Remember, on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said,
The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11. This should be headline news worldwide.
The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the U.S. media blindly read the
government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001? Why has the U.S. media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the governments account? And on those few rare occasions when a 9/11 dissenter has made it upon the airways, why has the mainstream media ridiculed the guest as a conspiracy nut, rather than listen to the evidence that clearly raises valid questions about the governments 9/11 account?
Why is the Big Media Conglomeration blindly content with the governments 9/11 story when so much verifiable information to the contrary is available with a few clicks of a computer mouse?
Who is it that is controlling the media message, and how is it that the U.S. media has indicted Usama Bin Laden for the events of September 11, 2001, but the
U.S. government has not? How is it that the
FBI has no
hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the U.S. media has played the Bin Laden - 9/11 connection story for five years now as if it has conclusive evidence that Bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?
No hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11
Think about it.