Think about the opposite, can you show that God does not exist?
You cannot prove a negative. Whatever proof I may claim to show that god does not exist, there is always the unknown. For this reason, between the one who say "God exists" (you) and the one who says "I do not know that god exists (which is not the same thing as saying "god does not exist) the burden of proof is always on the one saying "God exists.
Polisi wakija nyumbani kwako na kusema una madawa ya kulevya umeyaficha sehemu, na wewe ukasema huna madawa ya kulevya, mwenye kazi ya kuprove ni yule anayesema madawa ya kulevya yapo. Kamwe huwezi kuambiwa "prove kwamba madawa ya kulevya hayapo nyumbani mwako" kwa sababu hata ukiiturn nyumba yako inside out, always kuna chance umeyaweka chimbo ambalo halijafikiwa. Ndiyo maana logic ya "search warrant" ni kwamba law enforcement ifanye search na kutoa kithibitishi, wala hakuna logic ya kutaka mwenye nyumba a prove kwamba hana madawa ya kulevya.
Once again, the burden of proof is on you and all who say there is a god. Suppose I say that I am not necessarily saying there is no god, I simply want you to prove to me, how will you do that?
The main problem here is a failure of humans to remember, we are creatures of short memory and we have adapted to rely on documentation, the question is whose documentation?.
Absolutely, if you read Jewish mythology of course you will get a worldview that says the Jews are a chosen people, god gets angry, kills the innocent and such nonsense. I reject such outdated mythologies as gods word. If you study the scriptures you will see they are full of human error and contradictions.
Consider Adolf Hitler's Holocaust which occurred during WW2, some survivors are still alive, concentration camps are still standing and yet some people including politicians and academicians are in denial of its existence.
I am glad you mentioned this. What kind of god, especially if he is supposed to be an all loving, all powerful god, would allow a world to have a Holocaust like that? Where innocent children get burned for no reason? Was god not able to stop that? Or did he just not care?
What will happen hundreds of years from now when all survivors will be dead and camps demolished? Of course they will turn to science and historians, archeologist will excavate camp areas and will find no evidence for their existence and publish it in a would be very respected scientific journals and historians also will quote very prominent dead current holocaust deniers to prove that holocaust never existed.
Absolute hogwash, the evidence that document the Holocaust far outweigh any crackpot theorist who denies it. Quit reading too much into these crackpot theories.
The existence of God from the beginning is documented in books which are not popular at this time of human existence.
Can you be specific? Which books? Do you believe anything documented in books? Ptolemy documented in books that the universe is made of spheres holding the wanderers and the stars, but was he right? Aristotle documented that bodies of different masses fall down at different rates, but was he right? Bush and his administration documented that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, but was he right? Just because something is documented in books does not make it right. If that was the case, then what do you say about opposing views printed in different books? Scratch that book angle, it does not prove anything to be published, unpopularly or popularly, let's discuss the contents of these books.
So we turn to other sources including science (archeology, astronomy, evolution, big bang etc) and ancient manuscripts discovered by archeologists or stored somewhere. Interestingly, all archeological discoveries have not disapproved in what is documented in the Bible, instead it has strengthened its narratives.
I do not dispute that *some* of the bible is historical. I read all about the Dead Sea Scrolls, Nag Hamadi Library and all the other Gnostic books that did not make it through Constantine's "Council of Nicea" where the current Christian bible was edited to man's desire (Constantine). Mpaka hapo utaona the scriptures are not godly, but man made.
The fact that the bible is historical does not prove god exists, if anything, it only enforces my earlier argument that the bible is borne out of Jewish mythology and history, and it is not god given.
There is an archeological consensus that there was a Historical Jesus Christ,
This does not prove there is a god
There was a Roman Empire ruling Jerusalem at his time,
This does not prove there is a god
There was a Solomon Temple built in Jerusalem,
This does not prove there is a god
There was King David in Israel, There was a Babylonian and Persian Empire, There was Daniel living in Persia (his grave is in today's Iran), There was a historical Queen Esther in Persia (her grave is in today's Iran), There was Jacob, Isaac and Abraham, Their bodies are buried in the cave of Patriachs in Israel. There are also Archeological evidence to support Noah's flood and the list goes on and on
None of this proves there is a god, my main issue.
Kama unataka vitabu tu, kuna vitabu vya ma Buddhist, just as ancient if not even more elegant than the Judeo-Christian tradition. These books say the opposite, that there is no god. So this doesn't impress anybody who understand the core issues here.
It is a silly idea to draw a conclusion that God does not exist simply because science hasn't proven it
Fine, I told you before. I don't know that god exists (which is not the same thing as saying god does not exist) now can you prove to me that god exists?
while discrediting his own words carefully documented and passed down from generation to generation throughout human history.
If we haven't established that god exists (up to now you haven't) how can you validate this unproven god by "his words"? Isn't that putting the cart before the horse?
Unataka ku prove kwamba mungu yupo, kabla hujaprove kwamba mungu yupo, unatumia maneno ya kitabu ambayo hayaprove chochote zaidi ya wafalme fulani waliishi muda fulani na watu fulani waliishi, halafu unasema hiyo ndiyo proof yako kwamba mungu ana exist?
Unaona fault ya logic yako?