Privacy Law: Mwanaasha J. Kikwete kuwashitaki NECTA?

I am not a lawyer by profession but just by using commonsence I beg to dis agree with you, Firstly, why should that rise after the JK's daughter name appeared in the newspapers with poor results? how if she had got div 1?

secondly, let that be the challenge for other secondary school students. Knowing that results will be displayed in papers will push them strive hard to get good results.

Umemjibu vyema hata kama sio mwanasheria kwa taaluma
Ila mto amada afikirie maana alichokiweka hapo ni poor interpretation of the law and wrong definition ya privacy

Kuna sehem nyingine huwa haiaply na inapobidi hata kama ni suimu yako ya mkononi uhuru huo unaingiliwa na kuvunjwa
So katika mazingira haya NECTA haijaingilia uhuru wa mhusika wala kuvunja sheria inayohusiana na privacy
 
napita hapa_maake panahitaji uelewa wa sheria ili kuchangia....ntarudi kama msomaji tu.
 
Mbona watahiniwa wote majina yao na matokeao yao vimewekwa wazi? whats wrong na huyu mtoto?.......ingawa klam mzazi sijapenda barrage of criticism aliyoipata hapa JF...

ndio gharama ya kuwa "public figure" siye kapuku nani anatujua hata ukiweka majina yetu na division x zetu!
 
Wrong definition of Law!

One of the key subject functions of the NECTA is to disclose the names and results of students!

Haven't you found in this thread, a place to squeeeze your religious segregation mr MS?
duhu..............
 
Sidhani kama hapa kuna kuvunjika kwa privacy ya mtu
Kama ingelikuwa ni yeye mwenyewe tuu jina lake limetolewa na wengine yakafichwa na watu wakaenda kulitafuta may be huko shuleni kwao na akaja kuliweka hapa ingekuwa kweli kuna kuingilia privacy ya mtu
hapa ni majina ya wanafunzi wote wa tanzania waliofanya mtihani huo wamewekwa majina yao kwenye mtandao
Ingelikuwa ni kuingilia uhuru wa mtu wanafunzi wote wangeishtaki NECTA kwa kuwaanika majina yao na matokeo yao
So hicho kifungu ulichotoa hapo juu sidhani kama kinaaply hapa kuwa huyo mtoto NECTA imeingilia uhuru wake
Eti ehhh! Ingekuwa Ugonjwa labda lakini majibu ya mtihani!
Hivi hawa first families si wanatakiwa kuwa role models? Kama anafeli na huku tunawalisha na kuwalaza bure, wanapata priviledges kibao, mama ni mwalimu by profession - something must be very wrong with this family!
 
Kupata alama za chini hakumaanishi hana akili wala hakumaanishi hajiwezi kimasomo.

Ni mambo mengi mno yanayoweza kupelekea mtu kupata alama za chini katika mtihani.

Kuna watu wana vifesti klasi vyao vya UDSM na hata kifutio hawajawahi kuvumbua! So go figure.
 
Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Usishangae akawa beneficiary No. 1 wa HESLB wakati mtoto wa mkulima aliyesomea chini ya mawe na kadivisheni II kake akaambiwa ha-qualify kwa loan! Hii nchi bana!
 
It is sad to concede that in NECTA there is no comprehensive privacy legislation. To disclose the names and results of students NECTA go against the constitution of URT . It brings bad picture to see results of other students and a daughter of President of URT being disclosed without approval from a person concern.

Of course this does not mean that right to privacy is not recognized in Tanzania. The United Republic of Tanzania (URT) Constitution of 1977 as amended form time to times defines privacy as follows:

'…Every person is entitled to respect and protection of his person, the privacy of his own person, his family and of his matrimonial life, and respect and protection of his residence and private communications…'

Article 16(2) goes further stipulating that:
'…For the purpose of preserving the person's right in accordance with this Article, the state authority shall lay down legal procedures regarding the circumstances, manner and extent to which the right to privacy, security of his person, his property and residence may be encroached upon without prejudice to the provisions of this Article…'

Article 16(1) and (2) of United Republic of Tanzania Constitution of 1977 as amended from time to time provides for right to privacy. Article 16(2) of URT constitution provides for possibility of other laws to encroach the right to privacy. The said article stipulates clearly that the law maker will enact law to stipulate how privacy right may be protected, pursued or encroached by government agents.

Mytake; Mwanaasha atashitaki Necta?
:nerd:
Nawakilisha

unasoma au umesoma law wapi? degree?masters?phd?
 
Kwa nini usimshauri abadilishe jina? Labda itasaidia kumwongezea akili
 
It is sad to concede that in NECTA there is no comprehensive privacy legislation. To disclose the names and results of students NECTA go against the constitution of URT . It brings bad picture to see results of other students and a daughter of President of URT being disclosed without approval from a person concern.

Of course this does not mean that right to privacy is not recognized in Tanzania. The United Republic of Tanzania (URT) Constitution of 1977 as amended form time to times defines privacy as follows:

‘…Every person is entitled to respect and protection of his person, the privacy of his own person, his family and of his matrimonial life, and respect and protection of his residence and private communications…’

Article 16(2) goes further stipulating that:
‘…For the purpose of preserving the person’s right in accordance with this Article, the state authority shall lay down legal procedures regarding the circumstances, manner and extent to which the right to privacy, security of his person, his property and residence may be encroached upon without prejudice to the provisions of this Article…’

Article 16(1) and (2) of United Republic of Tanzania Constitution of 1977 as amended from time to time provides for right to privacy. Article 16(2) of URT constitution provides for possibility of other laws to encroach the right to privacy. The said article stipulates clearly that the law maker will enact law to stipulate how privacy right may be protected, pursued or encroached by government agents.

Mytake; Mwanaasha atashitaki Necta?
:nerd:
Nawakilisha

Ukiwa kenge hata tafakuri inakaa mkiani
 
It is sad to concede that in NECTA there is no comprehensive privacy legislation. To disclose the names and results of students NECTA go against the constitution of URT . It brings bad picture to see results of other students and a daughter of President of URT being disclosed without approval from a person concern.

Of course this does not mean that right to privacy is not recognized in Tanzania. The United Republic of Tanzania (URT) Constitution of 1977 as amended form time to times defines privacy as follows:

'…Every person is entitled to respect and protection of his person, the privacy of his own person, his family and of his matrimonial life, and respect and protection of his residence and private communications…'

Article 16(2) goes further stipulating that:
'…For the purpose of preserving the person's right in accordance with this Article, the state authority shall lay down legal procedures regarding the circumstances, manner and extent to which the right to privacy, security of his person, his property and residence may be encroached upon without prejudice to the provisions of this Article…'

Article 16(1) and (2) of United Republic of Tanzania Constitution of 1977 as amended from time to time provides for right to privacy. Article 16(2) of URT constitution provides for possibility of other laws to encroach the right to privacy. The said article stipulates clearly that the law maker will enact law to stipulate how privacy right may be protected, pursued or encroached by government agents.

Mytake; Mwanaasha atashitaki Necta?
:nerd:
Nawakilisha


Inaonekana waliokujibu hawakukujibu kwa kutumia sheria. Kwa hiyo mimi nitakujibu kwa kutumia sheria. Kabla ya kukujibu inabidi ujue kwamba, any article in the Constitution should not be read in isolation of the others. Pia inabidi ujue kwamba, Ibara nyingi za Katiba ya sasa zinaanza na "Bila kuathiri sheria nyingine za nchi........" Katiba inakupa haki kwa mkono wa kulia, then inaichukua haki hiyo hiyo kupitia mkono wa kushoto.

Now kukujibu hoja yako. Ni kweli Katiba inatoa haki ya privacy. Hata hivyo, ibara ya 30(2) ya Katiba hiyo hiyo inasema "Ifahamike kwamba masharti yaliyomo katika Sehemu hii (sehemu ya tatu ya haki za binadamu) ya Katiba hii, yanayofafanua misingi ya haki, uhuru na wajibu wa binadamu, hayaharamishi sheria yoyote iliyotungwa wala kuzuia sheria yoyote kutungwa au jambo lolote halali kufanywa kwa mujibu wa sheria hiyo..." I am sure NECTA watakuwa wana-publish majina ya wanafunzi waliofaulu na kufeli kwa mujibu wa sheria iliyotungwa na bunge.

Kwa kifupi vyombo vya dola viliyo chini ya serilkali inayoongozwa na baba yake vimekuwa vikitumia sana hiki kifungu kukandamiza haki za binadamu. Unaenda mahakamani una-cite haki yako ya kibinadamu jamaa wana-cite Ibara ya 30(2) na kesi unashindwa. Kwa hiyo, mtoto wa kikwete ni victim wa katiba mbovu kama wananchi wengine. She is not an exception. Anachotakiwa kufanya sasa ni kumshauri baba yake ili Ibara ya 30(2) indolewe kabisa kwenye Katiba mpya ili yasije yakampata tena.

Kwa hiyo, hii ni changamoto kubwa sana kwake kuona jinsi Katiba ilivyo mbovu. Inambidi sasa nae kuwa mstari wa mblele kabisa kupigania Katiba mpya inayolinda sio tuu privacy yake bali pia privacy za Watanzania wote. Thus, wa kumlaumu sio NECTA bali ni baba yake aliyekubali kuongoza hii nchi kwa katiba ambayo haijali haki za binadamu including hata haki za watoto wake.
 
Back
Top Bottom