GE2010 Dr.slaa na chadema twendeni mahakamani ushahidi upo tele!!!!

[Profesy]

Hivi ndio maana Slaa akuhudhuria JK akiingizwa madarakani upya? Hivi kama kuna mtu anajua naomba mjibu...

 

[Rugemeleza]

Ulichosema ninakubaliana nacho.

Swali: Twende mahakama ipi? Maana hapa kwetu kila kitu kipo chini ya Mkwere

Mahakama kuu licha ya udhaifu wake ndiyo sehemu ya kwanza kwenda. Uamuzi wa Kesi ya A.G &2 Others v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou (1996) TLR 156 unasema wazi kuwa uamuzi wa Tume unapingwa.
Nitajitahidi baadae kuweka nukuu sahihi ya uamuzi huo hapa.

 

[Anyisile Obheli]

hapa ni kuhamasiahana kuzichapa tu kwani unadhani vikundi vya waasi viaanzaje?

 

[Rugemeleza]

Katiba 'yenu' hairuhusu kuhoji matokeo ya urais! Hivyo la msingi ni kuhangaikia mabadiliko ya katiba yatayohakikisha kuwepo kwa tume huru ya uchaguzi na uchaguzi ulio huru na haki. Kung'ang'ania kubishania matokeo ni kupoteza muda - kwa hali ilivyo katiba inawakingia kifua. Wahenga hawakukosea "maji yakishamwagika hayazoleki".

Hairuhusu tu pale ambapo sheria na katiba vimefuatwa kama havikufuatwa mtu anayo haki ya kupinga kesi ya AG & 2 ors v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou {1996} 157 inasema hivyo. Hivyo ni jukumu la Chadema kupinga maamuzi yote ya kipuuzi ya Tume.

 

[Rugemeleza]

Ndugu zangu hii ni sehemu ya kesi ya Attorney General & Others v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou (1996} TLR 156 ambapo Mahakama ya Rufaa chini ya Jaji Mkuu Nyalali, Robert Kisanga na Lameck Mfalila ilitoa uamuzi juu ya umuhimu wa kuendesha uchaguzi huru na haki. Na vilevile ilisema wazi kuwa hakuna kinga yoyote ile ya kikatiba dhidi ya maamuzi ya Tume ya Uchaguzi ambayo ni kinyume cha sheria. Nitajitahdi kuiweka hukumu nzima ili watu wajisomee. Naomba radhi kwa makosa yanayoonekana kwani katika kuitoa katika pdf mfumo umeshindwa kufanya kazi inavyotakiwa.

We now come to our reasons in support of our findings on ground number one in both memoranda of appeal concerning the validity of the Tamko Rasmi. We begin naturally by considering whether courts of law have jurisdiction to inquire into the validity of the Tamko Rasmi in view of the provisions of sub-article (12) of article 74 of the Constitution. That sub-article as amended by Act 4 of 1992 states:

'No Court shall have jurisdiction to inquire into anything done by the Electoral Commission in the exercise of its functions according to the provisions of this Constitution.'

On the face of it, it appears that the Constitution expressly prohibits the courts from inquiring into the validity of such things like the Tamko Rasmi, but on a deeper consideration of the principles that underlie the Constitution, it is obvious that such an interpretation of the Constitution is wrong. One of the fundamental principles of any democratic constitution, including ours, is the Rule of Law. The Principle is so obvious and elementary in a democracy, that it does not have to be expressly stated in a democratic constitution. However, perhaps for purposes of clarity, there is an express provision to that effect under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. It is Sub-Article (1) of Article 26 which states:

'Every person is obliged to comply with this Constitution and the laws of the United Republic.'

In the light of this principle, we respectfully agree with the sub- mission of Mr Werema Learned Senior State Attorney to the effect that Sub-Article (12) of Article 73 of the Constitution cannot be interpreted so as to protect unconstitutional or illegal acts or deeds, see the recent famous case of Anismic Ltd v. Foreign Compensation Commission (1).
Since Tanzania has reverted to dejure multi- party democracy, it is time the same was similarly articulated here. We are satisfied and we find that the High Court in this country, like the High Court in England, has a supervisory jurisdiction to inquire into the legality of anything done or made by public authorities such as the Tamko Rasmi. As a collorary, this Court has similar jurisdiction to do so in a matter properly before it, as in the present case.

We now come to our reasons in support of our finding to the effect that the Electoral Commission is empowered to make and issue the Tamko Rasmi but under the circumstances of this case, the Tamko Rasmi is invalid. It is patently clear that the Electoral Commission derives its powers under the Constitution and the Elections Act, 1985 as amended from time to time. Under para (b) of sub-article (6) of article 74 as amended by Act 4 of 1992, read together with ss (2) of s 4 of the Elections Act, 1985 as amended by Act 6 of 1992.

In our considered opinion, we are satisfied that on a true and proper interpretation of the above cited provisions of the Elections Act, the Electoral Commission is empowered to make regulations not only in furtherance of specific provisions of the Act, but also in furtherance of the purposes of the whole Act. From the scheme of the Act as manifested in the various provisions of the Act, including the provisions for secrecy of the ballot and for polling agents, counting agents, one person one vote, one candidate one seat, as well as those provisions concerning election campaigns and election offences, it is evident that the overriding purpose of the Elections Act is to secure the election of the President of the United Republic and the members of the parliament of the United Republic in a free and fair election. It is also implicit from the provisions of the Constitution.

Majaji wakaendelea kusema

As we have already stated, we concur with the reasons given by Mchome J, and we have additional reasons for upholding his finding. First, weare satisfied that the established rule of interpretation embodied in the Latin Maxim 'Expressio Unius EST Exclusio Alterius' that is, where matters are expressly stated, then any other matters of the same class not so expressly slated are excluded, does not apply to s.108 because that section provides defences to matters which are not expressly stated therein. Second, taking into account the principle which underlies the Constitution and the Elections Act, 1985 that elections shall be free and fair, we are of the considered opinion that an election which is generally unfree and unfair is not an election at all as envisaged by the Constitution and the Elections Act, and consequently anything which renders the elections unfree or, and unfair is in law valid ground for nullification of such purported D election. We are further of the considered opinion that any law which seeks to protect unfree and unfair elections from nullification would be unconstitutional.

 

[lm317]

Hii NEC chini ya serikali na chama tawala ndio matatizo. Kikubwa ni kushinikizwa Tume iwe na wateuliwa kutoka vyama vyote.

Hao wanachakachuliwa kirahisi na mafisadi.

TUPAMBANE NA UFISADI NI SUMU KALI SANA KATIKA JAMII

 

[MartinDavid]

Nadhani mahakama ya africa mashariki inaweza kufanya hii kazi, au mahakama ya africa...

hapa bongo sidhani kama itawezekana kwani hawa jamaa wana vipandikizi vingi sana...

ila Slaa asikubaliane na matokeo...

 

[Kisima]

Eeeee mwenyezi Mungu nakuomba uiangazie Taifa langu Tanganyika. Baba sisi tulimchagua Dr Slaa tukiamini ndiye mtu pekee atakae tuongoza na kuleta mabadiriko ktk Taifa hili, lkn tazama Baba watu wenye uchu, wezi, mafisadi wamepindisha ukweli ili waingie madarakani-waendelee kutunyonya na watumie madraka yao vibaya kwa kujilimbikizia mali na kuruhusu raslimali za Taifa hili zifujwe kwa manufaa yao..... Baba nakuomba ulinusuru Taifa hili utupe nguvu za kuwang'oa mafisadi kwenye madaraka KWA NJIA YOYOTE ILE maana tumechoka nao.AMINA.

 

[Kisima]

Eeeee mwenyezi Mungu nakuomba uliangazie Taifa langu Tanganyika. Baba sisi tulimchagua Dr Slaa tukiamini ndiye mtu pekee atakae tuongoza na kuleta mabadiriko ktk Taifa hili, lkn tazama Baba watu wenye uchu, wezi, mafisadi wamepindisha ukweli ili waingie madarakani-waendelee kutunyonya na watumie madraka yao vibaya kwa kujilimbikizia mali na kuruhusu raslimali za Taifa hili zifujwe kwa manufaa yao..... Baba nakuomba ulinusuru Taifa hili utupe nguvu za kuwang'oa mafisadi kwenye madaraka KWA NJIA YOYOTE ILE maana tumechoka nao.AMINA.

 

[Mzito Kabwela]

hapa ni kuhamasiahana kuzichapa tu kwani unadhani vikundi vya waasi viaanzaje?

Haki y
a nani, kila siku inayopotea nahisi dhambi ya uuaji inanisogelea. Nikifikiria alivyofanyiwa komredi MPENDAZOE naiona hukumu ya maisha au kunyongwa kunanisubiria

 

[Gwaje]

Akili itumike sasa

 

[Jethro]

Ulichosema ninakubaliana nacho.

Swali: Twende mahakama ipi? Maana hapa kwetu kila kitu kipo chini ya Mkwere

Huku ni vithibitisho ndio vyahitajika tuu na sio porojo, sasa huyo Hakimu nae atakuwa mjinga akipinga atakuwa nae anajipalia kaa la moto huwezi jua huko mbeleni kukaundwa Tume huru ya kuchunguza uchakachuaji ulio fanyika kweney uchaguzi 2010 na watako kutwa walishiliki kwa namna yeyote kufikishwa mahakamini kwa kupotosha umma na kudhurumu maamuzi ya wananchi iau haki zao walizo piga kura.

 

[King kingo]

Mahakama kuu licha ya udhaifu wake ndiyo sehemu ya kwanza kwenda. Uamuzi wa Kesi ya A.G &2 Others v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou (1996) TLR 156 unasema wazi kuwa uamuzi wa Tume unapingwa.
Nitajitahidi baadae kuweka nukuu sahihi ya uamuzi huo hapa.

Mkuu hii siyo Ubunge pekee au??? kama na uraisi inawezekana bora kwenda tu hata kama watachakachua hukumu

 

[Uswe]

waliweka sheria, ati matokeo yakitangazwa, basi hakuna kuhoji

katika sheria za kibwege tanzania hii ni ya pili au ya tatu zikiongozwa na ile ya kuwawekea kinga viongozi walokwiba mali za uma

 

[EMT]

Hili swala la CCM,NEC,UWT(Usalama wa Taifa) KUCHAKACHUA matokeo ya kura za Urais na Ubunge liko wazi kabisa na ushahidi upo.

Mifano halisi ni ucheleweshaji wa kutangaza matokeo kwenye maeneo yenye nguvu kubwa ya Upinzani hasa CHADEMA. Hii haikutokea kwa bahati mbaya ni MAKUSUDI. Angali kilichotokea Dar,Arusha,Mwanza,Mbeya,Shinyanga na maneneo mengine mengi.

Majimbo ya Nyamagana,Ilemera,Arusha Mjini,Karatu,Shinyanga Mjini kura zake mpaka jana Usiku NEC walikuwa bado HAWAJAZIJUMLISHWA KWENYE IDADI YA KURA ZA DR.SLAA KWA MAKUSUDI wakti tayari wasimamizi wa majimbo walizitangaza kwa SHINIKIZO ZA WANANCHI. Nec wamefanya kusudi kuchelewesha kujumlisha ili Kiwete aonekana kuwa anaongoza kwa mbali.

HAINGII AKILINI MTU UMPIGIE KURA MBUNGE WA CHADEMA HALAFU KURA YA URAIS UMPE MGOMBEA WA CCM KIWETE. MTU UNACHAGUA SERA ZA CHAMA SIYO SURA YA MTU. MIFANO:

JIMBO: CHAMA:----------------------------UBUNGE:-------------------RAIS:

ARUSHA MJINI CHADEMA................................56,208..........................54,208
CCM...........................................................36,107..........................39,107

MBEYA MJINI CHADEMA.................................46,411........................42,917
CCM...........................................................24,236........................32,249

MWANZA-NYAMAGANA CHADEMA......................38,171.........................30,991
CCM.............................................................27,883........................32,320


MWANZA-ILEMERA CHADEMA............................31,256..........................29,701
CCM..............................................................26,870........................9,143

MASWA MAGH CHADEMA.........................17,456.........................11,742
CCM....................................................12,824.........................17,104

MASWA MASH CHADEMA......................17,075.........................12,203
CCM............................. 17,014.........................21,150


Kali zaidi ni hii ya JIMBO LA Musoma mjini: Kutoka KURA 14,723 za Mbunge wa CCM na kuongezwa kufikia KURA 49,858 za KIKWETE.

MUSOMA MJINI CHADEMA....................21,335........................23,211
CCM.................................................14,723........................49,858???

Hii ni zaidi ya mara 3 ya kura za Mbunge.Haingii akilini mtu amkatae mbunge wa chama halafu ampe Rais wa chama cha mbunge huyu aliyemkataa. Labda kama mtu huyo anachagua SURA na siyo SERA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Mpaka sasa ukiingia kwenye WEBSITE YA TUME: http:/www.nec.go.tz Bado KURA HIZO HAZIONEKANI KWENYE MTANDAO. KWANINI HAWATAKI KUZIJUMLISHA? WANOGOPA NINI?

Soma hizi nukuu toka Gazeti la MWANANCHI toleo la leo 5/11/2010:

''..............Nao wasomi wameungana na madai ya Dk Slaa wakisema kuwa uchakachuaji matokeo ya kura nchini umekuwa aibu kwa taifa.
Wakizungumza kwa nyakati tofauti jijini Dar es Salaam jana, wasomi hao walisema kuna dalili zinazotia shaka kwamba matokeo ya urais yamechakachuliwa kwa kuwa hawaoni sababu kucheleweshwa kutangazwa.
"Tunajua kuwa hata kama CCM ingeshinda, isingeshinda kwa kura nyingi kiasi hicho. Kwa nini tumsifie mtu kuwa ameshinda kwa kishindo na huku amechakachua matokeo?"alisema Dk Fairles Ilomo, mhadhiri wa Chuo Kikuu cha Tumaini, Iringa.
Dk Ilomo alisema haiingii akilini kuelezwa kuwa matokeo yamechelewa kutangazwa kwa sababu ya matumizi ya kompyuta katika hatua ya kuhesabu kwani wakati wa upigaji, wananchi hawakutumia kompyuta.

"Kwanini matokeo yasubiri kompyuta? Hakuna logic (mantiki) kusema kuwa kuingiza data kwenye kompyuta kulisababisha ucheleweshaji maana hata uchaguzi wa Marekani, walitumia kompyuta na matokeo yakawahi kutolewa," alisema Dk Ilomo.
"Ni kweli uchaguzi ulifanyika vizuri na kulikuwa na amani lakini katika hatua ya kuhesabu kura na kutangaza matokeo kulikuwa na uchakachuaji hasa katika maeneo nyeti.
"Rais aapishwe, lakini Dk Slaa ana haki ya kuendelea na malalamiko yake. Kama malalamiko hayo yakionekana yana ukweli, maamuzi mengine yafuate."

..............Mhadhiri mwingine chuoni hapo Harod Tairo alisema amestuka kuona matokeo hayo yanaonyesha kuwa watu wengi wamewapigia kura wabunge wa Chadema lakini si mgombea wake wa urais, yaani Dk Willibrod Slaa
"Mimi naamini kwamba wabunge wengi wa Chadema walichaguliwa kwa juhudi za Dk Slaa. Wananchi hawawezi kuchagua mbunge wa Chadema halafu rais wamchague wa CCM. Mimi naona matokeo hayaakisi halihalisi," alisema Tairo.

Hawa wasomi na Wahadhiri naungana nao kwa 100%.

Mkuu angalia vizuri data zako vizuri nyingi haziko sahihi. Kwa mfano, matokeo ya Urais Musoma mjini yako hivi kwenye tovuti ya NEC
SLAA WILLIBROD PETER - 19,095
KIKWETE JAKAYA MRISHO - 17,294
LIPUMBA IBRAHIM HARUNA - 589
KUGA PETER MZIRAY APPT - 151
MGAYWA MUTTAMWEGA BHATT TLP - 30
RUNGWE HASHIM SPUNDA NCCR-MAGEUZI - 26
DOVUTWA YAHMI NASSORO DOVUTWA -UPDP 9

SPOILT VOTES 560
TOTALS 37,754

Sasa hi ya kikwete kupata kura 49,858 umeipata wapi wakati hata wapiga kura wenyewe hawafikii hiyo idadi? Unless kama wamechange baada ya post yako

 

[King kingo]

Ndugu zangu hii ni sehemu ya kesi ya Attorney General & Others v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou (1996} TLR 156 ambapo Mahakama ya Rufaa chini ya Jaji Mkuu Nyalali, Robert Kisanga na Lameck Mfalila ilitoa uamuzi juu ya umuhimu wa kuendesha uchaguzi huru na haki. Na vilevile ilisema wazi kuwa hakuna kinga yoyote ile ya kikatiba dhidi ya maamuzi ya Tume ya Uchaguzi ambayo ni kinyume cha sheria. Nitajitahdi kuiweka hukumu nzima ili watu wajisomee. Naomba radhi kwa makosa yanayoonekana kwani katika kuitoa katika pdf mfumo umeshindwa kufanya kazi inavyotakiwa.

Mkuu hivi hiyo coram ya hao ma judge hapo unaweza kulinganisha na hawa wa sasa??

 

[Rugemeleza]

Mkuu hii siyo Ubunge pekee au??? kama na uraisi inawezekana bora kwenda tu hata kama watachakachua hukumu

Naomba nikujibu kama nilivyoandika hapo juu. Nimesikitishwa sana kuona watu hawasomi bandiko langu licha ya umuhimu wake mkubwa.

Ndugu zangu hii ni sehemu ya kesi ya Attorney General & Others v. Dr. Amani Walid Kaborou (1996} TLR 156 ambapo Mahakama ya Rufaa chini ya Jaji Mkuu Nyalali, Robert Kisanga na Lameck Mfalila ilitoa uamuzi juu ya umuhimu wa kuendesha uchaguzi huru na haki. Na vilevile ilisema wazi kuwa hakuna kinga yoyote ile ya kikatiba dhidi ya maamuzi ya Tume ya Uchaguzi ambayo ni kinyume cha sheria. Nitajitahdi kuiweka hukumu nzima ili watu wajisomee. Naomba radhi kwa makosa yanayoonekana kwani katika kuitoa katika pdf mfumo umeshindwa kufanya kazi inavyotakiwa.

We now come to our reasons in support of our findings on ground number one in both memoranda of appeal concerning the validity of the Tamko Rasmi. We begin naturally by considering whether courts of law have jurisdiction to inquire into the validity of the Tamko Rasmi in view of the provisions of sub-article (12) of article 74 of the Constitution. That sub-article as amended by Act 4 of 1992 states:

'No Court shall have jurisdiction to inquire into anything done by the Electoral Commission in the exercise of its functions according to the provisions of this Constitution.'

On the face of it, it appears that the Constitution expressly prohibits the courts from inquiring into the validity of such things like the Tamko Rasmi, but on a deeper consideration of the principles that underlie the Constitution, it is obvious that such an interpretation of the Constitution is wrong. One of the fundamental principles of any democratic constitution, including ours, is the Rule of Law. The Principle is so obvious and elementary in a democracy, that it does not have to be expressly stated in a democratic constitution. However, perhaps for purposes of clarity, there is an express provision to that effect under the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. It is Sub-Article (1) of Article 26 which states:

'Every person is obliged to comply with this Constitution and the laws of the United Republic.'

In the light of this principle, we respectfully agree with the sub- mission of Mr Werema Learned Senior State Attorney to the effect that Sub-Article (12) of Article 73 of the Constitution cannot be interpreted so as to protect unconstitutional or illegal acts or deeds, see the recent famous case of Anismic Ltd v. Foreign Compensation Commission (1).
Since Tanzania has reverted to dejure multi- party democracy, it is time the same was similarly articulated here. We are satisfied and we find that the High Court in this country, like the High Court in England, has a supervisory jurisdiction to inquire into the legality of anything done or made by public authorities such as the Tamko Rasmi. As a collorary, this Court has similar jurisdiction to do so in a matter properly before it, as in the present case.

We now come to our reasons in support of our finding to the effect that the Electoral Commission is empowered to make and issue the Tamko Rasmi but under the circumstances of this case, the Tamko Rasmi is invalid. It is patently clear that the Electoral Commission derives its powers under the Constitution and the Elections Act, 1985 as amended from time to time. Under para (b) of sub-article (6) of article 74 as amended by Act 4 of 1992, read together with ss (2) of s 4 of the Elections Act, 1985 as amended by Act 6 of 1992.

In our considered opinion, we are satisfied that on a true and proper interpretation of the above cited provisions of the Elections Act, the Electoral Commission is empowered to make regulations not only in furtherance of specific provisions of the Act, but also in furtherance of the purposes of the whole Act. From the scheme of the Act as manifested in the various provisions of the Act, including the provisions for secrecy of the ballot and for polling agents, counting agents, one person one vote, one candidate one seat, as well as those provisions concerning election campaigns and election offences, it is evident that the overriding purpose of the Elections Act is to secure the election of the President of the United Republic and the members of the parliament of the United Republic in a free and fair election. It is also implicit from the provisions of the Constitution.

Majaji wakaendelea kusema

As we have already stated, we concur with the reasons given by Mchome J, and we have additional reasons for upholding his finding. First, weare satisfied that the established rule of interpretation embodied in the Latin Maxim 'Expressio Unius EST Exclusio Alterius' that is, where matters are expressly stated, then any other matters of the same class not so expressly slated are excluded, does not apply to s.108 because that section provides defences to matters which are not expressly stated therein. Second, taking into account the principle which underlies the Constitution and the Elections Act, 1985 that elections shall be free and fair, we are of the considered opinion that an election which is generally unfree and unfair is not an election at all as envisaged by the Constitution and the Elections Act, and consequently anything which renders the elections unfree or, and unfair is in law valid ground for nullification of such purported D election. We are further of the considered opinion that any law which seeks to protect unfree and unfair elections from nullification would be unconstitutional.

 

[Rugemeleza]

Mkuu hivi hiyo coram ya hao ma judge hapo unaweza kulinganisha na hawa wa sasa??

Huwezi kulinganisha lakini Majaji wa Mahakama Kuu wanabanwa na uamuzi huo na inabidi waufuate. Vilevile hata Mahakama ya Rufani inabanwa na uamuzi huo labda tu kama kutakuwa na jopo kamili la Mahakama kuubatilisha hivyo ni lazima tuutumie kupambana na Tume hii ovu.

 

[Rwabugiri]

Katiba 'yenu' hairuhusu kuhoji matokeo ya urais! Hivyo la msingi ni kuhangaikia mabadiliko ya katiba yatayohakikisha kuwepo kwa tume huru ya uchaguzi na uchaguzi ulio huru na haki. Kung'ang'ania kubishania matokeo ni kupoteza muda - kwa hali ilivyo katiba inawakingia kifua. Wahenga hawakukosea "maji yakishamwagika hayazoleki".

Ni kweli kabisa, lakini kufungua kesi hata mahakama ya kimataifa itakuwa mwanzo mzuri wa kupata tume huru kwa chaguzi zijazo, lakini pia itatuma ujumbe mzuri kwa ufirauni ulio fanyika na kujenga msingi mzuri wa kungoa fisadi wote chaguzi zijazo!

CHADEMA wakitumia kete hii vizuri, na hasira walizo nazo wanachi juu ya uchakajuaji huu, wataimarisha chama vyema, kwa kupata wanachama wapya wengi mno! Tena nawasihi waanze sasa hivi kuandaa kadi nyingi ili wavune wanachama ktk mikutano yao ya kuwashukuru walo wapigia kura!

 

[Jile79]

bado tuna kazi kubwa!