While you have a point, the musketeers have a responsibility to ensure that their largest income stream (advertising) is safeguarded by ensuring maximum reach. I was talking of a governmental initiative to ensure total digital migration. Indeed we already have what should be a complete Kenyan mux at 72 East. What is not clear to me is why Signet (part owned by the Kenyan Govt, I think) settled on the particular bird, with such technicality as multi-stream inherent in its TPs.
On the presence of the paytv alongside FTA, it seems to be commonplace; OSN(Nilesat), Discoveries and Sonies (IS 20) .....etc, while on costs, I thinks they also pay dearly to construct, run /maintain those unreliable masts. An advert is running on 68.5 East (Ku-band) from either the satellite owners or content aggregators (probably Sentech) talking of a starting cost of about USD 6, 500 to lease the space there per month. While to an individual this may seem much, to the KTNs and CITIZENs of this world, this is a bargain considering the footprint of the bird. Did you notice that for the many differences (and competition for souls I dare churches have, they seem to agree to broadcast from the same satellite