Mungu is another one of those myths. Mungu and kudura are two sides of the same myth, which is rooted in ignorance and manipulation. The more humans move away from ignorance, the more kudura and mungu are exposed to be myths.
"Mungu" and "kudura" are two words used widely to sweep under the rug that which we do not understand or do not want to deal with.
I could trace the idea of a false god (or gods) being tolerated and even promoted by a non-believing ruling class back to Cicero, Marcus Aurelius and even earlier Chinese and Egyptian dynasties. Marx was hardly original in observing that religion was the opiate of the people, the Romans had it perfected right up there with the games of Circus Maximus.The educated ruling class did not believe in the Olympian gods, or any gods at all. In fact it was a badge of honor for the senatorial families to be skeptics. This remains to be the case largely up to today, educated societies have learned to accept that god is one big hoax to keep the poor in check and maintain social harmony, that the personal godhead as presented in Abrahamic religions and most other cultures is not actual.
Let's try to understand phenomena, not sweep things under the rug and resign what we do not understand or are too lazy to investigate to "kudura" and "mungu".
Kudura na mungu ni wewe mwenyewe.
You are also a simple fanatic of nothingness because Einstein's equations remains unsolved to date if you teach you simply teach abstractionI am always open to some education, especially if it involves some lofty and underlying principles of science. So I look forward to your input.
Am aware of this? Do you know how to read? Isn't this what I have been talking about by disputing the unidirectional and absolute nature of time? My entire reason for bringing Einstein in this conversation was to point this out, and you are asking me if I am aware of this? I was writing about tachyons moving back in time on my Geocities page in 1999, after learning about that for a decade. Am I aware?
You are stretching an analogy, a quantum/ subatomic one out of it's proper context. I wrote above how cause and effect are illusions of our scale in the universe, go low enough and everything becomes so probabilistic that time itself, the harbinger of "cause and effect" breaks down, and therefore causality breaks down.This is what I pointed above.
Am I aware?
This is the Doppler effect, the same effect that makes sirens sound distorted. I taught a class about this in 1996.
Am I aware?
Which is what I did by introducing Einstein's theory of relativity, which shows time - the harbinger of cause and effect- as being relative and not absolute, and therefore, cause and effect being an illusion of the large scale universe.
Who is not able to connect theory to real life to explain phenomena now?
Who is not aware now?
If you were aware of the underlying implications of Einstein's relativity you would have seen the point of my post.
You sound like you just copy pasted or reproduced something without understanding it.
Mungu is another one of those myths. Mungu and kudura are two sides of the same myth, which is rooted in ignorance and manipulation. The more humans move away from ignorance, the more kudura and mungu are exposed to be myths.
"Mungu" and "kudura" are two words used widely to sweep under the rug that which we do not understand or do not want to deal with.
I could trace the idea of a false god (or gods) being tolerated and even promoted by a non-believing ruling class back to Cicero, Marcus Aurelius and even earlier Chinese and Egyptian dynasties. Marx was hardly original in observing that religion was the opiate of the people, the Romans had it perfected right up there with the games of Circus Maximus.The educated ruling class did not believe in the Olympian gods, or any gods at all. In fact it was a badge of honor for the senatorial families to be skeptics. This remains to be the case largely up to today, educated societies have learned to accept that god is one big hoax to keep the poor in check and maintain social harmony, that the personal godhead as presented in Abrahamic religions and most other cultures is not actual.
Let's try to understand phenomena, not sweep things under the rug and resign what we do not understand or are too lazy to investigate to "kudura" and "mungu".
Kudura na mungu ni wewe mwenyewe.
It's my great honor to come before you, I trust you are doing brilliant this day..
Wana JF, ninapenda ku-share na nyinyi hili swala ambalo nimekuwa nikiliwaza wiki hii kwamba katika aspects zote za maisha ya binadamu lazima kuna vitu ambavyo tunakumbana navyo kwa pande zote mbili i.e postive and negative,
Mimi napenda ku-base kwenye negative kwamba je ni kweli kila kitu kinachokuja mbele yako ni kwaajili ya sababu maalum mbeleni au basi tu tunaunganisha matukio ili ku-justfy yale yanayotukuta???
Binafsi kuna mambo mengine naona ni "bad lucky" au kiimani naweza sema ni shetani/balaa/mikosi kwani sidhani kama kweli Mungu anakusudia kuturudisha nyuma na kutuvunja moyo kwa yale mabaya yanayotukumba..
Ningependa tujadili hili swala tukitoka nje kidogo "ki-imani" kwamba kwa atheists kama Kiranga yeye anaweza kuliona hili swala kwa mapana gani??
Lastly, Do you believe everthing happen for a reason??
Be Blessed abundantly..
Mungu is another one of those myths. Mungu and kudura are two sides of the same myth, which is rooted in ignorance and manipulation. The more humans move away from ignorance, the more kudura and mungu are exposed to be myths.
"Mungu" and "kudura" are two words used widely to sweep under the rug that which we do not understand or do not want to deal with.
I could trace the idea of a false god (or gods) being tolerated and even promoted by a non-believing ruling class back to Cicero, Marcus Aurelius and even earlier Chinese and Egyptian dynasties. Marx was hardly original in observing that religion was the opiate of the people, the Romans had it perfected right up there with the games of Circus Maximus. The educated ruling class did not believe in the Olympian gods, or any gods at all.
In fact it was a badge of honor for the senatorial families to be skeptics.
This remains to be the case largely up to today, educated societies have learned to accept that god is one big hoax to keep the poor in check and maintain social harmony, that the personal godhead as presented in Abrahamic religions and most other cultures is not actual.
Let's try to understand phenomena, not sweep things under the rug and resign what we do not understand or are too lazy to investigate to "kudura" and "mungu".
"Bad Lucky"... Ivi bahati inaweza kuwa mbaya kwl? Na hii imekaaje kitu kiwe bahati yako alafu kiwe kibaya at the same time? Me naona kikiwa kibaya basi haikuwa bahati yako ila kusema bahati mbaya mmmh!!
Mkuu "bad luck" ni kinyume cha kuwa "lucky" i.e an unfortunate state resulting from unfavorable outcomes..
Aliyaacha yatokee ili yamkomaze, yamfanye a better person, yamuandae for new level in life, yamuandae for future challenges.
So nafikiri ni sahihi kundelea kumuomba ampe nguvu (kumpigania) ya kupambana nayo.
Hapa una ya kujibu
Lakini bado kuna "yasiyojulikana" pale uliposema haya:
hatujui cause, inawezekana universe yetu hatujaielewa vizuri, inawezekana causality ime break down huko na kinachoangaliwa ni balance ya matter/antimatter kuliko cause and effect.
Huenda hatutajua!
Of course kuna yasiyojulikana.
You are also a simple fanatic of nothingness because Einstein's equations remains unsolved to date if you teach you simply teach abstraction
Proof atakuja kuishare (if she wants) when she faces bigger challenges than this one, na akaivuka salama na kwa ushindi.Where is the proof that he/she or whoever that is just let undesirable things happen (when they could have been prevented) to her just so she could be toughened up, be made a better person (what is that even?), get her ready for a new level life (what is that too?) , and prepare her for future challenges?
Can you explain to me in a very simple language as to why and how some people can see tomorrow? see and foretell future events which later happens exactly the way they were foretold?
Are you trying to say that belief in God is a sign of ignorance?
That you can't be educated and believe in God?
That you can't have an input in science as long as you believe in God?
If you follow history, you will find anything
You will find societies that believed in god/gods that had tremendous progressive ideas
You will find societies that promoted education, made contributions to science and still believed in god
At one point, it was a badge of honor to be a staunch Nazi supporter in Germany
At one point, it was a badge of honor to own slaves or to be a descendant of slave owners in America
So much for badge of honor.
What is an educated society and who is an educated person?
Belief in God does not stop a person from doing investigations or contributions to science
Sir Isaac Newton was a strong believer in God and his contribution to science is irrefutable
In fact one can say, his belief steered him in his work so he could sshow God's existence
If you don't mind, can you name me a few of those unknowns?
What lies beyond the electromagnetic waves spectrum?
What lies beyond the scope of the singularity of the big bang model?
What happens when matter attains the energy level to move faster than the speed of light and move backwards in time?
Why is matter quantized?
Why are photons quantized?
Why is quantum physics so probabilistic?
Is the Planck scale the limit of granularity?
Is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle a function of our technological impotence or due to an inherently seeded deeper reality in nature that would prove impregnable no matter what technology is used to to overcome the limitation?
What causes Einstein's "spooky action at a distance" ?
What is the largest prime number?
Will Tanzania qualify to go to the World Cup in the next 50 years?
Awesome.
Now, if we know them or if they are known to be unknowns, then how are they unknowns when they are already known?
An unknown quantity that is already known to be unknown is it still an unknown?
Can you explain to me in a very simple language as to why and how some people can see tomorrow?