Binadamu wawili kupelekwa mwezini tena mwaka 2018 na kampuni ya SpaceX

[mwaminifuhalisi]

Baada ya kupita kipindi kirefu tangu mwanadamu alipotua mwezini, kampuni ya spaceX jumatatu ya tarehe 27/2/2017 imetangaza kupitia kwa muasisi wake Elon Musk kuwa itafanya trip ya kibinifasi kwa watu wawili mwaka 2018 mwezini.

Kampuni hiyo ya maswala ya anga itatumia rocket aina ya "Falcon Heavy Rocket" kupeleka watu hao mwezini ambao bado majina yao hayajawekwa wazi.

Watu wao wanaotaraji kwenda mwezini tayari wameshafanya malipo ya awali kwa kampuni hiyo na sasa wapo kwenye hatua ya kuanza kuwapa mafunzo watalii hao wa anga ili kufanikisha safari kwa usalama na uhakika.

Sasa mzizi wa fititna unaenda kukatwa na watu wote wa kizazi cha sasa watashuhudia binadamu akitua mwezini mwaka 2018 baada ya baadhi ya watu kutokuamini kwamba binadamu alishawahi tua mwezini.

source: SpaceX to Fly Passengers On Private Trip Around the Moon in 2018

 

[Munru]

Baada ya kupita kipindi kirefu tangu mwanadamu alipotua mwezini, kampuni ya spaceX jumatatu ya tarehe 27/2/2017 imetangaza kupitia kwa muasisi wake Elon Musk kuwa itafanya trip ya kibinifasi kwa watu wawili mwaka 2018 mwezini.

View attachment 475264 ​

Kampuni hiyo ya maswala ya anga itatumia rocket aina ya "Falcon Heavy Rocket" kupeleka watu hao mwezini ambao bado majina yao hayajawekwa wazi.

Watu wao wanaotaraji kwenda mwezini tayari wameshafanya malipo ya awali kwa kampuni hiyo na sasa wapo kwenye hatua ya kuanza kuwapa mafunzo watalii hao wa anga ili kufanikisha safari kwa usalama na uhakika.

Sasa mzizi wa fititna unaenda kukatwa na watu wote wa kizazi cha sasa watashuhudia binadamu akitua mwezini mwaka 2018 baada ya baadhi ya watu kutokuamini kwamba binadamu alishawahi tua mwezini.

source: SpaceX to Fly Passengers On Private Trip Around the Moon in 2018

The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to assert their victory in the space race over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.
Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon. After the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky Dick to fake them to put America in good standing in the Cold War.In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA’s explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.

10.The Waving Flag

Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag. The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.

Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which is shown to shake in the video footage

9. Lack of Impact Crater

The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon, there would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed there. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.

Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than it would have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible anyway – in the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip

8. The Van Allen Radiation Belt

In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The Apollo missions to the moon marked the first ever attempts to transport living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of time it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – meaning they received only very small doses of radiation.

7.Lack of Stars

One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).

Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them

6.The Duplicate Backdrop

The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another? Well, if you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their moon landing videos.NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly false.

To be continued......................

 

[Faana]

trip ya kibinifasi

Sijaelewa kwenye red text

 

[KENZY]

halafu wanaobishaga hawajawahi hata kwendako! au hata kutoka nje ya dunia ha ha ha!

 

[mwaminifuhalisi]

Sijaelewa kwenye red text

private trip for space tourists