Errors in genesis


Nilifikiri kuwa hii kitu umetoa kichwani mwako mwenyewe, Kumbe ni mawazo ya mtu mwingine Lunatic ZAIDI yako!
Ungekuwa vizuri upstairs usingefanya C&P!
 
Nilifikiri kuwa hii kitu umetoa kichwani mwako mwenyewe, Kumbe ni mawazo ya mtu mwingine Lunatic ZAIDI yako!
Ungekuwa vizuri upstairs usingefanya C&P!
I'm totally dumbfounded about this situation
how can an insane person imitate an ideas from lunatic person more than himself?
if you think this is transcript,then give me original copy of it,otherwise you are just mentally deranged as your lord is
 
Guess what bro some rogue scientists are using the right science secretly but thats a topic for another time.
 

Je wewe utakufa ukikosa chakula kwa siku MOJA??? It's a matter of scheduling things...
 
Hata Mungu alisema kila amtafutaye kwa bidii atamuona.. Majibu mengi ya maswali magumu ambayo kila binadamu anawaza, either kwa kujiuliza au kumuuliza mwengine ni Mungu ndio anaweza kuyajib.. "ntakuonyesha mambo makuu na magumu usiyoyajua, science ni ya binadamu, ambaye Mungu alisema wanadam Wana utashi wa mavumbuzi mengi, lakn haitakuja hata siku moja utashi wa mavumbuzi ya wanadam ukafikia utashi wa Mungu, maana alisema kabisa anayowaza yeye sio tunayowaza sisi.. Ukifikiria tu mpangilio wa siku ulizoishi duniani u can't prove scientifically kuwa kila tukio ulipanga kulifanya, kwa wakat gani, na nani, imekuawaje mpaka mkafanya na uliyefanya nae, na matokeo yake yaliyopatikana kama uliplay part 100 % kuyafanikisha.. From here utajua hata kama Kuna percent ndogo ya uncertainty ya kuwa na mpangilio ambao hukuusababisha ndivyo hivyo pia Kuna mambo huwezi kuyapambanua kwa akili yetu ndogo, (ya kibinadam) labda upate Msaada wa realm nyengine au wa kiungu
 
wenyewwe wnakuambia ni mpango wa Mungu, YAANI UKIITAFAKARI DINI SANA UTAJUA KUA NDIO UPUMBAVU WA MWIIISHO KABISA, AMBAO UNAIKOST SANA DUNIA

You said it all brother
 

Yo're emperically very correct but totally wrong spritually. The Biible is full of spritual knowledge which cannot in any way, be proved by using scientific instruments.
 
You are talking science faith, not God faith. Remember, they are all faiths.
 
You are talking science faith, not God faith. Remember, they are all faiths.

you are quite wrong!

dictionary define "faith" in this way;
faith:belief that is not based on proof.

but in science, theory can never be accepted unless there is proof wich reinforce it

from that maxim,it obvious that there is no faith in science,because science contrary to religions it based on proof and fact
 
Yo're emperically very correct but totally wrong spritually. The Biible is full of spritual knowledge which cannot in any way, be proved by using scientific instruments.

you are correct!

but think this for moment,if something can never be detected in any way,then in principle it doesn't logically exist
so do you still believe that genesis story of creation is not a myth?
 
So you know you cannot find proof in religion. What are you looking for in the bible? What kind of proof are you asking for if you already know there is none?

Take it or leave it. Life goes on.
 

Mungu
Hachunguziki
 
Ungekuwepo wakat dunia inaumbwa ningekuelewa. Kile ambacho unaona kidunia principle kwa Mungu ni kinyume ukitaka kujua mwamini na uombe akuonyeshe majib ya maswali yako lakin sio kutumia principle za waumbwa
 


It's you committing fallacies for you have no idea about how the narratives were gathered and organised and whether what they present is a history of eg creation or a theology of creation. If it's a history then everything recorded follows in a chronological order and if it's a theology, then the chronological order doesn't matter what it matters is the message, which is intended for the addressees. My point is that it's not a history and so the arrangements are not necessarily in a chronological order. In this sense, the logic of history is not the logic of theology.
 

1. Kitu cha kuiuliza ni: is the bible a history or theology book?
2. Kama ni history book ina maana whatever is recorded happened the way it's recorded.
3. Kama ni theology book ina maana whatever is recorded did not necessarily happen the way it's recorded.
4. I'll explain as you pose questions.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn moreโ€ฆ