Augustine Moshi
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 22, 2006
- 2,556
- 1,394
I note that there are investors who want us to give them large tracts of land so that they can grow sugar cane. They would like to produce ethanol for use as engine fuel. I have seen, in our papers, that they want as much as 4,000 hectares each and that this land must come from Bagamoyo and Kisarawe districts.
We want investment, but we cannot hand over huge chunks of our inheritance for it. We have land that is extremely good for growing the food that we eat in those districts, and we must keep it that way. If someone wants us to grow sugar cane there for now (before cars change completely), we will do so, with their cooperation, but the land must remain ours.
Let the government assist the investors so that we reach an understanding whereby each villager gets to plant some sugarcane, with the assistance of the investors, on ten hectares or so. Each villager will look after the crop and sell the entire produce to the investor, at pre-arranged prices. This way, the villagers will not have to GIVE WAY to the investor. They will become participants in the project rather than cheap farm hands that work on land that they once owned.
I would say that 4,000 hectares of prime agricultural land is worth a lot of money. I would value it at around $500 million. We cannot simply disinherit ourselves of our land like that. Carl Peters tried it earlier. He gave us salt in return. Someone else wants to do it again, and this time, all we will get is the privilege of becoming very lowly paid, and despised, farm hands on a master's estate.
Any foreign investment that requires the use of large tracts of land should be a cooperative venture that lets us keep the land. If that cannot be arranged, then we would rather continue to grow cassava and a few other things on our land. That, I submit, is better that handing it over to foreigners.
Augustine Moshi
We want investment, but we cannot hand over huge chunks of our inheritance for it. We have land that is extremely good for growing the food that we eat in those districts, and we must keep it that way. If someone wants us to grow sugar cane there for now (before cars change completely), we will do so, with their cooperation, but the land must remain ours.
Let the government assist the investors so that we reach an understanding whereby each villager gets to plant some sugarcane, with the assistance of the investors, on ten hectares or so. Each villager will look after the crop and sell the entire produce to the investor, at pre-arranged prices. This way, the villagers will not have to GIVE WAY to the investor. They will become participants in the project rather than cheap farm hands that work on land that they once owned.
I would say that 4,000 hectares of prime agricultural land is worth a lot of money. I would value it at around $500 million. We cannot simply disinherit ourselves of our land like that. Carl Peters tried it earlier. He gave us salt in return. Someone else wants to do it again, and this time, all we will get is the privilege of becoming very lowly paid, and despised, farm hands on a master's estate.
Any foreign investment that requires the use of large tracts of land should be a cooperative venture that lets us keep the land. If that cannot be arranged, then we would rather continue to grow cassava and a few other things on our land. That, I submit, is better that handing it over to foreigners.
Augustine Moshi