wakenya na chuki zao za migogoro hatari ya ardhi.

kadoda11

kadoda11

JF-Expert Member
Jan 6, 2011
21,453
20,736
mda mchache uliopita,mwanasiasa mashuhuri nchini kenya na senator wa jiji la nairobi,mike mbuvi almaarufu kama mike sonko,ameruhusu polisi waue kwa risasi mtu yoyote atakaye kutwa anavamia eneo lake makazi huko karen-kusini mashariki mwa Nairobi.

ametoa kauli hiyo baada ya kupost video inayo onyesha watu wakivamia eneo lake.

12032f5cd5213b49ae1bdaf529112c05.jpg

71b3c1213133669a5493d7f9ba519d90.jpg
 
ALOYCE MPANDANA said:
Kwan kauli ngapi zimetolewa Tanzania na amjafanya kitu
Click to expand...
kama zipo ziweke hapa...pia usisahau kuweka na majina ya hao viongozi waliotoa kauli za kuhalalisha vyombo vya dola vifanye mauaji kwa raia wanaovunja sheria.

Mara nyingi viongozi wa Tz wanatumia kauli "tutawashughulikia"..." wafikishwe kwenye vyombo vya dola"..."sheria ifate mkondo wake".

hili la mike sonko ni la kikenya kenya.ndio unyang'au wenyewe huu.
 
Maneno Mabaya na hatari kabisa!!
Hilo liliwahi tokea kwa Sumaye
lakini hakuweza kutoa maneno kama hayo!!
Kauli kama hizo
huyo hastahili kuwa kiongozi tena
ajabu wapo watakae mtetea mtu huyo!!
 
kadoda11 said:
kama zipo ziweke hapa...pia usisahau kuweka na majina ya hao viongozi waliotoa kauli za kuhalalisha vyombo vya dola vifanye mauaji kwa raia wanaovunja sheria.

Mara nyingi viongozi wa Tz wanatumia kauli "tutawashughulikia"..." wafikishwe kwenye vyombo vya dola"..."sheria ifate mkondo wake".

hili la mike sonko ni la kikenya kenya.ndio unyang'au wenyewe huu.
Click to expand...

Asije tokea kiongozi Tanzania akaropoka ujinga huo!
 
MOTOCHINI said:
Maneno Mabaya na hatari kabisa!!
Hilo liliwahi tokea kwa Sumaye
lakini hakuweza kutoa maneno kama hayo!!
Kauli kama hizo
huyo hastahili kuwa kiongozi tena
ajabu wapo watakae mtetea mtu huyo!!
Click to expand...
wakenya ile dhambi ya chuki ya ukabila bado inawaandama sana.
 
kadoda11 said:
mkuu,kwa mtu mwenye wadhifa wa kisiasa kama yeye,ni jambo sahihi kutoa kauli ya kuhalalisha mauaji?.

kauli kama hiyo ingetolewa na mwanasiasa wa Tz,hali ingekuwaje?.
Click to expand...
mkuu, sijawahi kubaliana nawe kwa hoja lolote kisa ushabiki wako, lakini kwa hili naona una point. Huyu mjamaa sonko ana historia ndefu ya kukurupukwa na maneno/vitendo. Hiyo kauli yake ni ya uchochezi, nangojea vyombo vya dola hasa polisi vitoe statement, au zaidi wamfikishe kituoni ajieleze.
 
Quickly said:
mkuu, sijawahi kubaliana nawe kwa hoja lolote kisa ushabiki wako, lakini kwa hili naona una point. Huyu mjamaa sonko ana historia ndefu ya kukurupukwa na maneno/vitendo. Hiyo kauli yake ni ya uchochezi, nangojea vyombo vya dola hasa polisi vitoe statement, au zaidi wamfikishe kituoni ajieleze.
Click to expand...
 
kadoda11 said:
mkuu,kwa mtu mwenye wadhifa wa kisiasa kama yeye,ni jambo sahihi kutoa kauli ya kuhalalisha mauaji?.

kauli kama hiyo ingetolewa na mwanasiasa wa Tz,hali ingekuwaje?.
Click to expand...
Hawa lazma wapigane mwaka huu hizi kauli zimeanza siku nyingi tena toka kwa Uhuru mwenyewe angalia kesi ya karatasi za kura za Urais, pata picha Uhuru kapinga hukumu akitoa sababu ya uchochezi ya aibu na ya kujenga uhasama wa kikabila ati Majaji wana undugu na Aida Odinga.

Pili Mdahalo kakataa kuhudhuria pia ati kisa waendeshaji walisomeshwa na mfuko wa scholarship ya Jaramogi Odinga. Sasa Rais mzima anatoa sababu za kujenga chuki na kukuza uhasama baina ya makabila ya Kenya, hivi kweli atakubali matokeo akianguka? Yangu macho ila hali ni tense kidogo kutalipuka...

Damned if they do, and damned if they don’t: Judiciary’s dilemma

MONDAY JULY 24 2017

[https://www]

Judges of Kenya’s Court of Appeal when they made a ruling, okaying the printing of ballot papers in Dubai. PHOTO FILE | NMG

In Summary

The Judiciary has come under scrutiny not only for the poll-related cases currently in courtChief Justice David Maraga, who is also the chair of the Judiciary Committee on Election Petitions and president of the Supreme Court, has expressed concern that the Judiciary is likely to be overwhelmed by the many petitions expectedIn June, a three-judge Bench Court of Appeal ruled that presidential results declared at the constituency level will be final,

ADVERTISEMENT

With two weeks to Kenya’s elections, the Judiciary has come under scrutiny not only for the poll-related cases currently in court, but also its preparedness in dealing with the election petitions that are bound to follow.

Having upheld President Uhuru Kenyatta’s election victory in 2013 after petition by Raila Odinga, all eyes are now trained on the Supreme Court and how it is likely to rule should another petition arise from the presidential election result.

President Kenyatta and his deputy, William Ruto, have added insult to injury with recent attacks on the Judiciary for allegedly “favouring” the opposition National Super Alliance (Nasa) in judgments on election-related petitions.

But the recent Court of Appeal ruling that overturned an earlier High Court decision to allow Dubai-based firm Al-Gurair Printing and Publishing Company to go ahead with the printing of presidential ballot papers seemed to temporarily ease the pressure on the Judiciary.

Chief Justice David Maraga, who is also the chair of the Judiciary Committee on Election Petitions and president of the Supreme Court, has expressed concern that the Judiciary is likely to be overwhelmed by the many petitions expected, since its is lacking in numbers and financial resources.

Justice Maraga lamented that the National Assembly had thwarted several attempts by the Judiciary to increase the number of days for the hearing of presidential petitions from 14 to 30.

During the 11th Parliament, the Judiciary had four times written to MPs to increase the time limit for presidential petition on grounds that the current period is too short, but maintained that Kenya is politically sensitive and not having a sworn-in president in office for 30 days would create instability.

“Despite these challenges, the judges and magistrates are ready; we will have to work hard and fast, even if it involves sitting late hours and over the weekend,” said the CJ at a stakeholders meeting at a Nairobi hotel on July 17.

Justice Maraga added that the Judiciary has met with various agencies concerned with elections and that it is ready to deal with the petitions that will arise, even though he is concerned that they will disrupt the timetable and resolution of other matters, such as commercial disputes.

In 2013, the Supreme Court, led by then Chief Justice Dr Willy Mutunga, threw out Mr Odinga’s 839-page affidavit because it was time-barred.

The opposition, then under the defunct Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord), cried foul, saying that their evidence was thrown out on a technicality.

READ: Uhuru victory gives EA another youthful president
But Paul Mwangi, Mr Odinga’s lawyer, told The EastAfrican that the opposition does not think that the 14-day period will be a major challenge this time.

The Judiciary had argued that the Supreme Court has only five days to look at the substance of the presidential petition and make a ruling.

The rest of the days are used for pretrial hearing, exchange of documents between parties and other formalities.

Following the 2013 experience, the Judiciary Committee on Elections (JCE) was born in August 2015 as a standing committee to provide a mechanism to assist the Judiciary to continuously prepare for and discharge its mandate on election disputes resolution.

The JCE chairperson, Justice Mbogholi Msagha, is also concerned that the operations of the judiciary may be impaired because of the lack of funds, because it had asked the Treasury for Ksh1.9 billion ($18.3 million) but only got Ksh200 million ($1.9 million).

The Judiciary is expecting between 400-500 petitions arising from the 2017 election from presidential to gubernatorial, MPs and petitions for the members of County Assembly. There were 187 election disputes the ended in court after the 2013 election.

But the biggest challenge for the judiciary is the recent criticism and threats by President Kenyatta and his Jubilee officials.

READ: IEBC promises credible polling despite legal hurdles

In June, a three-judge Bench Court of Appeal ruled that presidential results declared at the constituency level will be final, after the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission had appealed against a similar ruling by the High Court in April that had been filed by Nasa.

Again on July 7, a three-judge High Court Bench nullified the tender that was awarded to Al Ghurair to print the presidential ballot papers, on the grounds that it failed to follow the laid-down procedures.

Immediately, President Kenyatta and Mr Ruto accused the Judiciary of working with the the opposition to have the August 8 polls postponed. This attracted condemnation from opposition who accused Jubilee of trying to intimidate the judiciary ahead of the elections.

Kenya's judiciary dilemma






Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Nasema wapigwe tu maana hakuna namna nyingine tena......Pinda former PM

Yaani mnamkuta mtu na meno ya tembo afu bado mnataka ushahidi gani mwingine polisi wamlaze chini mapema mtu huyo....Mnamjua mwenyewe aliyesema hivyo.

Tombatomba idevice Model TH 45
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Back
Top Bottom
Forums
New posts
Post thread
Back