Mwalimu, alipohojiwa na waandishi wa habari mwaka wa 1984, Dar es Salaam, alieleza kwa kirefu kwa nini alitofautiana na IMF. Na aliuliza, nani aliipa IMF mamlaka kuwa "International Ministrty of Finance"?
Bado naendelea kuvisoma vitabu vya Godfrey Mwakikagile (coincidentally, schoolmate wangu Tambaza High School) kuhusu Mwalimu Nyerere, na katika kitabu chake, "Tanzania under Mwalimu Nyerere: Reflections on an African Statesman," ameeleza kwa nini Mwalimu hakukubaliana na masharti ya IMF. Na katika kitabu chake kingine, "Nyerere and Africa: End of an Era," amemu quote Mwalimu Nyerere:
"I was in Washington last year (1997). At the World Bank. The first question they asked me was how did you fail? I responded that we took over a country with 85 per cent of its adult population illiterate. The British ruled us for 43 years. When they left, there were 2 trained engineers and 12 doctors. This is the country we inherited.
When I stepped down there was 91-per-cent literacy and nearly every child was in school. We trained thousands of engineers and doctors and teachers.
In 1988 Tanzanias per-capita income was $280. Now, in 1998, it is $140. So I asked the World Bank people what went wrong. Because for the last ten years Tanzania has been signing on the dotted line and doing everything the IMF and the World Bank wanted. Enrolment in school has plummeted to 63 per cent and conditions in health and other social services have deteriorated. I asked them again: what went wrong? These people just sat there looking at me. Then they asked what could they do? I told them have some humility. Humility - they are so arrogant!" - (Godfrey Mwakikagile, "Nyerere and Africa: End of an Era," p. 580).
Pia katika Chapter Sixteen: Nyerere as a Third World Leader, in "Nyerere and Africa: End of an Era," Godfrey Mwakikagile has written this:
"JULIUS NYERERE was one of the most eloquent spokesmen for the Third World. He was also a leading figure in the Non-Aligned Movement and one of its most uncompromising advocates. As he stated as far back as 1961, the same year he led Tanganyika to independence from Britain, we are not going to allow our friends to choose enemies for us.
But it was in Tanganyika, later Tanzania, where he demonstrated his qualities as a man of the people; a leader who sacrificed his personal comfort for the well-being of others. His policy of socialism was adopted in pursuit of this goal, as was the Arusha Declaration he wrote as the nation's political and economic blueprint but whose scope and relevance went beyond Tanzania to include Africa as a whole.
The driving force behind all his actions and policies was his belief that governments and societies exist to serve man. They have no other justification. A nation's economic growth is meaningless if the vast majority of its people, the poorest of the poor, do not benefit from such progress. Clean water for the people is more important than growth statistics; clinics more important than expensive projects undertaken out of sheer national pride.
And he was painfully aware of our underdeveloped status, not only as Tanzanians but as Africans as a whole. As he once said, "while others are going to the moon, we are trying to reach the village and it is getting farther and farther away." And to catch up with the rest, or achieve significant progress, "we must run while others walk," as he put it succinctly. Tragically, in many cases across the continent, we are not even running but crawling, if at all, emaciated by hunger, crippled by disease, and mangled by war. As he said not long before he died, "Africa is in a mess."
It was with such problems in mind, except civil wars, that he adopted socialist policies as the best way to achieve economic progress and social justice, enabling us to share the nation's wealth on an egalitarian basis. And his battle with the IMF and the World Bank in the early 1980s, against structural adjustment programmes and other austerity measures which hurt the poor the most but which these financial institutions demanded to be implemented by African and other developing countries as a condition for aid, clearly demonstrated his commitment to the well-being of the poorest of the poor; and his belief that economic growth indexes are less important than the welfare of the people. They come first.
In 1984, when he was still president and about a year after he survived a coup attempt some of whose details are discussed in Appendix VI of this book, Nyerere explained in detail Tanzania's stand on IMF proposals as they related to the country's economic development and financial woes. He said the major difference between Tanzania and the IMF was not based on the conditions demanded by the latter but the extent to which such conditions could be applied to Tanzania.
In an interview with local and foreign journalists at the State House in Dar es Salaam on November 22 the same year, the president said none of the IMF packages ranging from massive devaluation of currency, reduction of government deficits to liberalization of imports had helped improve any Third World economy. As he explained:
"They (international financial institutions) advised us to liberalize imports in 1977 when we had surplus in foreign reserves and we did. But we have been in trouble ever since."1
He once described the IMF as the International Ministry of Finance and famously asked who elected the IMF to be the ministry of finance for every country in the world.
Nyerere said IMF imposition of the ready-made prescriptions on poor countries as a condition for aid was unacceptable: "Any serious Third World government will ask serious questions. I cannot sign an agreement (with the IMF) and then have riots on the streets. You may be the economic experts but I am the political expert - allow me at least to say how much the people can take."2
He went on to explain that blind conformity and acceptance of the IMF packages would force the government to turn the police force against the people. The president said the government was flexible in its economic policies and had taken a number of measures similar to those recommended by the IMF; and went on to stress: "We don't say we don't change but we say how much should we change. Every government will have to ask that. Every government asks that."3
He said Tanzania needed the financial resources offered by the IMF to pay for her raw materials and spare parts but insisted that the negotiations must be balanced.
Commenting on government involvement in running the economy, Nyerere said all governments, including that of the United States, had to make decisions dealing with the economy. He cited as an example the deliberate decision by the American government to maintain "huge deficits" in its annual budget: "Those deficits are a government decision and it pervades the total economy."4
Nyerere said the higher degree of government control of the economy in Tanzania was basically historical because most of the economic infrastructure, including industry, was created by the government, pointing out that little was inherited from the colonial powers (first Germany, and then Britain). As he put it: "In Tanzania we do a little bit more than they (other countries) do. It is partly historical, partly ideological...but mostly historical."5"
See, Godfrey Mwakikagile, Chapter Sixteen: Nyerere as a Third World Leader," in "Nyerere and Africa: End of an Era," pp. 438 - 440.