Science Vs History

[donjr]

Life can create history but the life itself is science. Is history a part of science?

 

[wakikosi]

History is a science, history uses scientific methods to reach into conclusion

 

[Technian Tanga]

History sio science ijapokuwa muda mwingi wanaachukua nondo katika science na kuandika ..History ni hadithi tu ambazo mara nyingi ni za kusadikika but science inahusisha uchuguzi (Experimental) na clearly Verification

 

[sumbai]

History is a science, history uses scientific methods to reach into conclusion

Mkuuu umenikumbusha coz flan ya history chuo, philosophy and methodology of history.

History is social science.

 

[wakikosi]

History sio science ijapokuwa muda mwingi wanaachukua nondo katika science na kuandika ..History ni hadithi tu ambazo mara nyingi ni za kusadikika but science inahusisha uchuguzi (Experimental) na clearly Verification

Wewe unazijua hatua za uchunguz wa kisayansi? (Research procedures) kama unazijua zitaje
Hizo hizo methods of studying science ndizo hizo zinazotumika kwa Historians wakati wanatafiti na kuandika maswala mbalimbali ya kihistoria

 

[Technian Tanga]

Wewe unazijua hatua za uchunguz wa kisayansi? (Research procedures) kama unazijua zitaje
Hizo hizo methods of studying science ndizo hizo zinazotumika kwa Historians wakati wanatafiti na kuandika maswala mbalimbali ya kihistoria

Tujue tatizo,Tulichambue,tuchunguze harafu tu verify likiwa bado haliko verified hio ni nadharia ambayo inaweza kosorewa na mtu yoyote...Ohms law hata ww ukitaka una verify

 

[wakikosi]

Tujue tatizo,Tulichambue,tuchunguze harafu tu verify likiwa bado haliko verified hio ni nadharia ambayo inaweza kosorewa na mtu yoyote...Ohms law hata ww ukitaka una verify

Hizo hatua ndizo zinazotumika pia kwa watu wa History pindi wakitafiti mambo mbalimbali kabla ya kuandika kitabu cha History.
Kama history ina tumia scientific methods to draw conclusion wewe unawezaje kusema kuwa History sio sayansi? Unatumia vigezo gani kupinga kuwa history sio sayansi? Hebu nifahamishe!!

 

[shyja]

In history, you won't make any piece of history without having any source. And remember , not any source can give you full data for your history. There should be strong evidences. Kwenye kuzipata hizo evidence ndo unaingia kwenye scientific methods sasa.

 

[Technian Tanga]

Hizo hatua ndizo zinazotumika pia kwa watu wa History pindi wakitafiti mambo mbalimbali kabla ya kuandika kitabu cha History.
Kama history ina tumia scientific methods to draw conclusion wewe unawezaje kusema kuwa History sio sayansi? Unatumia vigezo gani kupinga kuwa history sio sayansi? Hebu nifahamishe!!

Mkuu Kitu kama Fuvu la binadamu wa kwanza kuonekana Olduvai George iko proved kweli? au ni assumption tu haya tuje kwa science Magnet ni mawe yaliyondulika huko magnesia Malaysia miaka hiyo na yani properties kadhaa ambazo hata ww ukitaka kuthibitisha unaweza

 

[wakikosi]

Mkuu Kitu kama Fuvu la binadamu wa kwanza kuonekana Olduvai George iko proved kweli? au ni assumption tu haya tuje kwa science Magnet ni mawe yaliyondulika huko magnesia Malaysia miaka hiyo na yani properties kadhaa ambazo hata ww ukitaka kuthibitisha unaweza

Binadamu wa zamani mafuvu yao yamepatikana sehemu nyingi duniani ikiwemo kule France, south Africa,China etc Lakini kati ya mafuvu hayo fuvu la kale kuliko yote yaliyowahi kupatikana ni fuvu la binadamu aliyeitwa zinjanthropus ambalo liligunduliwa na watu wawili wa taaluma ya Archaeology Mary Leakey na mumewe Louis Leakey kule Olduvai Gorge Mkoani Arusha.
Watu wa sayansi kote duniani wamekubali kuwa hilo ndilo fuvu la kale kuliko yote hapa Duniani.Hivyo wamehitimisha kuwa ndilo fuvu la binadamu wa kwanza kwani hakuna mabaki ya binadamu mengine yaliyowahi kupatikana ya kale kuliko hayo.
katika kupata fuvu hilo wanasayans wa Archaeology(tawi la history linaloshughulika na usomaji wa mabaki ya kale) walitumia hatua zote za kisayansi hata kutoa hitimisho hilo;kuwa hilo ndilo fuvu au mabaki ya kale kuliko yote ya binadamu wa kwanza.

 

[Urquhart]

I'd like to think it's neither. A very interesting question- " It is an academic discipline built on the structure of the humanities."

As one scientist said..
"Actual history is neither, however recorded history can be considered both. They say history is written by the winners. History is frequently being rewritten based on discoveries, and many times new scientific developments."

"Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

So, consider the results of past experiments when formulating new hypotheses?- That's science."

"Historians use methods from both the humanities and the social sciences. Social sciences like economics and political science often seek to answer questions using empirical methods including experiments and observational studies."

The scholar in me would say it's neither and also both! Yes it's contradictory, but so is science (when proven wrong by others, then debunk the existing scientific theory), and history since as we know (is always written by the conquerer)

 

[Technian Tanga]

Binadamu wa zamani mafuvu yao yamepatikana sehemu nyingi duniani ikiwemo kule France, south Africa,China etc Lakini kati ya mafuvu hayo fuvu la kale kuliko yote yaliyowahi kupatikana ni fuvu la binadamu aliyeitwa zinjanthropus ambalo liligunduliwa na watu wawili wa taaluma ya Archaeology Mary Leakey na mumewe Louis Leakey kule Olduvai Gorge Mkoani Arusha.
Watu wa sayansi kote duniani wamekubali kuwa hilo ndilo fuvu la kale kuliko yote hapa Duniani.Hivyo wamehitimisha kuwa ndilo fuvu la binadamu wa kwanza kwani hakuna mabaki ya binadamu mengine yaliyowahi kupatikana ya kale kuliko hayo.
katika kupata fuvu hilo wanasayans wa Archaeology(tawi la history linaloshughulika na usomaji wa mabaki ya kale) walitumia hatua zote za kisayansi hata kutoa hitimisho hilo;kuwa hilo ndilo fuvu au mabaki ya kale kuliko yote ya binadamu wa kwanza.

Naona uko nondo haswaa kiongozi