US Election Coverage 2008

Rev Kishoka, mi nilijua tu huyo Mzibua vyoo aka Joe the Plumber alikuwa anatafuta umaarufu na alikuwa a plant. Alishangaa kuona Obama anam-engage alafu ile comment yake that Obama's plan sounds like socialism was a talking point aliyopewa na GOP! It is best to ignore this guy and he will be forgotten.
But what about Sarah? What does Sarah want?
Huyu ameshaona mambo yameharibika kwahiyo yuko busy angling for 2012. Lakini sidhani kama atafika huko, when the dust settles the McCain camp will hang everything in her neck: not that it is fair but the jockeying has begun and it is going to get ugly. Kumbuka watu kama Schmidt hawatakubali reputation zao ziharibiwe, kwa hiyo watamsingizia Babu kuchemka katika kumteua Palin, na sasa they have put out the meme that Palin has gone rogue. So in 2 weeks time, Sarah's political career will be in jeopardy.
 
Judge tosses lawsuit challenging Obama citizenship
AP News
Saturday, October 25, 2008

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's qualifications to be president.

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit by attorney Philip J. Berg, who alleged that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency. Berg claimed that Obama is either a citizen of his father's native Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia after he moved there as a boy.

Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother and a Kenyan father. His parents divorced and his mother married an Indonesian man.

Internet-fueled conspiracy theories question whether Obama is a "natural-born citizen" as required by the Constitution for a presidential candidate and whether he lost his citizenship while living abroad.

Surrick ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters."


TRUTH I HOPE THERE'S STILL TIME TO APPEAL THIS CASE
 

Mkuu, Joe the Plumber ni One Hit Wonder..after Nov 4 hakuna atakayemkumbuka tena. Hivi kama Iraq veretans walikosa u congress kwenye ile mid term ya 2006..na wakti ule issue hot ilikuwa Iraq war huyu "mabombaa" hana chance.
 

Mi nilishangaa kwamba GOP wingnuts walikuwa tayari kugusa this with a 10 foot pole! Berg is a total nut! hata argument zake hazina uzito! It's just racism on his part, can't imagine having a Black president! kwikwikwikwiiiii
 
Pennsylvania GOP disavows inflammatory e-mail
AP News
Saturday, October 25, 2008

Pennsylvania Republicans are disavowing an e-mail sent to Jewish voters that likens a vote for Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama to events that led up to the Holocaust.

"Jewish Americans cannot afford to make the wrong decision on Tuesday, November 4th, 2008," the e-mail reads. "Many of our ancestors ignored the warning signs in the 1930s and 1940s and made a tragic mistake. Let's not make a similar one this year!"

A copy of the e-mail, provided by Democratic officials, says it was "Paid for by the Republican Federal Committee of PA - Victory 2008."

It warns "Fellow Jewish Voters" of the danger of a second Holocaust due to the threats to Israel from its neighbors and touts Republican presidential candidate John McCain's qualifications over those of Obama.

State GOP officials disavowed the e-mail and said the strategist who helped draft it had been fired.

"The Republican Party of Pennsylvania did not authorize that e-mail," Michael Barley, communications director for the state party, told The Associated Press on Saturday evening.

Barley said a "correction" would be sent out to everyone who received it.

The e-mail was sent Thursday morning to 75,000 Jewish voters.

The McCain campaign also repudiated the e-mail. Spokesman Peter Feldman said Saturday night that McCain "rejects politics that degrade our civics."

Political consultant Bryan Rudnick was identified as the person responsible for it. Rudnick, reached Saturday night, confirmed that he no longer works for the party, which employed him a few weeks ago as a consultant to do outreach to Jewish voters.

"I had authorization from party officials" to send the e-mail, Rudnick said, but he declined to say who had signed off on it. "I'm not looking to drag anyone else through the mud, so I'm not naming names right now," he said.

The e-mail also accuses Obama of teaching members of the community group ACORN "to commit voter registration fraud" during his years as a community activist.

Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., said the e-mail was part of a "smear campaign" that was among the worst he had seen in his state.
 
Mi nilishangaa kwamba GOP wingnuts walikuwa tayari kugusa this with a 10 foot pole! Berg is a total nut! hata argument zake hazina uzito! It's just racism on his part, can't imagine having a Black president! kwikwikwikwiiiii

Susu...where is The Truth? Tukimuona online tu mu encourage yeye na smear machine zao za kulia wa appeal hii kesi hata kama itasikilizwa mwaka ujao.
 
Susu...where is The Truth? Tukimuona online tu mu encourage yeye na smear machine zao za kulia wa appeal hii kesi hata kama itasikilizwa mwaka ujao.

Hahahahaaa 😀 too funny! huyo truth sijui vipi maana ameleta pumba yake hapa mpaka naona amekata tamaa!
 
Hii blog ya ma conservative (townhall.com) ina stori nzuri sana leo. Check this out.


No guarantee gas pipeline will be built
AP News
Saturday, October 25, 2008

Contrary to Gov. Sarah Palin's campaign promises to "build a pipeline quickly," the massive project to send natural gas south is still no sure thing.

TransCanada Corp. has been awarded a state license, but still needs approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which is years away. Canadian regulators must sign off on their portion. First Nation tribes in Canada are objecting to the proposed route. And even if it sails through financial and regulatory hurdles, TransCanada still has no obligation to build the pipeline.

If the company doesn't complete the project, it could still receive up to $500 million in state subsidies, with startup costs split evenly until the company tries to secure contracts to ship gas through the supply channel. Between the time TransCanada locks in shipping commitments and files for a federal permit, the state will pick up 90 percent of the tab even before ground is broken.

If TransCanada can't woo the energy companies to use its pipeline, banks won't finance the project. And unless the state or TransCanada decide to break the contract, the company must move forward with the federal permitting process for a project that would be all but doomed. The state treasury would cover most of those costs.

According to a new report by the Congressional Research Service, TransCanada and state officials may be underestimating how long the project will take; the target finish date is 2018.

Should TransCanada win federal permission to start digging, U.S. taxpayers could be on the hook, big time. Included in the company's bid is a proposal for the federal government to absorb up to $75 billion in liability over a 25-year period if the major natural gas suppliers refuse to ship their gas through the line, the CRS report said. Such a measure would require congressional approval.

Meanwhile, ConocoPhillips and BP have launched a competing project completely outside the state's process _ Denali-The Alaska Gas Pipeline _ that promises to get the job done more quickly.

Clearly, two pipelines won't be built, and already state officials acknowledge that the winners in Palin's process may end up being absorbed into a consortium with the multinational energy giants. After all, with no guaranteed gas supply, there's little need for a pipeline.

"Frankly, this continues to be one big negotiation," said Revenue Department Commissioner Pat Galvin.
 
BUt this is NO laughing matter! Hawa GOP cannot stoop lower!!!!
 
Palin allies report rising campaign tension
By BEN SMITH | 10/25/08 7:27 AM EDT

Four Republicans close to Palin said she will disregard the advice of the former Bush aides who handle her

Even as John McCain and Sarah Palin scramble to close the gap in the final days of the 2008 election, stirrings of a Palin insurgency are complicating the campaign's already-tense internal dynamics.

Four Republicans close to Palin said she has decided increasingly to disregard the advice of the former Bush aides tasked to handle her, creating occasionally tense situations as she travels the country with them. Those Palin supporters, inside the campaign and out, said Palin blames her handlers for a botched rollout and a tarnished public image — even as others in McCain's camp blame the pick of the relatively inexperienced Alaska governor, and her public performance, for McCain's decline.

"She's lost confidence in most of the people on the plane," said a senior Republican who speaks to Palin, referring to her campaign jet. He said Palin had begun to "go rogue" in some of her public pronouncements and decisions.

"I think she'd like to go more rogue," he said.

The emergence of a Palin faction comes as Republicans gird for a battle over the future of their party: Some see her as a charismatic, hawkish conservative leader with the potential, still unrealized, to cross over to attract moderate voters. Anger among Republicans who see Palin as a star and as a potential future leader has boiled over because, they say, they see other senior McCain aides preparing to blame her in the event he is defeated.

"These people are going to try and shred her after the campaign to divert blame from themselves," a McCain insider said, referring to McCain's chief strategist, Steve Schmidt, and to Nicolle Wallace, a former Bush aide who has taken a lead role in Palin's campaign. Palin's partisans blame Wallace, in particular, for Palin's avoiding of the media for days and then giving a high-stakes interview to CBS News' Katie Couric, the sometimes painful content of which the campaign allowed to be parceled out over a week.

"A number of Gov. Palin's staff have not had her best interests at heart, and they have not had the campaign's best interests at heart," the McCain insider fumed, noting that Wallace left an executive job at CBS to join the campaign.

Wallace declined to engage publicly in the finger-pointing that has consumed the campaign in the final weeks.

"I am in awe of [Palin's] strength under constant fire by the media," she said in an e-mail. "If someone wants to throw me under the bus, my personal belief is that the most graceful thing to do is to lie there."

But other McCain aides, defending Wallace, dismissed the notion that Palin was mishandled. The Alaska governor was, they argue, simply unready — "green," sloppy and incomprehensibly willing to criticize McCain for, for instance, not attacking Sen. Barack Obama for his relationship with his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Palin has in fact performed fairly well in the moments thought to be key for a vice presidential nominee: She made a good impression in her surprise rollout in Ohio and her speech to the Republican National Convention went better than the campaign could have imagined. She turned in an adequate performance at a debate against the Democratic Party's foremost debater.

But other elements of her image-making went catastrophically awry. Her dodging of the press and her nervous reliance on tight scripts in her first interview, with ABC News, became a national joke — driven home to devastating effect by "Saturday Night Live" comic Tina Fey. The Couric interview — her only unstaged appearance for a week — was "water torture," as one internal ally put it.

Some McCain aides say they had little choice with a candidate who simply wasn't ready for the national stage, and that Palin didn't forcefully object. Moments that Palin's allies see as triumphs of instinct and authenticity — the Wright suggestion, her objection to the campaign's pulling out of Michigan — they dismiss as Palin's "slips and miscommunications," that is, her own incompetence and evidence of the need for tight scripting.

But Palin partisans say she chafed at the handling.

"The campaign as a whole bought completely into what the Washington media said — that she's completely inexperienced," said a close Palin ally outside the campaign who speaks regularly to the candidate.

"Her strategy was to be trustworthy and a team player during the convention and thereafter, but she felt completely mismanaged and mishandled and ill advised," the person said. "Recently, she's gone from relying on McCain advisers who were assigned to her to relying on her own instincts."

Palin's loyalists say she's grown particularly disenchanted with the veterans of the Bush reelection campaign, including Schmidt and Wallace, and that despite her anti-intellectual rhetoric, her closest ally among her new traveling aides is a policy adviser, former National Security Council official Steve Biegun. She's also said to be close with McCain's chief foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, who prepared her for the Oct. 2 vice presidential debate.

When a McCain aide, speaking anonymously Friday to The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder, suggested that Palin's charge that Obama was "palling around with terrorists" had "escaped HQ's vetting," it was Scheunemann who fired off an angry response that the speech was "fully vetted" and that to attack Palin for it was "bullshit."

Palin's "instincts," on display in recent days, have had her opening up to the media, including a round of interviews on talk radio, cable and broadcast outlets, as well as chats with her traveling press and local reporters.

Reporters really began to notice the change last Sunday, when Palin strolled over to a local television crew in Colorado Springs.

"Get Tracey," a staffer called out, according to The New York Times, summoning spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt, who reportedly "tried several times to cut it off with a terse 'Thank you!' in between questions, to no avail." The moment may have caused ulcers in some precincts of the McCain campaign, but it was an account Palin's admirers in Washington cheered.

Palin had also sought to give meatier policy speeches, in particular on energy policy and on policy for children with disabilities; she finally gave the latter speech Friday, but had wanted to deliver it much earlier.

She's also begun to make her own ad hoc calls about the campaign's direction and the ticket's policy. McCain, for instance, has remained silent on Democrats' calls for a stimulus package of new spending, a move many conservatives oppose but that could be broadly popular. But in an interview with the conservative radio host Glenn Beck earlier this week, Palin went "off the reservation" to make the campaign policy, one aide said.

"I say, you know, when is enough enough of taxpayer dollars being thrown into this bill out there?" she asked. "This next one of the Democrats being proposed should be very, very concerning to all Americans because to me it sends a message that $700 billion bailout, maybe that was just the tip of the iceberg. No, you know, we were told when we've got to be believing if we have enough elected officials who are going to be standing strong on fiscal conservative principles and free enterprise and we have to believe that there are enough of those elected officials to say, 'No, OK, that's enough.'"

(A McCain spokeswoman said Palin's statement was "a good sentiment.")

But few imagine that Palin will be able to repair her image — and bad poll numbers — in the eleven days before the campaign ends. And the final straw for Palin and her allies was the news that the campaign had reported spending $150,000 on her clothes, turning her, again, into the butt of late-night humor.

"She never even set foot in these stores," the senior Republican said, noting Palin hadn't realized the cost when the clothes were brought to her in her Minnesota hotel room.

"It's completely out-of-control operatives," said the close ally outside the campaign. "She has no responsibility for that. It's incredibly frustrating for us and for her."

Between Palin's internal detractors and her allies, there's a middle ground: Some aides say that she's a flawed candidate whose handling exaggerated her weak spots.

"She was completely mishandled in the beginning. No one took the time to look at what her personal strengths and weaknesses are and developed a plan that made sense based on who she is as a candidate," the aide said. "Any concerns she or those close to her have about that are totally valid."

But the aide said that Palin's inexperience led her to her own mistakes:

"How she was handled allowed her weaknesses to hang out in full display."

If McCain loses, Palin's allies say that the national Republican Party hasn't seen the last of her. Politicians are sometimes formed by a signal defeat — as Bill Clinton was when he was tossed out of the Arkansas governor's mansion after his first term — and Palin would return to a state that had made her America's most popular governor and where her image as a reformer who swept aside her own party's insiders rings true, if not in the cartoon version the McCain campaign presented.

"There are people in this campaign who feel a real sense of loyalty to her and are really pleased with her performance and think she did a great job," said the McCain insider. "She has a real future in this party."
 
Hey Obantu supporters,

What do you think will happen when Obantu raises taxes to people and businesses making $250,000 and above? If you live in America and are currently working in a business that makes $250,000, don't you think that will put your job at risk? Don't you think price of goods will also go up since businesses will need to offset high taxes they are paying? Everything from gas to food to clothes you name it. When oil companies raise the price of oil to offset the high taxes and price of gas goes up who do think you will suffer? So even if you get a tax cut or tax credit from Obantu, you will still suffer more than you are doing now or even worse. I know you all want CHANGE but have you actually sat down and thought about the CHANGE Obantu is proposing?
 
Drama is unfolding in the McCain Camp....

John McCain loses temper with defeatist aides as he vows to fight to the last



The Republican presidential candidate John McCain is upset with the way some of his supporters appear to have conceded defeat

By Tim Shipman in Durango, Colorado
Last Updated: 10:49PM BST 25 Oct 2008

In heated exchanges the Republican presidential candidate made clear that he will not tolerate the blame game that some of his aides have engaged in over the last week as Barack Obama retains a comfortable lead in national and swing state polls... READ ON
 
Lots of trash talking here when all is not over and done......keep on...
 

Don't worry....If we have survived the worst Bush-McCain economic policy's regime. We will do just fine with President Barack Hussein Obama.
 

....you care about 250G wakati bracket yako ni ya Walmart janitor? dont worry u'll do better under Obama!
 

The problem you don't know the difference between sales and income, that's why you sound illiteracy on this. Business can have sales of $4,000,000 but still the income can be less than $250,000 why?. First in calculating income they exclude all expenses such as ( Cost of sales(i.e what those goods cost a business), all salaries and wages including your $30,000 p.a you receive for cleaning toilets, electicity and rents and all others, the remain or profit is what is going to be taxed) so don't worry nothing gona change on negative side but only on positive side, because you will earn more than $30,000 under Obama tax plan.
 

Thanks for the lesson in accounting but your post doesn't answer my questions. So let me repeat my questions:

1) What do you think will happen when Obantu raises taxes to people and businesses making $250,000 and above?

2) If you live in America and are currently working in a business that makes $250,000, don't you think that will put your job at risk?

3) Don't you think price of goods will also go up since businesses will need to offset high taxes they are paying?

4) When oil companies raise the price of oil to offset the high taxes and price of gas goes up who do think you will suffer?

5) I know you all want CHANGE but have you actually sat down and thought about the CHANGE Obantu is proposing?

These are simple questions that any Obantu supporter should be able to answer.
 
Don't worry....If we have survived the worst Bush-McCain economic policy's regime. We will do just fine with President Barack Hussein Obama.

But Obantu is proposing similar policies that Jimmy Carter tried and failed miserably. So I am not sure why you believe you will do just fine. I am puzzled here. So can you answer my questions now?

1) What do you think will happen when Obantu raises taxes to people and businesses making $250,000 and above?

2) If you live in America and are currently working in a business that makes $250,000, don't you think that will put your job at risk?

3) Don't you think price of goods will also go up since businesses will need to offset high taxes they are paying?

4) When oil companies raise the price of oil to offset the high taxes and price of gas goes up who do think you will suffer?

5) I know you all want CHANGE but have you actually sat down and thought about the CHANGE Obantu is proposing?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…