Ignoble Tenant,
So, you were making a general point about the UK, and other literate societies in the known universe, not relating particularly to Kikwete and the Tanzanian society.
Assuming, without concluding, that that is what you meant, then you would be pathetically wrong to wonder whether the original post was overly imaginary, since the call for resignation focused specifically on Kikwete's perfomance, and was pinpointed on this Tanzanian society, and nowhere else.
You then got imaginary, by expanding the thought of original post to include other socities in the UK, of which nothing was hinted at. So who was quixotic, you or the post?
If you're wondering whether Kikwete is performing well, but do not have the balls to say it, it'll be said for you!
You just confirmed my suspicion that two ideas in the same post, like walking and chewing gum, is a feat of disproportionately arcane demands for you.
I suspect also the significance of
"Just curious" was another waste?
FYI, I was musing and questioning which is far from making a point.The point was not about the UK, the UK situation was brought in just to further illustrate the general point to Noble Knights who cannot walk and chew gum, let alone the numerable intricacies of the fine art of dueling.
So, you were making a general point about the UK, and other literate societies in the known universe, not relating particularly to Kikwete and the Tanzanian society.
Correct
Assuming, without concluding, that that is what you meant, then you would be pathetically wrong to wonder whether the original post was overly imaginary, since the call for resignation focused specifically on Kikwete's perfomance, and was pinpointed on this Tanzanian society, and nowhere else.
After your assumption, why would you embarass youerself with disclosing even a dream of linking the call for resignation to anywhere else in any way at all, hence necessitating the above convolution?
Did my thinking that the original post was imaginary have a connection with the question that literate societies being intolerant? Did not my preface take care of any possible confusion you seem to self indulge in?
The original post is extravagantly naive and I stress again quixotic because although it focused specifically on Kikwete's resignation, it did not provide specifics.
You then got imaginary, by expanding the thought of original post to include other socities in the UK, of which nothing was hinted at. So who was quixotic, you or the post?
First you seem to equate imaginary and quixotic, which is a mistake.Quixotic is more impracticable than imaginary. Imagination powers innovation, quixotic ideals kill civilizations.It is hard to urge you to think outside the box outside the box when you can't think outside the box!
Again, you cannot chew gum and walk.Threads evolve and I doubt you can appreciate that one thread cannot be bound on one focus, as long as the relation is soundly relevant.
If you're wondering whether Kikwete is performing well, but do not have the balls to say it, it'll be said for you!
Not only am I decidedly clear on this, I was clear that Kikwete is a joker before the 1995 CCM nominations, when there was mass hysteria and Kikwetemania among many of today's Kikwete staunch opposers.
I will keep in mind to go slow, geez.U make me feel like I am extrapolating the implication of Poincare's conjecture on Kaluza-Klein warpage of strings and its eefct of the 26 dimension of space-time!