Kipi bora: Uhuru au Ukoloni??

Kipi bora: Uhuru au Ukoloni??

Mkuu why should they do so while they have their country,which is being embezzled by greedy leaders.
Can you give just one example that we may be proud of and say that we are free???. Mkuu nawasilisha with respect.

O.K, then why should those who don't want colonialism to return be colonized in their country? Does the country only belong to those who want colonialism back? Also didn't the colonialist embezzle our resources? If the problem is our leaders then why don't we deal with the issue of our leaders instead of saying we want colonialism back?

Thanks for the respect and you have mine in return mkuu.
 
afadhali uhuru iwapo tu ni uhuru kweli, sio huu "uhuru" tunaosema tunao sasa, wakoloni wameondoka lakini bado wanatutawala through "long distance colonialism" na kuna viongozi wetu aka watawala wetu wanaofanya ukoloni humu humu ndani ya nchi
 
Si muende huko kwao waka watawale huko huko? Nendeni sehemu kama Marekani mka fanyiwe kama African Americans huko mna faidi na vya nje. Si ndiyvyo mnavyo taka? Easy solution.......nendeni mkatawaliwe......sisi tuacheni tuendelee na tabu zetu.

Kama hao African Americans wanafanyiwa mbaya huko America kwanini wasirudi Africa?
 
Kama hao African Americans wanafanyiwa mbaya huko America kwanini wasirudi Africa?

Mkuu warudi waende wapi wanapo kujua? Wengi wao wame ridhika na maisha ya huko na wanaona bora huko kwenye life style walio zoea ndiyo maana kwao wanaona bora kuliko Africa. Ila nilicho sema ni kwamba kama kweli wanaona bora kutawaliwa kwa nini wasiwa fuata huko huko waka tawaliwa huko? Na pia natumai unajua kuwa hata wamarekani weusi kupitia Civil Rights Movement ya miaka ya hamsini na sitini wali pigania kuhesabika kama raia wengine wa marekani na siyo kufanywa kama watumwa kwa hiyo hata wao wanajua faida ya mtu kuwa huru. Ndiyo maana nika suggest kwa nini wasiende huko? Umenipata mkuu?

Respect/
 
Si muende huko kwao waka watawale huko huko? Nendeni sehemu kama Marekani mka fanyiwe kama African Americans huko mna faidi na vya nje. Si ndiyvyo mnavyo taka? Easy solution.......nendeni mkatawaliwe......sisi tuacheni tuendelee na tabu zetu.

Mkuu,

Kama hao African American wanafanyiwa mbaya sana huko America, kwanini wasirudi Africa?
 
Mkuu,

Kama hao African American wanafanyiwa mbaya sana huko America, kwanini wasirudi Africa?

Mkuu una rudia swali lako na nilisha kujibu. Warudi Africa waende wapi? Africa ina nchi nyingi. Na pili nilisha sema wameshaona maisha ya huko ni bora kuliko Africa kwa hiyo ni uamuzi wao kubaki. Ndiyo maana nikasema kama watu wanataka ukoloni urudi kwa nini wasiende kwenye nchi za wakoloni na kuwa raia tu badala ya kurudisha ukoloni Africa. Umeelewa sasa mkuu au bado? Maana swali nilisha jibu kwenye post iliyo pita umeirudia.
 
mi nadhani malalamiko yake(kikojozi) yana angalia situation ambayo iko nchini za africa at the moment. ana compare na what it was like during colonial times, based on what mzungu built on that time. wakati huo huo sidhani kama anelewa vizuri vingi vilivyokuwepo at the time vilikuwa ni kwa sababu yao wenyewe colonial masters and not for the indiginous. only now we use them because we gained our independence and mzungu ayupo tena.

kitu cha pili ana angalia movement ambayo ipo slow Africa, lakini aangali what role the devil plays to hinder the african movement. example tunafahamu ya kuwa madini ya mawe yana thamani sana, lakini je? if we were to process and use them ourselves, i think it will reflect the value of our economies, not many are going to afford items of gold, ruby, tanzanite, diamonds etc for prices of over $1000, that is the fact because not that many people have money, therefore the value of this items reflect our society. however on the other hand if the same rocks reach the west they become items of money, some can spend up to millions on rocks. now when the devils comes he buys them for the value he thinks it reflects in our society cheap. yet he knows the same commodities gives about 9 times the profit where he takes them . and when africans want to trade directly with the dealers in the west the IMF sets us limits on what we can trade and what we cant trade, but the same IMF allows the devil to deal directly with us without following the rules, giving him the chance to rob us without a gun. they do this in all sectors of our assets farming, fishing etc, etc ,etc so where are we going to get the money to develop if the devil ranks us as being of unequal on every thing.

plus we have other problems that we have created ourselves such as divisions, selfishness, not being patriots to our countries especilally our leaders. all these, works to the advantage of the devil. we need to stop and be realistic to ourselves and come up with plans that do not include the devil in anyway, let him come to trade if wants to trade but lets not be desparate with deals that make no sense at all. we have land for food, we have people to make a society, we have scholars to teach, so why do we need colonial masters. its our behaviour and the thinking that has to change especially the idea that other races are better than us what a bunkum ideology.

Ndio, wakoloni walijenga infrastructure for their own use. There is no free lunch. Kwani sisi Waafrika tuliwtengenezea nini wakoloni bure kwa hiari yetu?

Chukulia reli. Angalau enzi za mkoloni, watu walikua wanasafiri third class as human beings. And the trains ran on time. Leo the whole train mnasafiri like livestock, bila kua na schedule yoyote inayoeleweka. Train ya mizigi inachukua six weeks kutoka Dar mpaka Tabora. Ikifika unakuta nusu ya mzigo umeibiwa au kuharibika na mvua iliyovuja ndani ya behewa. Tangu mkoloni aondoke hatujajenga hata mita moja ya train track. Na baada ya kushindwa kuendesha shirika, tunalikabidhi kwa mhindi.

Sasa uhuru uko wapi hapo?
 
Just to clarify a point if it helps. Like I said in a previous post that African Americans fought through the Civil Rights Movement to be treated by law as equal citizens. Even before then they had fought for equality. What African Americans are enjoying now was the result of the struggle to be treated equally. What I'm suggesting is why not go to the former colonialist themselves and be ruled under them there? I didn't mean that African Americans are now treated as if they are being colonized but they know what it is like to be controlled.
 
If the feeling is that colonialism was better why don't all those who feel that way just take up citizenry in the countries of the former colonialists? Wouldn't that be much easier? Because if you are o.k. with being colonized directly by another country then you will surely be o.k. with being a citizen of their countries.

Mkuu,

What are you doing in Conway, Arkansas? What is your friend Juma Contena doing in the UK?
 
Ndio, wakoloni walijenga infrastructure for their own use. There is no free lunch. Kwani sisi Waafrika tuliwtengenezea nini wakoloni bure kwa hiari yetu?

Chukulia reli. Angalau enzi za mkoloni, watu walikua wanasafiri third class as human beings. And the trains ran on time. Leo the whole train mnasafiri like livestock, bila kua na schedule yoyote inayoeleweka. Train ya mizigi inachukua six weeks kutoka Dar mpaka Tabora. Ikifika unakuta nusu ya mzigo umeibiwa au kuharibika na mvua iliyovuja ndani ya behewa. Tangu mkoloni aondoke hatujajenga hata mita moja ya train track. Na baada ya kushindwa kuendesha shirika, tunalikabidhi kwa mhindi.

Sasa uhuru uko wapi hapo?

Mkuu nakubaliana na wewe there is no free lunch but do you want to say it was worth going through colonization to get those things? Kama kweli it was worth it kwa nini our forefathers who were present at the time waka taka uhuru?
 
Mkuu,

What are you doing in Conway, Arkansas? What is your friend Juma Contena doing in the UK?

Is that being colonized? Nyie si mnasema kuwa colonized? I didn't come here to be colonized the same where that Westerners now go freely to Africa and they are not colonizing us. Who said we should isolate from them? The point si ukoloni na kutawaliwa au?
 
I think hapa tuna changanya the meaning of colonization. Wewe umesema bora ukoloni urudi fine, one person said the same thing. I said kwa nini urudi Africa nzima kwa nini usiwafuate huko walipo kwenye ardhi yao uwaombe waku tawale kuliko kurudisha ukoloni Africa nzima? Unless you mean to say I'm being colonized where I am or Juma is being colonized where he is then hapo hakuna point. No one said we shouldn't interact kinacho ongelewa ni ukoloni. So unless you can prove I'm being colonized or Juma is you are not making a point.
 
REUTERS - Voters on Mayotte, a tiny island in the Indian Ocean, chose by referendum on Sunday to become a fully fledged part of France-a change of status that will end local traditions such as polygamy and Islamic courts.

Authorities said 95.2 percent of those who voted opted to turn Mayotte into a "departement", strengthening ties with Paris and requiring the island to align itself with French law. Only 4.8 percent voted no. Participation was 61 percent.

Mayotte, 400 km (250 miles) east of Mozambique and 300 km west of Madagascar, is in the Comoros archipelago but voted against independence in referendums in 1974 and 1976.

Instead it stayed French, with a status allowing legal differences from the mainland.

It has a population of about 186,000 people, of whom 95 percent are Sunni Muslims. Many do not speak French and a third of the population are illegal migrants, mostly from the nearby islands which make up the independent Comoran state.

"This will reinforce the place of Mayotte in the republic, reaffirming our founding values, particularly equality between men and women, the same justice for all, and the place of the French language," said Interior Minister Michele Alliot-Marie.

Many islanders were keen to boost ties with mainland France, which have kept Mayotte richer and more stable than the Comoros.


By JOHAN BODIN - LUCAS MENGET Mayotte
In the village of Chirongi, town hall officials prepare for voting day. Report by FRANCE 24 correspondents Lucas Menget and Johan Bodin.
» FRANCE 24 report on Mayotte expulsions
» Mayotte readies for referendum on overseas department status


"We may be black, poor and Muslim, but we have been French longer than Nice," Abdoulatifou Aly, a legislator from Mayotte, was quoted as saying in the French weekly L'Express.

President Nicolas Sarkozy had promised a referendum during his 2007 campaign. After Sunday's vote, the island is on track to become France's 101st department in 2011.

The referendum follows unrest in another French overseas department, the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, which was rocked by a general strike for pay rises in February and March.

That suggests that becoming a department will be no panacea for Mayotte, where unemployment runs at more than 25 percent.

The islanders stand to gain economically from the change of status, as they will become eligible for a wider range of social benefits as well as EU funds. Paris has also promised an economic development fund to boost the island's infrastructure.

However, residents will see their tax bills increase and have to abandon certain customs to conform to French law.

For now, men can have several wives whom they can repudiate unilaterally, and women do not have equal inheritance rights. The island has a traditional Islamic justice system with "qadis" or religious scholars who act as judges.

Mayotte will have to ban polygamy, raise the minimum age of marriage to 18 from 15 years old, and give women equal rights.

The Islamic justice system will be replaced by secular courts, though qadis will retain a consultative role.
 
Mayotte votes on ties with France

Leo hii Visiwa vya Mayotte wanapiga kura kama wapate uhuru au waendelee kuwa chini ya Mfaransa!

Chini ya Mfaransa visiwa hivi vyenye watu 200,000 Politically have been Stable unlike Komoro ambao walipenda kuwa huru 1970's ambapo kumekuwa na mapinduzi zaidi ya mara 20!

Kiuchumi Mayotte per capita income ni karibu mara 10 zaidi ya jirani zao Comoro ingawa 50% wa watu hawajui kusoma wala kuandika!

Inavyoonekana Mayotte watapiga kura kuendelea kuwa chini ya Mkoloni!

Hiii imekaaje?

Lipi Bora: Mkoloni au Uhuru? Hivi nchi za Afrika na Tz leo watu wakiulizwa wanapenda Mwingireza/ukoloni au tuendelee kuwa uhuru je watu wangeamuje?

Nini Tanzania tunaweza kujifunza hapo?

BBC NEWS | Europe | Mayotte votes on ties with France

Hili ni ka swali kwa mtoto ama kijana anaeishi nyumbani akilishwa vizuri... 'je unapenda kuendelea kuishi hapa ama unataka kuhama na kuanza upya' ... swali kijana angelipenda ni ka, mfano, 'je ungependa kusaidia kufanya uamuzi wa kununua vyakula humu nyumbani ? ' ... si badala ya kununua croissant, labda atataka kununua madafu... uamuzi

Generally, mi naamini uhuru ni bora. C'est tout. Ila, kimantiki, hili swali linategemeana na nchi gani inahusiana na swali ... Mayotte, kisiwa kidogo, sasa kinalindwa na waFaransa, pia kulishwa bora (nahisi) ... kikitaka uhuru, nani atawalinda? wapo tayari kujilisha?

Kura muhimu kwao si ukoloni ama uhuru ... ingekuwa 'kujitawala' ... kuwa federation yenye uhuru wa kujitawala, wakati bado ina uhusiano kiulinzi, nk na waFaransa... ili maisha ya wananchi yasipinduke vibaya mbioni. Mfano unaokuja kichwani, ni ka vile Puerto Rico ama US Virgins zinavokuwa na ka-uhuru wakati bado zinaeleweka kuwa ni sehemu za waMarekani.

Just an observation in this particular situation ... However, Independence in all that we do should be what we always strive to achieve
 
I think hapa tuna changanya the meaning of colonization. Wewe umesema bora ukoloni urudi fine, one person said the same thing. I said kwa nini urudi Africa nzima kwa nini usiwafuate huko walipo kwenye ardhi yao uwaombe waku tawale kuliko kurudisha ukoloni Africa nzima? Unless you mean to say I'm being colonized where I am or Juma is being colonized where he is then hapo hakuna point. No one said we shouldn't interact kinacho ongelewa ni ukoloni. So unless you can prove I'm being colonized or Juma is you are not making a point.

Mkuu,

Kwanza kabisa, a lot of people confuse colonialism with slavery. The two are different. Slavery was far more barbaric and degrading. Colonialism didn’t have to be.

Pili, understandably, the word colonialism conjures up images of torture, violence and suffering. But this was mostly unnecessary and was mainly aggravated by the violent uprising against colonialism.

According to the Oxford Concise English Dictionary, colonialism is where an area or country is administered and controlled by a foreign country, SOMETIMES with force. Note the use of the word ‘sometimes’ in that definition. Colonialism does not have to involve brutality. However, this doesn’t make it right.

The people who perceive colonialism to be better than independence are those who would like to see a foreign administration in place because they have lost confidence in local leaders. To them, the local leaders have failed dismally to provide the very basic social services such as security, healthcare, energy, education and infrastructure. These people would prefer to work under and pay taxes to a foreign administration in the hope that they will deliver better social services.

Nobody is calling for a blanket return to colonialism for Africa. But if given a choice, large sections of most African countries, if not all, would be willing to work for a colonial government. If the colonial governments can deliver better social services, there will be no need for people to cross oceans in search of these.

Ndo maana nikakuuliza, what are you doing in Arkansas? Kama umekwenda kusoma, you can study right here in Africa in a school of the same standard. Si shida yako kufundishwa na mzungu? Kama umekwenda kubeba box, hizo opportunities zitakua right here nyumbani. Si shida yako unataka kubeba box kwenye kampuni ya mzungu? You can do that at home without being frostbitten.

Finally, I do not condone colonialism. I am pro freedom/independence. But we must understand that freedom/independence comes with great responsibilities. Most Africans have failed miserably to meet these responsibilities. That is why I will keep on believing, until we change our ways, that colonialism is better than the mess we have now. That is why I understand and sympathize with our brothers and sisters in Mayotte who are against independence. That’s why I understand why some of our brothers and sisters risk everything to cross high seas and head for Europe. That’s why I understand why some of our brothers and sisters feel its better to be a dog in California than a human being in East Africa.
 
Ok mkuu me I have a question. Do you think that if our independence was delayed lets say like South Africa, would we be in a better economic state then we are now? And in the case of South Africa sure they have gotten ahead but at what price? The ones who are enjoying the fruits of the economy are the whites The few blacks who do enjoy it all are the ones who fought for independence but the mwananchi wa kawaida is left in the slums of Soweto. Isn't that what would have happened to us?
 
South Africa: Gap Between the Rich And Poor Too Wide

Peter Kagwanja 2 June 2008
opinion
Nairobi - The xenophobic attacks reflect the failure by the ANC government to close the gap between the "two different countries" that South Africa has become in the last 15 years.

The first country, visibly white and wealthy, signifies South Africa's dramatic successes in pulling back from racism, violence and human rights abuses of the apartheid era to political stability anchored on a liberal constitution, relatively impartial courts, faster economic growth than under apartheid and inflow of foreign investment.

African migrants with high professional skills, technology and resources to invest in businesses have settled in this "country", which has met the UN millennium Development Goals (MDGs) long before the 2015 finish line.

The second "country", manifestly black and impoverished, is characterised by economic woes, widespread poverty, unemployment, huge inequalities, violent crime, and anger.

Poor black migrants from Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Angola now under attack in Alexandra and other townships drifted into this "country", which like many African countries may never achieve MDGs at the present pace of economic growth.

As for now, the first "country" has not been engulfed in xenophobia.

But the second "country" is up in flames of hatred against foreigners, which has the potential of spreading to the first "country".

The existence of the two countries side by side signifies the failure of post-apartheid policies to roll back the Apartheid-era legacy of racial inequalities, black poverty and unemployment.

These woes have been compounded by stalled efforts to halt violent crime, job-poaching, housing allocations, poor service delivery, lax law enforcement and corruption, which have eroded public faith in formal structures to address grievances, and emboldened vigilantism and xenophobia.

For 13 years, the ANC has pursued the market-friendly Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) policy adopted in 1996 to attract direct foreign investment and make South Africa a competitive trading nation.

However, GEAR has failed to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor parts of Africa's wealthiest economy.

Along with Brazil, South Africa has become one of the most unequal societies in the world with a Gini coefficient (a number between 0 and 1 as a measure of inequality) of around 0.6.

Although the number of poor South Africans has expanded from a coverage rate of 2.5 million in 1994 to over 12.7 million in 2008, persistent inequalities remain a dangerous force.

Similarly, the ANC adopted the policy of "Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) to "deracialize" the economy and close the gap between whites and the poor blacks. But the policy has benefited only a small number of politically-connected black South Africans, producing a tiny "BEE-llionaires".

Not satisfied

Lamenting on this development, the newly elected ANC Deputy President, Kgalema Motlanthe, quipped: "Certain individuals are not satisfied with a single bout of empowerment. Instead, they are the beneficiaries of repeated bouts of re-empowerment. We see the same names mentioned over and over again in one deal after another."

As a result, roughly 45 per cent of South Africa's 47 million people, vastly black, are impoverished and unemployment stands at nearly 40 per cent.

Lack of skills rather than job opportunities is the main challenge for black South Africans.

As a 2006 research showed, the fast-growing information technology sector alone has 70,500 vacancies expected to reach 113,900 by 2009.

Mbeki's administration launched the Joint Initiative on Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA) in January 2006 to accelerate skills development among black South African.

But JIPSA has been slow in equipping locals with skills to take over jobs in the first-tier economy.

Ironically, xenophobic attacks have deepened the crisis in the second tier economy, the abode of Africans.

Tourism which employs a million people has suffered cancellations of bookings in the aftermath of violence.

Mines are also either scaling down or threatening to close down because foreigners constitute a third of the labour force.

The hope of attracting an estimated half a million foreign visitors to the 2010 soccer World Cup hangs in the balance as a result of South Africa's cycles of violence crime and now reputation for intolerance.

Xenophobic terror strikes at the heart of the African Renaissance project that the ANC mooted to open up South Africa to the rest of Africa and to advance its political and economic interests on the continent.

The pervading image of apartheid South Africa was that of "a white tip of a black continent".

Geo-politically, it was a "little more than the West's lackey on the southern tip of Africa".

Upon ascending to power in 1994, the ANC leadership embarked on an aggressive policy to turn South Africa into an African country.

On the eve of transition from apartheid to democracy in December 1993, former President Nelson Mandela declared that, "South Africa cannot escape its African destiny".

Mandela genuinely believed that South Africa's "future is inextricably linked to the future of the African continent."

He even married Graça Machel, the widow of the late Mozambican President, Samora Machel.

However, not all of his countrymen shared Mr Mandela's passion for Africa and its people.

Amid the attacks and neck-lacing of Mozambican migrants, Edith Tefo, 65, bizarrely faulted Mr Mandela for marrying Graça, a Mozambican national, accusing her of giving foreigners "freedom to come to SA the way they like".

Mr Mandela's successor, Mr Mbeki, had even a stronger passion and connection with Africa, where he spent his exile years.

Mr Mbeki's 1996 famous "I am an African" speech on the occasion of the adoption of the new constitution has come to signify South Africa's official turn away from its apartheid-era white identity to an African identity and pan-African outlook.

Mr Mbeki also popularized the concept of "African Renaissance', aimed at helping the continent resolve some of its worst crises without meddling from the western world.

As the basis of African unity, 'African Renaissance' drew heavily from philosophical ideas of pan-Africanism, negritude, ubuntu and black consciousness as the basis of African unity, dignity and pride.

Moved in

As South African business and experts forcefully moved into the continent, the "South African miracle" also attracted African migrants into the country.

As of May 2008, South Africa was home to five million immigrants, an estimated three million of these from Zimbabwe.

The main charge against African migrants in South Africa such as Zimbabweans is that they "are stealing our jobs and our homes and causing all the crime "

However, the group of African migrants in South Africa is neither seamless nor blood-suckers and criminals as their attackers would suggest.

They include refugees and asylum-seekers, whose rights are protected by regional and international refugee treaties such as the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1969 African Union Convention on Refugees, which South Africa has ratified.

Migrants to South Africa were more than refugees. "Not all immigrants are asylum seekers," says Moki Makura, a Nigerian businesswoman previously based in London and now stationed in Johannesburg.

South Africa has been an excellent base to highly qualified professionals overseas, keen to return and contribute to the continent's development.

The presence of pan-African institutions, including the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), the Pan-African Parliament

(PAP) and the African Peer Review (APRM) Secretariat has made its Gauteng province, hard hit by xenophobic terror, even more strategic.

This category of highly educated and skilled immigrants today anchors South Africa's economy.

African experts and investors also create jobs for the locals in the areas of policy research, finance, information technology and other business sectors.

"I employ 12 South Africans and that is only my contribution alone. There are many other foreign business people and graduates who came here to offer rare skills and seek investment opportunities because the climate is good," says a Zambian investor.

"The problem is not about South Africans losing jobs and economic opportunities (to other Africans), it is about sheer hatred of immigrants," Emmanuel Nyakarashi of the Johannesburg-based Refugee Ministries Centre said in a TV interview.

The Somali Association of South Africa (SASA) has recorded 471 fatalities in 11 years.

One reason cited for hate attacks on Africans is that they are responsible for spiralling crime and insecurity. Official statistics do not seem to support this claim.

The Department of Correctional Services has a total of 110,000 convicted prisoners and detainees awaiting trial on its books.

Of these, just over 4 per cent are foreigners, many on immigration charges.

Yet, the government's failure to act decisively has simply emboldened perpetrators of xenophobia, leading to the current mayhem.

Dr Kagwanja is the President of the African Policy Institute (Nairobi/Pretoria), and a director at the Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.

Copyright © 2008 The Nation. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com).
 
The above article is long but I will point out a few things and anybody who wishes to read the whole of it is welcome.

South Africa was ruled by apartheid until 1994. I think it is a good example regarding some of our arguments here.

South Africa is Africa's biggest economy no doubt. One might even argue it is because of white South Africans that the country is so develop thats all good and well. Lakini if you read the article you will notice a few things among others.

1.The gap between the rich and the poor is very large

2.The main beneficiaries of the large economy is the minority whites and the majority blacks a very poor and impoverished.

3.Although SA is a big economy you will notice that the majority of the blacks don't benefit from the big economy.

4.The gap between the poor has caused a lot of tension and unease among the poor who in turn take it out on innocent people.

I will then proceed to quote a few lines from the article.

"The second "country", manifestly black and impoverished, is characterised by economic woes, widespread poverty, unemployment, huge inequalities, violent crime, and anger."

"The existence of the two countries side by side signifies the failure of post-apartheid policies to roll back the Apartheid-era legacy of racial inequalities, black poverty and unemployment."

"Along with Brazil, South Africa has become one of the most unequal societies in the world with a Gini coefficient (a number between 0 and 1 as a measure of inequality) of around 0.6."

"Although the number of poor South Africans has expanded from a coverage rate of 2.5 million in 1994 to over 12.7 million in 2008, persistent inequalities remain a dangerous force."

"As a result, roughly 45 per cent of South Africa's 47 million people, vastly black, are impoverished and unemployment stands at nearly 40 per cent."

Although the article talks about xenophobia you can see that they is unrest with the majority blacks who are poor. Although for a long time the white man controlled the country and SA has developed far beyond other African countries we can see who are really enjoying all of this development.

The minority whites still hold the majority of the economy.

As I read this articles it makes me wonder, did the white ruling over us really help us? Did we actually benefit from the advancements?


The whites were able to make South Africa richer but has it actually done anything for the majority poor blacks?
 
Back
Top Bottom