The Atheists Paradox

The Atheists Paradox

I still do not understand why atheists have problems with Christians only, why not Hinduism? why not Buddhism, Islam or Shinto from China? is there any reason why Christianity seems to be their biggest target?

Zaidi ni kuwa mashitaka aliyoshitakiwa nayo Bwana Yesu Kristo ndiyo msingi wa shutuma za Atheist kwa Wakristo.
Wao wanashutumu Ukristo na vurugu duniani wakati Bwana Yesu Naye alishitakiwa kwa uongo huo huo na ndipo alipomwambia pilato kuwa Ufalme wake si wa dunia hii kwa kuwa ungekuwa wa dunia hii wafuasi wake wangepambana asifikishwe kwake.
Pilato akiwa amejulishwa juu ya mwanafunzi wa Bwana Yesu Kumkata sio mmoja wa maaskari na Bwana Yesu kulirudisha na kukataza matumizi ya upanga. Aling'amua kuwa mashitaka ni ya hila tu.
Nasi tunao wajibu kuthibisha kwa Atheist hawana hoja dhidi yetu.
 
mungu gan anatandikwa viboko mbele ya kadamnasi??? anali lia ovyo kama mtoto mdogo? kabla watu hawajamtight mungu analia akiomba msaada asikamatwe ili asichapwe viboko? kweli kuna mungu wa ivi? For your information jesus was just a rebel leader who was caught up with the authorities and got punished by the law hence to claim such a man is a God unatakiwa kweli uwe na ubongo wa samaki!!!

Msukule wa mburula Akbar umekurupushwa.
Mungu wako ni comic liliokuwa linatumiwa na washirikina wa Makkah, likiwa na mabinti watatu pamoja na wasaidizi zaidi nyuzi za mduara, Muhammad alimkarabati kwa kuwaondoa mabinti na wasaidizi ili aqualify angalau kumuigiza Mungu wa Abraham.
Jamaa lisilotahiriwa likafanikiwa kuwabrain wash watu na kuamini kuwa mungu mkarabatiwa amekuwa mungu wa Abraham
Bakaji, jizi uuaji na poraji limegeuka ati mbora wa mitume. Hakika kymwabudu mungu mkarabatiwa na mtume asiyetahiriwa kunaonyesha nini ni chimpazee incarnate.
Yesu Kristo angalau alitenda mambo ambayo ni vigumu binadamu wa kawaida kuyatenda akiwa (akiwa Mungu) na Yale ambayo ni vigumu Mungu kutatenda ( akiwa binadam) na ndiyo sababu kubwa ya misukule wa Mburula Akbar kushindwa kuelewa
 
SHETANI mwenyewe anamjua Yesu ni nani. Nyie mnaolalia huko si mkamuulize msikie atawajibuje. mnajua wapi mtampata. si mnawajua wale agents zake wapiga ramli
 
Amma kwa hakika macho unayo lakini hayaoni, masikio unayo lakini hayasikii, una maradhi kwenye moyo wako.

Mshukuru Bwana Yesu kwa maneno ya; wana macho lakini hawaoni, wana masikio lakini hawasikii...
Au mbora wa mitume asiyetohara amekufundisha hivyo maana alikuwa plagiarist mzuri Sana ...
 
Can God create something so heavy which he cannot move?
If the answer is yes, then god is not all powerful because he can create something which he cannot move.
If the answer is no, then god is not all powerful cuz he cannot create something which he cannot move

Can and can not... Mmmh ! God is able...
 
The thread is about atheists' paradox and not the existence of God. The only thing atheists knows is the existence of God, and never supports their disbelief of no God. That is very funny. You guys are addicted to God.

Of course the title is about the paradox but what is that paradox you are talking about. have you checked the content. I am not an atheist, i don't know why you are mention atheist in your comment on ma opinion.
 
Do not confuse between the God the creator and Atheist god of the gaps bro.
I am talking about God the issue of creator i do not know.vAnyway most of the argument given about God is that he is the creator. my question to you . Who or what is God?
 
Something can not come from nothing ?,only god can come from nothing?,huu sio upendeleo ?,kwa nn only god?hizo sifa zote za mungu (kama yupo)nani kakwambia ?,umetumia njia gani kuzijua?

Na wewe ! Nani kakwambia God 'come" nothing ? Soma Mwanzo 1:1-3 na John 1:1-3 uone jinsi sayansi ilivyochelewa kujua mambo ambayo dini iliyajua maelfu ya miaka.
 
There would be no Moral laws to determine what you call Morality.
Just trying to figure out the world without God....Mmmh...
we do not have moral laws but we have moral beliefs. who gives that law you are talking about.
Saying that "There would be no Moral laws to determine what you call Morality". It is begging the question cuz you have not establish how sure are you that we would not have moral beliefs. Therefore, your argument is fallacious
 
we do not have moral laws but we have moral beliefs. who gives that law you are talking about?
Saying that "There would be no Moral laws to determine what you call Morality". It is begging the question cuz you have not establish how sure are you that we would not have moral beliefs we have now. Therefore, your argument is fallacious
 

Similar Discussions

Back
Top Bottom