USA are not able to overcome S-300 air defense system

[Elungata]

MOP wala haiwezi kuwatisha irani kusitisha programme yake,hilo ni drum tu limejazwa milipuko na lazima libebwe na kuangushwa juu ya target kwani sio guided.hiyo ndege ya kulibeba haitaweza kupenya hadi kuifikia target,wataitungua.
wangekua irani wanagwaya hilo pipa basi wao ndo wangekua desperete kufikia muafaka

 

[2013]

Fardow = Fordow
nothing serious will happen but you cannot be a human and have a human spirit and still support the atrocities committed by the rogue american regime. Despite american propaganda, the facts remain that 90% of the dead in middle east were civilians and 90% of the dead in america were soldiers and this shows the nature of the american regime and its lies. Do you think America and Israel can't live with a nuclear Iran.???

Us soldiers death toll is too minimal, that's why USA loves fighting. More than 20 years us army is still operational.
Budget is increasing every single year. Even this year. Thanks for stealth, abram tanks and other hi-tech weapons, for keep safe us soldiers lives

 

[Yusomwasha]

Us soldiers death toll is too minimal, that's why USA loves fighting. More than 20 years us army is still operational.
Budget is increasing every single year. Even this year. Thanks for stealth, abram tanks and other hi-tech weapons, for keep safe us soldiers lives

kumbe unalindwa na usa

 

[Yusomwasha]

israel anadai iran akiwa na bomu la nyuklia ni tishio
kwa dunia hivi iran na israel nani tishio? we mtu ana mabomu 300 ya nyuklia halaf unamlalamikia ambae hana bomu 1 ni sawa na chui amlalamikie kondoo kuwa ni tishio kwake
tukirudi upande wa pili ni kuwa israel anataka iran ibanwe iache kbs ku2mia nyuklia jambo ambalo haliwezekani
israel anataka iran aadhibiwe kijesh kwa 7bu ya kuunga mkono hamas,na hezbolah bcoz anajua kbs hamas hzbolah
akishamalizwa na akikomkosa iran ndo israel
atapata chance ya kupora aridh ya palestina na kuikalia aridh ya lebanon ili aweze kuiba maji ya lubnan

 

[2013]

Do you think American and Israel can't live with a nuclear Iran.???

nope but i think NDOA ya usa, Israel kwa Saudia itaingia mchanga. na nchi mahasmu kama Russia, china zitapatiamo upenyo wa kuidhohofisha usa kwenye siasa za kimataifa. ikumbukwe kuwa Bush aliingia iraq kutokana na urafiki wake na mfalme marehemu abdullah wa saudia. Saudi kingdom inataka kupewa sapoti ya kuliangamiza taifa hili la kishia.(giant shiite country)
pia ninaona saudia na sunni nations ziko kwenye hatari ya kua-bullied nakuwa dis stabilized na iran ikiwa tu itamiliki nuclear. so nikitisho kwasabu iran ina pesa, na technolojia ya kudhohofisha haya mataifa ya sunni ni rahisi sana kuliko ya shia kwakua sunnni nations zimejaa fundamentalists wengi ambao ni rahisi kuwagawa vipande vidogoidogo na kuua amani iliyopo.
iran inaendesha mambo yake kwa siri pale arabuni kwenye vurugu dhidi ya mataifa ya wests ia anaendesha hezbollah dhidi ya israel. ikiwa atakua na ukucha mrefu ni wazi ataimega israel kiulaini kama mkate uliowekwa kwenye chai.

 

[2013]

israel anadai iran akiwa na bomu la nyuklia ni tishio
kwa dunia hivi iran na israel nani tishio? we mtu ana mabomu 300 ya nyuklia halaf unamlalamikia ambae hana bomu 1 ni sawa na chui amlalamikie kondoo kuwa ni tishio kwake
tukirudi upande wa pili ni kuwa israel anataka iran ibanwe iache kbs ku2mia nyuklia jambo ambalo haliwezekani
israel anataka iran aadhibiwe kijesh kwa 7bu ya kuunga mkono hamas,na hezbolah bcoz anajua kbs hamas hzbolah
akishamalizwa na akikomkosa iran ndo israel
atapata chance ya kupora aridh ya palestina na kuikalia aridh ya lebanon ili aweze kuiba maji ya lubnan

Ahmadinejad took part in a protest called "The World Without Zionism" and has derided Israel on numerous occasions.


"Israel, a small country of less than eight million people, looks out at a world where leaders of much larger nations threaten to wipe it off of the map. - - President Obama, speech to the U.N. General Assembly, September 21, 2011


"Outrageous statements by Ahmadinejad, such as a pledge to wipe Israel off the map, made it easier to keep that coalition together. Germany had been considered the weak sister of the group, but after Ahmadinejad's comments about Israel, the historical burden of the Holocaust made it difficult for Germany to appear too sympathetic to Iran."
- Glenn Kessler (aka The Fact Checker), "The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy (St. Martin's Press, 2007), page 188.




"It was only perhaps three weeks ago that the president of Iran once again said that Israel should be eradicated off the face of the Earth. As you recall, it was about in 2005 when he [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] said before that Israel -- he would use a nuclear weapon to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth."- Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), September 19, 2011

 

[Babu sea]

Obama yuko kenya kuna mdau anaweza kufunguka zaidi kuhusiana na ujio huu.

 

[Pianist]

nimejifunza mengi kwenye hii thread

 

[mohamedidrisa789]

kiukwel tunaongea tu kw mapenz ila kiuharisia warusi sio binadamu wa kawaida

 

[mohamedidrisa6789]

Iyo vita ya marekan na iran itachukua miak 50 bila kuisha.Kwan marekan mambo yanayotokea ukraine si anayaon kw iyo lazim achukue tahadhari,maan warusi wanatabia ya kukuletea jesh kweny uwanj wa vita kimy kimy mpak uje kushtuk kuw unapigan na warus unakuw ushatok damu.bado ya vietnam wanayakumbuk san

 

[mohamedidrisa6789]

Kiukwel Obama kafany kaz nzuri san ya kutafut aman kw njia ya kidiplomasia

 

[Mkambarani]

Wew Nyani Ngabo mueleweshe jamaa maana ya conventional warfare maybe unajua zaidi

 

[Bongolander]

Wew Nyani Ngabo mueleweshe jamaa maana ya conventional warfare maybe unajua zaidi

Siku hizi ni wajinga wanaotaka conventional warfare. Hailipi hata kidogo, gharama zake ni kubwa. Unless uwe nchi kubwa unavamia ka nchi kadogo kama Marekani Iraq na Afghanstan. Lakini Sio Russia, China au India. Looks at the cost of Iraq war....

 

[Ngaramtoni]

.Ngaramtoni.. It turns out that a military historian in Russia already did all the work for us. Nikolai Shefov is the author of 10 books about Russian history including one entitled "The Battles of Russia" in which he not only looks at each war, but actually at all the major battles fought in all the wars of Russia between 1700 and 1940 (he stops at the Soviet-Finnish war and does not include WWII).

Here are his findings:

Between 1700 and 1940 Russia/USSR fought in 34 wars and won 31 and in 392 battle and won 279. We could say that Russia won 91% of her wars and 71% of her battles.

Russia's opponents included: Swedes, French, Germans, Turks, Poles, Tatars, Finns, Caucasians, Japanese, Chinese, Austrians, Hungarians, British, Italians and Central Asians.

In the author's opinion Russia lost only three wars: the Crimean one, the Russo-Japanese one and the one against Poland in 1920. He considers that Russia won the first world war because no enemy ever stepped on any part of the Russian land (If you are interested, here is a link to an the original book in Russian, to an article summarizing the book, and to a machine-translation of this article into English).

I would just add that Crimea was fought against what I call a "great ecumenical coalition" (including Anglican British, the Latin French and the Muslim Turks) which outnumbered the Russians by over 200'000 people (there was almost a MILLION "ecumenical attackers" for just over 700'00 Russian defenders. But yes, Russia did lose this one.

Did Russia lose the war against Japan? I would argue that the Russian Fleet sure was defeated by the Japanese Navy, but Japanese historians have a very different view of what happened and consider that Japan's military was spent by the time the peace treaty was drafted (by the Russian side, by the way) and that Japan had been forced to accept very bad terms. At the very least, I would call this one a draw.

As for the Russian-Polish war, yes, the Soviet's lost this one badly. But look at the kind of Soviet Union we had in 1920: a country in the midst of a civil war, with many uprising taking place, with a "worker-farmer" "army" with no real officers and let by clueless commissars. So while the outcome was a defeat, the circumstances of that defeat are, I think, so unique as to be irrelevant.

But whatever the fine print and different views of the significance of individual outcomes, I think that these figures strongly suggest that attacking Russia is an exceedingly bad idea, even when only conventional wars are considered. Attacking Russia while she has the powerful nuclear arsenal on the planet is utter lunacy.

Let's hope that this short reminder will reach at least one of the crazies who think that playing a game of chicken with Russia is a sound policy and that the Russians will "blink first" impressed by the US/NATO military prowess.

cc Bongolander
.

huu ni ushindi wa vita za karne za kale,kwa karne hii ya sayansi Rusia ilipigana na kushinda vita gani?

 

[Yusomwasha]

tayari washapewa mfumo wa s-300 @nyaningabu Elungata @dortworld Nonda Mlaleo karibuni

 

[makodinda]

Noma sana

 

[kimsboy]

cc @Dotword Elungata Mlaleo Adiosamigo @Nyaningabu

 

[kimsboy]

aiseeeee

 

[MALCOM LUMUMBA]

Ukiwa na watu wanne (4) tu nchini Tanzania wa aina ya DOTWORLD na ukawafanya kuwa ndio 'think tank' ya Tanzania hakika nchi hii itakuwa mbali sana kwa kila kitu

Kiukweli Wakuu Dotworld , Bukyanagandi , Bongolander , Kimweri wamefanya niipende sana Jamiiforums kwasababu nimejifunza mambo mengi sana kutoka kwao. Japo siku hizi wanachangia kidogo sana hadi tunawakumbuka.

 

[Bukyanagandi]

huu ni ushindi wa vita za karne za kale,kwa karne hii ya sayansi Rusia ilipigana na kushinda vita gani?

Mkuu kwa hiyo kwa maoni yako mwaka 1945 nao hupo kwenye karne ya kale! Mapigano ya Korea na Merikani 1950 - 1953 vita ilishaje, mbona walishindwa ku defeate Korea Kasikazini, haya tuje Vita ya VietNam vilivyo piganwa baina ya Merikani na VietNam matokea yake Merikani mwaka 1975 ikashindwa na askali wanao vaa viatu vya kakatambuga na pyjama lakini walitumia silaha za kisasa kabisa, je, 1975 hupo kwenye karne ya kale kweli?

Mwisho nini kinaendelea huko Syria, mbabe ni nani pale? Afghanistani huu ni mwaka wa 15 mboba Amerika bado wapo pale wameshindwa ku-defeate Wataliban badala yake wanataka wafanya nazungumzo nao! Je, Iraq kukoje mpaka sasa kuna chochote cha maana Marekani walicho fanikisha katika Taifa hilo - leo hii wanapigana mjini Monsul wameshindwa kuwangamiza AlNusra/ISIS - mtu unategemea Taifa linalo tolewa kamasi na vinchi vidogo vidogo ndiyo ipigane na kushinda formidable Nations kama Urusi au Uchina?