Kuwa na chombo cha taifa (National flag) ni muhimu. Naona serikali ijaribu kulipa hili priority ili ATC akae katika hali nzuri na anunue ndege za kutosha. Inashangaza private firms zinakuwa more successful than National flag??? Au ???
While ATC is legendary for its less than mediocre quality control and almost nonexistent safety standards - I can recall hearing a squeaking wing this past July to attest to this personally-, the aviation industry in general, even in the confines of the best maintained and well funded airlines, is not without genuine difficulties. A case in point is the recent snafu to do with Japan Airlines' 787 fuel and other technical issues the flag carrier is having.
It remains to be seen whether this incident is a characteristic of the former or the latter.
An analysis steeped in sobriety and empiricism would require a transparent technical investigation and an open report.
While ATC is legendary for its less than mediocre quality control and almost nonexistent safety standards - I can recall hearing a squeaking wing this past July to attest to this personally-, the aviation industry in general, even in the confines of the best maintained and well funded airlines, is not without genuine difficulties. A case in point is the recent snafu to do with Japan Airlines' 787 fuel and other technical issues the flag carrier is having.
It remains to be seen whether this incident is a characteristic of the former or the latter.
An analysis steeped in sobriety and empiricism would require a transparent technical investigation and an open report.
Bro. it's both inappropriate an unprofessional of you to compare a single incident concerning one Airbus A320-200 with whatever current issues Boeing 78 is supposedly experiencing with the 787 Dreamliner.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is not only a spanking new and unproven breed of modern airliners conceptually and technologically, but a whole different animal altogether.
Dah kingereza chako wewe?! Kama mtu hajashiba hakielewi
I did not plainly compare the two, if anything I was contrasting. I made mention that even the best of airlines sporting "spanking new" planes that are "whole different animals" do have issues and a technical investigation is due before anybody starts to jump to conclusions.
Incidents involving aircraft aren't the same as accidents, and they rarely if ever warrant "technical investigations".
And moreover, comparing (or contrasting, as you may), an incident involving a Bombardier turboprop as is the case with Air Tanzania, with any shenanigans currently affecting the JAL or ANA 787 Dreamliners is hardly convincing to anyone with any modicum of credibility in the Aviation Transportation field.
So let's divine then.
Sorry dude. I'm not into divinity or whatever that's supposed to mean.
The context is not so much about divinity as it is about divination.
If you don't want the path of an investigation, you can't successfully claim that "you are not into divinity".
Well, how about asking the FAA who originally made that differentiation into a rule, and most of the aviation regulation agencies or authorities everywhere in the World who adapted that same FAA rule into their respective Aviation Code of Laws (And this being done in an virtually unadulterated fashion.)
That would fall under investigation, pray tell.
Says who?
Says you.