to Chelsea make sense for anybody involved?

hether it's in the coming hours, the coming days, or even the coming weeks, Falcao appears to be coming to Stamford Bridge. On loan, most likely, with at least one prospect going the other way, also on loan. There's no stopping this train, so we better hop on and hang on because it's going straight to Titletown. Maybe. I think. I hope. I once ended up in Zurich instead of Venice, but hey, we all make mistakes sometimes.

And I could very well be wrong about Falcao. Perhaps he's more Crespo than Shevchenko, more Eto'o than Torres. Not that we should be looking at repeating the mistakes made with any of those four, but perhaps we'll come out on the "less tragic" end of the scale. Perhaps Falcao truly just needs a supportive environment and some Mourinho magic to find what seems to have disappeared over the past two years of physical and mental injuries. Perhaps there's real hope left in there. Perhaps he makes up for the embarrassment he caused us in the 2012 Super Cup, instead of adding to it. Perhaps perhaps perhaps.

But what I think is troubling me the most is that I cannot figure out how any of this makes good sense for any of the principal parties involved. It does makes complete sense for one person and one person alone: Falcao's agent, Jorge Mendes. If Falcao moves, he gets paid. If Falcao stays put, he doesn't get paid. He gets further exposure either way, but collecting yet another round of agent fees and various percentages of various signing fees and bonuses only happens if Falcao is on the move and is on the move to a lucrative destination like Chelsea. We pay better than 99% of teams out there. Agents love us. Mendes loves us, and Mendes loves Mourinho, too. Mendes will get paid handsomely, even if Falcao turns out to be a flop (again).

But surely, this is not the ideal move for either the player or his parent club. And we're talking a one-year loan to the exact same league where he flopped so spectacularly last season as the move that's likely to happen. This is the riskiest option for both Falcao and Monaco. The prospect of yet another high profile failure is all too real, even if we assume slightly improved performances. His value drops even further. He literally becomes the next Torres, his parent club saddled with a huge contract, his confidence shattered, his prospects just about reduced to zero.

The ridiculous amounts of moneys that Monaco have promised to Atlético Madrid, Falcao, and Falcao's ex-third party owners are going to have to be paid one way or another. As of right now, Monaco do not appear to be able to do so, but contracts (and transfer fees) are guaranteed in professional football, and surely, even if Falcao has the most professional pride in the world, he wouldn't just leave guaranteed millions on the table by agreeing to a mutual termination. The club's creditors won't either. So as far as Monaco are concerned, they need to find the option that puts them under the least amount of financial burden. But not just for right now, for the future as well. They need to put Falcao in the shop window; they need to send him to an easier league than the Premier League. They might have to eat a higher percentage of his contract right now, but if the striker finds success in, say, Italy, his value next summer would be markedly higher than after yet another terrible year in England. They might even be able to sell him and get out from underneath the dark cloud of financial obligations.

Sure, Monaco might have drank the Mourinho Kool-Aid, and gotten sold on the idea of new-Falcao becoming old-Falcao once again in London. It's going to be tremendously hard for Monaco to rid themselves of the striker regardless, so maybe they're hoping this moonshot hits before they have to sell the house, the kids, and the dog, and go live in a trailer down by the river with a broken player and a terrible team once again back in the French second division.

And perhaps Falcao's hoping for the same. He probably is hoping for the same. Pride is usually the last thing to go, and José's Kool-Aid can be ridiculously potent. Falcao could very well even be looking forward to the challenge of competing against the likes of Diego Costa and Loïc Rémy. He may not fully realize just how much better those two guys are. Falcao would be a distant third-choice at the moment and that's hardly a conducive environment towards rediscovering one's self-worth, confidence, and goalscoring ability.

Which then leads us to the question of just why Chelsea would entertain this nonsense in the first place. The time to buy and spend lavishly on Falcao was at least two years ago, if not earlier. Certainly before the ACL injury. Guys, guys, we finally got him! Or is Mourinho petty enough to be personally motivated to succeed where Van Gaal has failed? Is this like bizarro-Shevchenko then? Instead of the owner saddling him with a washed-up striker, he's saddling himself with a washed-up striker? Is Mourinho drinking his own Kool-Aid then, too? At least one thing in this story gets to be potent.

Mourinho does have a bizarre obsession with bringing in veteran strikers of questionable quality. In effect, he chose Eto'o over Lukaku, Drogba over Bamford the last two summers. Lukaku has gone away in the meantime, and now Bamford's constantly being linked with a move away as well. Falcao would certainly fit this pattern, for better or worse, and a strike force of Costa, Rémy, Falcao looks pretty great on paper. With a one-year deal — even if it's not a loan — we have little to lose in terms of finances or FFP. That's not a concern. The concern is the future of Rémy, the future of Bamford, the future of other young players like, say, Bertrand Traoré. Is one year of Falcao adding enough winning value to justify the negatives for other players already in the squad or in the system and ready to contribute? I highly doubt it.

In lieu of a proper conclusion, here's a warning. Off the top of my head, I can remember going on similar rants just twice in recent times, once about keeping Roberto Di Matteo and once about not selling David Luiz. In both cases, the opposite happened within roughly 24 hours. So get those welcome banners ready.

Does Falcao's move to Chelsea make sense for anybody involved? - We Ain't Got No History

sidhani kama jamaa atakuja fanya la maana darajani.

 

[kalou]

Chelsea have won 12 of the last 13 opening day games and 14 of the last 16...

 

[Swiper]

Falcao atakuja darajani, na atafanya mengi hakika aminini wadau.....CFC na Mou haifanyi makosa!

SP

 

[Manumbu]

Falcao atakuja darajani, na atafanya mengi hakika aminini wadau.....CFC na Mou haifanyi makosa!

Natamani sana iwe hivyo. ingawa kwa sasa ana wakati mgumu sana to prove everyone wrong. unajua tena experience ya Torres bado iko fresh kabisa kwenye vichwa vyetu wengi wetu. na kumbuka pia tunae dogo potential sana Roic Remy ambaye kwa ufupi hajatumika kikamilifu sana. Na unajua pia tuna history ya big names strickers waliochemsha darajani i.e Chevchenko etc. no wonder kama ni opinio poll blues wengi wangesema bora tumchukue Ibrahimovic kuliko Falcao

 

[wall plate]

i hop atafanya vizur coz falcao ni streka anaefight sana na ndio type ya streka ambaye mou huwa anapenda kufanya nao kazi