Ndege ya Malaysia A/line yapoteza mawasiliano

[Viol]

Taarifa ya habari bbc usiku huu wanasema labda imetekwa na viumbe wa sayari nyingine.

Duh hiyo kuamini mbona ishu,kuna taarifa nilisoma pia kwenye yahoo news wanasema kuna uwezekano pia haijatua chini wala baharini ipo kwingine

 

[Jerhy]

Duh hiyo kuamini mbona ishu,kuna taarifa nilisoma pia kwenye yahoo news wanasema kuna uwezekano pia haijatua chini wala baharini ipo kwingine

Mi nadhani wameipeleka bara la antactica huko

 

[Jerhy]

Updated @ 08:40 March 11:

As the Malaysia Airlines MH370 search-and-rescue mission enters its fourth day, we still know almost nothing about the fate of the plane and the 239 people on board. Two passengers were travelling with stolen passports, but Interpol says they weren’t terrorist threats. According to Malaysian military radar, it now seems likely that MH370 turned back after its last contact with air traffic control, possibly crashing into the Strait of Malacca. We still have no idea why it turned back, or where the plane ended up.

 

[Jaslaws]

Kupatikana ama kutopatikana kwa hii ndege kutaibua mengi..tutubuni na kuiamini injili..

 

[engsir]

probably ua ryt,ila tunarudpalepale,na maendeleo yote haya ya teknolojia ndege siku ya 2 inasakwa

T.B JOSHUA aeleza ilipo ndege ya
Malaysia Airline, kuonekana hivi punde

 

[Jerhy]

Dunia hii sio ya zama zile ni ya kisasa zaidi, nakwambia ndege itapatikana, unakijua kifaa kinachoitwa flight data Recorder?


Do we live in the stone age or something?


Inside a modern, solid-state Cockpit Voice Recorder. The Flight Data Recorder is very similar.
So, think about this for a moment. We live in a day and age where GPS (and other radio triangulation methods) can track your smartphone to within a few meters, almost anywhere on Earth. With dedicated, land-based tracking networks, vehicles and devices can be tracked to within a few centimeters.-Even in the absence of GPS or radio tracking, inertial guidance (dead reckoning) has been accurate enough since the ’60s to accurately land a nuclear ICBM on the other side of the planet, or put the Apollo mission into space. (Read:-Think GPS is cool? IPS will blow your mind.)

 

[Jerhy]

Naendelea kukupa story ya kifaa hiki FDR

And then there’s connectivity. On land, there are networks (both commercial and governmental) that provide data connectivity almost everywhere. Over water is definitely harder, but satellites do provide pretty good coverage — and yes, that particular region of Asia is very well covered by communications satellites. Finally, even if an aircraft is out of satellite/radio coverage, there is absolutely nothing preventing the airplane from transmitting a really juicy low-frequency radio signal that could be picked up thousands of miles away. This is how they communicate with air traffic control, after all.

Why, then, does a plane like the MH370 keep all of its secrets locked up in a black box?-Why don’t planes constantly transmit all of their black box data, so that we know their exact location, bearing, altitude, and other important factors, at all times?

The short answer is, there’s no good reason

 

[Jerhy]

Kweli hii ni mysery ya mwaka, Taiwan nao wameongeza nguvu sijui nini kinatokea. Kuhusu satellites currently High resolution satellites kama IKONOS, Terra Modis, QUICKBIRD sidhani kama zinaweza saidia kwa jinsi zilivyojuwa designed. China imeamua kutumia satellite zao 8 HRS kusaidia ingawa most of sensors huwa zina kuwa more useful kwenye ardhi na majini is like <50m...anyway tusubiri tu

And then there’s connectivity. On land, there are networks (both commercial and governmental) that provide data connectivity almost everywhere. Over water is definitely harder, but satellites do provide pretty good coverage — and yes, that particular region of Asia is very well covered by communications satellites. Finally, even if an aircraft is out of satellite/radio coverage, there is absolutely nothing preventing the airplane from transmitting a really juicy low-frequency radio signal that could be picked up thousands of miles away. This is how they communicate with air traffic control, after all.

Why, then, does a plane like the MH370 keep all of its secrets locked up in a black box?-Why don’t planes constantly transmit all of their black box data, so that we know their exact location, bearing, altitude, and other important factors, at all times?

The short answer is, there’s no good reason

 

[Jerhy]

From where i ended,,, The ansewr is no good reason, naendelea sasa...


The long answer is, an aircraft generates a lot of data, and no one has bothered to work out a way of transmitting, receiving, and storing that data in a sensible fashion. The fact that disasters like MH370 are incredibly rare is probably one reason that the airline industry hasn’t got around to figuring it out. In 2013, there were around 36 million flights, with 281 total fatalities — and only 105 of those were on commercial jetliners. Compare this to car accidents, where in the US alone 34,080 people died in 2012.

Even so, it is hard to believe that in 2014, aircraft don’t transmit their location and bearing every few milliseconds. There is more than enough bandwidth on the lower radio frequencies for an airplane to transmit this data to the nearest land-based receiving station. Some planes, as I’m sure you’ve heard, even provide WiFi internet access to passengers. It’s hard to believe that the same network couldn’t be used to beam real-time flight data back to air traffic control.

 

[Jerhy]

Perhaps, much like how your smartphone waits for a WiFi connection before downloading or uploading large amounts of data, the plane could scale up how much data it sends: It could transmit basic flight data at all times via VHF, and then a full stream of data from the FDR when there’s a communications satellite overhead. Ultimately, even though FDRs might record more than 100 variables and diagnostics, we’re still only talking about a maximum bandwidth requirement of a few megabits; realistically, a few hundred kilobits per second would probably be more than enough.

With the Air France AF477 FDR never recovered, and now the very high profile disaster of MH370, I wouldn’t be surprised if the airline industry finally takes a serious look at mid-flight aircraft monitoring.

 

[Jerhy]

Perhaps, much like how your smartphone waits for a WiFi connection before downloading or uploading large amounts of data, the plane could scale up how much data it sends: It could transmit basic flight data at all times via VHF, and then a full stream of data from the FDR when there’s a communications satellite overhead. Ultimately, even though FDRs might record more than 100 variables and diagnostics, we’re still only talking about a maximum bandwidth requirement of a few megabits; realistically, a few hundred kilobits per second would probably be more than enough.

With the Air France AF477 FDR never recovered, and now the very high profile disaster of MH370, I wouldn’t be surprised if the airline industry finally takes a serious look at mid-flight aircraft monitoring.

See how it works

 

[stata mzuka]

Mungu saidia watoke Salama

 

[Jerhy]

Pan Am Flight 103

 

[Jerhy]

Who is terrorist "Malaysia Airlines flight MH370" in this new area of search can we get it?

 

[Jerhy]

Lakini naona wanazidishia tu helicopter, manowari na satelite hivi wanamkumbuka Mungu kwa Sala Na Maombi kwenye research hii, tuwaombee ndege ipatikane.

 

[kamonga]

Bado kuna watu hawaamini Mungu yupo? despite sayansi, no one can bring forward a plausible reason as to where something huge as plane can just disappear in thin air...

 

[Jerrymsigwa]

Satellite zitasaidia nimeona live leo CCTVNews wakizielezea

Sure Satellites ni powa sana, unaweza pata data toka 1972 mpk few hrs before your need. Zinaweza kupima spatial resolution hadi 1m kwa nchi kavu, na baadhi chache kwenye maji labda baada ya hii incidence ndipo TERRA AQUA iboreshwe zaidi

 

[Architect E.M]

samahani.. naomba kuuliza, pengine uelewa wangu mdogo, lakini nawaomba munisaidie wanajamvi wataalam..

ina maana hii ndege haikua na gps??? haionekani kwenye radar?? kwa nnavojua mimi, ndege ikiingia tu kwenye anga la nchi fulani inaonekana kwenye radar na exact position yake inajulikana.

if thats the case, what was the last position that ndege ilionekana kwenye radar??

na je, kama last position ya ndege inafahamika, have they searched kwenye deep sea ya hiyo point na ndege haipo?? kama haipo kuna possibility ya ndege kua imeenda out to space???

suala la kua ndege imeenda kutua sehem ingne ni suala ambalo haliwezekani, kwa maana radar zingeona bila shida kabisa, unless imeenda kutua na nchi husika together with the big nations with satellites and high technology zinauficha ulimwengu.

hayo ni maswali na mawazo yangu wanajamvi. nakuombeni tuendelee kusaidiana kimawazo..

 

[Mkatavimeo]

Wale jamaa wa UFO watakua wameichukua wameenda nayo kwao.

 

[Jerhy]

Bado kuna watu hawaamini Mungu yupo? despite sayansi, no one can bring forward a plausible reason as to where something huge as plane can just disappear in thin air...

Hakika!,,