Four takeaways from Trump's indictment for 2020 election interference

August

JF-Expert Member
Jun 18, 2007
8,407
4,081
Four takeaways from Trump's indictment for 2020 election interference

The special counsel investigating Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results has issued four charges against the US former president.

The 45-page indictment alleges Mr Trump orchestrated a broad conspiracy designed to keep him in power after he was defeated by President Joe Biden.

It accused him of knowingly spreading "pervasive and destablising lies" about election fraud that threatened the presidential election and therefore American democracy.

Mr Trump described the charges - the third separate criminal indictment he is facing - as part of "un-American witch hunts" against him.

Trump charged over bid to overturn 2020 election
The four charges are conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

Some legal experts say it will be a challenge to prove that Mr Trump's actions amount to crimes, and that a potential defence could be that what he said and did was protected by the US Constitutional First Amendment right to free speech.

Here are four key takeaways from the Justice Department's case.

1. Trump is accused of a wide-ranging conspiracy
In the indictment, special counsel Jack Smith does not focus on one particular incident, such as the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Mr Trump's supporters. Instead he considers the entirety of Mr Trump's actions over a two-month period from just after election day to the day he left the White House.

"Despite having lost, the defendant was determined to remain in power," the indictment states on the first page. "So for more than two months following election day on November 3, 2020, the Defendant spread lies that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election and that he had actually won."

Prosecutors go on to outline a three-part criminal conspiracy that violated various elements of Section 18 of the US Code:

A conspiracy to defraud the US by using fraud and deceit to impair, obstruct and defeat how the government collects, counts and certifies the results of presidential elections
A conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the certification of the electoral college results by Congress on 6 January
A conspiracy against the right to vote and to have one's vote counted, which comes under the conspiracy against rights statute
That last charge brings home the alleged harm Mr Trump directly caused to voters, said Daniel Charles Richman, a professor at Columbia University Law School.

He is accused of harm not just to the government and to Congress, but also "to the citizens whose right to have their votes mean something Trump allegedly tried to take away", Mr Richman told the BBC.

2. The indictment lists six unnamed co-conspirators alongside Mr Trump, who allegedly helped him carry out his unlawful efforts to overturn the election results.

Four are said to be lawyers working for Mr Trump's campaign, one is described as a political consultant and the other a Justice Department official.

The prosecution claims that along with Mr Trump, they pushed officials in states where the races had been close to ignore the popular vote, to disenfranchise millions of voters and replace legitimate electors with fake ones.

It also accused them of attempting to use the power of the justice department to conduct sham investigations into supposed fraud and of pressuring then Vice-President Mike Pence to fraudulently alter the election outcome as part of his ceremonial role to certify results in Congress.

Prosecutors included these individuals to back up their conspiracy charges, Aziz Huq of the University of Chicago Law School explained. Basically, you can't have a conspiracy with just one person - you have to conspire with others.

However, the six have not been charged in this indictment - and there is no guarantee all will be. There could be many possible reasons prosecutors decided not to name the co-conspirators here, Mr Huq said. For one, these individuals could be co-operating with the government.
 
Back
Top Bottom