Kinachoendelea Syria, Mungu haoni?

[korojani]

Mwenyezi Mungu awaepushie balaa watu wa Syria na nchi zenye vita na migogoro.

 

[mgen]

BBC DOCUMENTARY

ndio nini umii++++

 

[Gavana]

ndio nini umii++++

NI DOCUMENTARY YA BBC ,

WATCH WITH UNBIASED MIND

 

[mgen]

NI DOCUMENTARY YA BBC ,

WATCH WITH UNBIASED MIND

kwani aliye andika hii

mgen kama sio ummi kambishie kwa povu...

 

[Gavana]

kwani aliye andika hii View attachment 724331 mgen kama sio ummi kambishie kwa povu...

KAWABISHIE HAO WALIOKUANDIKIA BIBLIA , NA BBC , QURAN HAIONGELEI GOSPEL YA JOHN WALA HAO WENGINE. NA HAO WASOMI NDIO TUNAWASIKILIZA HAPA HICHO WANACHOKISEMA KAMA QURAN INAVYOELEZA

TULIA USIKILIZE

 

[mgen]

KAWABISHIE HAO WALIOKUANDIKIA BIBLIA , NA BBC , QURAN HAIONGELEI GOSPEL YA JOHN WALA HAO WENGINE. NA HAO WASOMI NDIO TUNAWASIKILIZA HAPA HICHO WANACHOKISEMA KAMA QURAN INAVYOELEZA

TULIA USIKILIZE

eti kambishie Aliye Andika Biblia yaani nikambishie Mungu kama hujui Mwandishi wa kwanza wa Biblia ni Mwenyezi Mwenyewe

leo ulivyo ummii huna ujanja wa kung'amua umebakia qalalahu wasomi Allah amekuagiza

na usipo fuata furqan na kuuishi upo kwenye hasara

wapi Allah amekuagiza uwasikilize wasomi

 

[Gavana]

eti kambishie Aliye Andika Biblia yaani nikambishie Mungu kama hujui Mwandishi wa kwanza wa Biblia ni Mwenyezi Mwenyewe View attachment 724558 leo ulivyo ummii huna ujanja wa kung'amua umebakia qalalahu wasomi Allah amekuagiza View attachment 724559 na usipo fuata furqan na kuuishi upo kwenye hasara View attachment 724560 View attachment 724561 wapi Allah amekuagiza uwasikilize wasomi

Umebaki kutapa tapa hao waliokuletea biblia na kukufundisha Ukristo hutaki kuwasikiliza tena??

Poa wasikilize upate kuokoka ,

 

[mgen]

Umebaki kutapa tapa hao waliokuletea biblia na kukufundisha Ukristo hutaki kuwasikiliza tena??

Poa wasikilize upate kuokoka ,

wee Umevurugwa sio bure Mungu Yesu Mwenyewe ndie Mwalimu wangu na ndiye aliye fikishia Viumbe vyote Mafundisho Yake, kupitia dhamira Njema aliyo tuumbia ndani Yetu ndio sababu sihitaji profesa anifundishe, usiibe, usizini, usiue...kama wewe umefundishwa na mtu ujue bila shaka dhamira Njema aliyo kuumbia Mwenyezi ndani yako imejifia na kabla hujafundishwa sijui hali yako ilikuwaje ndio sababu unapokea kila taka unaona gado sishangai mkilana kifisifisi na kupiga kata3 unaona ni ruksa, sababu eti umefundishwa na mtu au imeandikwa pahala basi ruksa

 

[Gavana]

wee Umevurugwa sio bure Mungu Yesu Mwenyewe ndie Mwalimu wangu na ndiye aliye fikishia Viumbe vyote Mafundisho Yake, kupitia dhamira Njema aliyo tuumbia ndani Yetu ndio sababu sihitaji profesa anifundishe, usiibe, usizini, usiue...kama wewe umefundishwa na mtu ujue bila shaka dhamira Njema aliyo kuumbia Mwenyezi ndani yako imejifia na kabla hujafundishwa sijui hali yako ilikuwaje ndio sababu unapokea kila taka unaona gado sishangai mkilana kifisifisi na kupiga kata3 unaona ni ruksa, sababu eti umefundishwa na mtu au imeandikwa pahala basi ruksa

Hayo mafundisho unayotamba nayo , hilo kanisa lako linasema wao wameandika , na kuchakachua ,usinibishie mimi , libishie kanisa lako


USHAHIDI HUU HAPA


Most shocking of all, the Roman Catholic Church herself admits to the forgery of the Holy Scriptures. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, page 136, gives us this admission.


"Substitution of false documents and tampering with genuine ones was quite a trade in the Middle Ages. Innocent III (1198) points out nine species of forgery [of ecclesiastical records] which had come under his notice.
But such frauds of the Church were not confined to the Middle Ages; they begin even with the beginning of the Church and infest every period of its history for fifteen hundred years and defile nearly every document, both of "Scriptures" and of Church aggrandizement. As truly said by Collins, in his celebrated Discourse of Free Thinking:

"In Short, these frauds are very common in all books which are published by priests or priestly men... For it is certain they may plead the authority of the Fathers for Forgery, Corruption and mangling of Authors, with more reason than for any of their Articles of Faith.."(p.96.)

So by forging, altering, and changing the Holy Scriptures, including the inspired record of God's teachings, Christianity has brought forth a pagan God-savior and a way of life in complete opposition to God's Laws.

 

[Gavana]

wee Umevurugwa sio bure Mungu Yesu Mwenyewe ndie Mwalimu wangu na ndiye aliye fikishia Viumbe vyote Mafundisho Yake, kupitia dhamira Njema aliyo tuumbia ndani Yetu ndio sababu sihitaji profesa anifundishe, usiibe, usizini, usiue...kama wewe umefundishwa na mtu ujue bila shaka dhamira Njema aliyo kuumbia Mwenyezi ndani yako imejifia na kabla hujafundishwa sijui hali yako ilikuwaje ndio sababu unapokea kila taka unaona gado sishangai mkilana kifisifisi na kupiga kata3 unaona ni ruksa, sababu eti umefundishwa na mtu au imeandikwa pahala basi ruksa

SORRY CHARLIE

USHAHIDI MWENGINE HUU, KUTOKA KANISA LAKO

The Church claims that "the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), yet no supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any of the earliest Gospels of Mark available.

A resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ is the sine qua non ("without which, nothing") of Christianity (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), confirmed by words attributed to Paul: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain" (1 Cor. 5:17).

The resurrection verses in today's Gospels of Mark are universally acknowledged as forgeries and the Church agrees, saying "the conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine ... almost the entire section is a later compilation" (Encyclopaedia Biblica, vol. ii, p. 1880, vol. iii, pp. 1767, 1781; also, Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. iii, under the heading "The Evidence of its Spuriousness"; Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, pp. 274-9 under heading "Canons"). Undaunted, however, the Church accepted the forgery into its dogma and made it the basis of Christianity.

The trend of fictitious resurrection narratives continues. The final chapter of the Gospel of John (21) is a sixth-century forgery, one entirely devoted to describing Jesus' resurrection to his disciples.

The Church admits: "The sole conclusion that can be deduced from this is that the 21st chapter was afterwards added and is therefore to be regarded as an appendix to the Gospel" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. viii, pp. 441-442; New Catholic Encyclopedia (NCE), "Gospel of John", p. 1080; also NCE, vol. xii, p. 407).

 

[mgen]

SORRY CHARLIE

USHAHIDI MWENGINE HUU, KUTOKA KANISA LAKO

The Church claims that "the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), yet no supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any of the earliest Gospels of Mark available.

A resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ is the sine qua non ("without which, nothing") of Christianity (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), confirmed by words attributed to Paul: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain" (1 Cor. 5:17).

The resurrection verses in today's Gospels of Mark are universally acknowledged as forgeries and the Church agrees, saying "the conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine ... almost the entire section is a later compilation" (Encyclopaedia Biblica, vol. ii, p. 1880, vol. iii, pp. 1767, 1781; also, Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. iii, under the heading "The Evidence of its Spuriousness"; Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, pp. 274-9 under heading "Canons"). Undaunted, however, the Church accepted the forgery into its dogma and made it the basis of Christianity.

The trend of fictitious resurrection narratives continues. The final chapter of the Gospel of John (21) is a sixth-century forgery, one entirely devoted to describing Jesus' resurrection to his disciples.

The Church admits: "The sole conclusion that can be deduced from this is that the 21st chapter was afterwards added and is therefore to be regarded as an appendix to the Gospel" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. viii, pp. 441-442; New Catholic Encyclopedia (NCE), "Gospel of John", p. 1080; also NCE, vol. xii, p. 407).

kama waliongeza au walipunguza tatizo liko wapi wakati Yesu Mwenyewe Aliwaruhusu

ni heri kwako hizi c$p ungepeleka msikitini wangekuelewa, na zawadi ya takbir ungezawadiwa lakini humu wakristo wanakushangaa kwa kujifanya mwalimu wao wakati huna sifa wala mamlaka

 

[Gavana]

kama waliongeza au walipunguza tatizo liko wapi wakati Yesu Mwenyewe Aliwaruhusu View attachment 725428 ni heri kwako hizi c$p ungepeleka msikitini wangekuelewa, na zawadi ya takbir ungezawadiwa lakini humu wakristo wanakushangaa kwa kujifanya mwalimu wao wakati huna sifa wala mamlaka

Kumbe wazee wa kanisa walipewa Funguo za Kuchakachua Biblia ???

Kweli injili yako ya Vodka imo kichwani


The conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine … almost the entire section is a later compilation’.

(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Vol., iii, p. 274, published under the Imprimatur of Archbishop Farley; also, ‘Encyclopedia Biblica’, ii, 1880; 1767, n. 3; 1781, and n. 1, on ‘The Evidence of its Spuriousness’)

The Vatican claims that ‘the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792), adding that a resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ is the ‘sine qua non’ of Christianity, ‘without which, nothing’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792). St. Paul agreed, saying; ‘If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain’ (1 Cor. 15:17). Yet no appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in the oldest Gospel in the oldest Bible in the world. Nor are there resurrection narratives in any other old Bibles, for a comparison shows they are non-existent in the Alexandrian Bible, the Vatican Bible, the Bezae Bible and an ancient Latin manuscript of Mark code-named ‘K’ by analysts. Some manuscripts of the 15th and 16th centuries have the fictitious verses written in asterisks, a mark used by ancient scribes to indicate spurious passages in a literary document. Resurrection narratives are also absent in the oldest Armenian version of the New Testament, and a number of Sixth Century manuscripts of the Ethiopic version. That is because the resurrection narratives in today’s Gospels of Mark are later priesthood forgeries.

‘When we turn to the internal evidence, the number, and still more the character, of the peculiarities is certainly striking [citing many instances from the Greek text]. But, even when this is said, the cumulative force of the evidence against the Mark origin of the passage is considerable. The combination of so many peculiar features, not only of vocabulary, but of matter and construction, leaves room for doubt as to Mark’s authorship of the verses. Whatever the fact be, it is not at all certain that Mark wrote the disputed verses. It may be that they are from the pen of some other inspired writer [!], and were appended to the Gospel in later times. Catholics are not bound to hold that the verses were written by St. Mark. But they are canonical scripture, for the Council of Trent [Session IV], in defining that all later parts of the New Testament are to be received as sacred and canonical, had especially in view the disputed parts of the Gospels, of which this conclusion of Mark is one. Hence, whoever wrote the verses, we say that they are inspired, and must be received as such by every Catholic’.

(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed. Vol. ix, pp. 677, 678, 679)

"How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us and our forefathers".
Pope Leo X (d. 1521)

 

[nyiokunda]

Waarabu hopeless

 

[mgen]

Kumbe wazee wa kanisa walipewa Funguo za Kuchakachua Biblia ???

Kweli injili yako ya Vodka imo kichwani


The conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine … almost the entire section is a later compilation’.

(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Vol., iii, p. 274, published under the Imprimatur of Archbishop Farley; also, ‘Encyclopedia Biblica’, ii, 1880; 1767, n. 3; 1781, and n. 1, on ‘The Evidence of its Spuriousness’)

The Vatican claims that ‘the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792), adding that a resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ is the ‘sine qua non’ of Christianity, ‘without which, nothing’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792). St. Paul agreed, saying; ‘If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain’ (1 Cor. 15:17). Yet no appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in the oldest Gospel in the oldest Bible in the world. Nor are there resurrection narratives in any other old Bibles, for a comparison shows they are non-existent in the Alexandrian Bible, the Vatican Bible, the Bezae Bible and an ancient Latin manuscript of Mark code-named ‘K’ by analysts. Some manuscripts of the 15th and 16th centuries have the fictitious verses written in asterisks, a mark used by ancient scribes to indicate spurious passages in a literary document. Resurrection narratives are also absent in the oldest Armenian version of the New Testament, and a number of Sixth Century manuscripts of the Ethiopic version. That is because the resurrection narratives in today’s Gospels of Mark are later priesthood forgeries.

‘When we turn to the internal evidence, the number, and still more the character, of the peculiarities is certainly striking [citing many instances from the Greek text]. But, even when this is said, the cumulative force of the evidence against the Mark origin of the passage is considerable. The combination of so many peculiar features, not only of vocabulary, but of matter and construction, leaves room for doubt as to Mark’s authorship of the verses. Whatever the fact be, it is not at all certain that Mark wrote the disputed verses. It may be that they are from the pen of some other inspired writer [!], and were appended to the Gospel in later times. Catholics are not bound to hold that the verses were written by St. Mark. But they are canonical scripture, for the Council of Trent [Session IV], in defining that all later parts of the New Testament are to be received as sacred and canonical, had especially in view the disputed parts of the Gospels, of which this conclusion of Mark is one. Hence, whoever wrote the verses, we say that they are inspired, and must be received as such by every Catholic’.

(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed. Vol. ix, pp. 677, 678, 679)

"How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us and our forefathers".
Pope Leo X (d. 1521)

Biblia Takatifu

imekamilika kama sivyo jibu haya maswali

 

[Gavana]

Biblia Takatifu View attachment 726119 imekamilika kama sivyo jibu haya maswali View attachment 726118

Injili yako ya konyagi inafanya kazi yake?? Wanaosema biblia imechakachuliwa ni Kanisa lako ,si Gavana na umesema mwenyewe walipewa
ufunguo wa kuchakachulia😛😛

Maswali yako wape wazee wa kanisa lako waliopewa hizo funguo za uchakachuaji😛😛

 

[mgen]

Injili yako ya konyagi inafanya kazi yake?? Wanaosema biblia imechakachuliwa ni Kanisa lako ,si Gavana na umesema mwenyewe walipewa
ufunguo wa kuchakachulia😛😛

Maswali yako wape wazee wa kanisa lako waliopewa hizo funguo za uchakachuaji😛😛

Biblia Takatifu tunayo Mkononi Imekamilika na Mwandishi wa kwanza wa Biblia Takatifu ni Mungu Mwenyewe

wewe unaedai imechakakachuliwa lazima ujibu haya

kama huna majibu jidunge ndoba usepe

 

[Kiti Chema]

Nani kasema washambuliaji wanafata maagizo ya Mungu ??.

Unajua maana ya ufunuo ??. Sasa ufunuo ni maono yamambo yatakayokua yanatokea either nimazur au mabaya.

Kasome kitabu cha Isaya ..utajua kwann syria ,iran,misri ,tunisia,libya, n.k kwann zimekua ivi zilivyo ?.

Mimi sio theologian ila naamin wakati mwingine mambo haya yanatokea sawa sawa na maandiko kwasababu Mungu anataka watu wamjue.. Ukiingia ndani sanaaaaaaaaaaa utagundua mambo haya yanatokea ili kuhakikisha UKRISTO unaingia ktk nchi za Kiarabu.

Ukifatilia sanaaaaaa utagundua Mzozo wa mashariki ya kati SIO kitu bali ni mzozo wa DINI TU.

Kitu cha kuongezea katika hili hamjui yakwamba ujio wa mwana kondoo utakuwa na dhikii kuu na matetemeko katika nchi pia ukisoma katika kitabu cha ufunuo kinaelezea jinsi taifa na taifa itakapo kwenda kupigana na nchi itajaa damu pia ukiendelea kusoma hapo ndipo itatokea vita ya MAGUGO. Usiombe sana hii vita ya magugo ikukute ukiwa bado upo hai maana imeandikwa ndege watakuwa mizogo ya binadamu na bahari itajaa damu kina cha mita 6000 na upana wa 1200000 mita, Na hizo ndizo dariri za mwisho wa dunia

 

[Tajiri Tanzanite]

Mungu nasema acha magugu na mimeo vikue pamoja ila siku ya mavuno......

Huja jibu chochote.. Acha siasa

 

[Tajiri Tanzanite]

Mkuu hata ukinitisha wala sitatishika, utakua unafanya kazi bure, nina uhakika Mungu hayupo na kama yupo basi baada ya kuumba ulimwengu na kanuni zake aliutelekeza ujiendeshe wenyewe, akajitoa kwenye kuingilia maisha ya watu moja kwa moja.

Anyway, rafiki Mungu ametupa sisi uhuru na mamlaka Ya kujitawala, Mungu ametupa akili ili ituwezesha kujua jema na baya kwa hao wanaowauwa watu ni Mungu ndio anawapa silaha na kuwaambia uwanani no....usiombe Mungu a contral Dunia au ulimwengu direct tutakwisha...Sisi ni Miungu wadogo hivyo uwezo wa kuishi Duniani kwa amani bdo ipo ndani Ya uwezo wa mwanadamu mwenyewe..Tume Miss use Utashi wetu.

Hakuna Mungu, hakuna kitu kama hicho.

 

[Gavana]

Biblia Takatifu tunayo Mkononi Imekamilika na Mwandishi wa kwanza wa Biblia Takatifu ni Mungu Mwenyewe View attachment 726342 wewe unaedai imechakakachuliwa lazima ujibu haya View attachment 726341 kama huna majibu jidunge ndoba usepe

Mbona unamfanya GAVANA ndiye kanisa lako ???

Wajibu wazee wako wa kanisa waliochakachua biblia na bila aibu wakakuandikia wewe , kazi kwako kuabudu uchakachuaji au kulipa talaka kanisa


The conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine … almost the entire section is a later compilation’.

(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Vol., iii, p. 274, published under the Imprimatur of Archbishop Farley; also, ‘Encyclopedia Biblica’, ii, 1880; 1767, n. 3; 1781, and n. 1, on ‘The Evidence of its Spuriousness’)

The Vatican claims that ‘the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792), adding that a resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ is the ‘sine qua non’ of Christianity, ‘without which, nothing’ (‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed., Vol., xii, p. 792).

St. Paul agreed, saying; ‘If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in vain’ (1 Cor. 15:17).

Yet no appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in the oldest Gospel in the oldest Bible in the world.

Nor are there resurrection narratives in any other old Bibles, for a comparison shows they are non-existent in the Alexandrian Bible, the Vatican Bible, the Bezae Bible and an ancient Latin manuscript of Mark code-named ‘K’ by analysts.

Some manuscripts of the 15th and 16th centuries have the fictitious verses written in asterisks, a mark used by ancient scribes to indicate spurious passages in a literary document.

Resurrection narratives are also absent in the oldest Armenian version of the New Testament, and a number of Sixth Century manuscripts of the Ethiopic version.

That is because the resurrection narratives in today’s Gospels of Mark are later priesthood forgeries.


‘When we turn to the internal evidence, the number, and still more the character, of the peculiarities is certainly striking [citing many instances from the Greek text].

But, even when this is said, the cumulative force of the evidence against the Mark origin of the passage is considerable.

The combination of so many peculiar features, not only of vocabulary, but of matter and construction, leaves room for doubt as to Mark’s authorship of the verses.

Whatever the fact be, it is not at all certain that Mark wrote the disputed verses.

It may be that they are from the pen of some other inspired writer [!], and were appended to the Gospel in later times.

Catholics are not bound to hold that the verses were written by St. Mark. But they are canonical scripture, for the Council of Trent [Session IV], in defining that all later parts of the New Testament are to be received as sacred and canonical, had especially in view the disputed parts of the Gospels, of which this conclusion of Mark is one.

Hence, whoever wrote the verses, we say that they are inspired, and must be received as such by every Catholic’.
(‘Catholic Encyclopedia’, Farley Ed. Vol. ix, pp. 677, 678, 679)

"How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us and our forefathers".
Pope Leo X (d. 1521)