Tanzania ivunje uhusiano na Israel?


Eeeh...! Kumbe Israel ni nchi ya kikiristu...!

Thanx 4 info...!

Nilikuwa sijajua kuwa Jews ni wakiristu...! lol

Mmmh! plus bongo pia...! lol

Sasa wewe unadhihirisha kwamba jina lako (X-pastor) ni la kufoji au ulikuwa pastor feki. Niambie Mkuu Makka siyo mji wa kiislamu? Mimi ninajua ni mji wa Kiislam kwasababu Quruan inasema hivyo. Kwa upande mwingine Biblia inasema Jerusalemu ni mji wa Bwana, ni mji Mtakatifu. Tena kabla ya kifo na ufufuko wa Kristo, Mungu aliwaamuru watu wasali kwa kuangalia Jerusalemu au kwenda kabisa. Yoh. 4:23. si Wayahudi wote ni Wakristo, ila Wayahudi ni msingi wa Ukristo Rum.11:1-32. Bongo ni nchi yetu Mkuu, tunaabudu kwa uhuru, dini zote zinapewa fursa sawa ya kumtumikia Mungu wao. Sasa unapaswa kukumbuka kwamba Mungu wetu sisi Wakristo ni Yehova, ni yule Mungu wa Yakobo (Israel). Hivyo Mungu wetu sisi ni Mungu wa Israel. Na Jerusalem ni mji Mtakatifu.
 
Ukiamua kuwa mkweli na mwenye nia thabiti ya kukemea uovu unatakiwa kukemea uovu wowote bila kujali nani anafanya huo uovu. Vita vya mashariki ya kati, wote wanamakosa na wote wana haki wanazozitafuta. Katika hali hiyo unatakiwa kujua msingi wa tatizo ndipo uanze kukemea.

Mkuu Bubu Ataka Kusema zingatia kwanza yafuatayo:-

1) si kweli kwamba Israel iliwapora ardhi Wapelestina mwaka 1967. Umiliki wa ardhi ya mashariki ya kati ulianza karne nyingi kabla ya Kristo (BC). Hivyo huwezi kutrace umiliki kuanzia 1967.
.


Huu ni ushahidi tosha kabisa wa kupinga kauli yako. Na hata jumuiya ya Kimataifa inajua wazi kwamba Israel inakalia ardhi ambayo si yake iliyoiteka katika vita vya mwaka 1967 na mara nyingi hata US wameshawaambia wairudishe ardhi hiyo kwa Wapalestina, Syria na Jordan. Huwezi kupinga kitu wakati kuna ushahidi wa kutosha ambao unaungwa mkono na jumuiya ya kimataifa ikiwemo supporter mkubwa wa Israel (US) kwamba Israel inakalia ardhi ambayo si yake.

Israeli Map Says West Bank Posts
Sit on Arab Land
By Steven Erlanger
New York Times
November 21, 2006​

An Israeli advocacy group, using maps and figures leaked from inside the government, says that 39 percent of the land held by Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank is privately owned by Palestinians. About 86 percent of Maale Adumim, an Israeli settlement, sits on privately held Palestinian property, according to government data.

Israel has long asserted that it fully respects Palestinian private property in the West Bank and only takes land there legally or, for security reasons, temporarily. If big sections of those settlements are indeed privately held Palestinian land, that is bound to create embarrassment for Israel and further complicate the already distant prospect of a negotiated peace. The data indicate that 40 percent of the land that Israel plans to keep in any future deal with the Palestinians is private.

The new claims regarding Palestinian property are said to come from the 2004 database of the Civil Administration, which controls the civilian aspects of Israel's presence in the West Bank. Peace Now, an Israeli group that advocates Palestinian self-determination in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, plans to publish the information on Tuesday. An advance copy was made available to The New York Times.

The data - maps that show the government's registry of the land by category - was given to Peace Now by someone who obtained it from an official inside the Civil Administration. The Times spoke to the person who received it from the Civil Administration official and agreed not to identify him because of the delicate nature of the material.

That person, who has frequent contact with the Civil Administration, said he and the official wanted to expose what they consider to be wide-scale violations of private Palestinian property rights by the government and settlers. The government has refused to give the material directly to Peace Now, which requested it under Israel's freedom of information law.

Shlomo Dror, a spokesman for the Civil Administration, said he could not comment on the data without studying it. He said there was a committee, called the blue line committee, that had been investigating these issues of land ownership for three years. "We haven't finished checking everything," he said. Mr. Dror also said that sometimes Palestinians would sell land to Israelis but be unwilling to admit to the sale publicly because they feared retribution as collaborators.

Within prominent settlements that Israel has said it plans to keep in any final border agreement, the data show, for example, that some 86.4 percent of Maale Adumim, a large Jerusalem suburb, is private; and 35.1 percent of Ariel is.

The maps indicate that beyond the private land, 5.8 percent is so-called survey land, meaning of unclear ownership, and 1.3 percent private Jewish land. The rest, about 54 percent, is considered "state land" or has no designation, though Palestinians say that at least some of it represents agricultural land expropriated by the state.

The figures, together with detailed maps of the land distribution in every Israeli settlement in the West Bank, were put together by the Settlement Watch Project of Peace Now, led by Dror Etkes and Hagit Ofran, and has a record of careful and accurate reporting on settlement growth.

The report does not include Jerusalem, which Israel has annexed and does not consider part of the West Bank, although much of the world regards East Jerusalem as occupied. Much of the world also considers Israeli settlements on occupied land to be illegal under international law. International law requires an occupying power to protect private property, and Israel has always asserted that it does not take land without legal justification.

One case in a settlement Israel intends to keep is in Givat Zeev, barely five miles north of Jerusalem. At the southern edge is the Ayelet Hashachar synagogue. Rabah Abdellatif, a Palestinian who lives in the nearby village of Al Jib, says the land belongs to him.

Papers he has filed with the Israeli military court, which runs the West Bank, seem to favor Mr. Abdellatif. In 1999, Israeli officials confirmed, he was even granted a judgment ordering the demolition of the synagogue because it had been built without permits. But for the last seven years, the Israeli system has done little to enforce its legal judgments. The synagogue stands, and Mr. Abdellatif has no access to his land.

Ram Kovarsky, the town council secretary, said the synagogue was outside the boundaries of Givat Zeev, although there is no obvious separation. Israeli officials confirm that the land is privately owned, though they refuse to say by whom.

Mr. Abdellatif, 65, said: "I feel stuck, angry. Why would they do that? I don't know who to go to anymore." He pointed to his corduroy trousers and said, in the English he learned in Paterson, N.J., where his son is a police detective: "These are my pants. And those are your pants. And you should not take my pants. This is mine, and that is yours! I never took anyone's land."

According to the Peace Now figures, 44.3 percent of Givat Zeev is on private Palestinian land. Miri Eisin, a spokesperson for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, said that Israeli officials would have to see the data and the maps and added that ownership is complicated and delicate. Baruch Spiegel, a reserve general who just left the Ministry of Defense and dealt with the separation barrier being built near the boundary with the West Bank, also said he would have to see the data in detail in order to judge it.

The definitions of private and state land are complicated, given different administrations of the West Bank going back to the Ottoman Empire, the British mandate, Jordan and now Israel. During the Ottoman Empire, only small areas of the West Bank were registered to specific owners, and often villagers would hold land in common to avoid taxes. The British began a more formal land registry based on land use, taxation or house ownership that continued through the Jordanian period.

Large areas of agricultural land are registered as state land; other areas were requisitioned or seized by the Israeli military after 1967 for security purposes, but such requisitions are meant to be temporary and must be renewed, and do not change the legal ownership of the land, Mr. Dror, the Civil Administration spokesman, said.

But the issue of property is one that Israeli officials are familiar with, even if the percentages here may come as a surprise and may be challenged after the publication of the report.

Asked about Israeli seizure of private Palestinian land in an interview with The Times last summer, before these figures were available, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said: "Now I don't deny anything, I don't ignore anything. I'm just ready to sit down and talk. And resolve it. And resolve it in a generous manner for all sides."

He said the 1967 war was a one of self-defense. Later, he said: "Many things happened. Life is not frozen. Things occur. So many things happened, and as a result of this many innocent individuals on both sides suffered, were killed, lost their lives, became crippled for life, lost their family members, their loved ones, thousands of them. And also private property suffered. By the way, on all sides."

Mr. Olmert says Israel will keep some 10 percent of the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, possibly in a swap for land elsewhere. The area Israel intends to keep is roughly marked by the route of the unfinished separation barrier, which cuts through the West Bank and is intended, Israel says, to stop suicide bombers. Mr. Olmert, however, describes it as a putative border. Nearly 80,000 Jews live in settlements beyond the route of the barrier, but some 180,000 live in settlements within the barrier, while another 200,000 live in East Jerusalem.

But these land-ownership figures show that even in the settlements that Israel intends to keep, there will be a considerable problem of restitution that goes beyond the issue of refugee return.

Mr. Olmert was elected on a pledge to withdraw Israeli settlers living east of the barrier. But after the war with Hezbollah and with fighting ongoing in Gaza, from which Israel withdrew its settlers in the summer of 2005, his withdrawal plan has been suspended.

In March 2005, a report requested by the government found a number of illegal Israeli outposts built on private Palestinian land, and officials promised to destroy them. But only nine houses of only one outpost, Amona, were dismantled after a court case brought by Peace Now.

There is a court case pending over Migron, which began as a group of trailers on a windy hilltop around a set of cellphone antennas in May 1999 and is now a flourishing community of 50 families, said Avi Teksler, an official of the Migron council. But Migron, too, according to the data, is built on private Palestinian land.

Mr. Teksler said that the land was deserted, and that its ownership would be settled in court. Migron, where some children of noted settlement leaders live, has had "the support of every Israeli government," he said. "The government has been a partner to every single move we've made." Mr. Teksler added: "This is how the state of Israel was created. And this is all the land of Israel. We're like the kibbutzim. The only real difference is that we're after 1967, not before."

But in the Palestinian village of Burqa, Youssef Moussa Abdel Raziq Nabboud, 85, says that some of the land of Migron, and the land on which Israel built a road for settlers, belongs to him and his family, who once grew wheat and beans there. He said he had tax documents from the pre-1967 authorities."They have the power to put the settlement there and we can do nothing," he said. "They have a fence around the settlement and dogs there."

Mr. Nabboud went to the Israeli authorities with the mayor, Abu Maher, but they were told he needed an Israeli lawyer and surveyor. "I have no money for that," he said. What began as an outpost taking 5 acres has now taken 125, the mayor said. Mr. Nabboud wears a traditional head covering; his grandson, Khaled, 27, wears a Yankees cap. "The land is my inheritance," he said. "I feel sad I can't go there. And angry. The army protects them."
 
Sasa wewe unadhihirisha kwamba jina lako (X-pastor) ni la kufoji au ulikuwa pastor feki. Niambie Mkuu Makka siyo mji wa kiislamu? Mimi ninajua ni mji wa Kiislam kwasababu Quruan inasema hivyo. Kwa upande mwingine Biblia inasema Jerusalemu ni mji wa Bwana, ni mji Mtakatifu. Tena kabla ya kifo na ufufuko wa Kristo, Mungu aliwaamuru watu wasali kwa kuangalia Jerusalemu au kwenda kabisa. Yoh. 4:23. si Wayahudi wote ni Wakristo, ila Wayahudi ni msingi wa Ukristo Rum.11:1-32. Bongo ni nchi yetu Mkuu, tunaabudu kwa uhuru, dini zote zinapewa fursa sawa ya kumtumikia Mungu wao. Sasa unapaswa kukumbuka kwamba Mungu wetu sisi Wakristo ni Yehova, ni yule Mungu wa Yakobo (Israel). Hivyo Mungu wetu sisi ni Mungu wa Israel. Na Jerusalem ni mji Mtakatifu.


Nziku, huyu jamaa ni X PASTER na sio PASTOR kama ulivyo andika, jina lake ni camaouflage, PASTER LIMETOKANA NA PASTE. Mixture of unga na maji. Si Pastor wala chochote, wala hawezi kupata bahati hiyo.

Asante kwa maneno yaliyo jaa hekima.

Be blessed.
 
Mkuu Bubu soma kwa makini maelezo haya, hii ni part I

Persian rule (538 BC) (Utawala wa Wairan)
During Persian Empire Jews were allowed to return to what their holy books had termed the Land of Israel, and having been granted some autonomy by the Iranian administration, it was during this period that the Second Temple in Jerusalem was built in Jerusalem (Hellenistic Greece: Alexander).

Hellenistic rule (333 BC)
The Persian Empire fell to Greek forces of the Macedonian general Alexander the Great. After his death, his conquests were divided amongst his generals, while the region of the Jews ("Judah" or Judea as it became known) was first part of the Ptolemaic dynasty and then part of the Seleucid Empire.

Hasmonean dynasty (140 BC)
An independent Jewish kingdom under the Hasmonean Dynasty existed from 140–37 BC. In the second century BC fascination in Jerusalem for Greek culture resulted in a movement to break down the separation of Jew and Gentile and some people even tried to disguise the marks of their circumcision.

Roman rule (63 BC – 330 AD)
Though General Pompey arrived in 63 BC, Roman rule was solidified when Herod, whose dynasty was of Idumean ancestry, was appointed as king
(http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/-1)

Around the time this period Jesus was born in Bethlehemu small city in Jerusalem.

Byzantine (Eastern Roman Empire) rule (330–640 AD)
Emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity around 330 AD made Christianity the official religion of Palaestina (url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/why/legitimization.html:

In 352 AD, a Jewish revolt against Byzantine rule in Tiberias and other parts of the Galilee.

In approximately 390 AD, Palaestina was further organised into three units: Palaestina Prima, Secunda, and Tertia (First, Second, and Third Palestine).

In 536 AD, Governor at Caesarea became the ruler.
 
Last edited:

The nation of Israel, inapigana vita na HAMAS and not Palestines. Hamas ni magaidi walio ndani ya Palestine.

Hamas is both religious and political terrorist organization, legalized by the people of Palestine, to kill innocent people. You don't need applied mathematics to understand that.

Short history of HAMAS
HIVI UNAJUWA MAANA YA HAMAS? = HAMAS is Islamic Resistance Movement.

Hamas was created in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi and Mohammad Taha of the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood at the beginning of the First Intifada. Notorious for its numerous suicide bombings and other attacks on innocent Israeli civilians and security forces.

Hamas' charter calls for the destruction of the State of Israel and its replacement with a defacto Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.

What does Hamas believe and what are its goals?
Hamas combines Palestinian nationalism with Islamic fundamentalism. Its founding charter commits the group to the destruction of Israel, the replacement of the PA with an Islamist state on the West Bank and Gaza, and to raising "the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine." Its leaders have called suicide attacks the "F-16" of the Palestinian people. Hamas believes "peace talks will do no good," Rantisi said in April 2004. "We do not believe we can live with the enemy."

Accordingly, Israel has the right to defends it self agaist these fashists and tyrannist called HAMAS. There is no reason in fact, law, or in ethic, why should Israel not defend against these Gazanian terrorists.

Who are Palestines? When was the first time the word palestine used and why?
 
karibu max
lakini Hamasi si ndio walichaguliwa kwa uchaguzi wa kidemokrasia na wananchi wa palestine?
What does Hamas believe and what are its goals?

Who are Palestines? When was the first time the word palestine used and why?
maswali mazuri mkuu maxshimba
 
Mkuu Bubu soma kwa makini maelezo haya, hii ni part II

Islamic period (630-1918 AD)
Arab Caliphate rule (638–1099)

In 638, Caliph Omar Ibn al-Khattab and Safforonius, the Byzantine governor of Jerusalem, signed Al-Uhda al-'Omariyya (The Umariyya Covenant), an agreement that stipulated the rights and obligations of all non-Muslims in Palestine. Jews were permitted to return to Palestine for the first time since the 500-year ban enacted by the Romans and maintained by Byzantine rulers.

Umayyad rule (661–750)

It was under Umayyad rule that Christians and Jews were granted the official title of "Peoples of the Book" to underline the common monotheistic roots they shared with Islam.

Abbasid ruled in 750–969, Fatimid ruled in 969–1099

Baada ya hapo zilipita tawala mbalimbali kama vile Crusader rule (1099–1187), Mamluk rule (1270–1516), Egyptian rule (1831-1841) na Ottoman rule (1841-1917)

The 20th century
The British-led Egyptian Expeditionary Force, commanded by Edmund Allenby, captured Jerusalem on 9 December 1917 and occupied the whole of the Levant following the defeat of Turkish forces in Palestine at the Battle of Megiddo in September 1918 and the capitulation of Turkey on 31 October.[115]

British Mandate (1920–1948)
The British Mandate enacted English, Hebrew and Arabic as its three official languages. The land designated by the mandate was called Palestine in English, Falastin (فلسطين) in Arabic, and in Hebrew Palestina or Eretz Yisrael ((פלשתינה (א"י).

UN partition
Main article: United Nations Partition Plan for PalestineOn 29 November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly, with a two-thirds majority international vote, passed the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine (United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181), a plan to resolve the Arab-Jewish conflict by partitioning the territory into separate Jewish and Arab states, with the Greater Jerusalem area (encompassing Bethlehem) coming under international control. Jewish leaders (including the Jewish Agency), accepted their portion of the plan, while Palestinian Arab leaders rejected it and refused to negotiate. Neighboring Arab and Muslim states also rejected the partition plan. The Arab community reacted violently after the Arab Higher Committee declared a strike and burned many buildings and shops. In a speech delivered on 25 March 1948, US President Truman recommended a temporary trusteeship and stated: We could not undertake to impose this solution on the people of Palestine by the use of American troops, both on Charter grounds and as a matter of national policy.[132] As armed skirmishes between Arab and Jewish paramilitary forces in Palestine continued, the British mandate ended on May 15, 1948, the establishment of the State of Israel having been proclaimed the day before (see Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel). The neighboring Arab states and armies (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Transjordan, Holy War Army, Arab Liberation Army, and local Arabs) immediately attacked Israel following its declaration, and the 1948 Arab-Israeli War ensued. Consequently, the partition plan was never implemented.
 
Part III (Mwisho)

Current status
Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the 1949 Armistice Agreements between Israel and neighboring Arab states eliminated Palestine as a distinct territory. With the establishment of Israel, the remaining lands were divided amongst Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The Arab governments at this point refused to set up a State of Palestine.

From the 1960s onward, the term "Palestine" was regularly used in political contexts. Various declarations, such as the 15 November 1988 proclamation of a State of Palestine by the PLO referred to a country called Palestine, defining its borders based on the U.N. Resolution 242 and 383 and the principle of land for peace. The Green Line was the 1967 border established by many UN resolutions including those mentioned above.

In the course of the Six Day War in June 1967, Israel captured the West Bank from Jordan and Gaza from Egypt. Israel also captured East Jerusalem.

According to the CIA World Factbook,[133] of the ten million people living between Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea, about five million (49%) identify as Palestinian, Arab, Bedouin and/or Druze. One million of those are citizens of Israel. The other four million are residents of the West Bank and Gaza, which are under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian National Authority.

In the West Bank, 360,000 Israeli settlers live in a hundred scattered settlements with connecting corridors. The 2.5 million West Bank Palestinians live in four blocs centered in Hebron, Ramallah, Nablus, and Jericho. In 2005, all the Israeli settlers were evacuated from the Gaza Strip in keeping with Ariel Sharon's plan for unilateral disengagement, and control over the area was transferred to the Palestinian Authority.

The Palestine Liberation Organization has enjoyed status as an observer member at the United Nations since 1974, and continues to represent "Palestine" there. After the 1988 declaration of independence, the State of Palestine was formally recognized by 117 United Nations member states.[135] Palestine is also represented at international sporting events, like the Olympics and Paralympics and films from Palestine have won awards at international cinema events, like the Oscars. (See also Cinema of Palestine).

Hivyo: Huwezi kutrace umiliki wa aedhi ya mashariki ya kati kuanzia mwaka 1967. Lazima uanzie karne nyingi kabla ya Kristo (BC).
 
Mkuu Bubu soma kwa makini maelezo haya, hii ni part I
.

Wewe unataka nisome unachoaandika wewe, lakini wakati huo huo hutaki kusoma ninachoandika mimi. Ugomvi mkubwa wa Wapalestine na Wayahudi unatokana na ardhi yao iliyochukuliwa na Wayahudi katika vita vya 1967 miaka 42 tu iliyopita. Na jumuiya ya kimataifa inatambua hilo na imeshaionya mara chungu nzima Israel kutojenga makazi mapya katika ardhi ambayo ni ya Wapalestine.

Wakati Clinton alipokuwa madarakani Wayahudi na Wapalestine walikaribia kusaini mkataba ambao labda ungeleta amani ya kudumu kati ya nchi hizo, lakini Wayahudi walikataa kurudisha ardhi ya Wapalestine ambayo ina rutuba kubwa katika eneo lile na pia kukataa kuwaruhusu wakimbizi wanaokaribia milioni 5 ambao wamesambaa katika nchi mbali mbali duniani haki yao ya kurudi nchini mwao. Haya yakasababisha kufa kwa majadiliano yale.

Sisi pia katika vita dhidi ya nduli tuliiteka Uganda yote, lakini hatukuikalia hata cm moja ya nchi hiyo na pia hatukupinga wakimbizi wa Kiganda ambao walikuwa wamesambaa katika nchi mbali mbali duniani kurudi kwao kama wangependa kufanya hivyo. Kwa mantiki hayo basi Wayahudi kama wanataka kuishi kwa amani ya kweli hawana budi kurudisha ardhi yote waliyoiteka katika vita vya mwaka 1967 na kuwapa haki yao wakimbizi wote wa Kipalestine ambao watapenda kurudi kwao kuwa na haki ya kufanya hivyo bila pingamizi la Israel.
 
...Wayahudi ni msingi wa Ukristo Rum.11:1-32. ... Mungu wetu sisi Wakristo ni Yehova, ni yule Mungu wa Yakobo (Israel). Hivyo Mungu wetu sisi ni Mungu wa Israel. Na Jerusalem ni mji Mtakatifu.

Ooh Thats good so.... Nabii yesu is not a god any more...!

Mmmh! Nimekuelewa mkuu... mungu wenu wakristu ni yehova na si yesu....! Na wayahudi wasio mkubali nabii yesu pia mungu wao ni yehova...! Ahsante kwa taarifa.
 
Part III (Mwisho)

Current status
Hivyo: Huwezi kutrace umiliki wa aedhi ya mashariki ya kati kuanzia mwaka 1967. Lazima uanzie karne nyingi kabla ya Kristo (BC).

Duh! Tukifuata style hii si kila nchi itaingia vitani...!? Tutaanza kutafutana na kunyoo-sheana vidole, nyie Wamasai asili yenu Ethiopia, nyie Wangoni rudini kwenu Azania (SA), nyie Wahaya nasikia kwenu Angola sijiu Uganda, Na nyie....! Kaaziii kweli kweliii...!
 
Tutu condemns Israeli 'apartheid'
Tutu said 'oppression' would not bring security
Monday, 29 April, 2002, 11:55 GMT 12:55 UK

South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu has accused Israel of practising apartheid in its policies towards the Palestinians.

The Nobel peace laureate said he was "very deeply distressed" by a visit to the Holy Land, adding that "it reminded me so much of what happened to us black people in South Africa".

In a speech in the United States, carried in the UK's Guardian newspaper, Archbishop Tutu said he saw "the humiliation of the Palestinians at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young white police officers prevented us from moving about".

The archbishop, who was a leading opponent of apartheid in South Africa, said Israel would "never get true security and safety through oppressing another people".

Archbishop Tutu said his criticism of the Israeli Government did not mean he was anti-Semitic.
"I am not even anti-white, despite the madness of that group," he said.
Jewish lobby

The archbishop attacked the political power of Jewish groups in the United States, saying: "People are scared in this country, to say wrong is wrong because the Jewish lobby is powerful - very powerful. Well, so what? "The apartheid government was very powerful, but today it no longer exists. "Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pinochet, Milosevic, and Idi Amin were all powerful, but in the end they bit the dust," he said.

Speaking at a conference called Ending the Oppression in Boston, Archbishop Tutu told delegates Jewish people had been at the forefront of the struggle against apartheid in South Africa.

He asked: "Have our Jewish sisters and brothers forgotten their humiliation? Have they forgotten the collective punishment, the home demolitions, in their own history so soon? "Have they turned their backs on their profound and noble religious traditions?"

The archbishop said that while he condemned suicide bombings by Palestinian militants against Israel, Israeli military action would not bring security to the Jewish state.

Israel must "strive for peace based on justice, based on withdrawal from all the occupied territories, and the establishment of a viable Palestinian state on those territories side by side with Israel, both with secure borders," he said.
 
"Mess with the bull and you get the horns"
Having said that, Hamas is learning it the hard way you cant fire rockets into another country and when they react preemptively you start whining.
As far as out diplomatic ties with Israel are concerned, do you really think they will actually be moved by our diplomatic withdrawal?

Kila kitu kin unit na Tanzania ni unit moja katika nchi za dunia na kupunguza sio kuengeza.
 

The nation of Israel, inapigana vita na HAMAS and not Palestines. Hamas ni magaidi walio ndani ya Palestine.

Hamas is both religious and political terrorist organization, legalized by the people of Palestine, to kill innocent people. You don't need applied mathematics to understand that.

Short history of HAMAS
HIVI UNAJUWA MAANA YA HAMAS? = HAMAS is Islamic Resistance Movement.

Hamas was created in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi and Mohammad Taha of the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood at the beginning of the First Intifada. Notorious for its numerous suicide bombings and other attacks on innocent Israeli civilians and security forces.

Hamas' charter calls for the destruction of the State of Israel and its replacement with a defacto Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.

What does Hamas believe and what are its goals?
Hamas combines Palestinian nationalism with Islamic fundamentalism. Its founding charter commits the group to the destruction of Israel, the replacement of the PA with an Islamist state on the West Bank and Gaza, and to raising "the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine." Its leaders have called suicide attacks the "F-16" of the Palestinian people. Hamas believes "peace talks will do no good," Rantisi said in April 2004. "We do not believe we can live with the enemy."

Accordingly, Israel has the right to defends it self agaist these fashists and tyrannist called HAMAS. There is no reason in fact, law, or in ethic, why should Israel not defend against these Gazanian terrorists.

Who are Palestines? When was the first time the word palestine used and why?

Ones stand does not justify killings or else OSAMA is right.
 

The nation of Israel, inapigana vita na HAMAS and not Palestines. Hamas ni magaidi walio ndani ya Palestine.

Hamas is both religious and political terrorist organization, legalized by the people of Palestine, to kill innocent people. You don't need applied mathematics to understand that.

Short history of HAMAS
HIVI UNAJUWA MAANA YA HAMAS? = HAMAS is Islamic Resistance Movement.

Hamas was created in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi and Mohammad Taha of the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood at the beginning of the First Intifada. Notorious for its numerous suicide bombings and other attacks on innocent Israeli civilians and security forces.

Hamas' charter calls for the destruction of the State of Israel and its replacement with a defacto Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.

What does Hamas believe and what are its goals?
Hamas combines Palestinian nationalism with Islamic fundamentalism. Its founding charter commits the group to the destruction of Israel, the replacement of the PA with an Islamist state on the West Bank and Gaza, and to raising "the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine." Its leaders have called suicide attacks the "F-16" of the Palestinian people. Hamas believes "peace talks will do no good," Rantisi said in April 2004. "We do not believe we can live with the enemy."

Accordingly, Israel has the right to defends it self agaist these fashists and tyrannist called HAMAS. There is no reason in fact, law, or in ethic, why should Israel not defend against these Gazanian terrorists.

Who are Palestines? When was the first time the word palestine used and why?

Tatizo la wengi wetu hapa tunaangalia hii issue kidini lakini mbona viongozi wengi wa dini zote wameshalani hili na kikubwa zaidi kuwa hata Wajews wenyewe wameshalani mauwaji haya. Sasa wenzetu mnaokuja mbele ya ukumbi na kuuhalalisha mauwaji haya tukuchukulieni vipi? Muambiwapo kuwa hamna UTU mnakuja juu kwani pale Mjerumani alipofanya mauwaji ndani ya nchi yake kwa kulinda maslahi ya nchi dhidi ya wageni hilo halikuchukuliwa kuwa ni mauwaji?

Ni jambo la kushangaza kuwa Israel yenye mamlaka kamili na Gaza isiwakamate wale wanaoleta hiyo inayoitwa uvunjifu wa Amani na badala yake kutumia majeshi na kuangamiza wasiona hatia. Jee yale majumba na vyote vinavyoharibiwa makusudi vyote ni vya HAMAS.
SASA Israel wamesimamisha mapigano kitu gani kimesaidia? wameiangamiza HAMAS? Mbona bado makubaliano ya kusitisha mapigano bado ni kati ya Israel na HAMAS wale wale waliokusudiwa kuangamizwa? Pengine washabikia mauwaji wangetuonesha njia.
 
0 Reactions
Reply
Back
Top Bottom