Kwa hiyo mtu ukiwa masikini na kama unatafuta ajira western Europe unaruhusiwa kua racist?Its normal for most folks from Eastern Europe ni washamba wa kufa mtu. Wengi hawana hope na future zao kwani wanakuwa vibarua tu wakija Western Europe kama wahamiaji wengine. Most of them live in misery that why they engage in racism
Ahhh vitu kama hivi ni vya kupotezea tu kwasababu hata sisi tu tunabaguana na kukashifiana wenyewe kwa wenyewe, achilia mbali weupe vs weusi vs yellow na wekundu.
Ila inanikumbusha waIsrael wenye ubaguzi na chuki wanavyopenda kuita watu weusi Baboons. . .it's kinda sad!!
Kwa hiyo mtu ukiwa masikini na kama unatafuta ajira western Europe unaruhusiwa kua racist?
Kama anavo sema Lizzy ni tabia za watu tu, and there is no justification for that...
Ndio maana Hitler alikuwa anataka kuwamaliza
washamba sana Ukraine wengi wao wamezamia sana scandinavia na hawataki kurudi kwao
la pili wanajidai kuwa ni nchi yenye warembo wazuri duniani ndio maana mtu bara lingine nje ya ulaya
anaonekana hana hadhi ya kuongea na hao mabinti hata awe malaya kama katuni hiyo inavosema.
Wewe. . bora hawa wanaishia kuita watu Baboons tu ila wanawapa waEthiopia kibao hifadhi. Kwa maana nyingine chuki/ubaguzi wao kwa watu wengine (well, ukiacha waarabu) haihusishi kuua.Tofauti na Hitler aliyeuwa wenzake kama vile anacheza rede. Alafu we unamshabikia. . .ujue kabisa kwamba kama angefanikiwa, next wangekua weusi. Kwahiyo usiponde chuki kwa kuendekeza chuki. . be better than them.
Hating is BAD.
Ila ukweli usemwe bana, wana wanawake wazuri sana tu. Hamna sababu ya kuwachukia kwa hilo.
Uzuri ni kwamba sio wote wako hivyo, na walioko hivyo wanapatikana kwenye kila makundi. Muhimu ni sisi kutorudisha hizo chuki. . .Nilikuwa natoa mfano tu, ila tabia ya kubaguana huwa inajenga chuki za muda mrefu na akitokea mtu wa roho mbaya kama Hitler retaliation inakuwa mbaya sana. Mimi nafikiri wangekuwa waungwana wangejifunza kilichowapata during Holocaust na wangekuwa ambassador wakupinga ubaguzi. Ni kweli HATING IS BAD
It makes sense, thank you for sharing... Nimeelewa ratio ya racist wasomi iko chini ukicompare na wale wa daraja za chini.There is correletion between ones own social class and engagement in racism. Most folks in lower class tend to be more racist than those in middle and upper class. Hii ni kwa sababu wenyeji waliokatika maisha ya chini huwa wanagombania kazi za aina moja na wageni. Kwa hiyo wanaona wahamiaji ni adui wa maslahi yao. Hizi ni tafiti ambazo ziko confermed na watalaam wengi wa mambo ya Uhamiaji. Na hii pia inaweza kuwa sababu kwa nini watu wengi wa Ulaya Mashariki ni wabaguzi kwa kuwa maisha yao yako chini, wengi pia hawana exposure ukicompare na watu wa Ulaya magharibi
Hili nakubaliana na wewe kabisa, poverty haiwezi kuwa sababu pekee. Racism inaweza kuwa combination ya sababu nyingi tu. Sometimes inaweza kuwa tabia ya mtu tuIt makes sense, thank you for sharing... Nimeelewa ratio ya racist wasomi iko chini ukicompare na wale wa daraja za chini.
Sasa ningependa kuona katika wale wa daraja la chini asilimia gani ni racist? My point is: kama wengi sio racist (even with a 45% rate of racism there) tayari inaonesha kua there are other factors beyond poverty.
This is exactly what has been assumed by many eugenicists, evolutionists, sociologists, and psychologists, both before and since the time of Darwin.
Darwin wrote: "I could not have believed how wide was the difference between savage and civilized man; it is greater than between a wild and domesticated animal
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes. . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.
Waafrika nao wanatafuta nini huko Ukraine?
This is exactly what has been assumed by many eugenicists, evolutionists, sociologists, and psychologists, both before and since the time of Darwin.
Darwin wrote: "I could not have believed how wide was the difference between savage and civilized man; it is greater than between a wild and domesticated animal
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes. . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla.