engmtolera
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 21, 2010
- 5,150
- 1,437
wadau
hebu tulijadili hili
inakuwaje Kenya imeipeleka serikali yetu ktk mahakama ya EAC juu ya ujenzi wa Barabara ktk mbuga ya Serengeti? kwani Mbuga ni yetu na ujenzi wa barabara ni kwa ajili ya kurahisisha utalii na kuwasaidia watanzania wa maeneo hayo ambao wamekuwa wakipata tabu sana kuja maeneo ya DSM,MOROGORO,DODOMA,kwani watanzania wanatumia muda mwingi kupitia kenya ndio waende musoma,lakini pia wakazi wa Serengeti wanaelewa fika usumbufu wanaoupata pindi wanapohitaji kuchukua bidhaa za kuuza hususani Mjini Mugumu!
Pamoja na kwamba wanaongelea mambo ya uharibifu wa njia za wanyama,lakini bado upembuzi yakinifu haujaonyesha madhara hayo.
Mbuga yetu,Barabara yetu,eneo linalojengwa barabara ni letu watanzania,lakini bado wenzetu wanatupeleka mahakamani kwa kitu ambacho ni chetu kwa manufaa ya watanzania.
Nini tatizo?
Wakati umefika kwa Serikali kutekeleza moja ya ahadi iliyoanishwa kwenye Ilani ya Uchaguzi ya mwaka 2010 kuwa barabara ya Makutano-Natta-Mugumu-Mto wa Umbu, ijengwe kwa kiwango cha lami bila ya kuwasikiliza hawa majirani zetu.
Govt defends Serengeti road
hebu tulijadili hili
inakuwaje Kenya imeipeleka serikali yetu ktk mahakama ya EAC juu ya ujenzi wa Barabara ktk mbuga ya Serengeti? kwani Mbuga ni yetu na ujenzi wa barabara ni kwa ajili ya kurahisisha utalii na kuwasaidia watanzania wa maeneo hayo ambao wamekuwa wakipata tabu sana kuja maeneo ya DSM,MOROGORO,DODOMA,kwani watanzania wanatumia muda mwingi kupitia kenya ndio waende musoma,lakini pia wakazi wa Serengeti wanaelewa fika usumbufu wanaoupata pindi wanapohitaji kuchukua bidhaa za kuuza hususani Mjini Mugumu!
Pamoja na kwamba wanaongelea mambo ya uharibifu wa njia za wanyama,lakini bado upembuzi yakinifu haujaonyesha madhara hayo.
Mbuga yetu,Barabara yetu,eneo linalojengwa barabara ni letu watanzania,lakini bado wenzetu wanatupeleka mahakamani kwa kitu ambacho ni chetu kwa manufaa ya watanzania.
Nini tatizo?
Wakati umefika kwa Serikali kutekeleza moja ya ahadi iliyoanishwa kwenye Ilani ya Uchaguzi ya mwaka 2010 kuwa barabara ya Makutano-Natta-Mugumu-Mto wa Umbu, ijengwe kwa kiwango cha lami bila ya kuwasikiliza hawa majirani zetu.
Govt defends Serengeti road
Arusha. The government has defended the proposed highway across the Serengeti National Park, saying constructing it will neither violate the East African Community (EAC) Treaty nor harm the ecosystem.
Government Counsel Gabriel Malata told the East African Court of Justice that the highway would ease the movement of tourists to and from the area.
When the case was filed in December 2010, he explained, the government had not decided on whether to build a tarmac or gravel road. After a feasibility study, Mr Malata said, the gravel road came out on top--essentially because it would have no effect on the Serengeti eco-system.
Mr Malata, the principal state attorney, asked the court to dismiss the case filed by the Nairobi-based Africa Network of Animal Welfare (ANAW) with costs. He argued that supporting ANAW would frustrate the tourism sector in the entire region "because the road is there to facilitate the movement of tourists".
The EAC partner states were yet to ratify the Protocol on Environment and Natural Resources, he added, making the case premature.
ANAW argues that construction of the road will be hazardous to the environment and animals in particular. The group's lawyer, Saitabao Kanchory Mbalelo told the court that construction of the road across the national park infringes Articles 5 and 3 of the EAC Treaty.
chanzo:http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/Go...road/-/1840392/2208404/-/12mix6x/-/index.html
Government Counsel Gabriel Malata told the East African Court of Justice that the highway would ease the movement of tourists to and from the area.
When the case was filed in December 2010, he explained, the government had not decided on whether to build a tarmac or gravel road. After a feasibility study, Mr Malata said, the gravel road came out on top--essentially because it would have no effect on the Serengeti eco-system.
Mr Malata, the principal state attorney, asked the court to dismiss the case filed by the Nairobi-based Africa Network of Animal Welfare (ANAW) with costs. He argued that supporting ANAW would frustrate the tourism sector in the entire region "because the road is there to facilitate the movement of tourists".
The EAC partner states were yet to ratify the Protocol on Environment and Natural Resources, he added, making the case premature.
ANAW argues that construction of the road will be hazardous to the environment and animals in particular. The group's lawyer, Saitabao Kanchory Mbalelo told the court that construction of the road across the national park infringes Articles 5 and 3 of the EAC Treaty.
chanzo:http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/Go...road/-/1840392/2208404/-/12mix6x/-/index.html
