Their mission statement was to replicate most of the old constitution, repackage it with wordy and tedious explanations as if they distrusted the judiciary to make proper interpretations of the mother law.
So name changing and violating the doctrine of separation of powers by packing the election commission with chief justices, speakers of the houses and a university professor Don was all was needed
Appointment powers of the election commission by a president belonging from party in power is a major source of contention and Kabudi and co. never addressed it in their draft constitution
Most of presidential powers in other appointments were left intact with no effort to empower parliamentary vetting save for chief justice, chief secretary, premier among a handful
JamiiForums uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.