First of all, I don't have a party, so take that back. I argue positions based on reason, not party affiliations. If you are a partisan Tanzanian, who cannot see anything outside the prism of party politics, I understand there is a temptation to color everything with the light that passes through that disjointed prism.
I am not into that. I take offense when my arguments are simplified so.
The question here is, what has marital status got to do with party leadership or leadership at all?
Stalin was a great family man, but he killed millions of people to the extent that the Russian demographic charts of his time took a toll.
Khama is not married but is ranked highly among African presidents. That shows you if you want leadership, look for leadership. If you are a priest looking for an unreal chastity, look on.
Khama is single, and he is running his economy far better than Tanzania's. Kikwete is married but our economy is in the doldrums.
I would choose a Khama over a Kikwete any day of the year.
Watu kama Belusconi na Sarkozy ni mifano hai ya viongozi waseja au wasio na ndoa walioziangusha nchi zao kutokana kushindwa kuongoza. Kama umeshindwa kuongoza familia 1 utawezaje kuongoza maelfu ya familia; tena zenye midimamo na mirengo tofauti?
Ndoa inaleta utulivu wa hisia nakuleta mchango mkubwa katika fikra na maamuzi.
Who asked you about Khama?
didn't you see the questions on three different former presidents of Botswana?
Blah blah blah, on Stalin does not give your party leaders tickets for their dubious marital status!
What has Tanzania's economy got to do with marital status of their leaders?
or in this matter Khama's marital status?
Pathetic.
Huwezi kuwa na urafiki na CAMERON kama utakuwa umeoa jinsia tofauti!
Khama hana familia na nchi yake ina rank highre kuliko most of the African countries.
Hapo unasemaje?
Nasema ameiacha nchi pabaya zaidi ya alipoikuta.
Kiongozi asiye na mke ni mzigo kwa jamii anayoiongoza. Tunahitaji kiongozi mwenye mamlaka ya kimaadili; kutuonyesha ni namna gani tupande mbegu za maadii mema kwenye familia. Kumbuka taifa lenye maadili mema (talk of ethics ) linaanzia nyumbani.
Hivyo tunapenda vijana wetu wengi waishi kwenye familia zinazofuata misingi ya jamii yetu: Ambapo kuoa ni moja ya misingi hiyo.
Kwa hiyo kwa simplistic approach yako, kuwa na mke ndo kuwa na maadili na kutokuwa na mke si maadili?
Kwa definition yako hiyo basi hata Yesu na Papai.
kabisa family life or marriage life is important to society...maana ukiwa kama kiongozi ndio unatakiwa uwe mfano kwa jamii...sasa kama mtu ukok solo unakaa ikulu matokeo yake utaanza kuwaingiza akina wema sepetu ikulu sasa kama baadhi ya viongozi tunawaona wanavyofanya bt ikulu au sehemu ya heshima inatakiwa kiongozi awepo pale na familia yake...Huwezi kuona nchi ka america or britain kiongozi yuko solo
Too low!
The thread is about marital status and leadership ability, the real life example of Khama refutes this fallacious notion squarely.
It takes only one president to disprove an untruth, you don't need two. A truth that need so much to defend it is suspect.
Backwards societies are overly characterized by an overindulgent zeal towards a utopian chastity.
Stalin's example shows that being a family man does not necessarily mean being a good leader. His own daughter escaped the USSR.
The economy is one central aspect of demonstration of leadership. Your notion that unmarried people cannot lead would have us believe Botswana would be disadvantaged, to the contrary.
As stated above, Khama is a living example that marital status has nothing to do with leadership.
What is pathetic here is the simplification of a complex issue into some party politics bickering and uninformed shenanigans, fact starved innuendos and sheer frustrated lack of argument on your part.
kabisa family life or marriage life is important to society...maana ukiwa kama kiongozi ndio unatakiwa uwe mfano kwa jamii...sasa kama mtu ukok solo unakaa ikulu matokeo yake utaanza kuwaingiza akina wema sepetu ikulu sasa kama baadhi ya viongozi tunawaona wanavyofanya bt ikulu au sehemu ya heshima inatakiwa kiongozi awepo pale na familia yake...Huwezi kuona nchi ka america or britain kiongozi yuko solo
ni kweli mkuu. Wenzetu waingereza na wamarekani suala la ndoa ni muhimu mno kwa kiongozi wao. Na unafuatiliwa na ukiwa na affair tu na mwanamke mwingine inatosha kukufanya ujiuzuru nafasi yako. Lakini kwetu tz mkuu angalia viti maalum walio wengi ni nyumba ndogo za ikulu na inaonekana ni kitu cha kawaida tu.
Was Seretse Khama single? how was the economy at his time?
Was Quett Mesire single? how was the economy at his time?
Was Quett Mesire single? how was the economy at his time?
Na pi wapo wasiokuwa na ndoa ambao wana nidhamu ya hali ya juu, ambao wameishi kwa wajibu na jukumu la kuangalia mienendo ya ndugu zao kwa kuwalisha, kuwavisha na kuwasomesha na wanawashinda wenye ndoa kwa nidhamu na taadhima.
Hivyo ndoa sio kigezo cha lolote kwenye uongozi bora wa mtu.
Ni sawa na kusema babu yangu amevuta sigara miak 50 lakini hajapata cancer, kwa hiyo sigara haisababishi cancer...Usitosheke na apparent view, hata penseli ikipitishwa kwenye maji inaweza kuonekana imepinda wakati kiukweli haijapinda, imebadili media tu.
Ni sawa na kusema babu yangu amevuta sigara miak 50 lakini hajapata cancer, kwa hiyo sigara haisababishi cancer...
Thats just .....
Marais wote wa G20 wameoa kasoro Hallendale.Kama unataka cause and effect toa study inayoonyesha link kwamba kuoa kunaleta ufanisi zaidi katika ndoa.
Kuna viongozi kama kina Janet Napolitano wanaonekana status yao ya kuwa single ndio inawapa uwezo zaidi wa kufanya kazi vizuri kwa sababu wana focus maisha yao yote kwenye service ya watu.