Kachanchabuseta
JF-Expert Member
- Mar 8, 2010
- 7,263
- 685
WanaJF nimepata habari muda si murefu kutoka chanzo changu cha kuaminika
kuwa UN Dar es salaama wamareject MAT's request
Chanzo kinasema UN hawawezi kuingilia mamlaka ya nchi kama nchi yenyewe inaweza kuyamaliza
maana hawawezi kuingilia uhuru wa sheria ndo maana baada ya MAT kuandika barua UN the next
day Mwenyekiti wa MAT alikuwa arrested na kupelekwa mahakamani
Kifungu kinacho wabana madoctor hiki hapa chini maana wamegoma then wanataka UN help
kuwa UN Dar es salaama wamareject MAT's request
Chanzo kinasema UN hawawezi kuingilia mamlaka ya nchi kama nchi yenyewe inaweza kuyamaliza
maana hawawezi kuingilia uhuru wa sheria ndo maana baada ya MAT kuandika barua UN the next
day Mwenyekiti wa MAT alikuwa arrested na kupelekwa mahakamani
Kifungu kinacho wabana madoctor hiki hapa chini maana wamegoma then wanataka UN help
The Protection of Human Rights and the Principle of
Non-intervention in Internal Affairs of States(b) Article 2.7 of the UN Charter
Article 2.7 of the Charter of the United Nations provides that – "Nothing contained in thepresent Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which areessentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members tosubmit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall notprejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII." Practice underArticle 2.7 has developed over time, and its practical importance is by now significantlyreduced.
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Article 41
It seems to be still well-established the diplomats should not interfere in the internalaffairs of the State to which they are accredited. But even here, as the leading work onthe subject points out, there is a "tension between the duty of a diplomat under Article 41of the Vienna Convention, not to interfere in the internal affairs of the receiving State andthe opinion of liberal States that human rights are a matter of legitimate international
concern whose active promotion is a major part of their foreign policyVienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Article 41
It seems to be still well-established the diplomats should not interfere in the internalaffairs of the State to which they are accredited. But even here, as the leading work onthe subject points out, there is a "tension between the duty of a diplomat under Article 41of the Vienna Convention, not to interfere in the internal affairs of the receiving State andthe opinion of liberal States that human rights are a matter of legitimate international
Among other activities which, depending on the circumstances, contravene the principleof non-intervention are:
(a) Interference in political activities (such as through financial or other support forparticular political parties or candidates, or even perhaps comment on upcomingelections or on the candidates;
(c) Seeking to overthrow the government - so-called ‘regime change', especially in thecase of ‘rogue States' It has occasionally been suggested thatintervention in order to restore (or establish) democracy is permitted under internationallaw
(a) Interference in political activities (such as through financial or other support forparticular political parties or candidates, or even perhaps comment on upcomingelections or on the candidates;
(c) Seeking to overthrow the government - so-called ‘regime change', especially in thecase of ‘rogue States' It has occasionally been suggested thatintervention in order to restore (or establish) democracy is permitted under internationallaw