zomba
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 27, 2007
- 17,240
- 3,910
First of all, I don't have a party, so take that back. I argue positions based on reason, not party affiliations. If you are a partisan Tanzanian, who cannot see anything outside the prism of party politics, I understand there is a temptation to color everything with the light that passes through that disjointed prism.
I am not into that. I take offense when my arguments are simplified so.
The question here is, what has marital status got to do with party leadership or leadership at all?
Stalin was a great family man, but he killed millions of people to the extent that the Russian demographic charts of his time took a toll.
Khama is not married but is ranked highly among African presidents. That shows you if you want leadership, look for leadership. If you are a priest looking for an unreal chastity, look on.
Khama is single, and he is running his economy far better than Tanzania's. Kikwete is married but our economy is in the doldrums.
I would choose a Khama over a Kikwete any day of the year.
Who asked you about Khama? didn't you see the questions on three different former presidents of Botswana?
Blah blah blah, on Stalin does not give your party leaders tickets for their dubious marital status!
What has Tanzania's economy got to do with marital status of their leaders? or in this matter Khama's marital status?
Pathetic.