China launches global yuan payment system

[Bavaria]

Ila pia sababu habari imeandikwa na Mrusi siiamini

Umeshindwa hata kutumia google ku-dig zaidi kupata accurate information?

Kwa akili yako ya kushikiwa unadhani habari kubwa kama hiyo ipo kwenye chanzo kimoja cha habari?

 

[Bavaria]

Hii yote ni sababu ya Obama, sababu ni mzembe zembe nchi imemshinda... Putin kaingia vitani Syria Obama aliogopa....
Wacha Trump aingie muone kama China atasimama

Obama is such a weakling.

No wonder why some think he is gay.

Obama and his Democrats fellas are not war people.

Global Economic Crunch ya 2008/2009 ilisababishwa kwa kiasi kikubwa na vita vya iraq na afghanstan.

Kwa kipindi cha Obama uchumi wa marekani umenawiri kwa kiasi kikubwa, unemployment impengua sana.

Vita ni gharama, ndio maana Obama hayupo tayari kuingia gharama ambazo sio za msingi.

Tusubiri Republicans waingie tuone.

 

[MALCOM LUMUMBA]

They've been trying for quite some time now...

That's correct,..
You can't just get hold of the global economy in just a nightfall.

How Germany, Great Britain and France became largest economies is quite different from how the U.S.A became the largest world economy..Do you know why??
Read all of the Truman Memoirs.

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

Obama and his Democrats fellas are not war people.

Democrats are not warmongers? You clearly don't know your history.

Who was the American president that got American into WWII? FDR, a Democrat

Who [which president] got America into the Korean Way? Harry S. Truman, a Democrat

Who got America into the Vietnam War? Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat.

Who got America involved in Kosovo and Bosnia? William J. Clinton, a Democrat.

As a matter of fact, more Democratic presidents have gotten America into wars than Republican presidents.

So your claim of Democrats not being warmongers doesn't hold up to the facts.

 

[Bavaria]

Democrats are not warmongers? You clearly don't know your history.

Who was the American president that got American into WWII? FDR, a Democrat

Who [which president] got America into the Korean Way? Harry S. Truman, a Democrat

Who got America into the Vietnam War? Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat.

Who got America involved in Kosovo and Bosnia? William J. Clinton, a Democrat.

As a matter of fact, more Democratic presidents have gotten America into wars than Republican presidents.

So your claim of Democrats not being warmongers doesn't hold up to the facts.

[h=1]Why Are Republicans Still the War Party?[/h] By Patrick J. Buchanan • March 8, 2012, 4:32 PM

• 
  
• 
• 

Denouncing Republican "bluster" about war with Iran, President Obama went on the offensive Tuesday:
"Those who are … beating the drums of war should explain clearly to the American people what they think the costs and benefits would be."
The president had in mind such remarks as those Newt Gingrich delivered to the Israeli lobby AIPAC that same day: "The red line is now … because the Iranians are deepening their commitment to nuclear weapons" - an assertion the Joint Chiefs and U.S. intelligence agencies say is blatantly false.
They insist: Iran has not made the decision to build a bomb.
Perhaps the president was referring to Mitt Romney's pledge to that same cheering throng to "station multiple carriers and warships at Iran's door" and deny Tehran even "the capacity to make a bomb."
But if "the capacity to make a bomb" means knowledge of how to build one and an ability to enrich uranium to bomb-grade, should they decide to do so, Iran already has that.
Does Mitt want war now?
Perhaps the president had in mind John McCain's call for U.S. air strikes on Syria, an act of war rejected even by GOP Speaker John Boehner as "premature," since the "situation in Syria is pretty complicated."
Have the Republican uber-hawks learned nothing from the war for which they beat the drums 10 years ago?
Then they told us Saddam Hussein was implicated in 9/11, that he had chemical weapons, that if we didn't invade his country we could expect anthrax attacks by Iraqi crop-dusters up and down our East Coast.
Those who asked for proof Saddam was a mortal threat were dismissed by Condi Rice: "There will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
The price of our heeding that bluster? Some 4,500 American dead, 35,000 wounded, $1 trillion sunk, 100,000 Iraqi dead, half a million widows and orphans.
The fruits of our victory? A Shia-dominated Iraq descending into sectarian and civil war.
The GOP's political reward for marching us up to Baghdad?
Loss of both houses of Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008, when the antiwar Obama crushed the war hawk McCain.
Today's GOP front-runners - Newt, Mitt and Rick Santorum - all clearly believe that a warlike stance toward Iran will appeal to the evangelical base and to Jewish voters who went for Obama by 57 points in 2008.
But they are rolling the dice with a war-weary America.
Ron Paul, whose youth vote the party needs and who receives the largest number of contributions from the military, has split with them on Iran.
The president, says Paul, is "closer to my position than the other candidates, because what the other Republicans are saying is reckless."
Most Republicans seem to be lining up with Newt, Mitt and Rick on a more hawkish stance. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell wants Congress to vote the president a blank check for war now. And the president is aware of and alarmed by the Republican stampede to war:
"The notion that the way to solve every one of these problems is to deploy our military - that hasn't been true in the past and it won't be true now. … Sometimes, it's necessary, but we don't do it casually. … We think it through. We don't play politics with it."
When rash decisions are made about war, said the president, mistakes are made, and "typically it's not the folks who are popping off who pay the price."
What to do about Iran - and whom to trust to deal with Iran - seems fated to be the foreign policy issue of 2012.
And the battle lines are drawn.
Bibi Netanyahu, the Israeli lobby and its allies in Congress will be demanding ever harsher sanctions and military action before November. For they assume, rightly, that the president does not want war and, if he wins, there will be no war with Iran.
The Republicans will portray Obama as dithering, vacillating and weak, no true friend of Israel, though the U.S. military and intelligence community are behind Obama in his belief that a war now on Iran would be unnecessary, unwise and potentially calamitous.
Nervous Democrats, facing Sheldon Adelson super PAC ads in the Jewish communities of every swing state, all accusing Obama of "throwing Israel under the bus," will be pressuring the president to get tougher.
And Obama surely knows that an October confrontation with Iran, with war a possibility, or a reality, will mean the nation rallies around him and he wins a second term.
Will Iranian intransigence provide him a casus belli? Or will Iran negotiate seriously and agree to more intrusive inspections to prove its nuclear program is not aimed at a bomb?
Whether there is a U.S. war on Iran seems up to the --------- now. Will he play into the hands of Israeli and American hawks who are salivating over a war with his regime and his country?
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" Copyright 2012 Creators.com

Why Are Republicans Still the War Party? | The American Conservative

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

[h=1]Why Are Republicans Still the War Party?[/h] By Patrick J. Buchanan • March 8, 2012, 4:32 PM

• 
  
• 
• 

Denouncing Republican "bluster" about war with Iran, President Obama went on the offensive Tuesday:
"Those who are … beating the drums of war should explain clearly to the American people what they think the costs and benefits would be."
The president had in mind such remarks as those Newt Gingrich delivered to the Israeli lobby AIPAC that same day: "The red line is now … because the Iranians are deepening their commitment to nuclear weapons" - an assertion the Joint Chiefs and U.S. intelligence agencies say is blatantly false.
They insist: Iran has not made the decision to build a bomb.
Perhaps the president was referring to Mitt Romney's pledge to that same cheering throng to "station multiple carriers and warships at Iran's door" and deny Tehran even "the capacity to make a bomb."
But if "the capacity to make a bomb" means knowledge of how to build one and an ability to enrich uranium to bomb-grade, should they decide to do so, Iran already has that.
Does Mitt want war now?
Perhaps the president had in mind John McCain's call for U.S. air strikes on Syria, an act of war rejected even by GOP Speaker John Boehner as "premature," since the "situation in Syria is pretty complicated."
Have the Republican uber-hawks learned nothing from the war for which they beat the drums 10 years ago?
Then they told us Saddam Hussein was implicated in 9/11, that he had chemical weapons, that if we didn't invade his country we could expect anthrax attacks by Iraqi crop-dusters up and down our East Coast.
Those who asked for proof Saddam was a mortal threat were dismissed by Condi Rice: "There will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
The price of our heeding that bluster? Some 4,500 American dead, 35,000 wounded, $1 trillion sunk, 100,000 Iraqi dead, half a million widows and orphans.
The fruits of our victory? A Shia-dominated Iraq descending into sectarian and civil war.
The GOP's political reward for marching us up to Baghdad?
Loss of both houses of Congress in 2006 and the White House in 2008, when the antiwar Obama crushed the war hawk McCain.
Today's GOP front-runners - Newt, Mitt and Rick Santorum - all clearly believe that a warlike stance toward Iran will appeal to the evangelical base and to Jewish voters who went for Obama by 57 points in 2008.
But they are rolling the dice with a war-weary America.
Ron Paul, whose youth vote the party needs and who receives the largest number of contributions from the military, has split with them on Iran.
The president, says Paul, is "closer to my position than the other candidates, because what the other Republicans are saying is reckless."
Most Republicans seem to be lining up with Newt, Mitt and Rick on a more hawkish stance. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell wants Congress to vote the president a blank check for war now. And the president is aware of and alarmed by the Republican stampede to war:
"The notion that the way to solve every one of these problems is to deploy our military - that hasn't been true in the past and it won't be true now. … Sometimes, it's necessary, but we don't do it casually. … We think it through. We don't play politics with it."
When rash decisions are made about war, said the president, mistakes are made, and "typically it's not the folks who are popping off who pay the price."
What to do about Iran - and whom to trust to deal with Iran - seems fated to be the foreign policy issue of 2012.
And the battle lines are drawn.
Bibi Netanyahu, the Israeli lobby and its allies in Congress will be demanding ever harsher sanctions and military action before November. For they assume, rightly, that the president does not want war and, if he wins, there will be no war with Iran.
The Republicans will portray Obama as dithering, vacillating and weak, no true friend of Israel, though the U.S. military and intelligence community are behind Obama in his belief that a war now on Iran would be unnecessary, unwise and potentially calamitous.
Nervous Democrats, facing Sheldon Adelson super PAC ads in the Jewish communities of every swing state, all accusing Obama of "throwing Israel under the bus," will be pressuring the president to get tougher.
And Obama surely knows that an October confrontation with Iran, with war a possibility, or a reality, will mean the nation rallies around him and he wins a second term.
Will Iranian intransigence provide him a casus belli? Or will Iran negotiate seriously and agree to more intrusive inspections to prove its nuclear program is not aimed at a bomb?
Whether there is a U.S. war on Iran seems up to the --------- now. Will he play into the hands of Israeli and American hawks who are salivating over a war with his regime and his country?
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" Copyright 2012 Creators.com

Why Are Republicans Still the War Party? | The American Conservative

Hahaha......see, facts are very stubborn things.

Not even Patrick J. Buchanan's opinions can dispute them.

The notion that Democrats are less warmongering than Republicans is a canard and the facts prove so.

So, if you are going to dispute that, please do so with counter-facts rather than with an opinion piece from a has-been curmudgeon.

 

[Red Giant]

mmarekani yupo radhi apigane vita ya nuklia lakini siyo ya sarafu. ila hana jinsi maana mchina kaisha ianzisha.

 

[Koba]

Kelele tuu hakuna kitu hapo,dollar still the king na hakuna nchi yeyote itakayoweka reserve yake in Chinese currency,Chinese hata status ya major currency bado then leo iwe reserve,Chinese Economy bado iko shaky sana,chinese market imeanguka almost 50% in less than 6 months,je vipi kama currency yao ingekuwa kama nyingine zinazo float free bila government intervention pesa kama hizi za kichina ukiziacha ziwe controlled na markets sitashangaa zikawa in bubble and bust circle kila siku,hakuna mtu mwenye akili anaweza kuamini hawa wakomunisti na kuhifadhi utajiri wake kwa kutumia Chinese currency.

 

[Kingmairo]

Hmm....huu sasa uzushi!

Watoto kusomea sakafuni na wajawazito kulala sakafuni hospitalini kunahusiana kivipi na sera ya nje ya Marekani?

Acheni kuwapa ushuru viongozi wenu wabovu kwa kisingizio cha sera za Marekani.

Mkuu usifunikwe macho na benefits chache unazopata (if at all you are an african). Soma kitabu cha THE CONFESSION OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN utatambua USA ndo anaivuruga hii dunia from Africa mpaka sasa hivi Middle East. Kwenye vuguvugu la sasa hivi huko Syria mlezi wa ISI ni Marekani. Russia is doing the right thing kwangu mie.
Pia, tulio na mtazamo tofauti na nyie kuhusu US msituone sie ni hypocrites! At least we have a clue on how they made us dependent ili waweze kutunyonya na tusiamke milele.

 

[Kingmairo]

Kelele tuu hakuna kitu hapo,dollar still the king na hakuna nchi yeyote itakayoweka reserve yake in Chinese currency,Chinese hata status ya major currency bado then leo iwe reserve,Chinese Economy bado iko shaky sana,chinese market imeanguka almost 50% in less than 6 months,je vipi kama currency yao ingekuwa kama nyingine zinazo float free bila government intervention pesa kama hizi za kichina ukiziacha ziwe controlled na markets sitashangaa zikawa in bubble and bust circle kila siku,hakuna mtu mwenye akili anaweza kuamini hawa wakomunisti na kuhifadhi utajiri wake kwa kutumia Chinese currency.

Chinese market imeanguka for almost 50% in 6 months? Are you sure?

 

[Bavaria]

Kelele tuu hakuna kitu hapo,dollar still the king na hakuna nchi yeyote itakayoweka reserve yake in Chinese currency,Chinese hata status ya major currency bado then leo iwe reserve,Chinese Economy bado iko shaky sana,chinese market imeanguka almost 50% in less than 6 months,je vipi kama currency yao ingekuwa kama nyingine zinazo float free bila government intervention pesa kama hizi za kichina ukiziacha ziwe controlled na markets sitashangaa zikawa in bubble and bust circle kila siku,hakuna mtu mwenye akili anaweza kuamini hawa wakomunisti na kuhifadhi utajiri wake kwa kutumia Chinese currency.

Huo ni mwanzo wa kuelekea kuwa major currency.
China sasa hivi ana comand large percent ya world trade. Imports and Exports anachuana giants kama EU, US.
Kuna haja gani ya kuendelea kutumia Dollar kwenye biashara zake?
Kumubuka BRICS nao wana-comand large percent of world trade. Wakiamua wote kuachana na dola bado itakuwa 'your' king?

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

Pia, tulio na mtazamo tofauti na nyie kuhusu US msituone sie ni hypocrites! At least we have a clue on how they made us dependent ili waweze kutunyonya na tusiamke milele.

Puhliiiiz....ati mna clue!

Yeah...mko clueless.

 

[Koba]

Chinese market imeanguka for almost 50% in 6 months? Are you sure?

Yes sir and just google it,and not necessarily a bad thing sometimes markets ziko hivyo lakini hii fall imeonyesha weakness kubwa sana ya mchina na sababu kubwa ilikuwa ni yuan devaluation by communist . Chinese hawezi kukubali value ya pesa yake iwe determined na markets wanajua itakuwa disaster kwa Economy yao inayotegemea Export.

 

[puppa]

china, Russia, Syria na MAREKANI ukipewa nafasi uchague utapenda kwenda kuishi wapi?

 

[124 Ali]

Hmm....huu sasa uzushi!

Watoto kusomea sakafuni na wajawazito kulala sakafuni hospitalini kunahusiana kivipi na sera ya nje ya Marekani?

Acheni kuwapa ushuru viongozi wenu wabovu kwa kisingizio cha sera za Marekani.

NyaniNgabu hapo umenena !tufirigiswe na CCM miaka hamsini ,waje kwenye kampeni sijui wiki ngapi wasemeseme uongo wao muwaweke tena madarakani wawafirigise tena mje msingizie Amerika Kha! huu ujuha uliopitiliza!

 

[MK254]

Mbona hata wewe you hypocritically hate almost every muslim; under the veneer of multiple ID's wao wamekufanyia nini???
Dotworld Nonda Bukyanagandi

MALCOM LUMUMBA Mambo ya waislamu na hela za Wachina wapi na wapi, wacha kuleta mambo ya dini kwa mada ambayo haihusiani. Huwa mnaanzisha chokochoko halafu mnalaumu eti Marekani.
Siwachukii waislamu ila nina tatizo na wale wanaoua watu eti kwamba wanamfurahisha allah na mohamed wenu. Juzi tu waliwachinja wakristo, na kwa ujasiri hao Wakristo waliita jina la Yesu hadi wakafa. Siku za kiama watajibu tu hao wauaji.

 

[Nyani Ngabu]

NyaniNgabu hapo umenena !tufirigiswe na CCM miaka hamsini ,waje kwenye kampeni sijui wiki ngapi wasemeseme uongo wao muwaweke tena madarakani wawafirigise tena mje msingizie Amerika Kha! huu ujuha uliopitiliza!

Ni beyond ujuha!

Lakini waache tu maana kwa sisi wapenda haki tunawaona wanayo haki ya kuwa zaidi ya majuha.

 

[124 Ali]

Ni beyond ujuha!

Lakini waache tu maana kwa sisi wapenda haki tunawaona wanayo haki ya kuwa zaidi ya majuha.

ha!ha! I like that! "wasinyimwe haki yao ya msingi kuwa majuha!"