Niijuavyo Freemasonry

Niijuavyo Freemasonry

Mashaxizo said:
We Free ideas vipi bhana!!!
Unajikosesha mazari hivi hivi?
Huwezijua may be mdau mvaa pedi! Au wewe kibogoyo?

REALITY nitakuchek badae nipo kwa Ferrari naelekea Osabey kumchek rafiki yangu!
Click to expand...

hehe ushabikiriwa mkuu?maana najiamini zaidi ya mngoa kucha na meno
 
Mashaxizo said:
We Free ideas vipi bhana!!!
Unajikosesha mazari hivi hivi?
Huwezijua may be mdau mvaa pedi! Au wewe kibogoyo?

REALITY nitakuchek badae nipo kwa Ferrari naelekea Osabey kumchek rafiki yangu!
Click to expand...

Hahaa,huwa sijali vitu kama hizo man,kawaida sana il nashukuru nishafika home na sasa napika hapa
 
Free ideas said:
Una uhakika mungu yupo ama unaamini?
Click to expand...

Na uhakika yupo.
Hakuna anaeweza Proof hayupo, can u prove his absence?

Huwezi omba udhibitisho wake out of Faith, ni sawa kujaribu kuelezea science without theories n Laws.

Swali kama kwann embe likidondoka, haliendi juu bali hurudi chini, halina explanation nzuri bila kuelezea gravitational Force, of which na yenyewe una theories na law zake.

Kama ilivyo science hawezi kuwa na meno bila laws n theoriez, ndivyo na Mungu huwezi muongea nje ya imani.

Yupo ndugu ambae haamini Mungu yupo, yet hajawah kuwakataza watoto wake kwenda kanisani wala kusali.

Yupo ndugu Muislam alikuwa anautukana ukristo, lakin mwanae alipozidiwa na maradhi alialika wachungaji waje kwake kumuombea mwanae na alipona.

Mungu yupo.
 
Free ideas said:
Sorry,nilimaanisha kitabu changu
Click to expand...

Mkuu,

Napenda sana kufahamu connection ya Nimrod yule mjukuu wa Nuhu na Freemason, yule alie ratibu ujenzi wa mnara wa babeli, Engineer wa kwanza kuchora raman ya nyumba kabla ya kujenga.
 
Noel 2014 said:
Mkuu,

Napenda sana kufahamu connection ya Nimrod yule mjukuu wa Nuhu na Freemason, yule alie ratibu ujenzi wa mnara wa babeli, Engineer wa kwanza kuchora raman ya nyumba kabla ya kujenga.
Click to expand...

Nimrod hakuwa mtu mbaya kama ambavo anatafsirika amaa navounganishwa na masonic ambayo watu washaichukulia vibaya.

Alikuwa mwindaji maarufu,na alihesabika hivo katika jamii yake.Ndio aliyechora michoro ya plani ya jengo lile maarufu.Lakini kukupa habari zaid kumhusu naona ni-google katika Wikipedia ili uone wanavomwongelea katika upabde huo wa dini zenu.Maana mi kama mm ninavomju ni tofauti na wao walivomchambua.Ni sawasawa na Habar za solomon zinavokolezwa na kutiwa chumvi ama pia habar za mussa ama Ibrahim.


Ok kamata hii hapa.

Nimrod revealed

The Bible states…

Cush was the father of Nimrod, who grew to be a mighty warrior on the Earth. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; that is why it is said, “Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the LORD.” The centers of his kingdom were Babylon, Erech, Akkad and Calneh in Shinar (Genesis 10:8-10).

Many consider this to be a positive, complimentary testimony about Nimrod. It is just the opposite! First, a little background study is necessary.

Cultural Connections in the Ancient Near East

Besides the stories of the Creation and Flood in the Bible there ought to be similar stories on clay tablets found in the cultures near and around the true believers. These tablets may have a reaction, or twisted version, in their accounts of the Creation and Flood.

In the post-Flood genealogical records of Genesis 10 we note that the sons of Ham were: Cush, Mizraim, Put and Canaan. Mizraim became the Egyptians. No one is sure where Put went to live. And it is obvious who the Canaanites were. Cush lived in the “land of Shinar” which most scholars consider to be Sumer. There developed the first civilization after the Flood. The sons of Shem-the Semites-were also mixed, to some extent, with the Sumerians.

We suggest that Sumerian Kish, the first city established in Mesopotamia after the Flood, took its name from the man known in the Bible as Cush.

The first kingdom established after the Flood was Kish, and the name “Kish” appears often on clay tablets. The early post-Flood Sumerian king lists (not found in the Bible) say that “kingship descended from heaven to Kish” after the Flood. (The Hebrew name “Cush,” much later, was moved to present-day Ethiopia as migrations took place from Mesopotamia to other places.)

The Sumerians, very early, developed a religio-politico state which was extremely binding on all who lived in it (except for the rulers, who were a law unto themselves). This system was to influence the Ancient Near East for over 3000 years. Other cultures which followed the Sumerian system were Accad, Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, which became the basis of Greece and Rome's system of rule. Founded by Cush, the Sumerians were very important historically and Biblically.

Was “Nimrod” Godly or Evil?

First, what does the name Nimrod mean? It comes from the Hebrew verb marad, meaning “rebel.” Adding an “n” before the “m” it becomes an infinitive construct, “Nimrod.” (see Kautzsch 1910: 137 2b, also BDB 1962: 597). The meaning then is “The Rebel.” Thus “Nimrod” may not be the character's name at all. It is more likely a derisive term of a type, a representative, of a system that is epitomized in rebellion against the Creator, the one true God. Rebellion began soon after the Flood as civilizations were restored. At that time this person became very prominent.

In Genesis 10:8-11 we learn that “Nimrod” established a kingdom. Therefore, one would expect to find also, in the literature of the ancient Near East, a person who was a type, or example, for other people to follow. And there was. It is a well-known tale, common in Sumerian literature, of a man who fits the description. In addition to the Sumerians, the Babylonians wrote about this person; the Assyrians likewise; and the Hittites. Even in Israel, tablets have been found with this man's name on them. He was obviously the most popular hero in the Ancient Near East.

The Gilgamesh Epic

The person we are referring to found in extra-Biblical literature was Gilgamesh. The first clay tablets naming him were found among the ruins of the temple library of the god Nabu (Biblical Nebo) and the palace library of Ashurbanipal in Nineveh. Many others have been found since in a number of excavations. The author of the best treatise on the Gilgamesh Epic says,

The date of the composition of the Gilgamesh Epic can therefore be fixed at about 2000 BC. But the material contained on these tablets is undoubtedly much older, as we can infer from the mere fact that the epic consists of numerous originally independent episodes, which, of course, did not spring into existence at the time of the composition of our poem but must have been current long before they were compiled and woven together to form our epic (Alexander Heidel, 1963: 15).

Yet his arrogance, ruthlessness and depravity were a subject of grave concern for the citizens of Uruk (his kingdom). They complained to the great god Anu, and Anu instructed the goddess Aruru to create another wild ox, a double of Gilgamesh, who would challenge him and distract his mind from the warrior's daughter and the noblemen's spouse, whom it appears he would not leave in peace (Roux 1966: 114).

The Epic of Gilgamesh has some very indecent sections. Alexander Heidel, first translator of the epic, had the decency to translate the vilest parts into Latin. Spieser, however, gave it to us “straight” (Pritchard 1955: 72).

With this kind of literature in the palace, who needs pornography? Gilgamesh was a vile, filthy man. Yet the myth says of him that he was “2/3 god and 1/3 man.”

Gilgamesh is Nimrod

How does Gilgamesh compare with “Nimrod?” Ancient historian Josephus says of Nimrod,

Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah-a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny-seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence upon his own power.

He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers! (Ant. I: iv: 2)

What Josephus says here is precisely what is found in the Gilgamesh epics. Gilgamesh set up tyranny, he opposed YHWH and did his utmost to get people to forsake Him.

Two of the premiere commentators on the Bible in Hebrew have this to say about Genesis 10:9,

Nimrod was mighty in hunting, and that in opposition to YHWH; not ‘before YHWH’ in the sense of according to the will and purpose of YHWH, still less,… in a simply superlative sense… The name itself, ‘Nimrod’ from marad, ‘We will revolt,’ points to some violent resistance to God… Nimrod as a mighty hunter founded a powerful kingdom; and the founding of this kingdom is shown by the verb with consecutive to have been the consequence or result of his strength in hunting, so that hunting was intimately connected with the establishing of the kingdom. Hence, if the expression ‘a mighty hunter’ relates primarily to hunting in the literal sense, we must add to the literal meaning the figurative signification of a ‘hunter of men’ (a trapper of men by stratagem and force); Nimrod the hunter became a tyrant, a powerful hunter of men (Keil and Delitzsch 1975: 165).

“in the face of YHWH” can only mean ‘in defiance of YHWH’ as Josephus and the Targums understand it (op. cit.: 166).

And the proverb must have arisen when other daring and rebellious men followed in Nimrod's footsteps and must have originated with those who saw in such conduct an act of rebellion against the God of salvation, in other words, with the possessors of the divine promise of grace (loc. cit.).

After the Flood there was, at some point, a breakaway from YHWH. Only eight people descended from the Ark. Those people worshipped YHWH. But at some point an influential person became opposed to YHWH and gathered others to his side. I suggest that Nimrod is the one who did it. Cain had done similarly before the Flood, founding a new city and religious system.

Our English translation of the Hebrew of Genesis 10:8-10 is weak. The author of this passage of Scripture will not call Gilgamesh by his name and honor him, but is going to call him by a derisive name, what he really is-a rebel. Therefore we should translate Genesis 10:8-10 to read,

Cush begat Nimrod; he began to be a tyrant in the Earth. He was a tyrannical hunter in opposition to the Lord. Thus it is said, 'Nimrod the tyrannical opponent of YHWH.'

Likewise, Gilgamesh was a man who took control by his own strength. In Genesis 10 Nimrod is presented as a type of him. Nimrod's descendents were the ones who began building the tower in Babel where the tongues were changed. Gilgamesh is a type of early city founders.

(Page numbers below are from Alexander Heidel 1963)

He is a “shepherd” _______ page 18 From Uruk ________________ page 17 (Kramer, 1959, page 31 calls Uruk “Erech”) A giant __________________ page 17 (11 cubits) Builds cities ____________ page 17 Vile man “takes women” ___ page 18 Mighty hunter ____________ page 18

Gilgamesh Confronts YHWH!

The name of YHWH rarely appears in extra-Biblical literature in the Ancient Near East. Therefore we would not expect to find it in the Gilgamesh epic. But why should the God of the Jews rarely be mentioned? The Hebrew Bible is replete with the names of other gods.

On the other hand, the nations surely knew of Him even though
 
Kuna mwenye ushahidi wa maovu ya freemson,natoa 1million kwa atakaye uweka hapa
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Our Community

Coming Soon

Regional Communities

Coming Soon
Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register