Magufuli didn’t ban all forms of politics...

[Simplicity.]

.
Acha ku-panic. Unachoulizia nimekiandalia scheme of work, nimekiandalia lesson plan, nimekifundisha darasani. Rejea kitabu "Civic Education Manual for schools and colleges" by TIE. You are wasting my time.

Yaani mimi nikarejee kitabu chako, ulichokiandika kwa akili yako hii? Sasa wewe unadhani kwa sababu umefundisha ninachokuuliza ndio justification ya kwamba unaelewa zaidi? Kwamba nikuamini au niamini mawazo yako kwa sababu unachosema umekifundisha?

Nimemsikia Rais akisema, "Haiwezekani kila siku ni siasa?", Alimaanisha nini?

 

[mchekanapori]

Magufuli didn’t ban all forms of politics ​

View attachment 364452 ​

On 23 June 2016, President Magufuli of Tanzania discouraged direct political discourses which prevailed during the general elections as political contestants from various political parties were competing for key offices.

In the alternative, he encouraged indirect political discourses through the parliament, district councils and ward development councils, where the elected politicians can compete through formal arguments, both written and oral. He said nothing about direct democracy at the Local Government Authority level. (Check the video: Video)

The next morning, it was too obvious that the most active segment of the civil society--the media-- either misunderstood the logic of the President’s statement or deliberately engaged in self-misdirection for ulterior motives.

For example, Mtanzania daily newspaper reported, “Mafufuli: Hakuna siasa mpaka 2020,” literally meaning, “Magufuli says no politics until 2020.” All other media houses fell into the same unethical trap of public disinformation through the fallacy of equivocation.

In the same spirit of equivocative communication, Zitto Katwe, the ACT-Wazalendo Supreme leader slammed the President for declaring a war on multiparty democracy by allegedly banning all forms of political discourse. Professor Kitila Mkumbo too, through his recent article in Raia Mwema newspaper, has accused the President of virtually banning all forms of political discourse until 2020.

As a result of this widespread misrepresentation of the Presidents statements, the general public has ultimately been made to believe the same—that, the President has banned all forms of political discourse until 2020.

Due to this disinformation through the Tanzania’s media, Chadema’s youth wing (BAVICHA) and CCM’s youth wings (UVCCM) are now in a fierce linguistic war as to whether the forthcoming CCM’s national convention is violative of the president’s directive or not. BAVICHA believes holding the convention will violate the president’s directive, while UVCCM thinks not. I think UVCCM is right and BAVICHA is wrong. Let me explain.

When the president said that “electoral politics are over” he rightly banned direct political discourses at a national level. He did not ban indirect political discourses both at a national and sub-national levels. National conventions and other indoor meetings in accordance with the constitutions of political parties are not direct political discourses. Thus they were not banned by the president.

It is my hope that, this line of reasoning will most probably stand out clearly if we look at the definition of the word “politics.”

MY DEFINITION OF POLITICS

According to the Chinese Communist leader Mao Tse-tung, “Politics is war without bloodshed, while war is politics with bloodshed.” And according to the Prussian General Karl von Clausewitz, “War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means.”

While the relationship between war and politics is often quite close, there is a world of difference between political and violent means to achieve one’s objectives. But recognizing how close these two essential human dynamics are to each other should elevate our appreciation for the importance of a healthy and robust politics in our societies and lives.

For this reason, I will take the word “politics” to refer to any process whereby two or more persons decide, through persuasion and without resorting to physical violence, who gets what value, when, where, how, and why.

In this definition, the keyword "value" means any sought-after value in life. It refers to any object, activity, idea, principle, goal, or other phenomenon upon which large numbers of people place appreciable value, something which is considered by many individuals and groups within the political community to be good, desirable, attractive, useful, rewarding, beneficial, or advantageous.

One set of values may be tangible, or material, in form, that is, in the form of money, property, or other economic goods, services, and conditions. Another set of values may be intangible; that is, the values may be symbolic, ideological, cultural, ethical, moral, or religious in character.

Examples of intangible values in politics include the expressed goals of political activists who assert that they are concerned primarily with "social" or "family" issues, that they seek mainly to promote and defend "social" or "family" values.

The keyword “WHO” refers to the winner-loser-contestant in a political conflict, for example, Magufuli versus Lowasa in an electoral contest, MP’s versus MP’s in a medicare budget fight, two or more aspiring managers in a match of office politics, or a neighborhood civic group versus a real estate developer in a community zoning dispute.

The keyword “WHAT” relates to the stakes in the battle, for example, preservation of an endangered species in an environmental politics fight, creation of a voting district designed to empower a particular group in a redistricting process, or custody of the family dog in the personal politics surrounding a contested divorce.

The keyword “WHEN” suggests that timing often can be a critical element in determining the achievement of a political goal. For example, maneuvering one’s boss for a pay raise will be a lot more difficult after an unfavorable earnings report; promoting passage of a death penalty statute may be substantially more successful after a grisly and callous murder.

The keyword “WHERE” indicates that political possibilities may differ from one terrain to the next. For example, passing gay rights legislation in America will be easier than in conservative Tanzania; locating a halfway house for substance abusers in a highly organized and affluent suburb can be much more difficult than in a poorly organized and disadvantaged neighborhood; paying hospitals for providing the same service will result in different levels of payment for urban teaching versus rural community institutions; getting one’s spouse to spend time with the in-laws may be easier if those relatives live in the same geographic area as opposed to an island in the Caribbean.

The keyword “WHY” synthesizes all of the above to explain why some person, group, or other entity (1) got what they wanted, (2) did not get what they wanted, (3) got what they did not want, or (4) did not get what they did not want.

And the key phrase “THROUGH PERSUASION AND WITHOUT RESORTING TO PHYSICAL VIOLENCE” places politics on a continuum of methods by which rights and resources within a society are distributed.

At one end of the continuum is democratic political action in a civil society; at the other end are violence, dictatorship, and war where normal civic functions have been eliminated or have lost their capacity to work. In other words, political action is the principal alternative to violence in figuring out how to deal with the disparate needs, desires, and values in society.

This concludes the bigger part of my expository analysis of the word “politics.” But it is not all. One helpful way to test the usefulness of a definition is to try it out with familiar categories. Following are some recognizable categories of politics presented here to test the definition of politics as the way people decide who gets what, when, where, how and why, but without resorting to violence.

DEMOCRATIC ELECTORAL POLITICS

Who gets the office—public or private—after being chosen by vote? This could be the Tanzania’s president, MP, councilor, school committee member, ward committee chairman, student council president, labor union secretary treasurer, condominium association president, chair of a local gay rights organization, minister, or thousands and thousands of other positions.

DEMOCRATIC BUDGET POLITICS

Who gets what levels of resources from federal, state, county, municipal, or private budgets, for what purposes, and from whom? Governments obtain their revenues from a variety of sources and then pursue a political process to determine how those funds will be allocated. In government, for example, choices are made among uses such as education, municipal aid, prisons, health needs, environmental programs, transportation and public works, tax cuts, public assistance, courts, and much more. Each one of these uses has a host of interest groups, lobbyists, and activists determined to get the largest possible share of the pie.

HEALTH CARE POLITICS

How much money is allocated for health purposes, and how are those funds distributed to, for example, hospitals, physicians, health plans, home health programs, public health initiatives, and community health centers? Within each of these categories, controversies also emerge concerning who gets what: teaching versus community versus rural versus public hospitals; primary-care physicians versus specialists; inpatient versus outpatient services; home and community versus institutional services. Who gets what rights when they belong to a managed-care organization? Who gets the right to have physician-assisted suicide?

REDISTRICTING POLITICS

Who gets what populations and borders when the time comes to redraw political district boundaries? Officeholders will seek to get and hold onto as many like-minded voters as possible and to minimize concentrations of voters who may not be as supportive. A familiar subtheme of this topic in America involves racial and ethnic issues, namely, who gets how many African Americans and/or Hispanics drawn into their districts?

CIVIL RIGHTS POLITICS

Who gets what protections written into law to guard against discriminatory treatment? Who gets special consideration to mitigate the effects of past discrimination? Who, if anyone, gets preferential treatment for jobs and educational admissions? In this political arena, as in many others, we can observe both internal politics—among and within various organizations for dominance and influence—and external politics involving these groups and non–civil rights groups opposed to or supportive of their goals and activities.

EDUCATIONAL POLITICS

Who gets to teach evolution versus creationism? Who gets a new school building in their community, and who pays for it? Who gets tenure, and who does not? Who gets public education resources: the traditional public school system or quasi-public charter schools? Who gets public dollars to promote higher education: the state university system or scholarship programs to help students attend private universities?

OFFICE POLITICS

Who gets the best office, the one with the corner window? Who gets the job title, the promotion, the raise? Who gets the burden of having to sit next to the copier machine? Who gets access to other employees’ E-mail folders?

NEIGHBORHOOD POLITICS

Who gets public permission via zoning approval to build an extension onto his or her house? Whose neighborhood gets the new subsidized housing for mentally ill individuals? How late will the corner tavern be permitted to stay open? Who gets to be (or gets stuck as) the leader of the local block association?

FAMILY POLITICS

Who takes care of the kids on the weekend? Who gets what household chores? Who gets to watch their favorite television program when there’s a conflict in scheduling? Who gets the kids or the house or the car in a marital separation? Who gets to have Thanksgiving dinner at their house?

CONCLUSION

In light of the above analysis, it does not appear to me that President Magufuli banned all political discourses in this nation. I think not. Thus, there is a need for our civil society, and our media houses in particular, to upgrade their "information analysis and evaluation" skills when it comes to reporting political matters.

Mnaneng'eneka tu, hamjui hata mnasimamia wapi na kitu gani, kila mtu waccm anatoa tamko, kila kiongozi wa wilaya, mkoa, kipolisi yeye anakenyua limdomo lake tu bila taratibu, nchi inaongozwa na katiba sio chuki zenu binafsi, katiba na sio matakwa yenu ccm, policcm, haki lazima itendeke sio ombi.

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Mkuu kwa bandiko hili nimekuwa na uhakika wewe ndiye mwandishi wa Makala hiyo.

Kwanza, kama unavyolaumu vyombo vya habari kwa 'misinformation', unatenda jambo hilo kwa JF
Kauli ya Rais haikuanza siku moja. Ni mfululizo wa kauli za viongozi wa awamu hii

Waziri Mkuu Mjaliwa akiwa jimboni kwake waliwataka Polisi wazuie mikutano kwa 'walioshindwa' ila walioshinda kama yeye wanaweza. Hapa alilenga 'kiongozi' wa upinzani aliyekuwa anapita kuwashukuru wapi kura wake

Jeshi la Polisi liliuzia mkyusanyiko wa mazishi kule Mwanza kwasababu ya Kipindu Pindu.
Ndivyo ilivyotokea kwa Dodoma kwa ugonjwa uisojulikana.
Utakubaliana name kuwa si kazi ya jeshi la Polisi kufuatilia shughuli za wizara ya afya.

Hakuna agizo la wataalam wa afya kuhusu mikutano, jeshi linachukuaje dhamana isiyo yake?

Rais alisema mikiutano hakuna hadi mwaka 2010. Ukimsikiliza sehemu nyingi amesisitiza sana kuhusu jambo hilo na kuliomba jeshi lisaidie(rejea mikutano yake).

Kama wewe una haki ya kutoa maoni, haki hiyo anayo mtu mwingine. Hakuna sharia za nchi zinazosema shughuli za kisiasa zifanywe wapi na wakati gani. Katiba inayotumia imetoa haki na kuhakikisha kila upande unalindwa kwa masilahi ya Taifa

Nawe umepotosha umma pale uliposhindwa kueleza, jeshi la Polisi lilizuia mikutano ya ndani.
Zitto na CT pale Millenimu hata katika ofisi zao. Jeshi limezuia hata mahafali tu ambazo ni sawa na mikusanyiko ya harusi.

Kinachosumbua serikali , jeshi na wewe ni ukweli kuwa wakati serikali na jeshi la Polisi wakipiga marufuku mikutano ya kisiasa , walisahau eneo moja, kwamba CCM ni sehemu ya siasa.

Sasa CCM wanataka kufanya mkutano wao, mantiki zote za mtu anayetumia akili zake vema zinalazimisha mkutano huo upigwa marufuku kama ile ya wapinzani ya ndani na nje.
Hakuna mahali waziri mkuu au Rais alianisha aina ya mikutano

Kinachofanyika ni kutafuta majibu ya kulazimisha ili kulisafisha jeshi na kutoa nafasi ya kuwakamata watu ilimradi tu wana uwezo huo. Kinachofanyika ni kutaka ksafisha makosa yakiyofanywa yanayotia aibu kwan kusema jambo leo na kusema tofauti kesho, ni kushusha heshima sana

Makala yako imelenga spinning, ukificha ikweli uliotangulia na kuchagua kauli za kuengea hoja.
Ninaheshimu mawazo yako kama ni huru, kama ni ya kikazi kwakweli jitathmini kama ipo heshima iliyobaki usoni kwako.

.
Kwa ufahamu wangu, mikutano iliyopigwa marufuku ni ile ya Bwana mvi kwenda kuwashukuru wananchi na kuwambia kwamba "nilishinda, nikaporwa ushindi, Magufuli sio Rais halali, lakini nimekubali yaishe ili damu isimwagike." Huu ni uhalifu chini ya Kanuni ya Adhabu CAP 16 RE 2002. Wewe huoni jambo hili?

 

[Simplicity.]

English is not your language why break it? Ungetumia Kiswahili ingekuwa na impact zaidi. Mimi jibu langu ninalileta Kama swali lililojikita kwenye title yako. Hayo mengine uliyoandika hayaeleweki kwa sababu umebomoa lugha ya watu. Nirudi kwenye swali-je, rais Ana mamlaka ya kikatiba ya kuzuia any form of politics in Tanzania? Kama anayo naomba utuelimishe.

Nasisitiza, umetumia neno "any form".

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Yaani mimi nikarejee kitabu chako, ulichokiandika kwa akili yako hii? Sasa wewe unadhani kwa sababu umefundisha ninachokuuliza ndio justification ya kwamba unaelewa zaidi? Kwamba nikuamini au niamini mawazo yako kwa sababu unachosema umekifundisha?

Nimemsikia Rais akisema, "Haiwezekani kila siku ni siasa?", Alimaanisha nini?

.
Alimaanisha, "Haiwezekani kila siku ni siasa za uchaguzi (electoral politics)"

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Mnaneng'eneka tu, hamjui hata mnasimamia wapi na kitu gani, kila mtu waccm anatoa tamko, kila kiongozi wa wilaya, mkoa, kipolisi yeye anakenyua limdomo lake tu bila taratibu, nchi inaongozwa na katiba sio chuki zenu binafsi, katiba na sio matakwa yenu ccm, policcm, haki lazima itendeke sio ombi.

.
Ni haki kwa chama cha siasa kuzunguka nchi kikieneza habari za uwongo kwamba Rais Magufuli hakushinda kihalali? Jitazame tena.

 

[KAMUGUNGA]

Hivi ndo huyu Deus Kahangwa tuliyeambiwa anahamia CCM wiki ijayo? No wonder!

 

[Simplicity.]

Mkuu kwa bandiko hili nimekuwa na uhakika wewe ndiye mwandishi wa Makala hiyo.

Kwanza, kama unavyolaumu vyombo vya habari kwa 'misinformation', unatenda jambo hilo kwa JF

Kauli ya Rais haikuanza siku moja. Ni mfululizo wa kauli za viongozi wa awamu hii

Waziri Mkuu Majaliwa akiwa jimboni Ruangwa aliwataka Polisi wazuie mikutano kwa 'walioshindwa' ila walioshinda kama yeye wanaweza.

Hapa alilenga 'kiongozi' wa upinzani aliyekuwa anapita kuwashukuru wapi kura wake

Jeshi la Polisi liliuzia mkusanyiko wa mazishi kule Mwanza kwasababu ya Kipindu Pindu.
Ndivyo ilivyotokea kwa Dodoma kwa ugonjwa uisojulikana.

Utakubaliana nami, si kazi ya jeshi la Polisi kufuatilia shughuli za wizara ya afya.

Hakuna agizo la wataalam wa afya, jeshi linachukuaje dhamana isiyo yake?

Rais alisema mikutano hakuna hadi mwaka 2010. Ukimsikiliza sehemu nyingi amesisitiza sana kuhusu jambo hilo na kuliomba jeshi lisaidie(rejea mikutano yake).

Kama wewe una haki ya kutoa maoni, haki hiyo anayo mtu mwingine.

Hakuna sharia za nchi zinazosema shughuli za kisiasa zifanywe wapi na wakati gani.

Katiba imetoa haki na kuhakikisha kila upande unalindwa kwa masilahi ya Taifa

Nawe umepotosha umma uliposhindwa kueleza, jeshi la Polisi lilizuia mikutano ya ndani.

Zitto na CT pale Millenimu hata katika ofisi zao.
Jeshi limezuia hata mahafali tu ambazo ni sawa na mikusanyiko ya harusi.

Kinachosumbua serikali , jeshi na wewe ni ukweli kuwa wakati serikali na jeshi la Polisi wakipiga marufuku mikutano ya kisiasa , walisahau eneo moja, kwamba CCM ni sehemu ya siasa.

CCM wanataka kufanya mkutano wao, mantiki zote za mtu anayetumia akili zake vema zinalazimisha mkutano huo upigwe marufuku kama ile ya wapinzani ya ndani na nje.

Hakuna mahali waziri mkuu au Rais alianisha aina ya mikutano ya ndani au nje.

Hizi ni hoja za kupandikiza za jeshi la Polisi ambalo kila siku limekuja na sababu na kujitia aibu kama ilivyoandikwa na gazeti mwananchi

Kinachofanyika ni kutafuta majibu ya kulazimisha ili kulisafisha jeshi na kutoa nafasi ya kuwakamata watu ilimradi tu wana uwezo huo.

Kinachofanyika ni kutaka kusafisha makosa yaliyofanywa yanayotia aibu, kusema jambo leo na kusema tofauti kesho, ni kushusha heshima sana

Makala yako imelenga spinning, ukificha ikweli uliotangulia na kuchagua kauli za kujengea hoja.

Kitendo cha serikali kupiga marufuku mikutano, kinakiuka katiba. Kubwa Zaidi kinaonyesha yapo mambo serikali inayotaka yasisemwe . Mambo gani hayo?
Kwanini wanaogopa kuzungumza? Kuna nini wasichotaka umma uelewe?

Ninaheshimu sana mawazo yako kama ni huru, kama ni ya kikazi kwakweli jitathmini kama ipo heshima iliyobaki usoni.

Mimi nakuelewa mkuu, halafu ni kama ulipotea!

 

[Simplicity.]

Kwa sasa ajira inayolipa ni siasa.

Soma kadiri uwezavyo. Halafu hakikisha unajenga urafiki na wanasiasa ili siku wakiwa kwenye vyeo vya kisiasa

wakukumbuke kwenye ufalme wao wa kuteua watendaji pengine u-RC,DC.DED.DAS.Ubunge nk...

Hawa watu sijui kwa nini hawana haya, yaani unajitoa ufahamu kiasi hiki, njaa mbaya aisee! Watu wanajaribu kila namna ili wapate nafasi.

 

[Nguruvi3]

.
Kwa ufahamu wangu, mikutano iliyopigwa marufuku ni ile ya Bwana mvi kwenda kuwashukuru wananchi na kuwambia kwamba "nilishinda, nikaporwa ushindi, Magufuli sio Rais halali, lakini nimekubali yaishe ili damu isimwagike." Huu ni uhalifu chini ya Kanuni ya Adhabu CAP 16 RE 2002. Wewe huoni jambo hili?

OK now you show the true color.

Kama alizuiwa yeye na serikali imeshaundwa kwanini mikutano inazuiwa tena?

Imefika mahali hata mahafali inawatia hofu viongozi

Lakini pia, ilikuwa nafasi nzuri ya kumkamata Mamvi kwa uchochezi.
Si Magufuli ana dola , nini kinamtisha

Pili, mkutano wa ACT ulizuiwa, tena wa ndani! kulikuwa na sababu gani?

Tatu, Polisi na serikali wazuia hata mkusanyiko wa mazishi kule Mwanza. Ni sawa hiyo?

Nne, tueleze ni wajibu wa jeshi la Polisi kutangaza kipindu pindu na kuzuia mikutano?

Tano, Jeshi la Polisi lina uwezo gani wa kubaini maradhi yasiyhitaji mikutano?

Sita, tueleze kwanini waziri mkuu alizuia mikutano akisema ni wakati wa kazi?

Utaona kuwa Polisi hawakujua CCM itakuwa na mkutano.

Serikali ilisahau wananchi wa leo si wa jana na kwamba hawawezi kudanganywa na sababu za kitoto zisizo na mashiko

Tamko la Magufuli kupiga mikutano marufuku liekiuka katiba na uhuru wa kukusanyika na kutoa mawazo ndani ya sheria.

Ni tamko lililochagua makundi ya jamii na hivyo kuleta 'discrimination'

Rais ni kiongozi wa Taifa, hatakiwi kubagua CCM na Wapinzani.

Akishatangazwa anakuwa wa wote, wezi, wafanyabaishara wapinzani na WanaCCM.

Ni jambo la hatari kutenga CCM na makundi mengine. Ni kujenga matabaka

Ndio maana nasema kama ni mawazo huru naheshimu sana mawazo yako, kama umeagizwa au kutumwa, kwakweli tafuta mahali pa kunawa, uso umejaa taka

 

[Simplicity.]

.
Alimaanisha, "Haiwezekani kila siku ni siasa za uchaguzi (electoral politics)"

Wapi aliposema siasa za uchaguzi?

 

[Descartes]

Hawa watu sijui kwa nini hawana haya, yaani unajitoa ufahamu kiasi hiki, njaa mbaya aisee! Watu wanajaribu kila namna ili wapate nafasi.

Kwa sasa ni hiyo ndo "short cut" kuelekea kwenye mafanikio.

Hutumi cha maombi sijui usaili, sijui nini na nini...subiria tu taarifa za habari utasikia umerushwa tu umeteuliwa

kimwendokasi kuwa RC au DAS au DED au DC au Mbunge.

Siasa inalipa kwa sasa, cha muhimu ujue kujitoa ufahamu...

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Amanito;
Kuna mambo naona wengi wanajiingiza ili kujipatia ujiko. Wewe nawe ni mmoja wa hao wanaojitafutia ujiko. Unatoa mfano mmoja tu wa Chaso Darisalama kupata nafasi ya kufanya mahafali yao. Mbona unasahau kuwa Dodoma walinyimwa? Mbona hukumbuki Mbeya?
Najiuliza, Hakuna msemaji wa rais au ni magazeti? Mnamsifu huyu mwandishi kumbe anajitafutia ujiko tu hapa. Yeye tangu lini akawa msemaji wa rais? Kama ni watu ambao hawakumwelewa rais, nadhani ni jeshi letu la Polisi, haswa wale makada nguli wa chama waliopewa ukuu huko. Hawasikii la muidhini wala adhana.
Wao huona kutokuwepo usalama tu kwenye mikutano ya hadhara ya UKAWA & Co. Why this?? Siungi mkono BAVICHA kwenda kuzuia ccm kufanya mkutano wao Dodoma ila nawaambia CCM. hizi double standards mlizowaamuru Polisi, mnawafanya wachukiwe na raia.
Msidhani kuwa upinzani ni ugaidi. Gaidi hana chama. Jambazi hana chama. Hata UKAWA aweza kuliokoa taifa kwa kutoa taarifa mapema. Ila, kwa mtindo huu wa visa na visasi sidhan ka ndo umoja wa kitaifa.
Ningelitamani, rais angelichukua muda wake kwa sababu ya mapenzi yake kwa taifa hili, achukue nafasi nyingine aeleze yeye maana ya maneno yake wala sio waandishi uchwara wenye njaa zao kutueleza. Rais wetu hayupo safarini, avumilie tu, aseme neno moja kuokoa hii sintofahamu.

.
Umetumia maneno makali 'waandishi uchwara." Kwa mujibu wa Kamusi ya Kiswahili Sanifu (Oxford University Press, 1980) neno "uchwara" ni kivumishi kinachomaanisha "-enye kutokuwa na thamani, -a kudharaulika, duni." Kwa hiyo unasema, hiyo thread yangu hapo juu ni yenye kutokuwa na thamani, ya kudharaulika, na duni. Kama hilo ndilo hitimisho lako, basi wewe unao ubongo uchwara.

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

.
Kwa sasa ni hiyo ndo "short cut" kuelekea kwenye mafanikio. Hutumi cha maombi sijui usaili, sijui nini na nini...subiria tu taarifa za habari utasikia umerushwa tu umeteuliwa kimwendokasi kuwa RC au DAS au DED au DC au Mbunge. Siasa inalipa kwa sasa, cha muhimu ujue kujitoa ufahamu...

.
Descartes, mie ni Prime Minister wa "medula oblangata" kwa miaka mingi sasa. Sihitaji vyeo chini ya hapo.

 

[Amanito]

Amanito;
Kuna mambo naona wengi wanajiingiza ili kujipatia ujiko. Wewe nawe ni mmoja wa hao wanaojitafutia ujiko. Unatoa mfano mmoja tu wa Chaso Darisalama kupata nafasi ya kufanya mahafali yao. Mbona unasahau kuwa Dodoma walinyimwa? Mbona hukumbuki Mbeya?
Najiuliza, Hakuna msemaji wa rais au ni magazeti? Mnamsifu huyu mwandishi kumbe anajitafutia ujiko tu hapa. Yeye tangu lini akawa msemaji wa rais? Kama ni watu ambao hawakumwelewa rais, nadhani ni jeshi letu la Polisi, haswa wale makada nguli wa chama waliopewa ukuu huko. Hawasikii la muidhini wala adhana.
Wao huona kutokuwepo usalama tu kwenye mikutano ya hadhara ya UKAWA & Co. Why this?? Siungi mkono BAVICHA kwenda kuzuia ccm kufanya mkutano wao Dodoma ila nawaambia CCM. hizi double standards mlizowaamuru Polisi, mnawafanya wachukiwe na raia.
Msidhani kuwa upinzani ni ugaidi. Gaidi hana chama. Jambazi hana chama. Hata UKAWA aweza kuliokoa taifa kwa kutoa taarifa mapema. Ila, kwa mtindo huu wa visa na visasi sidhan ka ndo umoja wa kitaifa.
Ningelitamani, rais angelichukua muda wake kwa sababu ya mapenzi yake kwa taifa hili, achukue nafasi nyingine aeleze yeye maana ya maneno yake wala sio waandishi uchwara wenye njaa zao kutueleza. Rais wetu hayupo safarini, avumilie tu, aseme neno moja kuokoa hii sintofahamu.

Mkuu mimi siungi mkono chama chochote na sina unazi wa mambo ya kisiasa yasiyokuwa na hoja... Lakini pia naunga mkono hoja yako ya kutaka Mh.Raisi atoe ufafanuzi kwa kauli yake!!

ila hizi double standard mbona zipo ata kwa CHADEMA pia... CHASO Dar es salaam na CHASO Iringa walifanya mikutano yao bila polisi kuwazuia... Je wao walifuata taratibu zipi??

kama lengo la Mh.Raisi ni kuzuia mikutano ya kisiasa ambayo haivunji taratibu zozote apo mimi simuungi mkono maana kufanya ivyo ni kuminya Demokrasia... ila kama vyama vya siasa vinakiuka taratibu kwanini visidhibitiwe??!!

Siku zote UHURU bila NIDHAMU ni UWENDAZIMU na NIDHAMU bila UHURU ni UTUMWA... lazima tujifunze kutumia uhuru wetu vizuri.

 

[Olecranon]

.
Acha ku-panic. Unachoulizia nimekiandalia scheme of work, nimekiandalia lesson plan, nimekifundisha darasani. Rejea kitabu "Civic Education Manual for schools and colleges" by TIE. You are wasting my time.

Wewe unafundisha? Kwa lugha gani? I am sorry your English is very poor! Rais anaongoza nchi kufuatana na katiba ya nchi. Vyama vya siasa vinaongozwa kutegemeana na katiba zao na sheria ya vyama vingi chini ya katiba ya nchi. Hivyo vyama Biko huru kufanya siasa anytime and anywhere they want as long as they are not breaking the laws set fourth by the constitution.

 

[Descartes]

.
Descartes, mie ni RC wa "medula oblangata" kwa miak mingi sasa.

Mkuu, RC, sina tatizo mimi na u-boss wako. Nakupongeza sana.

 

[Simplicity.]

Kwa sasa ni hiyo ndo "short cut" kuelekea kwenye mafanikio.

Hutumi cha maombi sijui usaili, sijui nini na nini...subiria tu taarifa za habari utasikia umerushwa tu umeteuliwa

kimwendokasi kuwa RC au DAS au DED au DC au Mbunge.

Siasa inalipa kwa sasa, cha muhimu ujue kujitoa ufahamu...

Halafu Social media zinawatoa watu sana, akina polepole walipiga kelele wakasikiwa, na wengine wengi, inaonekana macho ya serikali yapo sana mitandaoni!

Ila Magufuli ana kauli tata balaa, cheki hii, "Kwa sasa hivi, iwe kwa bahati nzuri au kwa bahati mbaya, serikali inayoongozwa ni ya Chama cha mapinduzi.."

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Wapi aliposema siasa za uchaguzi?

.
Hapa:
“Niwaombe wanasiasa wenzangu wafanye siasa za ushindani kwa nguvu zote baada ya miaka mitano ili wananchi watuhoji tuliyoyaahidi kama tumeyatekeleza au hatujayetekeleza. Kila nchi hata zile zilizobobea kwenye demokrasia unapokwisha uchaguzi unakuwa ni wakati wa kazi. Haiwezekani mkawa kila siku ni siasa watu watalima saa ngapi? Kila siku ni siasa, ni vema tukatimiza wajibu wetu tuliopewa na wananchi na watatupima kwenye hilo. Ni matumaini yangu kuwa Watanzania tunaowaongoza wanataka maendeleo. Iwe kwa bahati nzuri au mbaya Serikali inayoongoza ni ya Chama Cha Mapinduzi. Yapo tuliyoyaahidi kuyatekeleza kwa wananchi katika kipindi cha miaka mitano, nisingependa kuona mtu yeyote ananichelewesha kutekeleza hayo niliyoahidi kwa kipindi cha miaka mitano…”

 

[Deus J. Kahangwa]

Mkuu, RC, sina tatizo mimi na u-boss wako. Nakupongeza sana.

.
Hapo sawa.