Arduino Sentinel
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 8, 2014
- 203
- 274
Young being, stop playing stupid mind games! I have shown you the logical inconsistency of your previous posts that you asked about, now why are you trying to act smart when you're not? now if you want to break the loop of keeping on showing your stupidity, then do a very simple clever deduction as follows, First, admit you were/are wrong in most of your posts, Second, correct the mistake, Third, wait for my response(i will either let it slide, or help you fix all of the stupid mistakes you made, or keep proving how stupid and arrogant you are) Between all those possibilities i have mentioned, it's I who decide what is best for you, not you. Very simple like that, stop going around circles, you're not smart as you think, you're just less stupid than the rest of the dumb beings. You're basically helping me to execute the 3 section of the third option, You're proving how stupid and arrogant you are.In relativity, the fourth dimension is time.
Katika maisha ya kawida ili ujue kitu kipo wapi lazima uwe na coordinates, X, Y and Z (forward/backward, left/Right and Down/Up).
Sasa kwa concept hiyo nikikuelekeza uje hapa nilipo. Nitakwambia nyosha kutoka hapa ulipo kwa km 10 (X-coordinate), then kati kulia tembea km 20(Y-coordinate) ukifika hapo utaona ghorofa panda juu floor ya saba (Z-Coordinate).
Ukija nakuhakikishia hutanikuta kabisa maana sijakwambia coordinate/dimension moja ya msingi ambayo ni time kwamba mda gani nitakuwa hapo.
So if time ni coordinates/dimension ili kukamilisha directions i will tell you where and when I will be. 5km forward,(X) 10km right(Y) and 4 floors up,(Z) at 12:00am yesterday (time).
But many different observers (possibly moving observers) wanaweza observe the object at different coordinates from one another. Some may even observe the object moving. This doesn't matter however: if we know how each observer is moving, we can go from one set of coordinates to another, through what is known as a linear transformation.
But time is different. Suppose we watch a ball move erratically between two points A and B. Many different observers will give you many different accounts of the ball's coordinates. Some observers may not even see the ball change coordinates at all, if their motion happens to match the ball's. But one thing they can all agree on is the time taken for the ball to move from A to B. Time in this sense is fixed and agreed upon by everyone.
Relativity proposes however that different observers fail to agree even on the time taken. Before, they didn't agree in the space coordinates, but it didn't really matter: these three dimensions can be easily transformed from one observer to another. Now, they don't agree on space coordinates AND time, but special relativity saves the day and shows us how to transform from one set of coordinates and time to another, using a linear transformation once again.
Time has therefore been reduced to an entity that is really much like the three spatial coordinates, and that is why it is rightly regarded as a fourth dimension.
Spce-time should never be confused with time, there is space, time and spacetime. But as long as time is wrapped into space curvature in spacetime affects the fourth dimension.
PS: You're the one that keeps on confusing a complete dimension with its very own axis. In all of my statements, i have never reject the existence of time when i was trying to explain the Theory of relativity, rather i reject chini, kudumbukia, kushuka etc, and the distinction between past, present, and future that you were/are using on your posts to explain the Theory of relativity. I repeat and don't quote me wrong next time please, YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVE USING THREE DIMENSION LAWS.