Nini tofauti kati ya Atomic Bomb na Nuclear Bomb

[Kamawewe]

Thank mkuu

​Hydrogen Bombs are usually abbreviated as H-Bombs.

 

[Watu8]

Correction, 'Chemical reaction' involves the transfer of electrons. Nuclear bombs never relay on 'Chemical reactions' but rather relay on 'Nuclear reactions'.

Sote tupo sawa mkuu, utofauti ni kuwa ukitumia neno 'nuclear reactions' unakuwa specific zaidi.

Sometimes in 'nuclear chemistry' ambayo ni sub displine ya chemistry huwa wanatambua kuwa a nuclear reaction can sometimes be referred as the chemical reactions of unstable and radioactive elements where both electronic and nuclear changes may both occur.

Hivyo sikukosea ila ulipaswa tu uielewe kiutaalamu badala ya juu juu tu...

Hope we're good!!!

 

[Good Guy]

Sote tupo sawa mkuu, utofauti ni kuwa ukitumia neno 'nuclear reactions' unakuwa specific zaidi.

Sometimes in 'nuclear chemistry' ambayo ni sub displine ya chemistry huwa wanatambua kuwa a nuclear reaction can sometimes be referred as the chemical reactions of unstable and radioactive elements where both electronic and nuclear changes may both occur.

Hivyo sikukosea ila ulipaswa tu uielewe kiutaalamu badala ya juu juu tu...

Hope we're good!!!

mkuu sorry but i doubt that, its wrong to refer Nuclear reaction (such as these fusion and fission rxs) as Chemical. I get your point like reaction between Uranium(which is radioactive) and maybe some other negative element to form uranium salts might be chemical reaction since some ionization energy was required for the electron transfer and stuff. Ila these two (fusion n fission) we're now talking about Binding energy of the atom. No way that's chemical and in fact sijaona where they have referred to this as a chemical rxn, kama unaweza Google any source wamesema this is chem rxn share it with me, I'm always open to new ideas

 

[msafwa93]

Correction, 'Chemical reaction' involves the transfer of electrons. Nuclear bombs never relay on 'Chemical reactions' but rather relay on 'Nuclear reactions'. After a little research i saw there is a very fine line that separates these two terms( A-Bombs and Nuclear bombs), and it is as you said. FISSION Bombs=Nuclear but also Atomic. But FUSSION Bombs=NUCLEAR but not atomic. Which means i was correct saying Hiroshima Bomb was both Atomic and Nuclear. Again this means modern bombs are nuclear but aren't Atomic, since most modern nuclear bombs are H-Bombs. I think i got it now! 🙂

wabongo bwana kwa mbwembwe za kngereza

 

[Good Guy]

wabongo bwana kwa mbwembwe za kngereza

Mara nyingine ujumbe unafika vizuri zaidi kwa kutumia hii lugha, also brother sio watu wote humu waswahili, keep that in mind. Ila i'm assuming you got the point 🙂

 

[Watu8]

kama unaweza Google any source wamesema this is chem rxn share it with me, I'm always open to new ideas

Soma katika link hii hapa bro, nikipata vyanzo vingine i'll drop em....bahati mbaya natumia simu.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_reaction

 

[Good Guy]

Soma katika link hii hapa bro, nikipata vyanzo vingine i'll drop em....bahati mbaya natumia simu.

Chemical reaction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh now i see the clear picture. Mkuu unfortunately you're misunderstanding this. Fusion and Fission are NOT chemical reactions since the reactions take place in the nucleus of the atom. But the elements used for these nuclear reactions i.e Plutonium or Uranium for example, regardless they're radioactive can undergo Chemical reactions ndo maana nkakupa mfano wa Salts of Uranium(haziwi formed by Nuclear but Chemical reactions). Sasa Branch of Chem dealing with the CHEMICAL reaction side of the radioactive elements ndo hio, it just focuses on the chemical properties of these radioactive isotopes. But they do set a clear line that separates Nuke from Chemical reactions.