Kobello
JF-Expert Member
- Feb 20, 2011
- 9,228
- 8,922
Nope,Your logic must also be all fucked up...you seem not to comprehend the significance of tol's reasoning, could this be intentional?
Because 2005 budget was only 4.2 trillion shillings and exchange rate was 1167, so the total budget was roughly 3.5 bn $ and was 40% dependent.
Current budget stands at 10bn$, so you can tell that the numbers are all fvcked up. That article by whoever, can easily be discredited based on poor conversion. Putting a budget in terms of tens of millions is absurd, and it showed a lack of proof reading, if not understanding.
It's actually stupid to copy such an analysis.