Maajabu ya namba '9'.

[Ibrahimovic]

From FIFA laws,two consecutive yellow cards are equivalent to a red card,that is right.From which mathematique rule/principal/law is 1 equivalent to 0?.1 is not equal to 0 and neither equivalent to 0,we are just making fun of maths.We proved wrong that proof telling us 2=1 by saying that,if a=b,then a-b=0.so that proof was not valid.Now we need to prove wrong this fallacy proof that 1=0.coz we know that,1^sin 30=1^cos 60,then sin 30=cos 60.Also 1^1=1^0,then 1=0.I know practically 1 is not equal to 0,now prove this fallacy proof wrong mathematically!

LOL.. And U, from which maths rule/principal/law is 1=0?
Ok, u came again, see these:
1^sin30=1^cos60 it's true coz
2^sin30=2^cos60
3^sin30=3^cos60
: :
: :
n^sin30=n^cos60 where n is any number. So the equations balances, then sin30=cos60, i agree with that!

On 2nd case,
1^1=1^0 the eqn is true but
1=0 isn't true,
see these,
1^1=2^0 its true but 1=0 isn't true.
1^10=666^0 is true but 10=0 isn't true.
: :
: :
1^10= n^0 where n is any number. But still10 isn't equal to 0. So inorder for the eqns in 2nd case to be valid mathematically, the exponent to base 1 must be equivalent to zero which is the exponent to base n where n is any number!! So u see where the theory of equivalence can be practise?

 

[Jaguar]

LOL.. And U, from which maths rule/principal/law is 1=0?
Ok, u came again, see these:
1^sin30=1^cos60 it's true coz
2^sin30=2^cos60
3^sin30=3^cos60
: :
: :
n^sin30=n^cos60 where n is any number. So the equations balances, then sin30=cos60, i agree with that!
On 2nd case,
1^1=1^0 the eqn is true but
1=0 isn't true,
see these,
1^1=2^0 its true but 1=0 isn't true.
1^10=666^0 is true but 10=0 isn't true.
: :
: :
1^10= n^0 where n is any number. But still10 isn't equal to 0. So inorder for the eqns in 2nd case to be valid mathematically, the exponent to base 1 must be equivalent to zero which is the exponent to base n where n is any number!! So u see where the theory of equivalence can be practise?

I'm talking of 1^1=1^0 specifically and not the other equations and remember that i told you that in practice or logically 1 is not equal to 0 and neither equivalent to 0,that is what i said.Now get glued with that equation i.e[1^1=1^0] and try to prove this proof wrong,strictly this equation and not the other twin equations!

 

[Ibrahimovic]

I'm talking of 1^1=1^0 specifically and not the other equations and remember that i told you that in practice or logically 1 is not equal to 0 and neither equivalent to 0,that is what i said.Now get glued with that equation i.e[1^1=1^0] and try to prove this proof wrong,strictly this equation and not the other twin equations!

yeah, i'm specifically basing on ur equations and trying to introduce to you the theory of equivalence which u're using it in ur daily life!

U said it, if 1^sin30=1^cos60, then sin30=cos60, i agreed with U with elabolations of other eqns.. It was valid!
U came again, if 1^1=1^0, then 1=0 right?

And i told u, if
1^1=1^0,the eqn is true.
But 1=0 isn't true.. Also if 1^1=1^0, is true, then the exponent 1 is equivalent to exponent 0 is true..

See these in real life.
1kg of sugar=1kg of beans.
But sugar is not equal to beans. Still sugar may be equivalent to beans!
20cows may be equivalen to 1 girl to marry, but 20cows isn't equal to 1 girl!
During buttle trade 2gots was equivalent to 1 bag of maize but 2 goats was'nt equal to 1 bag of mize.
1little of kerosine is equivalent to 1750TSH but kerosine is'nt equal to 1750TSH.. That's mathematics, that's the language of numbers u get it!

 

[Jaguar]

yeah, i'm specifically basing on ur equations and trying to introduce to you the theory of equivalence which u're using it in ur daily life!

U said it, if 1^sin30=1^cos60, then sin30=cos60, i agreed with U with elabolations of other eqns.. It was valid!
U came again, if 1^1=1^0, then 1=0 right?

And i told u, if
1^1=1^0,the eqn is true.
But 1=0 isn't true.. Also if 1^1=1^0, is true, then the exponent 1 is equivalent to exponent 0 is true..

See these in real life.
1kg of sugar=1kg of beans.
But sugar is not equal to beans. Still sugar may be equivalent to beans!
20cows may be equivalen to 1 girl to marry, but 20cows isn't equal to 1 girl!
During buttle trade 2gots was equivalent to 1 bag of maize but 2 goats was'nt equal to 1 bag of mize.
1little of kerosine is equivalent to 1750TSH but kerosine is'nt equal to 1750TSH.. That's mathematics, that's the language of numbers u get it!

I'm afraid you don't understand what i want you to do with this equation[1^1=1^0],do the same thing you did with that proof of 2=1,you simply said a-b=0 and the discussion was over!now without using comparable examples,expose the error in this equation as you did in that fallacy proof of 2=1.Remember i want the error to be exposed and not to compare it with other examples.

 

[Nalonga]

Ronaldo de Lima akiwa Ac Milan alikuwa anavaa jezi na 99 ambayo 9+9=81=8+1=9

hapo sawa?

 

[Paje]

If a = 1 and b = 1 therefore i could say that .....

a = b and that

a^2 = ab where

a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2

(a+b)(a-b) = b(a-b) dividing both sides by (a-b) we get:

a+b=b substituting that in equation 1 makes

1+1=1 as in 2=1 ?!!

mwanangu umejikosesha kwa makusudi au kwa kutokujua. pale ulipoamua kugawa kwa zero.
sisi watu wa hesabu hatugawi kwa zero. ukisema divide by (a-b) you mean 1-1 ambayo ni zero.
kugawa kwa zero wanaita ni none sense

 

[Inkoskaz]

take any single digit number multiply it by 9 then multiply by 12345679=repetition of the single digit number

 

[Observer2010]

take tour to these very fantastic maths.

WHATCH OUT !

1 x 8 + 1 = 9
12 x 8 + 2 = 98
123 x 8 + 3 = 987
1234 x 8 + 4 = 9876
12345 x 8 + 5 = 98765
123456 x 8 + 6 = 987654
1234567 x 8 + 7 = 9876543
12345678 x 8 + 8 = 98765432
123456789 x 8 + 9 = 987654321


0 x 9 + 1 = 1
1 x 9 + 2 = 11
12 x 9 + 3 = 111
123 x 9 + 4 = 1111
1234 x 9 + 5 = 11111
12345 x 9 + 6 = 111111
123456 x 9 + 7 = 1111111
1234567 x 9 + 8 = 11111111
12345678 x 9 + 9 = 111111111
123456789 x 9 +10= 1111111111

Do you get something here ! Here we go,
The added figure in the LHS = No of ones in the RHS ! Brilliant isn't it !

Now look this !
9 x 9 + 7 = 88
98 x 9 + 6 = 888
987 x 9 + 5 = 8888
9876 x 9 + 4 = 88888
98765 x 9 + 3 = 888888
987654 x 9 + 2 = 8888888
9876543 x 9 + 1 = 88888888
98765432 x 9 + 0 = 888888888
987654321 x 9 + 1 = 8888888888
9876543210 x 9 + 2 = 88888888888


And look at this symmetry:
1 x 1 = 1
11 x 11 = 121
111 x 111 = 12321
1111 x 1111 = 1234321
11111 x 11111 = 123454321
111111 x 111111 = 12345654321
1111111 x 1111111 = 1234567654321
11111111 x 11111111 = 123456787654321
111111111 x 111111111=12345678987654321
I hope u get something here !
That is;
The number of figures that you square in the LHS = The central number in the LHS.
eg square (111) then the central number is 3 ! ie 12321
square (1111) then the central number is 4 ! ie 1234321

These are just samples of brilliant mathematics !