US Election Coverage 2008

US Election Coverage 2008

We Nyani, hivi ni lini utakapoanza kuamini kuwa babu yamemfika shingoni!?!

Hakuna cha imani hapa....ninachojua ni hiki: Babu atashinda na atashinda ushindi mnono na nyie mtalia na kusaga meno na kulaumu ubaguzi....
 
These "polls" don't matter. People are just concerned because it's psychological. No one wants see or feel like they are not doing well even though that may not be the case. Actually I'm glad to see that they are concerned because that will motivate them even more to turn out in massive numbers. Remember, fear can be the greatest motivator. But you go ahead and believe in them. I on the other hand will believe the polls of November 4th.


....only truth believe the crap your saying...say landslide x 3..teh teh teh!
 
Hakuna cha imani hapa....ninachojua ni hiki: Babu atashinda na atashinda ushindi mnono na nyie mtalia na kusaga meno na kulaumu ubaguzi....

Labda 2012, lakini sio mwaka huu. Anyway, mnatakiwa supporters msiopungukiwa na imani kama wewe, keep it up Mkuu
 
TRUTH NAOMBA JIBU MAANA WEWE NI MTAALAM WA HISPANIC VOTE NA ANTI OBAMA MOVEMENT YAO DHIDI YAKE.


Hispanics turn cold shoulder to McCain

By: Ben Smith
October 9, 2008 08:11 PM EST

They will change their minds when they enter the voting booth. Just visit latino message boards and ask their opinions of Obantu and Bantus in general and watch the vitriol. Face it, latinos can't stand your people.

Why Do Mexicans Hate Blacks?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Latina writer for the L.A. Times points the finger to Latinos as the source of most of the black-brown tension in Los Angeles.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/...nion-rightrail

Roots of Latino/black anger
Longtime prejudices, not economic rivalry, fuel tensions.
By Tanya K. Hernandez, Tanya K. Hernandez is a professor of law at Rutgers University Law School.
January 7, 2007


THE ACRIMONIOUS relationship between Latinos and African Americans in Los Angeles is growing hard to ignore. Although last weekend's black-versus-Latino race riot at Chino state prison is unfortunately not an aberration, the Dec. 15 murder in the Harbor Gateway neighborhood of Cheryl Green, a 14-year-old African American, allegedly by members of a Latino gang, was shocking.

Yet there was nothing really new about it. Rather, the murder was a manifestation of an increasingly common trend: Latino ethnic cleansing of African Americans from multiracial neighborhoods. Just last August, federal prosecutors convicted four Latino gang members of engaging in a six-year conspiracy to assault and murder African Americans in Highland Park. During the trial, prosecutors demonstrated that African American residents (with no gang ties at all) were being terrorized in an effort to force them out of a neighborhood now perceived as Latino.

For example, one African American resident was murdered by Latino gang members as he looked for a parking space near his Highland Park home. In another case, a woman was knocked off her bicycle and her husband was threatened with a box cutter by one of the defendants, who said, "You niggers have been here long enough."

At first blush, it may be mystifying why such animosity exists between two ethnic groups that share so many of the same socioeconomic deprivations. Over the years, the hostility has been explained as a natural reaction to competition for blue-collar jobs in a tight labor market, or as the result of turf battles and cultural disputes in changing neighborhoods. Others have suggested that perhaps Latinos have simply been adept at learning the U.S. lesson of anti-black racism, or that perhaps black Americans are resentful at having the benefits of the civil rights movement extended to Latinos.

Although there may be a degree of truth to some or all of these explanations, they are insufficient to explain the extremity of the ethnic violence.

Over the years, there's also been a tendency on the part of observers to blame the conflict more on African Americans (who are often portrayed as the aggressors) than on Latinos. But although it's certainly true that there's plenty of blame to go around, it's important not to ignore the effect of Latino culture and history in fueling the rift.

The fact is that racism — and anti-black racism in particular — is a pervasive and historically entrenched reality of life in Latin America and the Caribbean. More than 90% of the approximately 10 million enslaved Africans brought to the Americas were taken to Latin America and the Caribbean (by the French, Spanish and British, primarily), whereas only 4.6% were brought to the United States. By 1793, colonial Mexico had a population of 370,000 Africans (and descendants of Africans) — the largest concentration in all of Spanish America.

The legacy of the slave period in Latin America and the Caribbean is similar to that in the United States: Having lighter skin and European features increases the chances of socioeconomic opportunity, while having darker skin and African features severely limits social mobility.

White supremacy is deeply ingrained in Latin America and continues into the present. In Mexico, for instance, citizens of African descent (who are estimated to make up 1% of the population) report that they regularly experience racial harassment at the hands of local and state police, according to recent studies by Antonieta Gimeno, then of Mount Holyoke College, and Sagrario Cruz-Carretero of the University of Veracruz.

Mexican public discourse reflects the hostility toward blackness; consider such common phrases as "getting black" to denote getting angry, and "a supper of blacks" to describe a riotous gathering of people. Similarly, the word "black" is often used to mean "ugly." It is not surprising that Mexicans who have been surveyed indicate a disinclination to marry darker-skinned partners, as reported in a 2001 study by Bobby Vaughn, an anthropology professor at Notre Dame de Namur University.

Anti-black sentiment also manifests itself in Mexican politics. During the 2001 elections, for instance, Lazaro Cardenas, a candidate for governor of the state of Michoacan, is believed to have lost substantial support among voters for having an Afro Cuban wife. Even though Cardenas had great name recognition (as the grandson of Mexico's most popular president), he only won by 5 percentage points — largely because of the anti-black platform of his opponent, Alfredo Anaya, who said that "there is a great feeling that we want to be governed by our own race, by our own people."

Given this, it should not be surprising that migrants from Mexico and other areas of Latin America and the Caribbean arrive in the U.S. carrying the baggage of racism. Nor that this facet of Latino culture is in turn transmitted, to some degree, to younger generations along with all other manifestations of the culture.

The sociological concept of "social distance" measures the unease one ethnic or racial group has for interacting with another. Social science studies of Latino racial attitudes often indicate a preference for maintaining social distance from African Americans. And although the social distance level is largest for recent immigrants, more established communities of Latinos in the United States also show a marked social distance from African Americans.

For instance, in University of Houston sociologist Tatcho Mindiola's 2002 survey of 600 Latinos in Houston (two-thirds of whom were Mexican, the remainder Salvadoran and Colombian) and 600 African Americans, the African Americans had substantially more positive views of Latinos than Latinos had of African Americans. Although a slim majority of the U.S.-born Latinos used positive identifiers when describing African Americans, only a minority of the foreign-born Latinos did so. One typical foreign-born Latino respondent stated: "I just don't trust them…. The men, especially, all use drugs, and they all carry guns."

This same study found that 46% of Latino immigrants who lived in residential neighborhoods with African Americans reported almost no interaction with them.

The social distance of Latinos from African Americans is consistently reflected in Latino responses to survey questions. In a 2000 study of residential segregation, Camille Zubrinsky Charles, a sociology professor at the University of Pennsylvania, found that Latinos were more likely to reject African Americans as neighbors than they were to reject members of other racial groups. In addition, in the 1999-2000 Lilly Survey of American Attitudes and Friendships, Latinos identified African Americans as their least desirable marriage partners, whereas African Americans proved to be more accepting of intermarriage with Latinos.

Ironically, African Americans, who are often depicted as being averse to coalition-building with Latinos, have repeatedly demonstrated in their survey responses that they feel less hostility toward Latinos than Latinos feel toward them.

Although some commentators have attributed the Latino hostility to African Americans to the stress of competition in the job market, a 1996 sociological study of racial group competition suggests otherwise. In a study of 477 Latinos from the 1992 Los Angeles County Social Survey, professors Lawrence Bobo, then of Harvard, and Vincent Hutchings of the University of Michigan found that underlying prejudices and existing animosities contribute to the perception that African Americans pose an economic threat — not the other way around.

It is certainly true that the acrimony between African Americans and Latinos cannot be resolved until both sides address their own unconscious biases about one another. But it would be a mistake to ignore the Latino side of the equation as some observers have done — particularly now, when the recent violence in Los Angeles has involved Latinos targeting peaceful African American citizens.

This conflict cannot be sloughed off as simply another generation of ethnic group competition in the United States (like the familiar rivalries between Irish, Italians and Jews in the early part of the last century). Rather, as the violence grows, the "diasporic" origins of the anti-black sentiment — the entrenched anti-black prejudice among Latinos that exists not just in the United States but across the Americas — will need to be directly confronted.

Source:

http://boards.brownpride.com/showthread.php/why-do-mexicans-63071.html?
 
Guys..the air is changing. Conservative talk hosts and so far one journalist (CHRIS WALLACE) are not happy with McCain/Palin strategy of spending too much time talking about Bill Ayers while the stock Market (new record low today) and regular Americans 401(k)'s are plummeting. Howard Wilson (works for sen. clinton and now works for FIX News warned them..."Its not going to work"..because they too tried it. Well, It has showed so far it hasn't, other than making the Mc-Palin rallies fired up like those lynch mobs back in the days..I will keep bringing you the updates as the day unravels.

The McCain strategy is working and I truly hope they don't cave in to the media pressure and change the course. Let's remember, Obantu didn't defeat Clinton, his was nominated by the super delegates. By the end of the primaries, White voters had abandoned him. In my opinion McCain should have adopted this strategy early on but it is not too late. I just hope they don't cave in to political correctness police and the media. White people have not accepted Obantu, if they did Obantu would be ahead by 30 points.
 
We Nyani, hivi ni lini utakapoanza kuamini kuwa babu yamemfika shingoni!?!

Ha ha ha ha November 5th siku ambayo Ulimwengu wote utakapokuwa unashangilia kwa hoi hoi, vigelegele na vifijo ushindi mkubwa wa Obama. Bado siku 25 tu 🙂
 
Obantu supporters are trying to impose their will on the American people by fraudulent voting practices using organizations like ACORN. All McCain needs to do in the final debate is to hit Obantu with tough questions and stop treating him with kid's gloves. Obantu stinks politically there is no doubt about it. McCain needs to open the windows and let the American people smell for themselves. If he does that in the last debate, he will close the deal and win the election.
 
The McCain strategy is working and I truly hope they don't cave in to the media pressure and change the course. Let's remember, Obantu didn't defeat Clinton, his was nominated by the super delegates. By the end of the primaries, White voters had abandoned him. In my opinion McCain should have adopted this strategy early on but it is not too late. I just hope they don't cave in to political correctness police and the media. White people have not accepted Obantu, if they did Obantu would be ahead by 30 points.


Its not True...because..had he not been accepted, he shouldn't even made it through the Primaries. Also, the "kitchen sink" tactic both from Sen. Clinton and now Sen. McCain would have damaged him for GOOD!
Finally, if he's not accepted ....who is packing those stadiums wherever he goes? Last time I checked black people in the U.S. are not even 10% of the entire population.
 
Breaking .News


Panel: Palin Abused Her Power in Firing of Commissioner



hahaha......haha....
 
I see a landslide for OBAMA/BIDEN...No I am kidding I see McCain-Chelin (Chenney+Palin) with their ANGRY LYNCH MOB takes over the White house.
No wonder Bob mcMcain was so nice to Obama today
 
I can see her "bridge to nowhere" take her back to Alaska...Oooooh my wink winky...you betcha..Fix News naona wako KIMYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
 
I can see her "bridge to nowhere" take her back to Alaska...Oooooh my wink winky...you betcha..Fix News naona wako KIMYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

10292002.gif
 
Mwenye muda wa kusoma ripoti hii hapa 263 pages.....wanasema muosha huoshwa...this woman forgot she was in the glass house and started throwing stones at other peoples houses.

McCain/Palin 08 is DONE...FINITO...FINISHED
 
sarah oh.. Sarah what have you done to the real maverick? Why did you wear a lipstick while you know deep down inside you are still a .......?
 
gall.timesunion.jpg

This absentee ballot was sent out to voters in Rensselaer County in New York state. Photo credit: Albany Times Union newspaper
 
I am fed up..with these right winger radicals who would do anything to undermine the fact that their opponent is a better candidate. I m tired of all the anger, and the hatred that the Obama is/has been enduring. Someone called in today while I was listening to Ed Schultz show and demanded that Obama asked to show his "freaking" birth certificate. My answer was WTF? This man was born by an American mother and a Kenyan father why does he have to show his birth certificate? This and other news and sound bites of McCain rallies which I am sure will need the help of our "FFU's" just because some "WHITE SUPREMACISTS" can't accept the fact that In this day and age, anybody can become anybody...are scared to death and are shaking in their boots....pressurizing McCain to be more aggresive, to sharpen his attacks, basically to assasinate Sen. Obama's character.
Now, don't get me wrong....the GOP has had its moments---Its gotten away with so much, for example, the election in 2000, and 2004...Using mudslinging tactics and scare tactics they have become beneficiaries of AMERICAN IGNORANCE. Its like when it comes the election time..the GOP is the party that can be trusted to keep this country safe and restore family values and these folks will use anything and everything to get their way. Remember what happened to Kerry in 2004?

So tonight, I have been very anxiously welcoming of the Sarah Palin investigation report. I think this puts a seal to all the other nonsense that Camp McCain/Palin is feeding the American conservatives.

Here's my take..................I am fired up...I am ready to go...I don't want the Republican Party simply defeated in November, I want to see it smashed beyond all recognition, in such wriggling, writhing, anguished disarray that it can barely reconstitute itself, so desperate for answers that it looks to Sen. Lieberman for visionary guidance.
 
Back
Top Bottom