ISIS Fleeing Syria to Evade Russian Airstrikes

ISIS Fleeing Syria to Evade Russian Airstrikes

KImsingi Marekani hajadhamiria kuwapiga ISIS kinachoendelea ni saa tu..kwa uwezo walionao wamarekani wanajua at any time ISIS wapo wapi wamelala wapi wametoka na mwanamke gani wamevaa nguo gani chakula wanatoa wapi wana magari mangapi diseli inatoka wapi simu wamempigia nani etc etc..wao wanachotaka ni dunia iamini kuwa kweli wanapambana na ISIS ili hali wanataka Assad atoke (hawataki mtandika moja kwa moja kelele zitakuwa nyingi)..Mrusi kwa kuwa anajua hiyo fitna yote (na kwa kuwa analinda soko lake la gesi kwa kupinga gesi kutoka Qatar kupitishwa Syria kwenda uturuki na ulaya) kaamua kugawa kichapo cha mbwa mwizi tokea angani huku ardhini majemedari toka Syria, Lebanon (HIzbolah) na Iran wanakimbiza..kama marekani haitaingilia kati kuwapa silaha na makombora ya kudungulia ndege ISIS basi kiama chao kimewasili


Utawapaje silaha wakati mianya yote imefungwa?
 
ISIL/ISIS wanacheza kwenye premier league ya vita ambapo wao ni swindonFC na urusi ni Chelsea. poleni wana swindon FC no disrespect.

hahaha we lazima utakuwa mtu wa kubeti umeijuaje swindon fc ?!! teh teh teh
 
Ila usisahau Russia aliunda kikundi kule crimea vilevile cha wapiganaji. Tofauti kubwa nayoiona ni kua magaidi wa Arabuni hawafugiki(based on raison de'tre). Wanaweza kumchenjia Iran hapo baadaye.

2013,

Magaidi wa Sunni ndio hawafugiki kama kunguru.
Al Shaabab, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, ISIS wote hawa Sunni vichwa panzi. Kazi yao kujilipua au kuchinja watu.

Afadhali Russia kaingilia kati.

Hii findings ya Brookings Institute kuhusu ISIS imenifungua macho na kuelewa kumbe viongozi wengi wa ISIS ni former Ba'ath Party generals. Ndio maana yanajuwa propaganda.
Article ndefu sana ila inaelimisha http://www.brookings.edu/research/essays/2015/thebeliever
 
Utawapaje silaha wakati mianya yote imefungwa?

Hakuna mianya iliyofungwa. Mipaka yote ya syria upande wa uturuki iko wazi.. Upande wa israel (Golan heights) iko wazi. Kimsingi Assad kwa sasa anamiliki sehemu ndogo sana ya nchi ya syria sehemu kubwa inamilikiwa na waasi
 
Nonda, globalresearch.ca/org is owned by a Russian by the name Michel Chossudovsky, who always publishes such articles critical of the US. Their news source is almost solely from the RT.

Therefore, I can hardly consider the globalresearch.ca/org an impartial commentator on this issue.
Get us the commentaries from the relatively less impassioned sources such as the BBC, Reuters or the Aljazeera.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nonda, globalresearch.ca/org is owned by a Russian by the name Michel Chossudovsky, who always publishes such articles critical of the US. Their news source is almost solely from the RT.

Therefore, I can hardly consider the globalresearch.ca/org an impartial commentator on this issue.
Get us the commentaries from the relatively less impassioned sources such as the BBC, Reuters or the Aljazeera.


And how do you measure the impartial and impassioned source?
I don't see the credibility of BBC and Reuters. They are all western propaganda machinery.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And how do you measure the impartial and impassioned source?
I don't see the credibility of BBC and Reuters. They are all western propaganda machinery.
We can guage the impartiality of a news source when it items do not seem to be always maligning and deriding one side while exalting the other. It has to be balanced in its reportage, for the sake of credibility.

The globalresearch.cn/org is brazzenly anti-America; always scoffing at all their attempts to wipe out the terrorists, yet they say hardly anything about the recent Russian tactical blunders in the similar campaigns that have ended the lives of many innocent pipo.
 
And how do you measure the impartial and impassioned source?
I don't see the credibility of BBC and Reuters. They are all western propaganda machinery.

Kwa conflict hii ya syria media zote ziko biased kutegemeana uko upande ugani. Hata chinese CCTV Itakuwa biased kutegemeana na geopolitocal interests.. Kwa kukusaidia tu angalia tukio la ndege ya urusi kuingia anga ya uturuki (balozi wa urusi amewasilisha rasmi ujumbe wa kuomba radhi) ilivyoripotiwa na CNN.. BBC.. FOXNEWS.. ALJAZEERA.. CCTV.. RIANOVOSTI.. RT.. PRVADA.. PRESSTV na soma pia THE WASHINGTON POST
 
We can guage the impartiality of a news source when it items do not seem to be always maligning and deriding one side while exalting the other. It has to be balanced in its reportage, for the sake of credibility.

The globalresearch.cn/org is brazzenly anti-America; always scoffing at all their attempts to wipe out the terrorists, yet they say hardly anything about the recent Russian tactical blunders in the similar campaigns that have ended the lives of many innocent pipo.


The same as all western MSM.
Stick to what you think its credible to you.
 
Nonda, globalresearch.ca/org is owned by a Russian by the name Michel Chossudovsky, who always publishes such articles critical of the US. Their news source is almost solely from the RT.

Therefore, I can hardly consider the globalresearch.ca/org an impartial commentator on this issue.
Get us the commentaries from the relatively less impassioned sources such as the BBC, Reuters or the Aljazeera.
Thank you for making me laugh.

Haya bana.
Link Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq | Seumas Milne | Comment is free | The Guardian

Link 2. Media Blacks Out Pentagon Report Exposing U.S. Role In ISIS Creation

Link 3. Newly-Declassified U.S. Government Documents: The West Supported the Creation of ISIS Washington's Blog

Read those and come back with another story.
 
ISIS/ISIL ni zao la Marekani.
Na hawakuwa serious kuwaondoa maana walitaka ISIS wampe shida Assad kwa faida ya Marekani.

Kama kweli isil wanasaidiwa na us,basi hii ndo sabb ambayo kwa mbaaaaaaaaali inaniingia
 
We can guage the impartiality of a news source when it items do not seem to be always maligning and deriding one side while exalting the other. It has to be balanced in its reportage, for the sake of credibility.

The globalresearch.cn/org is brazzenly anti-America; always scoffing at all their attempts to wipe out the terrorists, yet they say hardly anything about the recent Russian tactical blunders in the similar campaigns that have ended the lives of many innocent pipo.






 
Last edited by a moderator:
We can guage the impartiality of a news source when it items do not seem to be always maligning and deriding one side while exalting the other. It has to be balanced in its reportage, for the sake of credibility.

The globalresearch.cn/org is brazzenly anti-America; always scoffing at all their attempts to wipe out the terrorists, yet they say hardly anything about the recent Russian tactical blunders in the similar campaigns that have ended the lives of many innocent pipo.






Did you hear what Obama said?....They train ISIL (ISIS)
Are you listening? Do you want me to tell you more?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nonda, globalresearch.ca/org is owned by a Russian by the name Michel Chossudovsky, who always publishes such articles critical of the US. Their news source is almost solely from the RT.

Therefore, I can hardly consider the globalresearch.ca/org an impartial commentator on this issue.
Get us the commentaries from the relatively less impassioned sources such as the BBC, Reuters or the Aljazeera.
Link https://medium.com/insurge-intellig...west-saw-isis-as-strategic-asset-b99ad7a29092
 
Nonda, globalresearch.ca/org is owned by a Russian by the name Michel Chossudovsky, who always publishes such articles critical of the US. Their news source is almost solely from the RT.

Therefore, I can hardly consider the globalresearch.ca/org an impartial commentator on this issue.
Get us the commentaries from the relatively less impassioned sources such as the BBC, Reuters or the Aljazeera.
Link Russia: Strikes in Syria exclusively targeting ISIL - Al Jazeera English
 
Back
Top Bottom