No sir, I do not agree on those accusations; JKN was a highly principled character a proponent of free and independent Africa which was free from western interference/influence in its politics and economic affairs. With those strong believes it was no surprise of his role as an activists of that era, therefore it is only right to justify his expenditures on those lines.
He also understood there was the need for Africans states to collaborate closely in fuelling their own development in the future; most of his struggles were as a result of the future of Africa he saw on his mind. May be he thought the future leaders would be smart and understood their phase of leadership and take the struggles further in order to gain economical independence which was free from western government manipulation and their exploitative organs such as IMF and World Bank.
The misuse of funds occurs when one spends for personal gain, in this instance it was for what he believed would benefit the continent in the long run. To me the faults of JKN lies in his economical approach, his untimely resignation which dint have a succession planning that would have made the right people run the country and not removing the mechanism of governance which he needed to build a nation he found, but not suitable for the health of democracy in the long run.
Imefikia hatua kuna watu wanaamini ni haki yao pekee kupata madaraka na lazima upitie kwao kwa namna za kujipendekeza kwakuwa wanamiliki polisi, mahakama na mfuko wa jamii that is pathetic. Worst na jamii inaamini hivyo lazima ujipendekeze hili ufike popote hata humu ndani we chunguza 80% ya wachangiaji wa jukwaa la siasa ni watu wa kusujudu vyama au watu lakini there is very little contribution from their own thinking hata kama ni wanachama wa vyama fulani ushabiki wao umepitiliza especially when they do not defend the policies tangibly.