hi i am interested by the etymological database project of Serguei sTAROSTIN
i want to participate in it , bringing infos about african languages to compare them with melano- hindus( veddoids and dravidians) people who originate from Africa as said Bernard Sergent of french CNRS
I think it can help us better understand ancient india and south indians and Mundas and adivasis and Nihalis languages and origins better !
I also noticed sumerians have veddoid origins as said here in the introduction comment les origines noires du Qatar et des Emirats arabes unis and that they are very closed Nihalis and dravidians the first being pure veddoids , the seconds being mixed veddoid/ elamite origin people and that Nihali and dravidian and sumerian cognated each other ( higher for dravidian and sumerian and dravidian and Nihali, a lil bit for Nihali and sumerian ) meaning they surely of the same phylum Did the Nihali/Nahali language isolate or a language from the same phylum influence any other language families in South Asia?
and we know sumerians were the first people of south to central IRAK the same way Nimrod who has a sumerian name ( Nim meaning high in sumerian and dravidian tamil where nimir = to go high , to arise ) and was a koushite , a black , when sumerians called themselves sag gig ga ( which is translated by zalmat qaqqadu who is also the name of the adamu race of sumerians tales , the black race according to them contrasted to white/fair race called called Sarku) and veddoids are the first except to no one as sumerians to people south irak and Qatar and Bahrein first peopled too by ubaidians ancestors of sumerians
So what you think about it ?
Would you like to accept me to paticipate in the Etymological Database project ?
Would you fund me to help you with african langages ?
I just ask about 50 Euros by month to help me do the work
Do you agree ?
i want to participate in it , bringing infos about african languages to compare them with melano- hindus( veddoids and dravidians) people who originate from Africa as said Bernard Sergent of french CNRS
I think it can help us better understand ancient india and south indians and Mundas and adivasis and Nihalis languages and origins better !
I also noticed sumerians have veddoid origins as said here in the introduction comment les origines noires du Qatar et des Emirats arabes unis and that they are very closed Nihalis and dravidians the first being pure veddoids , the seconds being mixed veddoid/ elamite origin people and that Nihali and dravidian and sumerian cognated each other ( higher for dravidian and sumerian and dravidian and Nihali, a lil bit for Nihali and sumerian ) meaning they surely of the same phylum Did the Nihali/Nahali language isolate or a language from the same phylum influence any other language families in South Asia?
and we know sumerians were the first people of south to central IRAK the same way Nimrod who has a sumerian name ( Nim meaning high in sumerian and dravidian tamil where nimir = to go high , to arise ) and was a koushite , a black , when sumerians called themselves sag gig ga ( which is translated by zalmat qaqqadu who is also the name of the adamu race of sumerians tales , the black race according to them contrasted to white/fair race called called Sarku) and veddoids are the first except to no one as sumerians to people south irak and Qatar and Bahrein first peopled too by ubaidians ancestors of sumerians
So what you think about it ?
Would you like to accept me to paticipate in the Etymological Database project ?
Would you fund me to help you with african langages ?
I just ask about 50 Euros by month to help me do the work
Do you agree ?
