Ni lini Wanyarwanda wataadhimisha mauaji ya Wahutu?

Ni lini Wanyarwanda wataadhimisha mauaji ya Wahutu?

Source ni Peter Erlinder former prisoner in Rwanda Hahahah!! where is the statement from ICTR??
Ndugu yangu hapa umeshindwa, nimekupatia link ya ICTR inayotoa hukumu where is yours..what you are bringing in are opinions..!!! and not statements:
These are coming from some one who was once a prisoner in Rwanda and posted from this NGO called RNW ..
I was expecting something from ICTR and not this cheap sources

Mkuu, huyu jamaa anaejiita wa "facts" in actual fact facts zake leave a lot to be desired. Hii source yake ni ya mzungu aliyedhani anaweza kuleta fyoko fyoko eti kwa sababu yeye ni mzungu. Katiwa ndani mpaka akashika adabu. Jamaa hawezi kukanyaga hapa tena. jMali kama alivyokuambia MGOSI132, some website ya ICTR sio hizo tabloids zako za interahamwe.

hhahaha. i won't do this again, mngekuwa watu wengine sawa, ila nyinyi a big NO! Tufanye mmeshinda and everything you said was the truth, i was a big liar!
----
more on peter erlinder:


[h=1]US Lawyer Peter Erlinder: Where to find the right facts on the Rwandan genocide[/h] Posted on April 4, 2014 | Leave a comment

In the picture it is the lawyer who is wearing the prisoner uniform, but Peter Erlinder, after two weeks in jail in Kigali, would manage to be released following international pressure. Victoire Ingabire’s turn in prisoner’s uniform starts on October 14th, 2010. Last December she has been sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment.



Peter Erlinder was imprisoned in Rwanda in 2010 when he went to defend Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza. At the occasion of commemorating the 20th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, through an interview published by Black Star News, the US lawyer explains a number of facts that many who have been intoxicated by RPF propaganda don’t have access to. There have been massive cover-up and deceit, so much so that to unveil the truth will take sometime.

Please find here a short extract of the interview.



Q: As we are getting closer to the 20th anniversary of Rwandan Genocide; what does this mean to you?
A: During the past 20 years, we have learned that a UN Tribunal charged with prosecuting all crimes that were committed in Rwanda during 1994 has prosecuted only crimes charged to the defeated and none have been charged to the victors. This means the four-year war of aggression and invasion of the RPF supported by Uganda [about which there is no dispute] is the first in history in which only the defending side committed crimes, or like Nuremberg and the Tokyo Tribunals, the supposedly neutral UN Tribunal was actually a victor’s tribunal. As former U.S. Secretary of [Defense] Robert McNamara admitted in the documentary The Fog of War ‘Had the Japanese won the war, those of us who planned the gasoline bombing of Tokyo would have been the war criminals.’ Until a fair assignment of mutual responsibility is reached, long-lasting peace in Rwanda and central Africa will be difficult to achieve.


Q: How would you like people to look at this eventful day April 6 which many believe to have triggered the 1994 genocide and today’s debate and narrative?
A: As early as 1997 UN Prosecutors recommended that Paul Kagame be prosecuted for the assassinations of Presidents Habyarimana and Ntaryamira. The U.S. removed U.N Prosecutor Del Ponte from office when she insisted on doing so on May 15, 2003. Former Chief of Staff to Kagame, Dr. Theogene Rudesingwa has admitted being involved in the cover-up. The detailed testimony in the ICTR Military-1 case resulted in every Trial Chamber, and the Appeal Chamber, agreeing that the former Rwandan military were not engaged in any criminal conspiracy before the assassination of President Habyarimana…. that would include the assassination itself. I would like people to look at the same evidence that convinced ALL of the ICTR judges.



Q: People wonder and would like to understand why very few people accused of being perpetrators of Rwandan Genocide have actually been convicted?
A: Many, if not most, have been convicted of crimes committed after the assassination of President Habyarimana. All national leaders have been acquitted of crimes of conspiracy and planning before the assassination because the Kagame regime and UN Prosecutors have no evidence to support their claim that a long-planned conspiracy to commit genocide against Tutsi, or any other civilians actually existed.


To read the full interview, please click on this link: Narrative Shift: U.S. Lawyer Highlights Kagame's Role In Rwanda Genocide And Habyarimana Assassination | Black Star News

-----
Last year Kagame arrested and imprisoned Erlinder in Rwanda, after he had traveled there to defend Ingabire, and last week the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda came close to sanctioning him for refusing to return to Arusha, Tanzania, to defend another client. Erlinder had said that he would not return because Kagame’s Rwandan Patriotic Front agents might well assassinate, kidnap, or disappear him if he did. The court did not acknowledge Erlinder’s claim that his life would be in danger in Arusha, but they did excuse him after his doctor reported that he suffers from post traumatic stress syndrome as a consequence of his arrest and imprisonment in Rwanda last year.

KPFA’s Ann Garrison spoke to Professor Erlinder by phone from his office at William Mitchell College of Law, in St. Paul, Minneapolis:
TRANSCRIPT
Ann Garrison: Peter Erlinder, this story is still obscure to many KPFA listeners. Could you explain why Paul Kagame, the President of Rwanda, would conceivably want to assassinate, kidnap, or disappear you?


Peter Erlinder: Well, during my work at the UN Tribunal, I had an opportunity to have access to the previously secret United Nations files that were kept by UN personnel in Rwanda during the time that’s known as the genocide. And those documents tell a completely different story than the story the world has heard about what happened in Rwanda during that time. Also I was able to link that to US documents from the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon and the documents from other countries. And I used those documents to defend my client and he and other military officers were acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to commit genocide, which means there was no plan on the part of the previous government and military.


Ann Garrison: And do the documents that you’ve assembled demonstrate that President Kagame and the Rwandan Patriotic Front regime are most responsible for the mass slaughter of 1994 which came to be the principle justification of the Kagame regime?


Peter Erlinder: Yeah, what the documents show is that the RPF were the dominant military power in Rwanda. They were responsible for assassinating the Rwandan and Burundian Presidents, which touched off the mass violence. They were in a position to stop the mass violence and didn’t do so because of their desire to win the war. And then once they did seize power continued carrying out violence against civilians.


Ann Garrison: And what do those documents that you’ve assembled say about the ensuing Congo War?
Peter Erlinder: Well, the documents make clear that the RPF went on to carry out an invasion of the eastern Congo along with Uganda and then essentially to control the eastern Congo, which they do to this day. And that was accomplished because of ongoing support from the Pentagon, and then, unfortunately, it becomes clear that this support was covered up as the ICTR began to develop.


Ann Garrison: Links to Professor Erlinder’s report on the Rwanda Genocide and Congo War can be found on the websites of the San Francisco Bay View and AfrobeatRadio.net. For Pacifica, KPFA andAfrobeatRadio, I’m Ann Garrison.

source:Rwanda Genocide: Erlinder v. Kagame, Case Continued in the Court of Public Opinion | Global Research
 
Dude,what are you smoking? Black star news,Ann Garrison,Peter Erlinder?????? Good try though.
 
hhahaha. i won't do this again, mngekuwa watu wengine sawa, ila nyinyi a big NO! Tufanye mmeshinda and everything you said was the truth, i was a big liar!
----
more on peter erlinder:


US Lawyer Peter Erlinder: Where to find the right facts on the Rwandan genocide

Posted on April 4, 2014 | Leave a comment

In the picture it is the lawyer who is wearing the prisoner uniform, but Peter Erlinder, after two weeks in jail in Kigali, would manage to be released following international pressure. Victoire Ingabire's turn in prisoner's uniform starts on October 14th, 2010. Last December she has been sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment.



Peter Erlinder was imprisoned in Rwanda in 2010 when he went to defend Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza. At the occasion of commemorating the 20th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, through an interview published by Black Star News, the US lawyer explains a number of facts that many who have been intoxicated by RPF propaganda don't have access to. There have been massive cover-up and deceit, so much so that to unveil the truth will take sometime.

Please find here a short extract of the interview.



Q: As we are getting closer to the 20th anniversary of Rwandan Genocide; what does this mean to you?
A: During the past 20 years, we have learned that a UN Tribunal charged with prosecuting all crimes that were committed in Rwanda during 1994 has prosecuted only crimes charged to the defeated and none have been charged to the victors. This means the four-year war of aggression and invasion of the RPF supported by Uganda [about which there is no dispute] is the first in history in which only the defending side committed crimes, or like Nuremberg and the Tokyo Tribunals, the supposedly neutral UN Tribunal was actually a victor's tribunal. As former U.S. Secretary of [Defense] Robert McNamara admitted in the documentary The Fog of War ‘Had the Japanese won the war, those of us who planned the gasoline bombing of Tokyo would have been the war criminals.' Until a fair assignment of mutual responsibility is reached, long-lasting peace in Rwanda and central Africa will be difficult to achieve.


Q: How would you like people to look at this eventful day April 6 which many believe to have triggered the 1994 genocide and today's debate and narrative?
A: As early as 1997 UN Prosecutors recommended that Paul Kagame be prosecuted for the assassinations of Presidents Habyarimana and Ntaryamira. The U.S. removed U.N Prosecutor Del Ponte from office when she insisted on doing so on May 15, 2003. Former Chief of Staff to Kagame, Dr. Theogene Rudesingwa has admitted being involved in the cover-up. The detailed testimony in the ICTR Military-1 case resulted in every Trial Chamber, and the Appeal Chamber, agreeing that the former Rwandan military were not engaged in any criminal conspiracy before the assassination of President Habyarimana…. that would include the assassination itself. I would like people to look at the same evidence that convinced ALL of the ICTR judges.



Q: People wonder and would like to understand why very few people accused of being perpetrators of Rwandan Genocide have actually been convicted?
A: Many, if not most, have been convicted of crimes committed after the assassination of President Habyarimana. All national leaders have been acquitted of crimes of conspiracy and planning before the assassination because the Kagame regime and UN Prosecutors have no evidence to support their claim that a long-planned conspiracy to commit genocide against Tutsi, or any other civilians actually existed.


To read the full interview, please click on this link: Narrative Shift: U.S. Lawyer Highlights Kagame's Role In Rwanda Genocide And Habyarimana Assassination | Black Star News

-----
Last year Kagame arrested and imprisoned Erlinder in Rwanda, after he had traveled there to defend Ingabire, and last week the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda came close to sanctioning him for refusing to return to Arusha, Tanzania, to defend another client. Erlinder had said that he would not return because Kagame's Rwandan Patriotic Front agents might well assassinate, kidnap, or disappear him if he did. The court did not acknowledge Erlinder's claim that his life would be in danger in Arusha, but they did excuse him after his doctor reported that he suffers from post traumatic stress syndrome as a consequence of his arrest and imprisonment in Rwanda last year.

KPFA's Ann Garrison spoke to Professor Erlinder by phone from his office at William Mitchell College of Law, in St. Paul, Minneapolis:
TRANSCRIPT
Ann Garrison: Peter Erlinder, this story is still obscure to many KPFA listeners. Could you explain why Paul Kagame, the President of Rwanda, would conceivably want to assassinate, kidnap, or disappear you?


Peter Erlinder: Well, during my work at the UN Tribunal, I had an opportunity to have access to the previously secret United Nations files that were kept by UN personnel in Rwanda during the time that's known as the genocide. And those documents tell a completely different story than the story the world has heard about what happened in Rwanda during that time. Also I was able to link that to US documents from the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon and the documents from other countries. And I used those documents to defend my client and he and other military officers were acquitted of the charge of conspiracy to commit genocide, which means there was no plan on the part of the previous government and military.


Ann Garrison: And do the documents that you've assembled demonstrate that President Kagame and the Rwandan Patriotic Front regime are most responsible for the mass slaughter of 1994 which came to be the principle justification of the Kagame regime?


Peter Erlinder: Yeah, what the documents show is that the RPF were the dominant military power in Rwanda. They were responsible for assassinating the Rwandan and Burundian Presidents, which touched off the mass violence. They were in a position to stop the mass violence and didn't do so because of their desire to win the war. And then once they did seize power continued carrying out violence against civilians.


Ann Garrison: And what do those documents that you've assembled say about the ensuing Congo War?
Peter Erlinder: Well, the documents make clear that the RPF went on to carry out an invasion of the eastern Congo along with Uganda and then essentially to control the eastern Congo, which they do to this day. And that was accomplished because of ongoing support from the Pentagon, and then, unfortunately, it becomes clear that this support was covered up as the ICTR began to develop.


Ann Garrison: Links to Professor Erlinder's report on the Rwanda Genocide and Congo War can be found on the websites of the San Francisco Bay View and AfrobeatRadio.net. For Pacifica, KPFA andAfrobeatRadio, I'm Ann Garrison.

source:Rwanda Genocide: Erlinder v. Kagame, Case Continued in the Court of Public Opinion | Global Research
jMali...Kama kawaida yako. Unapotezea. Umeulizwa na MGOSI132, ICTR website/archives inasemaje kuhusu hukumu ya Bagosora? Jibu hilo swali.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ukweli utabaki pale pale lazima ifike hatua tuambiwe kuwa yale yalikuwa ni mauaji ya wanyarwanda na siyo watusi peke yake, kagame anachokifanya ni kuficha ukweli juu ya mauaji haya kagame asimame aseme juu ya wahutu walio uliwa na siyi kusena watusi peke yao, bila kuweka mambo sawa rwanda mtarudia genocide nyingine coz mpaka sasa wahutu wametengwa na serikali.
 
jMali...Kama kawaida yako. Unapotezea. Umeulizwa na MGOSI132, ICTR website/archives inasemaje kuhusu hukumu ya Bagosora? Jibu hilo swali.

cc: MGOSI132 Koba
kwani leo mara ya kwanza kujadili hili? Hebu sema mwenyewe honestly sijawahi kuleta hukumu nzima ya ICTR kutoka kwenye website yao kama unavyoidai sasa? Nyinyi mnafanya utoto kwa kurudia rudia mada ambazo tayari zilishaletwa hapa na ushahidi juu. Tukiongelea interahamwe sasa hivi nyinyi mtaanza kudai link kuthibitisha Robert kajuga alikuwa mtutsi as if we haven't been through it already.
Ndio maana nikasema i'm not doing this again with you people. labda mtengeneze ID nyingine ndio iulize hilo swali. Otherwise i don't have a problem kukubaliana na propaganda zenu to save time because they won't change the truth! If you believe Bagosora hakuwa acquitted of conspiracy to genocide then that's fine with me.
 
Ukweli utabaki pale pale lazima ifike hatua tuambiwe kuwa yale yalikuwa ni mauaji ya wanyarwanda na siyo watusi peke yake, kagame anachokifanya ni kuficha ukweli juu ya mauaji haya kagame asimame aseme juu ya wahutu walio uliwa na siyi kusena watusi peke yao, bila kuweka mambo sawa rwanda mtarudia genocide nyingine coz mpaka sasa wahutu wametengwa na serikali.
Eti wahutu wametengwa na serikali??? mijitu mingine sijui itaacha lini uwongo wa *******
 
Dah! Kweli kila kitu kina siku yake ya kujua.
cc: kibanga ampiga mkoloni

1. acha ni kudokezee japo kidogo tu! Mauaji ya kimbali kawaida ni mpango unaofanywa makusudi kuwa lenga jamii fulani kwa sababu za chuki ili kuwamaliza/exterminate.: definition yako iko sawa, lakini mahakama ya ictr imethibitisha kuwa hakukuwa na mpango wa mauaji ya watutsi rwanda! Kilichotokea ni mauaji spontaneous katikati ya vita. Source: jurist - forum: Rwanda: No conspiracy, no genocide planning ... No genocide?

2. kuna wahutu waliokufa katika vita wakati majeshi ya rpa yalipo kua yakisimamisha mauaji dhidi ya watusi, : Rpa/kagame walivamia rwanda toka mwaka 1990, huko kote walikuwa wanasimamisha genocide ipi? Na kumbuka kagame hapa alikuwa hapigani na jeshi alikuwa anavamia vijiji na kusambaratisha wananchi (ambao zaidi ya 80% ni wahutu)!

3. kuna wahutu wachache walio uwawa kwa kesi za kulipiza kisasi kwani kuna wakati baaadhi ya wanajeshi wa rpa walikuta jamaa zao: Huu ni miongoni mwa uwongo ambao unarudiwa rudiwa kila mara. Rpa ni jeshi lilioundwa na watutsi toka nchi za nje ya rwanda, most of them hawana uhusiano wowote na rwanda isipokuwa historia tu kuwa wao ni watutsi. Ni kama vile wahehe warudi leo south africa halafu wajifanye eti wanatetea ndugu zao wazulu! Kagame mwenyewe kakulia uganda toka ana miaka 3 karudi ana almost 30! Patrick karegeya ndio kabisa mpaka wazazi wake leo hii ni waganda, james kabarebe kazaliwa congo drc, ....wengine walikuwa hapa hapa tanzania.
Mauaji haya yanayoitwa ya "kisasi" hayana uhusiano na undugu wowote, ni mauaji ya chuki tu dhidi ya wahutu.

4. Mwisho wa siku kagame amepiga marufuku kuhesabu wahutu waliokufa. Hilo ni kosa linaitwa "revisionism", yaani kuharibu "historia rasmi". Historia ambayo yeye mwenyewe ndio kaitunga. Hii ni kwa sababu ukihesabu wahutu wangapi walikufa 1994 utakuta wako wengi kuliko wahutu. Watutsi kupitia jumuiya yao ya wahanga wa genocide wanasema ndugu zao waliokufa wako chini ya laki nne! Lakini ni kosa kusema kuwa waliobaki obviously ni wahutu! Kwa sababu hiyo itamaanisha kuwa it was actually "genocide against hutus".
Haiwezekani serikali ikaua wahutu wengi kwa kusapoti watutsi kuliko hao watutsi wenyewe waliokuwa wanasapotiwa.
 
Eti wahutu wametengwa na serikali??? mijitu mingine sijui itaacha lini uwongo wa *******

Ama kweli chuki ikipitiliza inakuwa hatari sana. Inaonekana unayo chuki kali sana dhidi ya wahutu kiasi kwamba huwezi hata ukaona mnavyowatenga kiasi kwamba utadhani siyo wanyarwanda.
 
Ama kweli chuki ikipitiliza inakuwa hatari sana. Inaonekana unayo chuki kali sana dhidi ya wahutu kiasi kwamba huwezi hata ukaona mnavyowatenga kiasi kwamba utadhani siyo wanyarwanda.

NO clue unaongea ushuzi gani hapo,and pls stop hadithi zenu za Hutu/Tutsi BS I think majority of Rwandese are past
that,uninformed ignorant haters +interahamwe mliojaa humu JF conspiracies,accusations,lies etc ndio mlichobakiza that's why kila siku ni Kagame this/that/this...you need to get a life and tell that to your friends too,Rwanda is getting better and stronger everyday under Kagame na hawajui hata kama mna exist.
 
cc: MGOSI132 Koba
kwani leo mara ya kwanza kujadili hili? Hebu sema mwenyewe honestly sijawahi kuleta hukumu nzima ya ICTR kutoka kwenye website yao kama unavyoidai sasa? Nyinyi mnafanya utoto kwa kurudia rudia mada ambazo tayari zilishaletwa hapa na ushahidi juu. Tukiongelea interahamwe sasa hivi nyinyi mtaanza kudai link kuthibitisha Robert kajuga alikuwa mtutsi as if we haven't been through it already.
Ndio maana nikasema i'm not doing this again with you people. labda mtengeneze ID nyingine ndio iulize hilo swali. Otherwise i don't have a problem kukubaliana na propaganda zenu to save time because they won't change the truth! If you believe Bagosora hakuwa acquitted of conspiracy to genocide then that's fine with me.
jMali sio vibaya kukubali kushindwa, inaweza kuwa ulikuwa misinformed au you didn`t dare to make a research, being a hardliner wont help anything.
Usikwepe, my reaction ilikuwa juu ya statement yako kwamba mahakama imesema hakukuwa na genocide (NOT PLANNED)
Hapa ulidanganya si kweli..THE ICTR COURT HAS NEVER ISSUED SUCH STATEMENT...
 
no clue unaongea ushuzi gani hapo,and pls stop hadithi zenu za hutu/tutsi bs i think majority of rwandese are past
that,uninformed ignorant haters +interahamwe mliojaa humu jf conspiracies,accusations,lies etc ndio mlichobakiza that's why kila siku ni kagame this/that/this...you need to get a life and tell that to your friends too,rwanda is getting better and stronger everyday under kagame na hawajui hata kama mna exist.

apigwe nduli kagameeeee fdlr sasa rasmi ndani ya jeshi la rwanda ngoja waingie wakasome mazingira kama rpf mlivyoruhusiwa kuingia kigali ila kwa kuwa kiongozi wenu huwa anasukutua mdomo kwa damu ya wahutu akaitungua ndege ya rais kipenzi wa wanyarwanda na kuanzia hapo neno uhuru na demokrasia likakwama midomoni mwa wanyarwanda
 
jMali sio vibaya kukubali kushindwa, inaweza kuwa ulikuwa misinformed au you didn`t dare to make a research, being a hardliner wont help anything.
Usikwepe, my reaction ilikuwa juu ya statement yako kwamba mahakama imesema hakukuwa na genocide (NOT PLANNED)
Hapa ulidanganya si kweli..THE ICTR COURT HAS NEVER ISSUED SUCH STATEMENT...

unaweza kutueleza watu wangapi wamekuwa convicted by ICTR kwa shitaka la conspiracy to genocide?
 
Kiukweli jMali ni kiboko cha watutsi humu na amewashika sehemu mbaya ndio maana wameanza matusi. Hii ni tabia ya ukweli na siku zote hauchangamani na uwongo na porojo za kina Koba na waongo wengineo kama murutongore humu.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
kubali ukatae serikali ya Kagame imewatenga wahutu walio wengi katika taifa la rwanda hasa katika mambo muhimu kama vile ELimu, na kuwanyima nyazifa muhimu serikalini, lakini atambue kuwa anachokifanya kina mwisho wake coz akumbuke pamoja na kuwaua wahutu wengi alipoingia madarakani lakaini akumbuke kuwa haki ya mtu ina itachelewa lakini lazima ipatikane
 
unaweza kutueleza watu wangapi wamekuwa convicted by ICTR kwa shitaka la conspiracy to genocide?

1: The Trial Chamber convicted Nzabonimana of Genocide, Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Direct and Public Incitement to Commit Genocide and Extermination as a Crime Against Humanity. He was sentenced to life imprisonment:Source:http://www.unictr.org/tabid/155/Default.aspx?id=1281 (from the original source and not Erlinder or FDRL websites)

2:Angalia sentences for Mugenzi and Mugiraneza they were also found guilty...

Vipi hukubaliani na hizi judgements?
Kambanda alihukumiwa nini...



 
1: The Trial Chamber convicted Nzabonimana of Genocide, Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Direct and Public Incitement to Commit Genocide and Extermination as a Crime Against Humanity. He was sentenced to life imprisonment:Source:http://www.unictr.org/tabid/155/Default.aspx?id=1281 (from the original source and not Erlinder or FDRL websites)

2:Angalia sentences for Mugenzi and Mugiraneza they were also found guilty...

Vipi hukubaliani na hizi judgements?
Kambanda alihukumiwa nini...

Ndio maana sometimes i find it hard kubishana na nyinyi childish grown ups, unajua kabisa ukweli ni upi ila unadistort facts, unachukua taarifa za zamani unaziweka hapa knowing fully well.... anyway kwa faida ya watanzania wengine:

Kesi ya Nzabonimana iko kwenye appeal. Mugenzi, Mugiraneza, bagosora and others also were previously convicted but later on acquitted baada ya ku-appeal. Iam very optimistic that kesi ya Nzabonimana will turn out with an acquittal too.
Kiufupi kuna mtu mmoja tu ambaye amekuwa convicted na hili shitaka la conspiracy to commit genocide, naye ni jean kambanda ambaye mazingira ya kesi yake ni haya hapa chini, HAKI HAIKUTENDEKA KABISA. Prosecutors walimteka na kumuweka hostage, waliteka familia yake etc, akalazimishwa kuplead guilty. Isingekuwa hivyo huyu naye angekuwa aquitted of this charge. Vinginevyo jiulize how come yeye pekee ndie kahukumiwa kwa kosa hili? ina maana huyu alipanga MWENYEWE/ALONE genocide? halafu alitekeleza nani ikiwa nobody else hakupanga naye? nobody else knew of the conspiracy? hapa hata chizi hawezi kukubali.
Ushahidi huu hapa chini:

1. Orodha yote ya mashitaka ya ICTR: you can see for yourself status ya: Nzabonimana, Mugenzi na Mugiraneza.
  • source: International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda - UNICTR > Cases > Status of Cases kama bado huamini angalia jinsi vyombo vyenu vinavyolialia source:The New Times Rwanda: :: ICTR used meaningless formula to acquit the worst genocidaires
  • Jinsi Jean Kambanda alivyoonewa na ICTR:
    • [h=2]Jean Kambanda, Convicted Without Trial[/h]“Jean Kambanda, Convicted Without Trial” is the title of Chapter 16 of the book A History of Political Trials byDr. John Laughland.
      Jean Kambanda’s confession is widely considered to be the sole uncontested evidence that the former Rwandan government conspired and planned to commit a genocide against the Tutsis in 1994.
      According to many ICTR defence counsel, the essential facts are that his confession is nothing but a miscarriage of justice, a world scandal and a shame for international justice.
      Upon his arrest on the 18th of July 1997, the Prime Minister of Rwanda was never assigned a lawyer and, unlike other accused brought before the ICTR, he was not taken to appear before a judge on his arrest as required by the Tribunal’s own Statute.
      Instead, he was taken to the national capital of Tanzania, Dodoma, several hundred kilometres away from Arusha, where the International Tribunal is located.
      He was kept incommunicado in a hotel for nine months.During those nine months he was denied the right to see a lawyer and was denied contact with his family or friends.
      During those nine months former Canadian police officers working with the ICTR continuously questioned him, and every day threatened him and his family if he did not cooperate, behaviour that can only be described as psychological torture.
      “[The] officer responsible for administering a “good dose of torture” to Mr. Kambanda was Pierre Duclos. Pierre Duclos is well known in his country, Canada. He was accused of perjury, fabricating evidence and obstructing justice in relation to the aborted trial of the Matticks brothers, a family involved in organized crime in Montreal.
      Yes, the ICTR hires individuals with a sulphurous past. In fact, the Canadian prosecutor Louise Arbour, whose record as prosecutor is also a dark one, was responsible for hiring Pierre Duclos” according to Patrick Mbeko, a Canadian of Congolese origin, in his article: Rwanda: “Genocide of Tutsis”, The Biggest Lie of The Century.
      ​
      According to our sources inside ICTR Tribunal, Mr Jean Kambanda was told every day that if he did not sign some sort of confession, his life was at risk and that of his family.
      He endured this for 9 months but then finally gave in and agreed to sign a document in which he stated simply that he accepted responsibility for his government’s actions in 1994 in his role of prime minister.
      Many ICTR lawyers and staff categorically affirm that Mr Jean Kambanda did not confess to genocide. He did not think that his government had done anything wrong in 1994.  (see Jean Kambanda’s Statement from Prison)
      The document he signed, he was told, (English is not his first language) stated simply that he accepted political responsibility for whatever his government did during 1994. He did not understand the document he was about to sign stated that his government had committed genocide.
      Remember, up to this stage, he had no access to a lawyer, was not told he had the right to remain silent and did not even know the charges against him nor the evidence the ICTR claimed to have.
      However, once he signed that document, he was finally taken to Arusha to appear before a judge and then was assigned a lawyer. However, he was not told that the lawyer he was assigned was the best friend of the Prosecutor in charge of his case.
      This lawyer then tricked him into agreeing to plead guilty. He thought he was only pleading “guilty” to political responsibility” for any actions his government took during the events of 1994 and was not a confession to a criminal act as such and he did not understand it to be a confession to war crimes or genocide.
      His assigned lawyer,and friend of the prosecutor never discussed with him the events of 1994, whether any crimes had been committed and whether or not he had a defence nor did he advise the judges of the circumstances of Mr. Kambanda’s detention and violation of his rights and psychological pressures placed on him.
      The prosecutor promised Mr. Kambanda that he would receive a 12 year sentenceif he made a plea of guilty based on the document he had signed.However the day he appeared in court and made theplea the judges gave him a life sentence without any hearing on the sentence and in violation of the agreement the prosecutor had made.
      He then spent the next couple of years pressing to be allowed to withdraw his plea as it was made under duress, in violation of his rights and by trickery.
      Finally in 2001 he was allowed to appear before a panel of judges to argue that the plea should be rescinded and he should be given a trial in which he could present a defence and tell the wolrd what happened in Rwanda in 1994.
      We have managed to speak to some ICTR Defence lawyers who were in the courtroom that day and watched the proceedings. They all recall how it was disgusting to watch what how he was treated.
      The prosecution counsel appearing in the “court” that day was also a Canadian. Kambanda told the judges the facts of his arrest and detention and how he was manipulated into signing the “confession” document.
      He stated repeatedly that neither he nor his government were responsible for planning or organising or conducting a genocide against the Tutsis in Rwanda and he never intended to plead guilty to that nor understood that he had.
      Mr. Kambanda demanded the right to a trial, the right to speak and the opportunity to tell the world what had really happened. But the Canadian prosecutor questioned him over and over asking simply “But you signed this document, did you not?”
      Kambanda would reply, “yes, but you’re not listening to what I am saying as to how I came to sign that document.” Then the same question was put-”You signed it?” And so on. At the end of the day they refused to allow him to withdraw his plea and he was taken away and silenced.
      Why did they do this? Because it was clear to them that if he was allowed a trial he was in a position to tell the world what had really happened and it would be a disaster for the RPF and the US and UK that control the tribunal. They could not allow him to talk so they shut him up.
      [h=2]The ICTR needed to justify its existence and a reason for a second mandate.[/h]In his article titled “Main Achievements of the ICTR”, published in International Criminal Justice Journal of September 2005, Judge Erick Mose, former president of the ICTR, justifies the role of the ICTR stating that “During the first mandate (1995^1999), the Tribunal delivered ground-breaking judgments concerning genocide, such as Akayesu and Kambanda”.
      Since then many prisoners have refused to plead guilty and have insisted on trials. The accused used these trials especially the MIlitary I and Military II trials to bring out the truth the truth about the 4 year war in Rwanda and that in fact there was no government-sponsored genocide or planning of one against the Tutsis and that most of the accusations are false and that the RPF committed most of the atrocities.
      In 2003, Jean Kambandamade a statement as to what his true position was and that statement was later made an exhibit in the MIlitary II trial involving the chiefs of staff of the Rwandan Army and Gendarmerie. Â In his position, Jean Kambanda states:
      “16. I also swear also that the spread of trouble over the entire Rwandan territory was not caused by the government or by the FAR. The infiltrators of the RPF are responsible for that. We succeeded in capturing their plans, the names of their agents, and their arms caches in Kigali, Bisesero, Kibungo, etc. The mass graves dug deep by the accomplices of the RPF were discovered in many places. The terrorised population knew of this and considered it as a threat to their lives. The government, I at the head, never stopped to explain to the population that they cannot confuse the Tutsi and the RPF and that their accomplices must be arrested and brought before the authorities.”
      ​
      As this excerpt reveal, Jean Kambanda was set up and silenced so that the truth about what happened could not come out. But now it has.
      Now ex-Prime Minister Kambanda is rotting in prison in Mali, without trial, without a voice.His case deserves to be known by all Rwandans and, in fact, by all Africans who care for justice.
[TABLE="width: 550, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 5"][/TD]
[TD="width: 473"][/TD]
[TD="width: 5"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 5"]source: Rwandan Ex-Prime Minister Kambanda: Inside Story of His Court Case. « Classified « Documents « The Proxy Lake
[/TD]
[TD="width: 473"][/TD]
[TD="width: 5"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 5"][/TD]
[TD="width: 473"][/TD]
[TD="width: 5"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 473"] Kuanzia sasa nisipokujibu wewe au murutongore, Koba, MUKAMASIMBA Commanche msijisifu kuwa mmeshinda, bali mjue NIMEWADHARAU!


[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom