Munich Security conference: Netanyahu awakebehi Waajemi

Ahmadinejad alikuwa anakuwa popular mno ndo maana akafanyiwa figisu na jina kukatwa bila sababu za msingi,
baadae nikasikia aliihusika na maandamano ya mwezi uliopita ya wananchi kudai ugumu wa maisha ,vitu kuwa bei juu etc.
Ujue enzi ya utawala wa ahmadinejad serikali yake ilitoa ruzuku kwa vitu mbalimbali na hivyo bei ya vitu ikawa balanced,sasa bajeti ya mwaka huu baadhi ya ruzuku zilifutwa na kukaleta maandamano,
ambayo kwa bahati mbaya yakaingiliwa na majasusi ya CIA na kugeuzwa kuwa maandamano ya Regime change ambayo baadae yalizimwa,

so nasikia Ahmadinejad ni miongoni mwa waliokamatwa na kuwekwa lokapu kwa kuchochea maandamano,
na sijui kama alishaachiwa ama bado yuko kizuizini
 
Mkuu Malcolm heshima kwako..... Kwa mtazamo wako nini kiini cha mgogoro wa mashariki ya kati na suluhisho ni lipi maana miaka na miaka ni vuta nikuvute tupu!!
 
Saudi and Israeli leaders asked Washington to bomb Iran, says John Kerry


The leaders of Saudi Arabia and Israel asked Washington to bomb Iran in the years before the 2015 nuclear deal, former US Secretary of State, John Kerry, has revealed.
Kerry tolda panel discussion at the Munich Security Conference on Sunday about the demands to bomb Tehran, stressing it was "absolutely critical" to ensure the landmark deal survived.
The former top diplomat, who was one of the main architects of the nuclear deal, explained that when he met with Iran's foreign minister in 2013, Tehran had already developed advanced nuclear technology.
"Bombing was not about to put that genie back into the bottle. Now I can't tell you how much we were resisting [Netanyahu] himself and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, who said it to me personally," Kerry said.
"President Mubarak, who said it to me personally, the only thing you can do with Iran is bomb them," he added, referring to Egypt's toppled strongman Hosni Mubarak.
Kerry's comments came in response to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who said the deal with Iran has emboldenedTehran to become increasingly aggressive in the region.
 
zitto junior said:
Mkuu Malcolm heshima kwako..... Kwa mtazamo wako nini kiini cha mgogoro wa mashariki ya kati na suluhisho ni lipi maana miaka na miaka ni vuta nikuvute tupu!!
Click to expand...
Chanzo #1 cha migogoro ya Mashariki ya Kati ni DINI ama directly au indirectly hayo mengine yanajazilizia tu. Niorodheshe michache;
(a) Houthi kule Yemen - power struggle between Shia and Sunni - DINI
(b) Qatar Vs Saudi Arabia and others - Qatar anatuhumiwa na wenzie ku-support makundi ya kigaidi - DINI.
(c) Iran support for Hamas Vs Israel - DINI
(d) Palestine Vs Israel - Mji wa Jerusalem - DINI
(e) Iran support for Hizbullah Vs Israel (kuifuta katika uso wa dunia) - DINI
(f) Iran support for Syria - Shia influence - DINI
(g) Muslim Brotherhood Vs Coptic (Egypt) - DINI
(h) Iraq - Shia Vs Sunni - DINI
(i) etc. etc. etc.
Kwa namna moja au nyingine lazima "elements" za dini ziwepo popote penye migogoro middle east unlike other parts of the world.
 

Walivyopigana The Ottoman Empire na The British Empire kuhusu Mashariki ya kati kwenye vita ya kwanza ya dunia dini ilihusika vipi ?? Nakubaliana na wewe kwamba dini imechochea sana huu mgogoro. Japo swala la msingi kabisa uliloliacha ni kwamba umeaungalia huu mgogoro ambao ni wa kimataifa katika nyanja ya kikanda tu. Nadhani tuhusishe kila chembe kwenye huu mgogoro: Iran, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestine, Israel, Hezbollah, Daesh na Iraq zipo na ndiyo hatari sana lakini pia usisahau kwamba huu mgogoro umekuwepo sana pale hata kabla ya hawa wadau na unavaa sura mpya kila siku.

Zamani Ulikuwa katika sura ya Crusade na Jihad,
Ukabadilika na kuvaa sura mpya ya Siasa za kimataifa kama ambapo mataifa Makubwa kama The Russian Empire, Imperial Germany, The British Empire, The Republic of France na The Ottoman Empire yalihusishwa moja kwa moja kugombania ile ardhi ya Mashariki ya kati. Hapa dini ilihusika kidogo sanaaa, zaidi zaidi maslahi ya mataifa makubwa ndiyo ilikuwa ni chanzo.

Jiulize hivi Uingereza wasingekubaliana kubaliana na Wazayuni hadi kupelekea The Balfour Declaration leo hii huu ugomvi ungekuwa wapi ??

AU Marekani na Warusi wasingekubaliana kuigawanya Palestina mwaka 1947 chini ya Umoja wa Mataifa na Yerusalem ingebaki chini ya Umoja wa Mataifa kama ilivyokubalika leo hii huu mgogoro ungekuwa wapi ??

AU Marekani na Urusi leo waamue kujitoa nje ya Mashariki ya kati na kuweka vikwazo vya Silaha eneo lile huu mgogoro utachukua sura gani ??​
 
Of course, in 2017 alitaka ku-take advantage of the Constitution ambayo inasema mgombea urais anaruhusiwa MARA MOJA to run for consecutive terms.

Sasa ukisoma hiyo ibara ni kwamba after the first 4 years in the office, Rais aliye madarakani anaruhusiwa kugombea one more LAST time consecutively lakini katiba haisemi kwamba huyu "president" haruhusiwi tena huko mbeleni!

So, Ahmedejan ambacho alifanya ni kutogombea tena 2013 ili kuua ile "consecutively". It's like Kikwete leo hii! Katiba yetu inasema Rais aliye madarakani can run only one consecutive term. So, JK akitaka kugombea 2020 ckujui tutamkataza kwa kutumia kifungu kipi!
 

Sheria ya Iran inaruhusu kabisa kwamba miaka minne baada ya kipindi cha Uraisi kuisha mtu anaruhusiwa kugombea tena. Ukitaka kulinganisha Baina ya Uraisi wa Jakaya Kikwete na Ahmedinejad utakuwa unakosea sana na kutengeneza kitu kiitwacho FALSE ANALOGY kwasababu TANZANIA na IRAN tuna LEGAL SYSTEMS mbili tofauti, hapa utakuwa unalinganisha The Common Law System Vs Islamic Law System(They are very Incompatible) . Isitoshe mfumo wetu wa Kisiasa na Katiba ya Tanzania ikisaidiwa, Kesi za Kisheria na matukio vimekataza kabisa Raisi mstaafu kutaka kugombea tena Uraisi wa Jamhuri ya Muungano baada ya kustaafu. Sheria ya Iran na Mfumo wao wa Kisiasa haviruhusu kabisa!!!

Ukisoma Mapendekezo ya wakina Judge Nyalali kuhusiana na Siasa za Tanzania hilo linaonekana wazi kabisa. Ndiyo maana Ayatollah alisema "I didn’t tell him not to participate, I told him I won’t recommend him participating" Hivyo bwan Ahmedinejad hakuzuiwa kwasababu Sheria inamruhusu kufanya hivyo bali kwasababu ya Umoja wa Kitaifa alishauri Ahmed asigombee.​
 
Nisome kwa vituo Mheshimiwa! Nimesema katiba ya Iran inaruhusu serving president to run ONLY one CONSECUTIVE term.

Maana yake ni kwamba, tuchukulie Rouhan ambae aliingia 2013. Tunaposema ONLY one consecutive term ni 2017. Hii 2017 ni one more consecutive term kwa Rohuan lakini hawezi kugombea tena 2021 kwa sababu consecutives terms kwa rais ni 2 terms na unagombea mara moja tu consecutively. Msisitizo ni neno consecutive!

Tukirudi kwa Ahmadijen, as a serving president, sheria ilikuwa inamruhusu ku-run for one consecutive term na ndio maana aligombea mwaka 2009. Hata hivyo, sheria ilikuwa haimruhusu kugombea tena 2013 kwa sababu ya ile "one consecutive" term.

Mwaka ambao alishauriwa lakini akakaidi na kisha kupigwa chini na Baraza la Walezi ilikuwa 2017 na sio 2013. Na kama nilivyosema, alifanya attempt ya "coming back" in 2017 kwa sababu katiba yao inasema rais can serve for only 2 consecutive terms. In 2017, hilo neno consecutive ceased to work for Ahmedijan kwa sababu tayari kulishakuwa na 4 years gap wakati rais ni Rouhan.

In addition, Islamic Law has nothing to do with Iranian Presidency. Islamic Laws play a major role for a Supreme Leader!

But let me talk a little bit hiyo unayosema issue ya JK ni tofauti na Ahmedinejad!

Katiba yetu ipo wazi; sasa kwanini umetoa reference ya kesi ya Jaji Nyalali kama sio kwamba katiba haisemi wazi ikiwa rais aliye-serve 2 terms anaruhusiwa tena kugombea akisha-bypass ile 2 consecutive terms?!
 
lauzi96 said:
Ahmadinejad misimamo mikali sana hawa wazee wako wastani.
Click to expand...
ndo maana nilipenda sana Ahmadinejad agombee tena urais in recent election, lakini aliwekewa figisu na jina likakatwa. Is a man of steel...Ahmadinejad
 

Unenacho ni sahihi kabisa mgogoro wa Middle East ni mkakati wa super power countries ili kusipatikane amani ya kudumu eneo Hilo.Mi nadhani mashariki ya kati kuna siri kubwa sana kuhusu hii Dunia na hatma ya mwanadamu ulimwenguni.
Huwa nawashangaa sana waswahili wenzangu wanajaribu Kupaza sauti zao kwa mlengo wa kidini kuhusu mgogoro wa mashariki ya kati
 

Ahmedinedjad alifanyaje ukaidi wakati alikuwa na haki ya kisheria kugombea ??

In addition, Islamic Law has nothing to do with Iranian Presidency. Islamic Laws play a major role for a Supreme Leader
Click to expand...

Nani kakwambia haya ??
Unajua maana ya Legal System ni nini ??
Unataka kusema kwamba Iran wanatumia Sheria ya Kiislamu kwenye cheo cha Ayatollah tu ??
Unaweza ukatenga sheria nje ya Legal System ??

Halafu unasema Islamic Laws play a major role for a supreme leader, umelitoa wapi hili ??
Hivi lile Baraza la Wataalamu (Council of Experts) lenye nguvu ya kumfukuza Ayatollah linatumia sheria ipi kumfukuza ??
Halafu kuna Baraza la Wasimamizi (The Guardian Council) ambalo ni sawa na Mahakama ya Katiba, ambalo pia linafanya kazi ya kuwasaili maraisi kabla ya kuteuliwa. Baraza hili lina wataalamu wa Sheria za dini na Sheria za kawaida. Wewe utasemaje kwamba Sheria ya dini inafanya kazi kwa Supreme Leader tu ??

NB: Nikuu
Haya mambo umeyaongea baada ya kufanya utafiti au kwa ajili ya kubishana tu ??
Hili swala nimeliongelea kidogo hapa: Malcom Lumumba Live: Tusemezane...


Nimetoa mfano huu kwasababu wewe ulimlinganisha JK na Ahmedinejad ili hali ukijua JK hapa nchini ni RETIRED AND FORMER PRESIDENT wakati AHMEDINEJAD ni FORMER PRESIDENT ELIGIBLE FOR RE-ELECTION. Nikakwambia kulinganisha JK na Ahmed ni kutengeneza FALSE ANALOGY.....! (Hapa gumu kueleweka ni lipi ??)

Kuhusu hili la Jaji Nyalali naomba nikunukuu wewe mwenyewe:
"So, Ahmedejan ambacho alifanya ni kutogombea tena 2013 ili kuua ile "consecutively". It's like Kikwete leo hii! Katiba yetu inasema Rais aliye madarakani can run only one consecutive term. So, JK akitaka kugombea 2020 ckujui tutamkataza kwa kutumia kifungu kipi!" by Myplusbee kwenye bandiko la #66.

Sasa nikujibu kama ifuatavyo,
Nchini Tanzania Raisi akishakaa vipindi viwili haruhusiwi kurudi tena.
Wewe unauliza tutamzuia kwa kifungu kipi kweli, hivi hujasoma mapendekezo ya mabadiliko ya Katiba toke mwaka 1985 hadi 1992 kipindi cha Nyalali Commission hadi uulize hili swali ??

Halafu unaongea hivi Katiba Umeisoma yote hadi kusema hakuna kifungu kinachomzuia Raisi Mstaafu kugombea ??
Haya mimi nakuwekea hapa Katiba na uchukue muda kupitia vifungu vya katiba pamoja na Bango-Kitita (Matrix) yake ambayo imeelezea kwanini Raisi haongezi muda.

Article 40 (2) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania 1977 states that:
40.-(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Article, any person who holds office as President shall be eligible for re-election to that office. (2) No person shall be elected more than twice to hold the office of President.

NB: Where do you get an audacity to question something you haven't researched ???
 
Duh!! Nilikuuliza kwanini watu walifungua shauri nawe kuleta kesi ya akina Nyalali? But all in all, hoja hapa ni Iranian presidency!

Narudia: mwaka 2017 baada ya kuwa amesha-serve 2 terms plus 4 years outside presidency ndipo Ahmedijan alitaka kurudi tena!

Alipotaka kurudi, Khamenei akamwambia asigombee lakini Ahmedijan akabisha akachukua form!

Baada ya kuchukua form; akakatwa na the Guardian Council!

Sasa suali haliwezi kuwa kwanini afanye ukaidi wakati alikuwa na haki bali suali liwe ni kwanimi Khamenei alimtaka asigombee wakati ana haki!

Tukija kwenye suala la Islamic Laws ni kwamba Rais wa Iran anachaguliwa according to Katiba na wala sio according to Islamic Laws. Tunaposema Islamic Laws ni laws as per Quran and Hadith lakini kwa urais wa Iran haipo hivyo!

Before 1979; Iran ilikuwa inaongozwa kifalme lakini baada ya mapinduzi; wakafuta ufalme na kuwa na katiba na ndio maana hata Rais pale ana leadership terms like any other secular government.

Likewise, nimemtaja Supreme Leader in Islamic Law kwa sababu, SL ndie kiongozi wa kiroho na sio Rais. Na ingawaje pia hata SL anaweza kuondolewa madarakani as per constitution lakini huwezi kumuondoa kirahisi kama anavyoweza kuondolewa Rais ambae sio kiongozi wa kiroho!
 
Malcom Lumumba said:
Siasa za mashariki ya kati ni ngumu sana sanaa.
Ziko kama zile za Ulaya kipindi cha Reformation (Protestants V Catholics)
Wengi tunasema chanzo ni mafuta lakini zimeanza hata kabla ya kristo kuzaliwa.
Click to expand...
Vita ya imani ni hatari sana
 


Hapa ndipo pana tatizo,

Mosi,
Nimekuuliza swali rahisi hujanijibu.
Can you separate any state law (Whether its Positive or natural) from the Legal System ??
Jibu la hili ndilo litafungua uwanja mwingine mpana kimtazamo kwamba Iranian Legal System is a Holistic one; In the sense that it is a creature of Secular, non-secular, traditional laws and positive laws (Laws made my a legislature)

Pili,
Na pia huwezi kusema Supreme Leader Ayatollah ni kiongozi wa Kiroho tu wakati he Wields a considerable powers beyond those of the President. Tuangalie uhalisia wa mambo tofauti na vile vitabu vinatuambia:
1. Ayatollah is the Commander in Chief of all the Iranian Forces.
- The Iranian President cannot appoint Minister of Intelligence and Foreign affairs without the approval of the Ayatollah.
- And he is the one who has all the political powers to declare war and peace on behalf of the Islamic Republic.
2. He is the head of all branches of the government (The Judiciary, The Legislature and the Executive)
3. He has the ability to Veto legislation passed by the parliament.
4. He can dismiss and reinstate minister of the executive of the Islamic Republic.

NB: Mpaka hapa bado tu unahisi kwamba Ayatollah ni kiongozi wa Kiroho tu na siyo Siasa wakati ana nguvu za kuingilia moja kwa moja utendaji kazi wa mihimili yote ya Serikali ???

Tatu,
Tafadhali naomba uelewe lugha Khamenei alitoa mapendekezo na Ushauri na kauli yake haioneshi kuwa amekataa.
Msuome hapa tena "I didn’t tell him not to participate, I told him I won’t recommend him participating" Ni wapi ambapo Khamenei amekataza Ahmedinejad asigombee ?? USHAURI ni tofauti na KATAZO, hivyo mtu unaweza kuukubali au kuukataa wala hufungwi na mtu.

Nne,
Islamic Laws are not only laws as per Quran and Hadith.
In Muslim Jurisprudence Islamic law has more than four Sources apart from these you have mentioned. (Find them)
Sasa kuna kitu unashindwa kukielewa hapa, Islamic Law is one of the major sources of law within the Islamic Republic.
Kila sheria inayotungwa ni ndani ya nchi ni lazima iwiane na Sheria za kiislamu (Any positive laws enacted must be in conformity with the Sharia and traditional laws so as to create Congruence and harmony within the legal system).

Hivyo basi kama ambavyo Papa au Malkia wa Uingereza walivyo viongozi wa Kisiasa na kiroho ndivyo ilivyo kwa bwana Ayatollah Khamenei. Ukifuatilia nchi Uingereza mpaka kufika mwak 2014 bado kulikuwa na kosa la Blasphemy against God, The Church of England and The Queen: Hii sheria ilikuwa inashughulikiwa na mahakama za kawaida kabisaaaa.

NB: Tanzania yenyewe Sheria za Kiislamu ni Sehemu ya Sheria za nchi na zinafanya kazi kwa Waislamu kwenye baadhi ya mambo yanayowahusu, lakini ili ifanye kazi ni lazima ilingane na sheria za nchi (Positive laws). Lakini Iran ni kinyume kabisa, ili sheria za nchi zipite ni lazima zikubaliane na Sheria za kidini (Sharia Law). Na ndiyo maana Iran ni nchi ya kidini kwasababu msingi wa Sheria, Siasa na Uchumi ni Sheria za Kiislamu...

Tano,
Narudia tena kusema hivi,
Huwezi kulinganisha Siasa za Tanzania na zile za Iran kwasababu utakuwa unafananisha maji na mafuta.
Tena huwezi kuielewa katiba ya nchi ya Tanzania bila kupitia mapendekezo ya NYALALI COMMISSION, never ever!
Tanzania yetu kuna ukomo wa Uraisi na katiba imesema wazi kabisa kama nilivyokuwekea mfano hai hapo juu.....!

I rest my case!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…