Mkuu Keil,
I wish we had more people of your reasoning caliber; Nasikia kuwa documents za kampuni moja ya kitanzania ilikuwemo kwenye kabrasha la Sagem (nina ambiwa tayari wajanja wameshalichomoa huko kwenye tender committee na huenda likamfikia dr. Slaa na hata JF muda wowote). Nasikia Sagem walimtaja hiyo kampuni kam sub-contractor na wala siyo partner. Sasa issue ni hiyo, kamati inasema huyu ni partner na lazima uwe na agreement ya Joint Venture; Sagem wanasema huyu ni sub-contractor na kwa sub-contractor siyo lazima kuwa hiyo JV agreement. Nasikia Sagem wanayo policy ya kutotumia ma-partners baada ya scandal ya Nigeria walipolizwaa na local partner (ingawa eventually waliifanya project minus the local partner), kwa hivyo since then wakaamua kuwa watatumia ma sub-contractors and not partners.
Sasa wajanja wa mjini wanasema kuwa tender board walivyoona hilo ni la msingi ndiyo maana wakagwaya kwenda PPRA kwa vile kutokuwa na JV agreement siyo kigezo cha kumwengua mzabuni at this pre-qualification stage, kwa hivyo waka-utilize issue ya waziri kuingilia mchakato na kumwandikia CS. Kwa hivyo unaona wazi kuwa kila mwamba ngoma anavutia kwake. Tender comitte inajua imechemsha inajihami kwa kuingiliwa na waziri, waziri anajua hana mamlaka ya mojakwamoja therefore anataka PPRA wasuluhishe who are legally mandated to solve such disputes.
But all in all thanks for you open-minded "un-spinned" observation.
ZalendoHalisi
- Habari za dataz nilizozipata sasa hivi toka Dodoma ni kwamba hii ishu sasa ni official kuwa imekufa na waziri hana makosa. Barua ya waziri kwa Waziri Mkuu ili-leakishwa kwa makusudi na kambi inayomsafisha waziri, matokeo ni wasomi wengi walioiona hii barua wamekataa kabisa kwua waziri ana makosa, infact hata wale viongozi wa juu waliokuwa wakitaka waziri asulubishwe wamebadili mawazo, mpaka Spika pia.
- Mwenyekiti wa kamati ya bunge hakujua kwamba sheria yetu inasema kwamba mchakato wa tenda za serikali huwa hautakiwi kuingiliwa na yoyote mpaka mwisho, kwa hiyo hata kitendo cha kamati yake ya bunge hivi karibuni kuingilia kati ilikuwa pia ni kuvunja sheria hiyo, kwa hiyo nasikia na wao wameambiwa sasa wakae pembeni.
Wakuu nimezifikisha kama nilivyopewa hizi, ni kwamba ishu imekufa rasmi na waziri hana makosa na hata mkuu wa kaya amekubali hilo.
Ahsante Wakuu and Out!
Nimesikia katika advert moja ITV leo usiku, kuna gazeti la SEMA USIKIKE ambalo lina habari kuwa Mh. Masha alikutana na kampuni anayoikingia kifua huko Geneva Uswisi siku za nyuma kuhusiana na Tender ya Vitambulisho vya Taifa.
Kama ni kweli basi ipo kazi.
Mods: ikishachanganya mnaweza mkaiunganisha na thread kuu.
Mkuu Keil,
I wish we had more people of your reasoning caliber; Nasikia kuwa documents za kampuni moja ya kitanzania ilikuwemo kwenye kabrasha la Sagem (nina ambiwa tayari wajanja wameshalichomoa huko kwenye tender committee na huenda likamfikia dr. Slaa na hata JF muda wowote). Nasikia Sagem walimtaja hiyo kampuni kam sub-contractor na wala siyo partner. Sasa issue ni hiyo, kamati inasema huyu ni partner na lazima uwe na agreement ya Joint Venture; Sagem wanasema huyu ni sub-contractor na kwa sub-contractor siyo lazima kuwa hiyo JV agreement. Nasikia Sagem wanayo policy ya kutotumia ma-partners baada ya scandal ya Nigeria walipolizwaa na local partner (ingawa eventually waliifanya project minus the local partner), kwa hivyo since then wakaamua kuwa watatumia ma sub-contractors and not partners.
Sasa wajanja wa mjini wanasema kuwa tender board walivyoona hilo ni la msingi ndiyo maana wakagwaya kwenda PPRA kwa vile kutokuwa na JV agreement siyo kigezo cha kumwengua mzabuni at this pre-qualification stage, kwa hivyo waka-utilize issue ya waziri kuingilia mchakato na kumwandikia CS. Kwa hivyo unaona wazi kuwa kila mwamba ngoma anavutia kwake. Tender comitte inajua imechemsha inajihami kwa kuingiliwa na waziri, waziri anajua hana mamlaka ya mojakwamoja therefore anataka PPRA wasuluhishe who are legally mandated to solve such disputes.
But all in all thanks for you open-minded "un-spinned" observation.
ZalendoHalisi
Zalendohalisi.............
5.Ukifuatilia track record ya project ilizokwishafanya SAGEM......says a lot of inferior products and very shaky in project implementations........and hence open room for a lot of boo boo to be done......check projects walizofanya Honduras, Malaysia na nchi zingine..........
...........umesema kuwa "unasikia" SAGEM wana policy ya kutokuwa na partners baada ya kulizwa kule Nigeria.......hivi SAGEM alilizwa au SAGEM waliwaliza Nigerians na substandard product................
QUOTE]
Mkuu Ogah
Cha ajabu kwangu pamoja na sub-standard workmanship accompanied by a ton of "boo boo" bado wanafanikiwa ku-roll out projects all over the place, Europe, USA, Asia na Africa. They have implemented ID and AFIS projects in 10+ countries in Africa na bado kila kukucha wanapata kazi left right and centre, I wonder how do they do that!
Huko Malaysia bado wapo pamoja na "boo boo" zao what is happening? ThirdFactor | Sagem Sécurité selected by Malaysia for new biometric ID system
Labda hawa jamaa wana kaujanja kama kale ka "Bill Gates na Microsoft" they are smart enough to wade muddy waters au wanahonga ile mbaya.
Naona sasa wameamua kumnunua competitor Printrak owned by IBM
Sagem to buy Motorola's biometrics business @ Biometrics SecurityInfoWatch.com
My personal view ni kuwa hivi ni vita vya wakubwa - these are multinational corporations fighting for another shot at our money, wanapambana on our grounds and the locals just pawns, incidentally Tanzania ni uwanja this time!
Good day mkuu - Over and OUT!
ZalendoHalisi
Kwa waliosoma article ya Yahaya Charahani kwenye Mwananchi ya leo anaweza kuangalia jambo hili katika mtazamo mpana zaidi. Hebu jiulize ni kwanini Magazeti ya Mengi ndo yapo mstari wa mbele kuandika kuhusu Masha. Tangu wameanza hakuna jambo lolote jipya walilotuambia zaidi ya kuzunguka na kurudiarudia yaliyopo kwenye barua ya Masha kwa PM. Mengi nasikia amenunua gazeti la majira pia, kwa lengo hilo hilo. Nadhani hili suala ni zaidi ya Vitambulisho.
Nimesikia katika advert moja ITV leo usiku, kuna gazeti la SEMA USIKIKE ambalo lina habari kuwa Mh. Masha alikutana na kampuni anayoikingia kifua huko Geneva Uswisi siku za nyuma kuhusiana na Tender ya Vitambulisho vya Taifa.
Kama ni kweli basi ipo kazi.
Mods: ikishachanganya mnaweza mkaiunganisha na thread kuu.
Pundamilia,
Kwa hiyo ndugu yangu unanambia hizi power grab kati ya Chief Secretary, the Minister, and Principal Secretary hazikuanza leo wala jana? Of course!
Utaratibu wa kazi ya Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi uko fuzzy. On the one hand kuna wachangiaji wengine wanasema siku zote makatibu wakuu walikuwa "wanafunikwa" na mawaziri waliozoea vibaya. On the other, you have this Masha situation ambapo Waziri ndio anakataa "kufunikwa," anaangalia kazi yake kama ni dhamana ya mwisho juu ya kazi zote za Wizara, anajaribu ku push back against this backdoor paper dealing between the secretaries at Ikulu and one right under his nose. Sasa sidhani kama tunaweza kusema kwa uhakika nani kamuingilia mwenzake, lakini suffice is to say that hii itifaki ina mushkeli na inachanganya wengi.
Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi, inadaiwa, ni mkuu, ni bosi, wa watumishi wa Umma. Definition za "mtumishi wa umma" zimetolewa nyingi humu. Moja imesema ni wote ambao sio "political appointees" au wabunge. Kwa nadharia hiyo, Mkuu wa Majeshi ya ulinzi, ambae sio mwanasiasa, sio Mbunge, na yeye bosi wake ni Chief Secretary! Au kuna exception kwamba mwanajeshi sio mtumishi wa umma? Na Mkuu wa TISS je? Au ma-spy nao wako exempted from this model? Jaji Mkuu nae anaripoti kwa Chief Secretary? Au the judiciary iko excepted? I mean, at some point you gonna have to say somebody come up with a newer definition of Mtumishi wa Umma, cause this just ain't working, it's got too many exceptions, don't ya think? Ungependa kusikia defition yangu ya "Mtumishi wa Umma"? Mtu yeyote anaepokea paycheck ya serikali ni mtumishi wa umma. Every last one of them! Which makes Chief Secretary the boss of everybody! Outta whack, ain't it? Ndo maana nasema Luhanjo si bosi wa mtu!
Nadhani Masha ameeleza vizuri sana role ya Chief Secretary: "Ninatambua kwamba Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi anayo mamlaka na madaraka makubwa ya kuingilia maamuzi ndani ya Wizara yoyote pale anapoona maagizo ya Baraza la Mawaziri hayatekelezwi."
Kwangu mimi hapo maana yake huyu Chief Secretary anaweza kuingilia chochote kile kinachofanywa na yeyote yule, katika wakati wowote ule akifuatilia maagizo ya Barazala la Mawaziri. Including ya Waziri. Lakini hii haimaanishi ni bosi wa Waziri au Katibu Mkuu. Ila, "...ingefaa Waziri ahusishwe kwa kuwa mwisho wa siku mimi ndiye nitakaewajibika kwa maamuzi yoyote ambayo yatafanyika Wizarani kwangu pasipokujali kwamba maamuzi hayo yalipata baraka za Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi au hapana."
Waziri anasema Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi hawezi akamvuta chemba Katibu wa Wizara. Wizara ni lazima iwe ukurasa mmoja katika kutekeleza maagizo ya kuingiliwa na Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi. Mkuu wa Utumishi wa Umma sio Mkuu wa watumishi wa umma. Tusichanganye.
Nadhani Waziri Masha hakukosea kukataa kufanywa second banana wa Katibu Mkuu Kiongozi, Luhanjo.