Why Magufuli administration misses the point on Government splurge

Status
Not open for further replies.
The regime got away with "viroba" because the victims are Lilliputians but Acacia are anything but pushovers
The regime is extreme, the regime is lawless, the re regime is unpredictable! Let it go! FB_IMG_1495691215294.jpg
 
I have for sometime been assaying Prof. Mruma's report and I have come to the following conclusions:-

1) The report is unprofitable because it does not evaluate the mining laws and contractual obligations on both sides. Without analysis of the two legal regimes the rest of the report together with its recommendations are useless.

2) The government initiated investigations are biased and cannot be parlayed to justifying halting of mining operations in the respective mines.

3) Efforts to widen the tax base and encourage higher tax payment compliance are now withering under these unlawful investigations deeds

4) Less tax revenues will be collected from mining operations this financial year.

5) Illegal investigations carried out will benefit Acacia who stands to reap billions in damages from serious violations of contract

6) Experiences from Dowans, Iptl, Aggrecko and others, it is decorous to suggest this regime is working in tandem with Acacia to loot us for election financing purposes.
 
What Tundu Lissu is saying may be the gospel truth

*MAJIBU YA LISSU KWA MAKADA WA CCM*

Khamnemba.

Na mimi ni Mtanzania pia.

Tofauti kati yangu mimi na wewe na Magufuli ni hii: Mimi nimepigania nchi yangu katika masuala haya tangu mwaka '99.

Wakati huo tulikuwa na mgodi mmoja tu wa dhahabu, Resolute Golden Pride Nzega. Bulyanhulu ilikuwa haijajengwa. Geita ndio kwanza walikuwa wanafukuza wanakijiji wa Mtakuja.

Nadhani nilikuwa wa kwanza katika nchi hii kupiga yowe kwamba tutaibiwa sana kwenye sekta ya madini.

Wewe sijui ulikuwa wapi wakati huo. Najua Magufuli alikuwa wapi: upande wa MaCCM na wawekezaji hawa.

Nimepigana na wawekezaji hawa mahakamani, kwenye medani ya kisiasa ndani na nje ya nchi hii kwa zaidi ya miaka 15. Nimetetea wananchi completely free of charge Bulyanhulu, Tarime, Nzega, Geita, n.k.

Sijui wewe ulikuwa wapi lakini najua Magufuli alikuwa upande wa nani: wa MaCCM na wanyonyaji hawa.

Soma Rai ya tarehe 17 Julai, 2001, uone tulimwambia nini Mkapa siku anaenda kuzindua Mgodi wa Bulyanhulu.

Sijui ulikuwa wapi lakini najua Magufuli alikuwa wapi: alikuwa anatetea tumbo lake na matumbo ya wanyonyaji hawa.

Nilikamatwa na kushtakiwa kwa uchochezi kwa sababu ya Bulyanhulu. Hiyo ilikuwa December 2002. Nilikaa na kesi hiyo mahakamani Kisutu kwa miaka sita.

Sijui ulikuwa wapi ila najua Magufuli alikuwa wapi: upande wa watesi wa wananchi na wanyonyaji wa rasilmali zetu.

Leo Magufuli anajifanya mzalendo na anahoji uzalendo we yeyote anayepingana nae.

Ni muongo. Anatafuta umaarufu wa kisiasa kwa wasiojua na wasiokumbuka. Ataupata. Kwa siku chache tu. Mark my words: ataumbuka na mtaumbuka.

Mimi ninampinga hadharani. Sio mnafiki, na sijahongwa. Ninampinga kwa sababu atatusababishia matatizo makubwa zaidi kuliko tuliyonayo sasa.

Huo mchanga atauachia upelekwe ambako umepelekwa kwa miaka 16 iliyopita. Kama sheria ndiyo hiyo na mikataba ndiyo hiyo hana pakwenda.

Tatizo ninaloliona ni kwamba by the time anawarudishia mchanga wao, Tanzania itakuwa imekuwa a basket case kama Zimbabwe.

Na tutakuwa tumelipishwa mapesa mengi kama fidia na arbitral tribunals za kimataifa kwa kuvunja mikataba na wawekezaji hawa.

Kama kuna anayefikiri uzalendo ni kufumbia macho masuala haya basi huyo na amuunge mkono Magufuli kwenye upofu wake wa kujitakia.

Ripoti ya Prof. Mruma haitamaliza hata nusu saa under serious scrutiny. Zaidi ya majina ya maprofesa walioiandaa, ripoti hii haina credibility yoyote. Ni kazi ya kisiasa iliyopakwa rangi ya usomi.

Kama umefuatilia taarifa za kitaalamu za Bulyanhulu hata kabla ya Barrick Gold kuingia mwaka '99 utajua ninasema nini.

Sutton Resources, Outukumpu Oy na hata STAMICO walishafanya utafiti mkubwa juu ya utajiri wa Bulyanhulu. Taarifa zipo na zimekuwepo kwa hata mbumbumbu wa jiolojia ya madini kama mimi.

Hiki alichoambiwa Magufuli ni rubbish, hata kama ni ya kiprofesa. Rubbish. Hatuibiwi kwenye mchanga, that's the rubbish fed on the unlettered.

Tunaibiwa kwenye sheria. Kama hamuoni hilo then God have mercy on us.
 
I have for sometime been assaying Prof. Mruma's report and I have come to the following conclusions:-

1) The report is unprofitable because it does not evaluate the mining laws and contractual obligations on both sides. Without analysis of the two legal regimes the rest of the report together with its recommendations are useless.

2) The government initiated investigations are biased and cannot be parlayed to justifying halting of mining operations in the respective mines.

3) Efforts to widen the tax base and encourage higher tax payment compliance are now withering under these unlawful investigations deeds

4) Less tax revenues will be collected from mining operations this financial year.

5) Illegal investigations carried out will benefit Acacia who stands to reap billions in damages from serious violations of contract

6) Experiences from Dowans, Iptl, Aggrecko and others, it is decorous to suggest this regime is working in tandem with Acacia to loot us for election financing purposes.
atleast today you have written something analytical instead of just acting as an amateur news reporter like you always do.bravo
 
atleast today you have written something analytical instead of just acting as an amateur news reporter like you always do.bravo
News reporter?
At least you have the nerves to lie!
This is atypical when the fear of God not in your lustful eyes. You are a child of the flesh while I am the child of the spirit.

You love strolling the wide path while I am contented trudging a torturous strait! No wonder we see no eye to eye.
 
My prognosis of Ernest Mangu sacking is ominous, I do not see anything positive, at all.

Is he blamed for the mind boggling disappearance of cdm stalwart or the relentless Kibiti massacres or his overt condemnation of extra judicial deeds against journalists or the unceasing lawlessness now diabolizing the police force?

IMG-20170528-WA0043.jpg
tapatalk_1496002481860.jpeg
IMG-20170528-WA0042.jpg
IMG-20170528-WA0039.jpg
 
The new IGP Simon Sirro leans more as a politician than law enforcer eager to craft middle ground pleasing nobody but ruffling few feathers.

Is he a step in the right direction where the police will repair the damaged reputation with citizens mostly likely not.

In Kibiti expect bloodshed but no reconciliation

In muzzling political dissent contemplate business as usual

In silent clampdown on pluralism expect more middle ground seeking in particular because of donor pressure and no local initiative as the house of cards continue creaking
 
Appointment of siro will not help anything positive to the reconciliation of peace and security in area affected with these gangster and hooligans.but more mass killing of innocent peole . Human right violation by police .kidnapping and all sort of uncivilised regime in our country.
 
Magufuli violated the rights of TMAA & Acacia by acting adversely on a report the accused never saw let alone been given the opportunity to contradict if chooses to.

In Jimmy David Ngonyani (supra), the High Court quashed and set aside the decision of the Board of Directors of NIC after it deprived Ngonyani his rights to natural justice of impugning a controversial auditors' report but the Board of Directors still went on to dismiss him based on the findings of that report he never saw nor given an opportunity to assail it!


This regime has little regard to the administrative law and its decisions cannot stand the test of time.


JIMMY DAVID NGONYA v NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION LTD 1994 (HC)[Reported]

Details
Category: High Court
Case Summary

This is an application for orders of certiorari and mandamus to remove into this Court and quash the decision of the Board of Directors of the National Insurance Corporation, and to compel the Board of Directors of the respondent Corporation to reinstate the applicant and thereby direct it to act with fairness.

Bahati J Held:

(i) Since the audit report was prejudicial to the interests of the applicant and it formed the basis of the decision of the Board, it ought to have been shown to the applicant for his comments and for an opportunity to contradict its contents; failure to do that contravened the right of the applicant to be heard;

(ii) Since the General Manager, who was in the nature of a prosecutor, was present during the deliberations of the Board which dismissed the applicant, the proceedings of the Board were vitiated by bias.

Application granted.

JPMRIPOTI.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom