Waingereza kama kawa wawakabili warusi

Waingereza kama kawa wawakabili warusi

Wacha1

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Posts
16,676
Reaction score
8,246
25D7168000000578-2959849-image-m-93_1424369474740.jpg
Russian President Vladimir Putin attended a wreath laying ceremony in Saint Petersburg today amid growing alarm over his intentions in Eastern Europe

David Cameron has been warned that Britain cannot afford any more defence cuts in the wake of the growing threat posed by Vladimir Putin - despite claiming the UK military is strong enough to fend off Russian aggression.

The Conservative chair of the Defence Select Committee Rory Stewart said Mr Putin was watching to see if Britain was going soft on defence. He said Britain's military could not stand another round of defence cuts after the election.

Mr Stewart's stark warning comes after RAF fighters, were scrambled to escort two Russian bombers in international airspace off the coast of Cornwall yesterday.

A Typhoon jet was seen taking off from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire at 4.30pm, shortly before the Russian planes were intercepted.

The Prime Minister today admitted Mr Putin's regime was 'trying to make some sort of point' but insisted the UK military had the capability to protect the country.

Russia meanwhile attacked Britain's 'too old' Defence Secretary Michael Fallon after he claimed Mr Putin posed a threat to EU and NATO states Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

The Kremlin accused the Tory minister of 'complete intolerable' stereotyping of Russia in his comments which were 'beyond the bounds of diplomatic ethics'.

Vladimir Komoyedov, chairman of the Russian parliament's defence committee, accused 62-year-old Mr Fallon of 'yet another stupidity' and said he was 'too old, not only in terms of his age but also in his ideas'.

The row comes after Britain raised concerns over the latest in a series of military manoeuvres by Russian forces around the UK as relations between Russia and the West continue to sour.

An MoD spokesman said: 'RAF Quick Reaction Alert Typhoon fighter aircraft were launched yesterday after Russian aircraft were identified flying close to UK airspace.

'The Russian planes were escorted by the RAF until they were out of the UK area of interest. At no time did the Russian military aircraft cross into UK sovereign airspace.'

However, a witness claims she saw the Russian planes flying inland in Cornwall while she was on a driving lesson yesterday afternoon.

Sue Bamford, 45, from Bodmin, said: 'I live in Cornwall and we see a lot of military aircraft around. But this was like nothing I had seen before.

'They were flying really low through the St Mawgan valley and around Cornwall.

'I am not an imaginative person in that way. I know what I saw - and I saw the Russian bombers flying over UK soil.'

Her driving instructor Claire Brazil, from St Austell, added: 'I am not an expert but they did look out of the ordinary for Cornish airspace. We leant up to have a look, they were definitely inland, not over the coast.'

The Ministry of Defence said it is standing by its original statement.

Prime Minister David Cameron said that Moscow appeared to be trying to make 'some sort of a point' with the latest incursion by Russian warplanes.

'I think what this episode demonstrates is that we do have the fast jets, the pilots, the systems in place to protect the United Kingdom,' he said during an event at Felixstowe in Suffolk.

'I suspect what's happening here is that the Russians are trying to make some sort of a point and I don't think we should dignify it with too much of a response.'

But Defence Committee chair Rory Stewart told MailOnline it was crucial Britain did not go soft on defence spending next year.

'The most important thing is the UK must make a commitment to spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence. That's what Putin will be looking for. We can't at the moment be showing weakness.

'The problem isn't about planes this year – the problem is next year. At the moment we've got the planes, but we need the funding in the next four or five years.'

Mr Cameron has refused to guarantee that he will not cut defence spending below 2 per cent of GDP after the election - despite signing up to a pledge to maintain the military budget at last year's Nato summit in Wales.

The Defence Secretary Michael Fallon has insisted that Nato is ready to fight back against Russian aggression as it poses a 'real and present danger' to the Baltic States.

He told of the threat to Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia as Vladimir Putin continues to 'test us' by deploying submarines and warplanes near British territory.

Defence analyst Major Charles Heyman said the flights were being carried out by Russia to learn more about Britain's air defences.

He told MailOnline: 'What they are doing is getting us to turn on our radars so they look at our radars and suck up electronic intelligence. They are also flying the Russian flag.

'It's a game that has been played for years and we do the same thing to them. In some respects, it is good practice for both sides. It's like two children staring at each other in the playground as if to say; 'Stay away from me'.

'I don't think it is anything to worry about particularly. The situation in Ukraine has changed things though in that we are now pushing the Russians and they are pushing us.

'They are trying to say; 'Don't underestimate us, don't disrespect us, we're still here'.'

The latest incident came after a similar approach by two identical Russian planes last month off the coast of Bournemouth.

Experts said then that the manoeuvre could have been designed to 'probe the RAF speed of reaction' – raising fears that the Russians were looking for weaknesses in the British fighter force.

Russia is said to have stepped up military manoeuvres as Britain joins the chorus of international condemnation of Vladimir Putin's support and alleged arming of rebels in Ukraine.

During the similar incident last month, the Typhoons were so close to the Russian planes – roughly 1,000ft away – that they could signal to the pilots.

Dr Samuel Greene, director of the Russia Institute at King's College London, said: 'People thought that after the end of the Soviet Union, Russia would become more and more like Europe but it hasn't happened that way. Russia has its own system.'

He added: 'Russia can't project force to the same degree. Their best weapon is unpredictability.'

Earlier this week, a Russian warship was intercepted by the Royal Navy as it strayed close to the UK while passing through the English Channel.

The vessel – equipped with missiles, anti-aircraft guns and torpedoes – was monitored and escorted by a heavily-armed British frigate, HMS Argyll.

Britain summoned the Russian ambassador for a dressing down after long-range bombers flew over the Channel close to UK airspace last month, disrupting civil aviation and prompting Britain, like today, to scramble two Typhoon jets.

Fears have been raised that a Russian military plane could crash with an airliner after a near-miss in the skies over a Sweden last year when a spy-plane switched off its transponders, making it invisible to commercial radar.

Figures released by the MOD show that last year the RAF deployed jets in response to Russian military aircrafts eight times.

Russian president Vladimir Putin will try to 'humiliate' Nato if the West goes soft on him, a senior MP has warned.

Rory Stewart, the influential chair of the Commons defence select committee, said the world was facing a 'genuinely dangerous' situation in Eastern Europe and warned there was a risk of unintended escalation.

He said the threat posed by Russia should force all political parties to guarantee there will not be further cuts in defence spending.

Mr Stewart told BBC Radio 4's The World At One: 'I think there is always the risk of that, but equally there is the risk that if you do nothing, you end up with violence.

'I mean this is the razor edge which Western policy makers need to walk. If they do nothing, Putin who is a real opportunist, will be encouraged to push his luck and see if he can humiliate Nato. If on the other hand we do too much, we could risk provoking an overreaction.

'I think we are facing a genuinely dangerous situation and this really means that Britain needs to make the commitments, the long-term commitments, to defence spending.'

He said it was 'very important' to send a clear message to Mr Putin that Nato is 'actually serious about defending its own territory'.

The MP said: 'I think it should be a manifesto commitment from all the political parties and it is something that I think Russia will be looking at quite carefully.'

He added: 'The world has never been so dangerous. We need to have a very honest conversation with the public, the world is more dangerous now than any time in the past 20 years.

'We cannot lurch to isolationism. We have to reach out into the world otherwise Europe will find itself in a very dangerous situation.'

It came after Russia reacted with fury after Defence Secretary Michael Fallon warned there was a 'real and present danger' that Moscow could repeat the tactics used to de-stabilise Ukraine against the Baltic States.

Deputy foreign minister Aleksandr Lukashevich said his words were 'beyond diplomatic ethics' and warned that the Kremlin would 'find a way to react'.

In his comments to journalists travelling with him to Sierra Leone, Mr Fallon compared the threat from Russian president Vladimir Putin to Islamic State and warned Nato had to be ready to respond to any further aggression 'whatever form it takes'.

In a statement reported by the Russia Today website, Mr Lukashevich said his remarks were 'absolutely unacceptable'.

'His absolutely unacceptable characteristics of the Russian Federation remind me of last year's speech of US president Barack Obama before the UN general assembly, in which he mentioned Russia among the three most serious challenges his country was facing,' he said.

'I believe we will find a way to react to Mr Secretary's statements.'


http://goo.gl/wVzT4J
 
Mkuu,

Warusi wanawajaribu wahasimu wao wa vita vya baridi vya miaka ile.

Wanaangalia kasi ya vyombo ya usalama wa angani vya UK imekaa vipi kujibu au kufuatilia ikiwa hizo Bear Bomber zinafika hadi katika hio anga la kimataifa.

Halafu warusi wana hii tabia ya kuja karibu na IAS nje ya UK, na mwaka jana ilibidi UK wawaombe nchi za France, US na Canada ndege kubwa ya kutafuta manowari chini ya maji kwani wao (UK) hawana hio Maritime Patrol Aircraft na utafutaji ulienda hadi kwenye bahari nje ya pwani ya Scotland, ambako again kwenye IWs manowari za kirusi zilikuwa hapo.

Halafu UK bado ipo nyuma miaka 9 kukamilisha uundaji wa manowari ya kivita mpya ambayo itasaidia kukabiliana na vita vya majini, kwani serikali ya D Cameron ilivunja na kubomoa ile manowari yao maarufu ya Nimrod ambayo ilikuwa ndio best ever reconnaissance tool kwao kwa sababu ya kubana matumizi.
 
UK kelele tu hawana lolote lile. Wanategemea NATO

Na NATO kwa kiasi kikubwa ni US.

Ila hayo madege ya Kirusi dizaini ni ya zamani sana.

Yanafanana na yale madege ya WWII.

But I still got my money on the UK.

Urusi hamna kitu kabisa. Ni sawa mbwa koko tu.
 
[FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Arial][LEFT][COLOR=#800000][FONT=Arial][SIZE=4][B]Putin anafikiri UK ni third world country, ajaribu akione cha ntema kuni.[/B][/SIZE]


The UK would crush him na hiyo midege yake ya WWII.
[/FONT]
[/FONT][/COLOR]​
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/LEFT]
 
Uiingereza peke yake haiiwezi Urusi. Wakuu wa Jeshi la Uiingereza kila siku wanalalamika kuwa serikali yao imepunguza sana matumuzi kununua vifaa vya kijeshi kutokana na hali mbaya ya uchumi.

Sidhani Urusi wanataka vita, wanajaribu tu kuona nguvu za radar za Uiingereza na pia kuwakumbusha kuwa Urusi ina uwezo wa kijeshi bado. Hizo bomber Tupolov Tu 95 hata kama za zamani, zina uwezo wa kubeba mabomu ya nuclear.

Soma zaidi chini hapo kutoka dailymail.co.uk


Country 'could not cope' if Russia attacked because our defences have been 'decimated', say military chiefs
RAF fighter jets scramble to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles off Cornwall

.......former air chiefs say number of British fighter squadrons has fallen from 26 at Cold War end to just seven

Britain cannot defend itself against the military threat posed by Russia, former top brass warned last night.

Military chiefs said the UK ‘could not cope’ if Russia attacked because our defences had been ‘decimated’.

Since 2010, the Coalition has axed 30,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen as well as hundreds of warships, fighter jets, spy planes and tanks in a bid to cut the Ministry of Defence’s budget by £4.7 billion and plug a £40 billion hole in equipment spending.

Air Commodore Andrew Lambert, who commanded Allied forces in northern Iraq in 1999, said: ‘If the Russians turned up the heat, we would struggle badly.

‘If Putin wanted to attack, he would not send a pair of bombers, he would send the lot and saturate our defences; we couldn’t cope.

‘The Typhoon is a really good aircraft but with their relatively small numbers they would be overwhelmed: the Russians would outflank us, go around us or just go through us.’

He added: ‘The modern generation of politicians has grown up in absolute security – they’ve never felt a threat to their existence, safety or security.
 
Jamani, najua wengi wenu ni westernized. Russia iko juu sana kwenye teck za anga na aircraft. Kila mara wanaingia kwenye anga hata za US. Russia anaweza kupigana na nchi zote za ulaya kwa wakati mmoja.

Hakuna nchi inayoweza kupigana na russia bila kusaidiwa. Lakini russia anacheza Game yeye kama yeye...
Long live PUTIN
 
The UK would crush him na hiyo midege yake ya WWII.[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]
[/LEFT]
[/CENTER]

Una uhakika? nahisi ni ushabiki tu ilamukweli unaujua, hizo ndege za Urusi zinauwezo wa kurusha makombora ya nuclear umbali wa zaidi ya 12000 km, maana yake wanaweza piga Uingereza wakiwa Moscow
 


tupolev_tu160_blackjack.jpg
Nr.2 Tupolev Tu-160 (Russia)
The Tupolev Tu-160 (NATO designation Blackjack) was developed during the Cold War. This strategic bomber was intended to attack the most important American targets. Dwarfing the similar-looking B-1B Lancer, it is the largest and heaviest combat aircraft ever built.
The Tu-160 carries cruise and land attack missiles, fitted with conventional or nuclear warheads. This bomber can also carry free-fall bombs with a maximum weight of up to 40 t in place of the missiles. It has a range of 14 500 km.
It is believed that production totaled no more than 39 aircraft. This aircraft was extremely expensive to build and to maintain.
 
RUSSIA VS USA.


Russia is still the only country with the ability to erase the US from the face of the world. With 8500 nuclear warheads (and at least 30,000 more mothballed) the Russian strategic forces are the world's most fearsome. Against this massive firepower, the US has 7500 nuclear warheads plus another 20,000 in storage.

The difference in numbers may not be wide but the Russian strategic forces are several orders of magnitude powerful than the US arsenal. The Americans know that in any war between the two powers, Russia's intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) – secure in silos super-hardened to an incredible 6000 psi as against 300 psi for the American missiles – are going to be decisive. This doomsday force is hardened to not only survive a nuclear first-strike but can easily penetrate existing anti-missile defences. The US does not have any protection against a volley of Russian ICBMs.

Moscow has yet another Armageddon force. These are nuclear-tipped cruise missiles launched by its mighty strategic bombers including the T-160 Blackjack, Tu-95 Bear and T-95M Backfire. The Blackjacks and Bears are known to take off from bases in western and southern Russia and come screaming in over the North Pole to safe standoff distances from where they can fire hundreds of nuclear-armed cruise missiles against the US.

Simultaneously, the comparatively shorter-range Backfires based in the Russian Far East can launch nuclear cruise missiles at the US west coast. As far back as the 1980s, the Russians were so sure about the accuracy of their missiles that the Backfires carried only one Raduga Kh-22 (NATO name AS-4 Kitchen) missile armed with a nuclear warhead. According to weapons expert Bill Sweetman and Bill Gunston these missiles could be "programmed to enter the correct Pentagon window".

In fact, just the Russian strategic bomber force of 195 aircraft – against 171 American – can end nearly all human life in the continental US in a matter of hours.

Packing a new punch

Moscow has an array of newer weapons rolling off the assembly lines to complement these Cold Warriors. The powerful strategic bombers will be escorted by the super-maneuverable Sukhoi-27 Flanker and the newest member of the Flanker family, the Su-35 Super Flanker. Able to carry an enormous variety and number of payload, the Su-35's most potent weapons are a ramjet-powered version of the K-77 air-to-air missile and the Kh-59 land attack cruise missile. Both aircraft are nearly invisible to radar during super-maneuverable flight.

Nuclear submarine construction has hit a post-Soviet high in Russia. Brand new nuclear powered attack submarines of the Yasen class – of which 10 will be built – will shadow the US Navy's nuclear submarines, the "boomers" that lurk silently in the ocean depths. In 2012, an older Akula submarine was able to infiltrate the Gulf of Mexico and patrol restricted US waters for over a month without being detected by the US Navy.

The strategic submarine force is being revamped with the 170-feet Borei class vessel, armed with up to 20 new Bulava ballistic missiles, featuring advanced defence capabilities designed to penetrate US missile-defence systems.

Also, since that scrappy five-day war in Georgia in August 2008, the Russian Army has become more agile, better connected and better armed. With 300,000 troops and 2,500 tanks (including the advanced ‘flying tank', the T-90), and with the S-400 and S-500 anti-aircraft and anti-missile missiles, the Russian Army has unmatched firepower in Europe.

Russia has around 845,000 combat ready troops and nearly 2.5 million more in reserve. The US has 1.4 million active duty troops and 850,000 reservists. But while all nearly Russian troops are available within Russia, the American forces are scattered in 598 bases around the world.

As the leaden-footed response of the American military during the Crimean and – ongoing – Ukrainian crises demonstrated, taking on the Russian military is not a task for the fainthearted.

Plus, after years of ceaseless fighting – and embarrassing losses – in Iraq and Afghanistan, American troops are tired and demoralised, if not yet mentally defeated. The US defences forces are, therefore, not keen on yet another military engagement, especially not against a country that defeated and ruined both Napoleon and Hitler.

At any rate, the US military – despite spending seven times more than Russia on defence – provides little bang for the buck. The ‘success' of American weapons has largely been on CNN rather than in the battlefield, and that too has come against the small forces of Iraq, Serbia and Libya.

In this backdrop, the Russian military's resurgence has swept aside even the pretence of military action against Moscow. It is this paucity of response that forced the US and its Man Friday, the UK, to press for sanctions.

Sanctions have led to more sanctions and counter sanctions, leading to the prospect of a full-fledged trade war, but what they haven't accomplished is a policy shift in the Kremlin.

On the contrary, President Vladimir Putin's calibrated diplomacy ensured that Russia has faced off the entire western bloc. Moscow has also got ample backing from the BRICS.

The force of Russian arms – in step with suave diplomacy, best exemplified by the wit of Vitaly Churkin at the UN – has effectively neutered the West. The Germans and French are not the least bit interested in a war with Russia. Pro-Russian sentiments are strong in Greece – another NATO member – even as Italy, Spain and smaller southern European countries see no reason why anyone should meddle in the Russia-Ukraine spat.

Ironically, it's NATO that has contributed to the stunted military forces of nearly all European countries. Smug under the alliance's security umbrella, Europe has allowed defence spending to plummet, knowing full well the US is committed to protect it. Some countries like Greece and Bulgaria – both pro-Russian – are in NATO only because they are scared of Turkey.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars, in which around 22 countries fought alongside the US, have killed the appetite for more war in those countries. The UK's parliament – knowing that it could lead to WW III – refused to back an attack on Syria.

But now that the US itself is seen as powerless to do anything except hurl the tired threat of sanctions, the Europeans are wondering what the hell American troops are doing in Europe if they can't fight. This is a new current in geopolitics, and American presence in Europe could be swept away by its force.

In June, as Putin attended D-Day celebrations in France, a senior Chinese general told a regional security conference in Asia that US inaction in Ukraine was an unmistakable symptom of America's strategic "erectile dysfunction".

Worse, the sanctions are now starting to bite back. Apples meant for Russian markets are rotting in Poland, hurting small Polish farmers. Dairy farmers in the Netherlands are sitting on piles of rotten cheese. There are hundreds of such stories in every European country that was unwillingly dragged into the sanctions regime.

Those most impacted are continental Europeans who conducted a thriving business with Russia. On the other hand, the least affected seems to be the UK, which continues to benefit from its proud status as a concierge to Russian billionaires. But overall, Europe is hurting as it hadn't quite come out of the economic recession.

Poverty transforms relationships – for the worse. As economic anguish increases, fraying of fraternal ties in the western alliance is almost certain. Unlike previous generations, today's Europeans – better informed because of the reach of social media – are demanding answers from their political leadership. If the nearly $1 trillion dollar (the annual military budget of western nations) alliance cannot even stare back at Russia, then what is NATO's use? If the US backs Neo-Nazi Ukrainians and sparks a war in Europe, then how is it contributing to Europe's security?

Both Sun Tsu and Chanakya aver that the ideal victory is that which is obtained without shedding blood – that is, by diplomacy or subterfuge. Putin's high-octane military build-up may be about to deliver a victory without firing a shot at the West.
 
Na NATO kwa kiasi kikubwa ni US.

Ila hayo madege ya Kirusi dizaini ni ya zamani sana.

Yanafanana na yale madege ya WWII.

But I still got my money on the UK.

Urusi hamna kitu kabisa. Ni sawa mbwa koko tu.

naona teknolojia huijui vizuri. Unadhani makombora ya nyuklia yanachukuliwa na drones au jet fighters?
 
Nchi mbili tu duniani ndo wana strategic long range bomber.
marekani na russia.
marekani wana B-52,B-1 na B-2.
Russia TU-60,TU-90,TU-160
 
Una uhakika? nahisi ni ushabiki tu ilamukweli unaujua, hizo ndege za Urusi zinauwezo wa kurusha makombora ya nuclear umbali wa zaidi ya 12000 km, maana yake wanaweza piga Uingereza wakiwa Moscow

Na wewe una uhakika?

Nahisi ni ushabiki tu maana hata Marekani wana uwezo wa kuiangamiza kabisa hiyo Russia.
 
Back
Top Bottom