Atheists tulionekana wa ajabu sana!

[geniusbaraka]

Kwa nini unafikiri ni "nani" ?

Hujajibu swali.

Kwa nini Mungu mwenye uwezo wote, ujuzi wote na upendo wote kaumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya

yanawezekana, wakati alikuwa na uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezekani?

Hujajibu swali hili.

haya tunatoa nan.. nithibiyishie ulimwengu universe origin yake ni ipi??????

siku ukinithibitishia origin ya mwanadamu au ulimwengu nami bila shaka nitakuthibitishia uwepo wa MUNGU. PHYSCALLY..

BINADAMU KAPEWA FREEWILL ...ANAWEZA KUAMUA BAYA AU ZURI

 

[geniusbaraka]

Hilo pia halitathibitisha kwamba Mungu yupo.

Nataka uthibitishe Mungu yupo.

Hujajibu swali.

Kwa nini Mungu mwenye uwezo wote, ujuzi wote na upendo wote kaumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya

yanawezekana, wakati alikuwa na uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezekani?

Hujajibu swali hili.

HUJAJIBU SWALI............TOA UTHIBITISHO WA ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU UNAYEMUONA...KAMA HUTOTHIBITISHA HAPA..UTAKUA UMEFELI LOGICCALLY BILA MASWALI

 

[geniusbaraka]

Hilo pia halitathibitisha kwamba Mungu yupo.

Nataka uthibitishe Mungu yupo.

Hujajibu swali.

Kwa nini Mungu mwenye uwezo wote, ujuzi wote na upendo wote kaumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya

yanawezekana, wakati alikuwa na uwezo wa kuumba ulimwengu ambao mabaya hayawezekani?

Hujajibu swali hili.

THIBITISHA KWANZA ORIGIN YAKO...KAMA HUTOWEZA BAS FAHAM AKILI YAKO NI NDOGO SAAAANA,,,, NA IMEUMBWA

 

[Kiranga]

haya tunatoa nan.. nithibiyishie ulimwengu universe origin yake ni ipi??????

siku ukinithibitishia origin ya mwanadamu au ulimwengu nami bila shaka nitakuthibitishia uwepo wa MUNGU. PHYSCALLY..

BINADAMU KAPEWA FREEWILL ...ANAWEZA KUAMUA BAYA AU ZURI

Unaelewa kitu kinaitwa "logical non sequitur" ?

Nikishindwa kukutajia square root ya 2, hilo linafanya square root ya 2 iwe 10?

 

[Kiranga]

HUJAJIBU SWALI............TOA UTHIBITISHO WA ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU UNAYEMUONA...KAMA HUTOTHIBITISHA HAPA..UTAKUA UMEFELI LOGICCALLY BILA MASWALI

Nikishindwa kutoa origin ya mtu, hilo litathibitisha origin ya mtu ni Mungu?

 

[Kiranga]

THIBITISHA KWANZA ORIGIN YAKO...KAMA HUTOWEZA BAS FAHAM AKILI YAKO NI NDOGO SAAAANA,,,, NA IMEUMBWA

Nikishindwa kutoa origin yangu, hilo linathibitisha nimeumbwa na Mungu?

This is a logical non sequitur.

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

 

[geniusbaraka]

Nikishindwa kutoa origin ya mtu, hilo litathibitisha origin ya mtu ni Mungu?

Nikishindwa kutoa origin ya mtu, hilo litathibitisha origin ya mtu ni Mungu?

HUJAJIBU SWALI NDUGU ...NIPE KWANZA ORIGIN YA BINADAMU KWA UTHIBITISHO... KAMA HUTOTOA BASI LOGICALLY WEWE NI NONEXISTENT

 

[geniusbaraka]

Nikishindwa kutoa origin yangu, hilo linathibitisha nimeumbwa na Mungu?

This is a logical non sequitur.

HUJAJIBU SWALI NDUGU ...NIPE KWANZA ORIGIN YA BINADAMU KWA UTHIBITISHO... KAMA HUTOTOA BASI LOGICALLY WEWE NI NONEXISTENT .......SAWA

 

[Kiranga]

HUJAJIBU SWALI NDUGU ...NIPE KWANZA ORIGIN YA BINADAMU KWA UTHIBITISHO... KAMA HUTOTOA BASI LOGICALLY WEWE NI NONEXISTENT

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

 

[Kiranga]

HUJAJIBU SWALI NDUGU ...NIPE KWANZA ORIGIN YA BINADAMU KWA UTHIBITISHO... KAMA HUTOTOA BASI LOGICALLY WEWE NI NONEXISTENT .......SAWA

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

 

[geniusbaraka]

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

SAWA ..LAKINI HUJAJIBU SWALI....UKINIJIBU ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU ..NDIO NITAFIKA KUJADILI STAGE ZINAZOFATA USIPO JIBU BAS HUJUI UNACHOKIONGELEA LOGICALY

 

[Kiranga]

SAWA ..LAKINI HUJAJIBU SWALI....UKINIJIBU ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU ..NDIO NITAFIKA KUJADILI STAGE ZINAZOFATA USIPO JIBU BAS HUJUI UNACHOKIONGELEA LOGICALY

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

 

[geniusbaraka]

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

SAWA ..LAKINI HUJAJIBU SWALI....UKINIJIBU ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU ..NDIO NITAFIKA KUJADILI STAGE ZINAZOFATA USIPO JIBU BAS HUJUI UNACHOKIONGELEA LOGICALY

 

[Kiranga]

SAWA ..LAKINI HUJAJIBU SWALI....UKINIJIBU ORIGIN YA MWANADAMU ..NDIO NITAFIKA KUJADILI STAGE ZINAZOFATA USIPO JIBU BAS HUJUI UNACHOKIONGELEA LOGICALY

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

 

[geniusbaraka]

Non Sequitur

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.

www.logicallyfallacious.com

Non Sequitur


(also known as: derailment, “that does not follow”, irrelevant reason, invalid inference, non-support, argument by scenario [form of], false premise [form of], questionable premise [form of], non-sequitur)
Description: When the conclusion does not follow from the premises. In more informal reasoning, it can be when what is presented as evidence or reason is irrelevant or adds very little support to the conclusion.
Logical Form:
Claim A is made.
Evidence is presented for claim A.
Therefore, claim C is true.
Example #1:
People generally like to walk on the beach. Beaches have sand. Therefore, having sand floors in homes would be a great idea!
Explanation: As cool as the idea of sand floors might sound, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that people generally like to walk on sand does not mean that they want sand in their homes, just like because people generally like to swim, they shouldn’t flood their houses.
Example #2:
Buddy Burger has the greatest food in town. Buddy Burger was voted #1 by the local paper. Therefore, Phil, the owner of Buddy Burger, should run for president of the United States.
Explanation: I bet Phil makes one heck of a burger, but it does not follow that he should be president.
Exception: There really are no exceptions to this rule. Any good argument must have a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Tip: One of the best ways to expose non sequiturs is by constructing a valid analogy that exposes the absurdity in the argument.
Variations: There are many forms of non sequiturs including argument by scenario, where an irrelevant scenario is given in an attempt to support the conclusion. Other forms use different rhetorical devices that are irrelevant to the conclusion.
False or questionable premises could be seen as errors in facts, but they can also lead to the conclusion not following, so just keep that in mind, as well.
References:


Hyslop, J. H. (1892). The Elements of Logic, Theoretical and Practical. C. Scribner’s Sons.

HHAHHAHAHHAHA BRO HUJAJIBU SWALI..USILETE VINGEREZA VYA PRIMARY HAPA

 

[Tz mbongo]

Wingi ndio usahihi au si usahihi?
Ukishasema wingi si usahihi, point ya kuongelea "kikundi kidogo cha watu" ni moot, haina maana.
Kama wingi si usahihi, usahihi unajali nguvu ya hoja, si wingi wa watu, suala la kikundi kidogo au kikubwa si muhimu, suala la muhimu ni nguvu ya hoja.
Kwa hiyo, andika upya habari yako.
Kama unasema wingi si usahihi, ondoa kabisa habari za "kikundi kidogo cha watu" (ambacho hata huwezi kuthibitisha kwamba ni kidogo).
Kama unataka kuandika habari za "kikundi kidogo cha watu", ondoa habari za "sijasema kwamba wingi ndiyo usahihi".
Hutakiwi kuambatanisha habari ya "sijasema wingi ndiyo usahihi" halafu hapo hapo ukaendeleza na "kikundi kidogo cha watu".
Utakuwa una ji contradict kwa kutaka kusema wingi si usahihi, halafu hapo hapo unahesabu ukubwa wa kikundi cha watu katika ku validate hoja yako.
You can't eat your cake and still have it.
You are contradicting yourself.

Kwanza kabisa zingumzii usahihi au kutokuwa sahihi,swali langu lilikuwa linauliza kwanini watu bado wana msimamo wa kuwepo Mungu ni kipi kinachofanya msimamo huo uendelee kuwepo hadi leo? hilo ndio lilikuwa swali langu,sasa majibu yako ndio nikasema kama unawazungumzia watu ambao ni kakundi tu kadogo,kwa maana wingi wa hao watu unafanya majibu yako kuwa hayana uhalisia na si kwamba hao watu wako sahihi kwa sababu ni wengi.

Hvyo siangalii usahihi bali sababu za huu wa msimamo wa kuwepo Mungu kuendelea kuwepo hadi leo.

 

[Kiranga]

HHAHHAHAHHAHA BRO HUJAJIBU SWALI..USILETE VINGEREZA VYA PRIMARY HAPA

Wewe ngumbaru hujui kusoma, hatuna cha kujadiliana, nakupeleka ignore list.

 

[Kiranga]

Kwanza kabisa zingumzii usahihi au kutokuwa sahihi,swali langu lilikuwa linauliza kwanini watu bado wana msimamo wa kuwepo Mungu ni kipi kinachofanya msimamo huo uendelee kuwepo hadi leo? hilo ndio lilikuwa swali langu,sasa majibu yako ndio nikasema kama unawazungumzia watu ambao ni kakundi tu kadogo,kwa maana wingi wa hao watu unafanya majibu yako kuwa hayana uhalisia na si kwamba hao watu wako sahihi kwa sababu ni wengi.

Hvyo siangalii usahihi bali sababu za huu wa msimamo wa kuwepo Mungu kuendelea kuwepo hadi leo.

Kama huzungumzii usahihi au kutokuwa sahihi, huna la kujadiliana nami.

Mimi najadili usahihi na kutokuwa sahihi.

 

[geniusbaraka]

Wewe ngumbaru hujui kusoma, hatuna cha kujadiliana, nakupeleka ignore list.

HAHAHHA TOA KWANZA ORIGIN YA BINADAMU NDIO UONDOKE... MIMI SIO NGUMBARU ..WAAMBIE NA WENZAKO WAJE WATHIBITISHE ORIGIN YA BINADAMU ...

 

[Tz mbongo]

Kama huzungumzii usahihi au kutokuwa sahihi, huna la kujadiliana nami.
Mimi najadili usahihi na kutokuwa sahihi.

Utaniambiaje kuwa huna la kjadiliana na mimi kwamba wewe unajadili usahihi na kutokuwa sahihi wakati wewe ndio wa kwanza Kuni quote!! Labda useme ulivamia swali bila kulielewa na ulivyojibu hilo swali hukuonesha usahihi ni upi.